Foraging behavior of Highland cattle in silvopastoral systems in the Alps.

Trees and shrubs expanded in the last decades in European mountains due to land abandonment and the decrease in grazing pressure, and are expected to further spread also due to climate change. As a consequence of low forage quality and topographic constraints, the management of mountain environments dominated by woody vegetation with livestock is often challenging. Silvopastoral systems based on cattle hardy breeds able to forage on woody plants, such as Highland cattle, could be a suitable option for the management and restoration of such environments. In this study, we used direct observations to explore the foraging behavior of Highland cattle in four study areas across the western Alps. In particular, we assessed: (1) cattle diet composition, (2) the selection for more than 30 tree and shrub species, and (3) the relationships between species consumption and their abundance in the environment. Highland cattle fed on a mixture of both woody and herbaceous species, including between 15 and 46% of woody plants in the diet. Some trees (e.g., Celtis australis, Fraxinus spp., and Populus tremula) and shrubs (e.g., Frangula alnus, Rhamnus spp., and Rubus idaeus) were positively selected by cattle, thus they could be an important forage supplement to their diet. Moreover, the results highlighted that relative species consumption generally increased with increasing species abundance in the environment, suggesting that this cattle breed could be suitable to control shrub expansion in highly encroached areas. The outcomes of this study can support the development of targeted silvopastoral systems in the Alps. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10457-023-00926-z.

Dysphagia in Parkinson's disease: Pharyngeal manometry and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia is a common symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) and it represents a negative prognostic factor because of its complications. This study is to evaluate pharyngeal dysphagia for boluses of various consistencies with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Pharyngeal High-Resolution Manometry (PHRM) in a group of PD patients, making a comparison between the information provided by the two exams. METHODS: Group of 20 patients affected by PD was selected and initially subjected to a qualitative evaluation of the swallowing performing FEES. Subsequently, they were evaluated by PHRM to identify quantitative measures associated with pressures expressed by pharyngeal organs during swallowing. Values obtained in the study group were compared with those recorded in a group of 20 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Study showed that Pmax (the maximum pressure elicited by the single pharyngeal muscle structures involved in swallowing) was significantly lower than the control group (p<0.05) for all the boluses and consistency tested, in particular for the Tongue base and the Cricopharyngeal muscle. Pmean pre-swallowing pressure (represents the mean value of a contraction in which basal and maximal pressure where normally calculated) was significantly higher compared to normal subjects for the Tongue base and the Cricopharyngeal muscle (p<0.05). Mean intra-swallowing pressure was higher for the Velopharynx and the Cricopharyngeal muscle, but lower for the tongue base. Pmax and Pmean at PHRM were altered independently to the degree of dysphagia detected at FEES, and they did not correlate either with the location of the residue or with the type of bolus. Images displayed at the FEES, found the corresponding biomechanical explanations in the PHRM, which also allowed us to quantify the extent of the dysfunction, through the calculation of the pressures generated in the various structures studied. CONCLUSION: PHRM is particularly useful in the early detection of dysphagia, when FEES may still show no evidence of abnormal swallowing.

Complications during Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in 5,680 Examinations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retrospectively the incidence of complications during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in 5,680 examinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 5,680 patients were evaluated at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics of Pisa University Hospital between January 2014 and December 2018, involving both inpatients and outpatients. Most common comorbidities included neurological pathologies such as stroke (11.8%), neurodegenerative diseases (28.9%) and a history of previous head and neck surgery (24.6%). The evaluation was conducted by clinicians with experience in swallowing for a minimum of 10 years with the assistance of one or more speech-language pathologists. RESULTS: In all patients studied the endoscope insertion was tolerated, and it was possible to visualize the pharyngolaryngeal structures. Three subjects refused to undergo the procedure after being informed regarding the protocol and were therefore not included in this study. Most patients reported discomfort (70.1%) and gagging (20.8%). In a minority of patients complications were recorded, such as anterior epistaxis (0.1%), posterior epistaxis (0.02%), vasovagal crises (0.08%) and laryngospasm (0.04%). Especially laryngospasm was recorded in patients affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Multivariate binary logistic regression showed that discomfort (OR 9.944; CI 7.643-12.937), chronic gastrointestinal diseases (OR 2.003; CI 1.518-2.644), neurodegenerative diseases (OR 1.550; CI 1.302-1.846) and brain tumors (OR 1.577; CI 1.179-2.111) were risk factors associated with minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: FEES proved to be easy to perform, well tolerated by the patients and cost-effective. It can be performed at the patient's bedside, and it is characterized by a low rate of complications. As a matter of fact, normally only discomfort, gagging and/or vomiting are reported. Complications occurred only rarely, such as anterior or posterior epistaxis episodes or vasovagal crises, but these are still easily managed. Exceptionally, more severe complications are reported: adverse drug reactions to substances such as blue dye (methylene blue) and local anesthetics (not used in our protocol), and laryngospasm.