Spatial Distribution of Missense Variants within Complement Proteins Associates with Age Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: Genetic variants in complement genes are associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, many rare variants have been identified in these genes, but have an unknown significance, and their impact on protein function and structure is still unknown. We set out to address this issue by evaluating the spatial placement and impact on protein structureof these variants by developing an analytical pipeline and applying it to the International AMD Genomics Consortium (IAMDGC) dataset (16,144 AMD cases, 17,832 controls). Methods: The IAMDGC dataset was imputed using the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC), leading to an improvement of over 30% more imputed variants, over the original 1000 Genomes imputation. Variants were extracted for the CFH , CFI , CFB , C9 , and C3 genes, and filtered for missense variants in solved protein structures. We evaluated these variants as to their placement in the three-dimensional structure of the protein (i.e. spatial proximity in the protein), as well as AMD association. We applied several pipelines to a) calculate spatial proximity to known AMD variants versus gnomAD variants, b) assess a variant's likelihood of causing protein destabilization via calculation of predicted free energy change (ddG) using Rosetta, and c) whole gene-based testing to test for statistical associations. Gene-based testing using seqMeta was performed using a) all variants b) variants near known AMD variants or c) with a ddG >|2|. Further, we applied a structural kernel adaptation of SKAT testing (POKEMON) to confirm the association of spatial distributions of missense variants to AMD. Finally, we used logistic regression on known AMD variants in CFI to identify variants leading to >50% reduction in protein expression from known AMD patient carriers of CFI variants compared to wild type (as determined by in vitro experiments) to determine the pipeline's robustness in identifying AMD-relevant variants. These results were compared to functional impact scores, ie CADD values > 10, which indicate if a variant may have a large functional impact genomewide, to determine if our metrics have better discriminative power than existing variant assessment methods. Once our pipeline had been validated, we then performed a priori selection of variants using this pipeline methodology, and tested AMD patient cell lines that carried those selected variants from the EUGENDA cohort (n=34). We investigated complement pathway protein expression in vitro , looking at multiple components of the complement factor pathway in patient carriers of bioinformatically identified variants. Results: Multiple variants were found with a ddG>|2| in each complement gene investigated. Gene-based tests using known and novel missense variants identified significant associations of the C3 , C9 , CFB , and CFH genes with AMD risk after controlling for age and sex (P=3.22×10 -5 ;7.58×10 -6 ;2.1×10 -3 ;1.2×10 -31 ). ddG filtering and SKAT-O tests indicate that missense variants that are predicted to destabilize the protein, in both CFI and CFH, are associated with AMD (P=CFH:0.05, CFI:0.01, threshold of 0.05 significance). Our structural kernel approach identified spatial associations for AMD risk within the protein structures for C3, C9, CFB, CFH, and CFI at a nominal p-value of 0.05. Both ddG and CADD scores were predictive of reduced CFI protein expression, with ROC curve analyses indicating ddG is a better predictor (AUCs of 0.76 and 0.69, respectively). A priori in vitro analysis of variants in all complement factor genes indicated that several variants identified via bioinformatics programs PathProx/POKEMON in our pipeline via in vitro experiments caused significant change in complement protein expression (P=0.04) in actual patient carriers of those variants, via ELISA testing of proteins in the complement factor pathway, and were previously unknown to contribute to AMD pathogenesis. Conclusion: We demonstrate for the first time that missense variants in complement genes cluster together spatially and are associated with AMD case/control status. Using this method, we can identify CFI and CFH variants of previously unknown significance that are predicted to destabilize the proteins. These variants, both in and outside spatial clusters, can predict in-vitro tested CFI protein expression changes, and we hypothesize the same is true for CFH . A priori identification of variants that impact gene expression allow for classification for previously classified as VUS. Further investigation is needed to validate the models for additional variants and to be applied to all AMD-associated genes.

Multi-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis of 56,241 individuals identifies LRRC4C, LHX5-AS1 and nominates ancestry-specific loci PTPRK , GRB14 , and KIAA0825 as novel risk loci for Alzheimer's disease: the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium.

Limited ancestral diversity has impaired our ability to detect risk variants more prevalent in non-European ancestry groups in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We constructed and analyzed a multi-ancestry GWAS dataset in the Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Genetics Consortium (ADGC) to test for novel shared and ancestry-specific AD susceptibility loci and evaluate underlying genetic architecture in 37,382 non-Hispanic White (NHW), 6,728 African American, 8,899 Hispanic (HIS), and 3,232 East Asian individuals, performing within-ancestry fixed-effects meta-analysis followed by a cross-ancestry random-effects meta-analysis. We identified 13 loci with cross-ancestry associations including known loci at/near CR1 , BIN1 , TREM2 , CD2AP , PTK2B , CLU , SHARPIN , MS4A6A , PICALM , ABCA7 , APOE and two novel loci not previously reported at 11p12 ( LRRC4C ) and 12q24.13 ( LHX5-AS1 ). Reflecting the power of diverse ancestry in GWAS, we observed the SHARPIN locus using 7.1% the sample size of the original discovering single-ancestry GWAS (n=788,989). We additionally identified three GWS ancestry-specific loci at/near ( PTPRK ( P =2.4×10 -8 ) and GRB14 ( P =1.7×10 -8 ) in HIS), and KIAA0825 ( P =2.9×10 -8 in NHW). Pathway analysis implicated multiple amyloid regulation pathways (strongest with P adjusted =1.6×10 -4 ) and the classical complement pathway ( P adjusted =1.3×10 -3 ). Genes at/near our novel loci have known roles in neuronal development ( LRRC4C, LHX5-AS1 , and PTPRK ) and insulin receptor activity regulation ( GRB14 ). These findings provide compelling support for using traditionally-underrepresented populations for gene discovery, even with smaller sample sizes.

Private well water testing promotion in pediatric preventive care: A randomized intervention study.

Over 43 million U.S. residents rely on private unregulated wells for their drinking water, raising public health concerns, particularly in regions like northern New England where widespread groundwater arsenic contamination is now recognized. Children are particularly vulnerable to adverse health effects from arsenic exposure. Despite AAP Guidelines, approaches to engage pediatric clinicians in promoting private well testing have not been previously described. We sought to determine the most effective practice approaches to achieve successful well water testing in routine pediatric care. 12 primary care clinics were block randomized to one of four study arms. Two intervention variables were assessed: (1) test results access (parent only vs. parent and clinic) and (2) follow up approaches (yes/no). Parents of children under 12 months using a private well were eligible. Prepaid water tests were provided. Primary outcome was parental water test completion. Eleven clinics successfully implemented processes identifying well users. 240 testing kits were dispensed. Completion rates averaged 29% (range 10 to 61%). The study arm with both clinic results access and staff follow up system was 2.3 times more likely to achieve test completion than other arms (95% CI 1.12-4.86, p = .03). Kit distribution by clinicians versus nursing staff, irrespective of study arm, had 2.4 times greater completion (95% CI 1.13-5.11, p = .02). Systematic drinking water source screening can be improved in pediatric care. Higher testing completion was found in practices randomized to reminders and structured follow up versus single visit discussion, but clinician involvement was the most predictive factor.

Assessing data availability and quality within an electronic health record system through external validation against an external clinical data source.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of deaths in the US each year are attributable to smoking, yet current practices in the recording of this health risk in electronic health records (EHRs) have not led to discernable changes in health outcomes. Several groups have developed algorithms for extracting smoking behaviors from clinical notes, but none of these approaches were assessed with external data to report on anticipated clinical performance. METHODS: Previously, we developed an informatics pipeline that extracts smoking status, pack year history, and cessation date from clinical notes. Here we report on the clinical implementation performance of our pipeline using 1,504 clinical notes matched to an external questionnaire. RESULTS: We found that 73% of available notes contained no smoking behavior information. The weighted Cohen's kappa between the external questionnaire and EHR smoking status was 0.62 (95% CI 0.56-0.69) for the clinical notes we were able to extract information from. The correlation between pack years reported by our pipeline and the external questionnaire was 0.39 on the 81 notes for which this information was present in both. We also assessed for lung cancer screening eligibility using notes from individuals identified as never smokers or smokers with pack year history extracted by our pipeline (n = 196). We found a positive predictive value of 85.4%, a negative predictive value of 83.8%, sensitivity of 63.1%, and specificity of 94.7%. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that our pipeline can extract smoking behaviors from unannotated EHR notes when the information is present. This information is reliable enough to identify patients most likely to be eligible for smoking related services. Ensuring capture of smoking information during clinical encounters should continue to be a high priority.

Building a tobacco user registry by extracting multiple smoking behaviors from clinical notes.

BACKGROUND: Usage of structured fields in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to ascertain smoking history is important but fails in capturing the nuances of smoking behaviors. Knowledge of smoking behaviors, such as pack year history and most recent cessation date, allows care providers to select the best care plan for patients at risk of smoking attributable diseases. METHODS: We developed and evaluated a health informatics pipeline for identifying complete smoking history from clinical notes in EHRs. We utilized 758 patient-visit notes (from visits between 03/28/2016 and 04/04/2016) from our local EHR in addition to a public dataset of 502 clinical notes from the 2006 i2b2 Challenge to assess the performance of this pipeline. We used a machine-learning classifier to extract smoking status and a comprehensive set of text processing regular expressions to extract pack years and cessation date information from these clinical notes. RESULTS: We identified smoking status with an F1 score of 0.90 on both the i2b2 and local data sets. Regular expression identification of pack year history in the local test set was 91.7% sensitive and 95.2% specific, but due to variable context the pack year extraction was incomplete in 25% of cases, extracting packs per day or years smoked only. Regular expression identification of cessation date was 63.2% sensitive and 94.6% specific. CONCLUSIONS: Our work indicates that the development of an EHR-based Smokers' Registry containing information relating to smoking behaviors, not just status, from free-text clinical notes using an informatics pipeline is feasible. This pipeline is capable of functioning in external EHRs, reducing the amount of time and money needed at the institute-level to create a Smokers' Registry for improved identification of patient risk and eligibility for preventative and early detection services.