Cannabinoid products for pain management: recommendations from the São Paulo State Society of Anesthesiology.

There is growing interest in using cannabinoids across various clinical scenarios, including pain medicine, leading to the disregard of regulatory protocols in some countries. Legislation has been implemented in Brazil, specifically in the state of São Paulo, permitting the distribution of cannabinoid products by health authorities for clinical purposes, free of charge for patients, upon professional prescription. Thus, it is imperative to assess the existing evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of these products in pain management. In light of this, the São Paulo State Society of Anesthesiology (SAESP) established a task force to conduct a narrative review on the topic using the Delphi method, requiring a minimum agreement of 60% among panelists. The study concluded that cannabinoid products could potentially serve as adjuncts in pain management but stressed the importance of judicious prescription. Nevertheless, this review advises against their use for acute pain and cancer-related pain. In other clinical scenarios, established treatments should take precedence, particularly when clinical protocols are available, such as in neuropathic pain. Only patients exhibiting poor therapeutic responses to established protocols or demonstrating intolerance to recommended management may be considered as potential candidates for cannabinoids, which should be prescribed by physicians experienced in handling these substances. Special attention should be given to individual patient characteristics and the likelihood of drug interactions.

Lidocaine 5% patch in the treatment of localized neuropathic pain due to nerve compression. Case reports / Emplastro de lidocaína a 5% no tratamento da dor neuropática localizada por compressão nervosa. Relato de casos

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition with a significant burden for patients, society, and healthcare systems. Due to neuropathic complexity, its management must be different than the one for nociceptive pain. First-line systemic treatments may be associated with dose-dependent adverse events and drug-drug interactions. On the other hand, topical treatments have less systemic adverse events, with the 5% lidocaine transdermal patch being recommended for firstor second line of treatment for neuropathic pain according to various international guidelines. The aim of this study is to present three cases of localized neuropathic pain due to nerve compression managed with 5% lidocaine transdermal patch. CASE REPORTS: The cases of three adult patients (>40 years old) with pain or tingling for a long period of time and their outcomes with treatment with 5% lidocaine transdermal patch for a prolonged duration were investigated. All three cases report a significant improvement in pain. CONCLUSION: The results of the reported cases revealed that a 5% lidocaine transdermal patch represents an effective, safe and tolerable and noninvasive option for the management of localized neuropathic pain due to peripheric nerve compression.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor neuropática é uma condição crônica com impactos significativos para o paciente, a sociedade e o sistema de saúde. Pela sua complexidade neuropática, a sua abordagem deve ser diferente da dor nociceptiva. Os tratamentos sistêmicos de primeira linha para a dor neuropática podem estar associados à incidência de eventos adversos dose-dependentes e interações farmacológicas. Por outro lado, os fármacos tópicos apresentam menor incidência de eventos adversos sistêmicos, sendo o emplastro de lidocaína a 5% recomendado como primeira ou segunda linha de tratamento para essa condição em diversos guidelines internacionais. O objetivo deste estudo foi apresentar três casos clínicos de dor neuropática localizada por compressão nervosa manejados com o emplastro de lidocaína a 5%. RELATO DOS CASOS: Três pacientes com idade superior a 40 anos e queixas de dor ou parestesia de longa duração foram manejados com emplastro de lidocaína a 5% em tratamento prolongado, com melhora da intensidade de dor expressiva. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados dos casos reportados revelaram que o emplastro de lidocaína a 5% se apresentou como uma opção terapêutica eficaz, segura, bem tolerada e não invasiva no manejo da dor neuropática localizada por compressão nervosa periférica.

Treatment of postoperative localized neuropathic pain with topical 5% lidocaine. Case report / Tratamento de dor neuropática pós-operatória localizada com lidocaína tópica a 5%. Relato de caso

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Post-surgical neuropathic pain (NP) is an important clinic condition, with recurring pain and that may be a result of transection, contusion, nerve inflammation or stretching and lasting for 3-6 months. Having into consideration the prevalence of postoperative localized NP, its impact in quality of life of patients, its complexity of diagnosis and treatment and available treatment options, the aim of this report was to present efficacy, safety and tolerability outcomes of 5% lidocaine transdermal patch use as a single treatment or in combination with other therapeutic options by describing and analyzing four clinical cases. CASES REPORT: Four patients aged between 43 and 70 years old and complains of postoperative localized NP were managed with 5% lidocaine transdermal patch in prolonged treatment, with significant improvement in pain scores. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of the described cases revealed that postoperative localized NP management was successful with 5% lidocaine transdermal patch. Moreover, it was possible to observe that its association to other treatments (pharmacological or not) has proved efficacy with no negative impact the tolerability of the treatment or the patient routine and comfort.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor neuropática (DN) pós-operatória é um problema clínico relevante, com dor persistente, que pode ser resultado de transecção, contusão, alongamento ou inflamação do nervo, durando geralmente cerca de 3-6 meses após a cirurgia. Tendo em consideração a prevalência estimada da DN localizada pós-operatória, seu impacto na qualidade de vida dos pacientes, sua complexidade diagnóstica e terapêutica, e as opções de tratamento disponíveis, o presente estudo teve como objetivo apresentar os desfechos de eficácia, segurança e tolerabilidade do uso do emplastro de lidocaína a 5% nesta condição clínica, seja como fármaco isolado ou em combinação com outras classes terapêuticas. RELATO DOS CASOS: Quatro pacientes com idades entre 43 e 70 anos e com história de DN localizada pós-operatória foram manejados com emplastro de lidocaína a 5% em tratamento prolongado, com melhora significativa do nível de dor. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados dos casos apresentados neste estudo revelam que o manejo da DN localizada pós-operatória foi eficaz com a utilização do emplastro de lidocaína a 5%. Além disso, foi possível observar que sua associação com outros tratamentos (farmacológicos ou não) mostrou-se efetiva, sem impactar negativamente a tolerabilidade do tratamento ou o conforto do paciente.

Indications for the use of cannabinoids / Indicação do uso de canabinoides

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The increasingly widespread use of cannabinoids in the management of acute and chronic pain generates an urgent need to study how cannabinoids act on CB1 and CB2 receptors and what their effects are on the organism. It is important to understand the difference in action between natural cannabinoids (cannabidiol, delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabigerol, cannabinoil, terpenes) and synthetic ones, so that the appropriate choice is made in each case, and depending on the pathophysiology of pain, one or the other active is more indicated. CONTENTS: Studies collected in the Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were analyzed. These studies focus were on natural cannabinoids (cannabidiol, delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabigerol, cannabinoil, terpenes) and synthetic cannabinoids in the use for the treatment of chronic pain, their action on the endocannabinoid system through the activation of the CB1 and CB2 receptor and their effect after activating this receptor, aiming to compile which cannabinoid is more indicated in the treatment of pain pathology. CONCLUSION: The subject still requires much study and new articles are being published daily. The analysis of the studies must be carried out with criteria to evaluate their seriousness. The endocannabinoid system is closely linked to the treatment of chronic pain and some cannabinoids such as: cannabidiol, delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabigerol, cannabinoil, as well as some terpenes are already considered important in the treatment of chronic pain inferring sparing effect of opioids, anticonvulsants, antidepressants among others.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O uso cada vez mais disseminado dos canabinoides no controle da dor aguda e crônica gera uma necessidade urgente do estudo de como os canabinoides agem nos receptores CB1 e CB2 e quais seus efeitos no organismo. É importante entender a diferença de ação entre os canabinoides naturais (canabidiol, delta 9-tetrahidrocanabinol, canabigerol, canabinol, terpenos) e os sintéticos, para que a escolha adequada seja realizada em cada caso, sendo que dependendo da fisiopatologia da dor é mais indicado um ou outro ativo. CONTEÚDO: Foram analisados estudos coletados na Pubmed, Cochrane Library e Web of Science. Os estudos se concentram em canabinoides naturais (canabidiol, delta 9-tetrahidrocanabinol, canabigerol, canabinoil, terpenos) e canabinoides sintéticos no uso para o tratamento da dor crônica, sua ação no sistema endocanabinoide através da ativação do receptor CB1 e CB2 e seu efeito após ativar esse receptor, visando compilar qual canabinoide é mais indicado no tratamento da patologia álgica. CONCLUSÃO: O assunto ainda requer muito estudo e diariamente novos artigos vem sendo publicados. A análise dos estudos deve ser realizada com critério para avaliar sua seriedade. O sistema endocanabinoide está intimamente ligado ao tratamento da dor crônica e alguns canabinoides como: canabidiol, delta 9-tetrahidrocanabinol, canabigerol, canabinoil, assim como alguns terpenos já são considerados importantes no tratamento da dor crônica inferindo efeito poupador de opioides, anticonvulsivantes, antidepressivos entre outros.

Understanding transdermal buprenorphine and a practical guide to its use for chronic cancer and non-cancer pain management.

Transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) has demonstrated effectiveness in treating a range of chronic pain conditions, including cancer pain, nociceptive pain, and neuropathic pain and has a favorable safety profile. Worldwide, clinical experience of its use is relatively limited. There is considerable misunderstanding about the pharmacology, mechanism of action, and safety of buprenorphine. There is also limited guidance on the appropriate use of TDB for chronic pain management. This article presents an overview of TDB and also provides practical recommendations for its use as part of a multifaceted strategy in chronic cancer and non-cancer pain.

Lidocaine medicated plaster, an additional potential treatment option for localized post-surgical neuropathic pain: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (lidocaine plaster) compared to placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSNP). METHODS: Patients (n = 363) with a diagnosis of PSNP for a minimum of 3 months to 36 months were randomized (1:1) to lidocaine plaster or placebo for a 12 week double-blind treatment period. Randomization was stratified as "plaster-only" (no concomitant medication for PSNP) or as "add-on" (stable systemic medication for PSNP). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in 24 hour average pain intensity at Week 12, assessed by 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS). The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01752322) and EudraCT (2012-000347-28). RESULTS: Treatment with lidocaine or placebo plaster led to a clinically relevant reduction in average pain intensity. Pain reduction (least squares mean [LS mean] standard error [SE], [95% confidence interval, CI]) with lidocaine plaster (-1.70 [0.16], [-2.03, -1.38]) was numerically higher than with placebo (-1.47 [0.16], [-1.78, -1.15]) but the difference was not statistically significant (-0.23 [0.23], [-0.69, 0.22]). Pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses showed the largest differentiation between lidocaine and placebo in patients without concomitant pain medication, and in patients with more than 1 year between surgery and enrollment. Many secondary outcomes showed a numerically larger improvement in favor of lidocaine. The most commonly reported adverse events were administration site reactions linked to topical administration. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically relevant pain reduction was observed with lidocaine plaster in patients with PSNP. The safety and tolerability profile is consistent with current knowledge.

Topic drug therapy for neuropathic pain / Farmacoterapia tópica da dor neuropática

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: First line drugs indicated to treat neuropathic pain are few and their use may be limited by the presence of side effects, impairing adherence to treatment. This review aimed at evaluating whether available topic analgesics have clinical efficacy and whether they might be used as alternative or adjuvant to treat neuropathic pain. CONTENTS: The topic effect of NSAIDs, tricyclic antidepressants, capsaicin, ketamine, clonidine and local anesthetics to treat neuropathic pain of different etiologies was evaluated. CONCLUSION: Few studies in the literature validate the use of topic analgesics to treat neuropathic pain. On the other hand, topic 5% lidocaine may be safely used with good analgesic effect and tolerability. The clinical efficacy of topic analgesics may be associated to the choice of the vehicle, to agent concentration, to pain location and to the specific disease.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Os fármacos disponíveis e indicados como primeira linha de tratamento da dor neuropática são poucos e o emprego desses agentes pode ser limitado pela presença de efeitos adversos, prejudicando a aderência ao tratamento. O objetivo desta revisão foi avaliar se aos analgésicos tópicos disponíveis para uso apresentam eficácia clinica e se podem ser utilizados como alternativa ou como adjuvante no tratamento da dor neuropática. CONTEÚDO: Foi avaliado o efeito tópico dos anti-inflamatórios não hormonais, os antidepressivos tricíclicos, a capsaicina, a cetamina, a clonidina e os anestésicos locais no tratamento da dor neuropática de diversas etiologias. CONCLUSÃO: Poucos estudos da literatura validam o emprego de analgésicos tópicos no tratamento da dor neuropática. Por outro lado, a lidocaína tópica a 5% pode ser utilizada de forma segura, com bom efeito analgésico e tolerabilidade. A eficácia clinica dos analgésicos tópicos pode estar associada a escolha do veículo, a concentração do agente, o local da dor e a doença específica.