Survey of Clinical Knowledge and Procedural Readiness of Pulmonary Fellows to Start Interventional Pulmonary Fellowship: A Survey of Interventional Pulmonary Fellowship Directors.

BACKGROUND: Entry into the interventional pulmonary (IP) fellowship requires prerequisite training in pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowship in the United States. IP fellowship has become standardized, but the prerequisite training may be quite variable depending on the learner's exposure to IP during their PCCM fellowship. A survey study was conducted to identify potential foundational knowledge and/or skills gaps of new fellows entering IP fellowships. This may help both PCCM and IP fellowship directors to identify common knowledge gaps within PCCM training specific to IP. METHODS: Based on components of the ACGME's common program requirements for PCCM fellowships, a survey was developed and categorized into 5 domains: nonprocedural skills, didactic knowledge, diagnostic bronchoscopy, pleural procedures, and airway/percutaneous procedures. The survey was then sent to 42 IP fellowship directors after the content validity review and approval by the Association of Interventional Pulmonary Program Directors. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 88.1% (37/42). The overall mean scores in all 5 domains were perceived as below competent (<3). The highest mean domain was nonprocedural skills, and the lowest was airway/percutaneous procedures. Within the domains, there were 4/ 30 topics that were considered competent with a score of ≥3 as competent or higher; bronchoscopy lavage (mean: 3.5/5, SD: 0.87), interpersonal skills (mean: 3.03/5, SD: 0.76), thoracentesis (mean: 3.14/5, SD: 0.89), and ultrasound for pleural effusion (mean: 3.19/5, SD: 0.84). CONCLUSION: There are perceived gaps in PCCM training pertaining to IP fellowship readiness.

Gravity- vs Wall Suction-Driven Large-Volume Thoracentesis: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have found no differences in procedural chest discomfort for patients undergoing manual syringe aspiration or drainage with gravity after thoracentesis. However, whether gravity drainage could protect against chest pain due to the larger negative-pressure gradient generated by wall suction has not been investigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does wall suction drainage result in more chest discomfort compared with gravity drainage in patients undergoing large-volume thoracentesis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, patients with large free-flowing effusions of ≥ 500 mL were assigned at a 1:1 ratio to wall suction or gravity drainage. Wall suction was performed with a suction system attached to the suction tubing and with vacuum pressure adjusted to full vacuum. Gravity drainage was performed with a drainage bag placed 100 cm below the catheter insertion site and connected via straight tubing. Patients rated chest discomfort on a 100-mm visual analog scale before, during, and after drainage. The primary outcome was postprocedural chest discomfort at 5 min. Secondary outcomes included measures of postprocedure chest discomfort, breathlessness, procedure time, volume of fluid drained, and complication rates. RESULTS: Of the 228 patients initially randomized, 221 were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome of procedural chest discomfort did not differ significantly between the groups (P = .08), nor did the secondary outcomes of postprocedural discomfort and dyspnea. Similar volumes were drained in both groups, but the procedure duration was longer in the gravity arm by approximately 3 min. No differences in rate of pneumothorax or reexpansion pulmonary edema were noted between the two groups. INTERPRETATION: Thoracentesis via wall suction and gravity drainage results in similar levels of procedural discomfort and dyspnea improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05131945; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Variation of the response to metal ions and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay across different Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetic backgrounds.

Regulation of mRNA steady-state levels is important in controlling gene expression particularly in response to environmental stimuli. This allows cells to rapidly respond to environment changes. The highly conserved nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway was initially identified as a pathway that degrades aberrant mRNAs. NMD is now recognized as a pathway with additional functions including precisely regulating the expression of select natural mRNAs. Majority of these natural mRNAs encode fully functional proteins. Regulation of natural mRNAs by NMD is activated by NMD targeting features and environmental cues. Here, we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from three genetic backgrounds respond differentially to NMD depending on the environmental stimuli. We found that wild type and NMD mutant W303a, BY4741, and RM11-1a yeast strains respond similarly to copper in the environment but respond differentially to toxic cadmium. Furthermore, the PCA1 alleles encoding different mRNAs from W303a and RM11-1a strains are regulated similarly by NMD in response to the bio-metal copper but differentially in response to toxic cadmium.