Differential Regulation of Circadian Clock Genes by UV-B Radiation and 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D: A Pilot Study during Different Stages of Skin Photocarcinogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence points at an important physiological role of the timekeeping system, known as the circadian clock (CC), regulating not only our sleep-awake rhythm but additionally many other cellular processes in peripheral tissues. It was shown in various cell types that environmental stressors, including ultraviolet B radiation (UV-B), modulate the expression of genes that regulate the CC (CCGs) and that these CCGs modulate susceptibility for UV-B-induced cellular damage. It was the aim of this pilot study to gain further insights into the CCs' putative role for UV-B-induced photocarcinogenesis of skin cancer. METHODS: Applying RT-PCR, we analyzed the expression of two core CCGs (brain and muscle ARNT-like 1 (Bmal1) and Period-2 (Per2)) over several time points (0-60 h) in HaCaT cells with and without 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (D3) and/or UV-B and conducted a cosinor analysis to evaluate the effects of those conditions on the circadian rhythm and an extended mixed-effects linear modeling to account for both fixed effects of experimental conditions and random inter-individual variability. Next, we investigated the expression of these two genes in keratinocytes representing different stages of skin photocarcinogenesis, comparing normal (Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes-NHEK; p53 wild type), precancerous (HaCaT keratinocytes; mutated p53 status), and malignant (Squamous Cell Carcinoma SCL-1; p53 null status) keratinocytes after 12 h under the same conditions. RESULTS: We demonstrated that in HaCaT cells, Bmal1 showed a robust circadian rhythm, while the evidence for Per2 was limited. Overall expression of both genes, but especially for Bmal1, was increased following UV-B treatment, while Per2 showed a suppressed overall expression following D3. Both UVB and 1,25(OH)2D3 suggested a significant phase shift for Bmal1 (p < 0.05 for the acrophase), while no specific effect on the amplitude could be evidenced. Differential effects on the expression of BMAL1 and Per2 were found when we compared different treatment modalities (UV-B and/or D3) or cell types (NHEK, HaCaT, and SCL-1 cells). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing epidermal keratinocytes representing different stages of skin photocarcinogenesis, we provide further evidence for an independently operating timekeeping system in human skin, which is regulated by UV-B and disturbed during skin photocarcinogenesis. Our finding that this pattern of circadian rhythm was differentially altered by treatment with UV-B, as compared with treatment with D3, does not support the hypothesis that the expression of these CCGs may be regulated via UV-B-induced synthesis of vitamin D but might be introducing a novel photoprotective property of vitamin D through the circadian clock.

Cross-talk of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR)- and Vitamin D Receptor (VDR)-signaling in Human Keratinocytes.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Vitamin D receptor (VDR), activated upon binding of 1,25(OH)2D3, was described as a tumor suppressor in the skin. New biological functions of non-classical vitamin D derivatives were recently identified, that are mediated via binding to alternate receptors, including the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and that indicate functional interaction between AHR and VDR signaling in various human tissues. We aimed to gain further insights into the cross-talk of VDR and AHR signaling in skin photo-carcinogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using real-time quantitative PCR, we analyzed in vitro effects of the complete carcinogen UVB and of 1,25(OH)2D3 on the expression of members of the AHR and VDR pathways in human keratinocytes revealing characteristics of different stages of skin photo-carcinogenesis. RESULTS: In precancerous HaCaT keratinocytes, induction of a target gene of AHR-mediated transcription (CYP1A1) was markedly stronger after treatment with UVB, as compared to treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3. In contrast, in SCL-1 cells (that reveal the complete phenotype of malignant transformation), expression of CYP1A1 was higher after treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3 as compared to treatment with UVB. The classical VDR target CYP24A1 was up-regulated by 1,25(OH)2D3, but not by UVB, in both cell lines. However, the combined treatment with UVB strongly enhanced the 1,25(OH)2D3-mediated up-regulation of CYP24A1 exclusively in SCL-1, but not in HaCaT cells. CONCLUSION: There is a differential regulation of VDR and AHR target genes by UVB and 1,25(OH)2D3 in HaCaT and SCL-1 cells, that points to a complex and highly orchestrated network of vitamin D derivatives (and other photoproducts) and its relevance for photo-carcinogenesis.