Non-HLA type 1 diabetes genes modulate disease risk together with HLA-DQ and islet autoantibodies.

The possible interrelations between human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ, non-HLA single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and islet autoantibodies were investigated at clinical onset in 1-34-year-old type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients (n=305) and controls (n=203). Among the non-HLA SNPs reported by the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium, 24% were supported in this Swedish replication set including that the increased risk of minor PTPN22 allele and high-risk HLA was modified by GAD65 autoantibodies. The association between T1D and the minor AA+AC genotype in ERBB3 gene was stronger among IA-2 autoantibody-positive patients (comparison P=0.047). The association between T1D and the common insulin (AA) genotype was stronger among insulin autoantibody (IAA)-positive patients (comparison P=0.008). In contrast, the association between T1D and unidentified 26471 gene was stronger among IAA-negative (comparison P=0.049) and IA-2 autoantibody-negative (comparison P=0.052) patients. Finally, the association between IL2RA and T1D was stronger among IAA-positive than among IAA-negative patients (comparison P=0.028). These results suggest that the increased risk of T1D by non-HLA genes is often modified by both islet autoantibodies and HLA-DQ. The interactions between non-HLA genes, islet autoantibodies and HLA-DQ should be taken into account in T1D prediction studies as well as in prevention trials aimed at inducing immunological tolerance to islet autoantigens.

Islet autoimmunity in phenotypic type 2 diabetes patients.

Historically, type 2 diabetes (T2D) was considered a metabolic disease of ageing. However, recent discoveries have demonstrated the role of chronic systemic inflammation in the development of insulin resistance and subsequent progression to T2D. Over the years, investigations into the pathophysiology of T2D have identified the presence of islet-specific T cells and islet autoimmune disease in T2D patients. Moreover, the cell-mediated islet autoimmunity has also been correlated with the progressive loss of ß-cell function associated with T2D disease pathogenesis. In this manuscript, the involvement of cell-mediated islet autoimmune disease in the progression of T2D disease and the similarities in islet-specific T-cell reactivity between type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D are discussed.

Attenuation of islet-specific T cell responses is associated with C-peptide improvement in autoimmune type 2 diabetes patients.

The clinical efficacy of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonists in cell-mediated autoimmune diseases results from down-regulation of inflammatory cytokines and autoimmune effector cells. T cell islet autoimmunity has been demonstrated to be common in patients with phenotypic type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and islet-specific T cells (T(+) ) to be correlated positively with more severe beta cell dysfunction. We hypothesized that the beneficial effects of the PPAR-γ agonist, rosiglitazone, therapy in autoimmune T2DM patients is due, in part, to the immunosuppressive properties on the islet-specific T cell responses. Twenty-six phenotypic T2DM patients positive for T cell islet autoimmunity (T(+) ) were identified and randomized to rosiglitazone (n = 12) or glyburide (n = 14). Beta cell function, islet-specific T cell responses, interleukin (IL)-12 and interferon (IFN)-γ responses and islet autoantibodies were followed for 36 months. Patients treated with rosiglitazone demonstrated significant (P < 0·03) down-regulation of islet-specific T cell responses, although no change in response to tetanus, a significant decrease (P < 0·05) in IFN-γ production and significantly (P < 0·001) increased levels of adiponectin compared to glyburide-treated patients. Glucagon-stimulated beta cell function was observed to improve significantly (P < 0·05) in the rosiglitazone-treated T2DM patients coinciding with the down-regulation of the islet-specific T cell responses. In contrast, beta cell function in the glyburide-treated T2DM patients was observed to drop progressively throughout the study. Our results suggest that down-regulation of islet-specific T cell autoimmunity through anti-inflammatory therapy may help to improve beta cell function in autoimmune phenotypic T2DM patients.

Immunology in the Clinic Review Series; focus on metabolic diseases: development of islet autoimmune disease in type 2 diabetes patients: potential sequelae of chronic inflammation.

Historically, the development of type 2 diabetes has been considered not to have an autoimmune component, in contrast to the autoimmune pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. In this review we will discuss the accumulating data supporting the concept that islet autoreactivity and inflammation is present in type 2 diabetes pathogenesis, and the islet autoimmunity appears to be one of the factors associated with the progressive nature of the type 2 diabetes disease process.

Changes in GAD65Ab-specific antiidiotypic antibody levels correlate with changes in C-peptide levels and progression to islet cell autoimmunity.

CONTEXT: The previously reported absence of 65-kDa glutamate decarboxylase antibody (GAD65Ab)-specific antiidiotypic antibodies (anti-Id) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients at clinical onset could be due to an inability to mount an antibody response to GAD65Ab or a longitudinal decline in anti-Id levels. OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: We investigated anti-Id levels in longitudinal samples obtained from T1D patients (n = 41) (clinical diagnosis - 12 months), and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) patients (n = 32) who received alum-formulated human recombinant GAD65 (baseline - 12 months). We also determined anti-Id levels in a small cohort of Type 2 diabetes patients during their development of autoimmune T cell responses. RESULTS: At clinical onset T1D patients presented no or low anti-Id levels. However, 22/41 T1D patients showed ≥50% increase in GAD65Ab-specific anti-Id levels during follow-up; peaking at 3 (n = 1), 6 (n = 10), 9 (n = 10), or 12 (n = 1) months. Increasing anti-Id levels marked patients who experienced a temporary increase in C-peptide levels. Anti-Id levels correlated significantly with glycated hemoglobin and C-peptide levels at 6 and 9 months (P values ranged from <0.001 to <0.05). In LADA patients receiving placebo, anti-Id levels declined in seven of nine patients, whereas four of five patients receiving 20 µg alum-formulated human recombinant GAD65 showed increasing anti-Id levels. Changes in anti-Id and C-peptide levels closely correlated (P < 0.0001). The significant decline in anti-Id levels (P = 0.03) in T2D patients developing T cell autoimmune responses supports our hypothesis that declining anti-Id levels are associated with developing islet autoimmunity. CONCLUSIONS: The close association between GAD65Ab-specific anti-Id levels and ß-cell function may provide a novel marker for the progression of autoimmune diabetes.

The association between the PTPN22 1858C>T variant and type 1 diabetes depends on HLA risk and GAD65 autoantibodies.

The single nucleotide polymorphism 1858C>T in the PTPN22 gene is associated with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in several populations. Earlier reports have suggested that the association may be modified by human leukocyte antigen (HLA), as well as by islet autoantibodies. In a large case-control study of Swedish incident T1D patients and controls, 0-34 years of age, we tested whether the odds ratio (OR) measure of association was dependent on HLA or autoantibodies against the islet autoantigens glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 kDa autoantibodies (GADA), insulin, islet antigen-2, or islet cell. The association between the carrier status of 1858C>T allele in PTPN22 (PTPN22(CT+TT)) and T1D was modified by HLA. In addition, in GADA-positive T1D, the OR was 2.83 (2.00, 3.99), whereas in GADA-negative T1D, the OR was 1.41 (0.98, 2.04) (P for comparison=0.007). The OR of association between PTPN22(CT+TT) and GADA-positive T1D declined with increasing HLA-risk category from 6.12 to 1.54 (P=0.003); no such change was detected in GADA-negative T1D (P=0.722) (P for comparison=0.001). However, the absolute difference in risk between PTPN22(CC) and PTPN22(CT+TT) subjects with high-risk HLA was five times higher than that for subjects with low-risk HLA. We hypothesize that the altered T-cell function because of the PTPN22(1858C>T) polymorphism is exclusively associated with GADA-positive T1D at diagnosis.

Initial treatment with fixed-dose combination rosiglitazone/glimepiride in patients with previously untreated type 2 diabetes.

AIM: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of two different dosing regimens of fixed-dose combination (FDC) rosiglitazone (RSG) plus glimepiride (GLIM) compared with RSG or GLIM monotherapy in drug-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Drug-naive subjects (n = 901) were enrolled into this 28-week, double-blind, parallel-group study if their glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) was >7.5% but

The rise and fall of insulin secretion in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

An understanding of the natural history of beta cell responses is an essential prerequisite for interventional studies designed to prevent or treat type 1 diabetes. Here we review published data on changes in insulin responses in humans with type 1 diabetes. We also describe a new analysis of C-peptide responses in subjects who are at risk of type 1 diabetes and enrolled in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-1 (DPT-1). C-peptide responses to a mixed meal increase during childhood and through adolescence, but show no significant change during adult life; responses are lower in adults who progress to diabetes than in those who do not. The age-related increase in C-peptide responses may account for the higher levels of C-peptide observed in adults with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes compared with those in children and adolescents. Based on these findings, we propose a revised model of the natural history of the disease, in which an age-related increase in functional beta cell responses before the onset of autoimmune beta cell damage is an important determinant of the clinical features of the disease.

Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) should be less latent.

'Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults' (LADA) is the term coined to describe adults who have a slowly progressive form of autoimmune or type 1 diabetes that can be treated initially without insulin injections. The diagnosis of LADA is currently based on three clinical criteria: (1) adult age at onset of diabetes; (2) the presence of circulating islet autoantibodies, which distinguishes LADA from type 2 diabetes; and (3) insulin independence at diagnosis, which distinguishes LADA from classic type 1 diabetes. The prevalence of LADA in adults presenting with non-insulin-requiring diabetes is approximately 10%. Recognition of LADA expands the concept and prevalence of autoimmune diabetes, but LADA remains poorly understood at both a clinical and research level. In this perspective, we review the nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, genetics, pathology and therapy of LADA, to arrive at recommendations that might advance knowledge and management of this form of diabetes.

Therapeutic targets for the prevention of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

The pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes is multifactorial, involving genetic susceptibility, autoimmune mechanisms, and environmental factors. This article will focus on two main strategies for altering the underlying disease process in type 1 diabetes. The first strategy is to identify individuals at risk for the development of diabetes and to halt the immune process before it leads to overt clinical disease, Promising in vitro and animal studies with nicotinamide, parenteral insulin, and oral insulin led to large clinical prevention studies, such as the European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial and the Diabetes Prevention Trial (DPT-1). These studies failed to show that nicotinamide and insulin prevented the disease in at risk relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes and left many questions unanswered. The second strategy focuses on intervention shortly after diagnosis in order to arrest the destruction of beta cells and to preserve residual beta-cell function as long as possible. Cyclosporin was an effective immunosuppressive but was rejected as a potential treatment for type 1 diabetes because of its renal toxicity. Recently, more attention has been focused on an anti-CD3 antibody, on DiaPep277, and on glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD). Animal studies and small short-term human trials with these compounds have suggested that they may be effective interventions in patients recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.

Epitope analysis of insulin autoantibodies using recombinant Fab.

Autoantibodies to insulin are often the first autoantibodies detected in young children with type 1 diabetes and can be present before the onset of clinical diabetes. These autoantibodies and their epitopes are, however, not well characterized. We explored the use of monoclonal antibodies and their recombinant Fab as reagents for epitope analysis. In this study we cloned and characterized the recombinant Fab of the insulin-specific monoclonal antibody CG7C7. We found the epitope of this antibody to be located predominantly at the A-chain loop of the insulin molecule. The recombinant Fab was then used to compete for insulin binding against insulin autoantibodies present in sera from patients with type 1 or type 1.5 diabetes. In competition experiments with sera positive for autoantibodies to insulin the recombinant Fab significantly reduced the binding to [125I]-insulin by sera of type 1 (n = 35) and type 1.5 diabetes [latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA)] (n = 14) patients (P < 0.0001). We conclude that competition between insulin-specific monoclonal antibodies or their recombinant Fab and insulin autoantibodies should prove useful in the epitope analysis of autoantibodies to insulin.

Islet cell antibodies and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, but not the clinical phenotype, help to identify type 1(1/2) diabetes in patients presenting with type 2 diabetes.

This study was undertaken to determine which type 1 diabetes-associated autoantibodies and what clinical characteristics are most useful to identify patients with type 1(1/2) diabetes. We studied 125 patients, recently diagnosed clinically with type 2 diabetes for the presence of islet cell antibodies (ICA), insulin autoantibodies (IAA), antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase(GADAb), and IA-2a (IA-2Ab). Patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes who met all of the following criteria at diagnosis were studied: age > or = 30 years, no history of ketonuria or ketoacidosis, and not requiring insulin treatment. Thirty-six patients (29%) were positive for at least 1 antibody. Thirty-two (26%) were ICA positive and 20 (16%) GADAb positive. Insulin autoantibodies and IA-2Ab occurred less frequently in 2 (1.6%) and 8 (6.4%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the ages at diagnosis between the Ab(+) and Ab(-) patients, age in years (range) 47.2 (32 to 64) versus 51.2 (31 to 77), respectively, P =.06. Body mass index (BMI) was different in the 2 groups, with Ab(+) patients being less obese, BMI (range) 28.3 kg/m(2) (17.6 to 54.9) versus 32.0 kg/m(2) (19.2 to 68.8), respectively, P =.01. Clinical presentation of diabetes was more commonly symptomatic with polyuria and polydipsia in Ab(+) patients, while in Ab(-) patients, diagnosis was more often incidental, P =.002. However, more than 95% of patients overlapped in both age and BMI irrespective of antibody status. Similarly, 42% of Ab(+) patients had their diabetes diagnosed incidentally, while 29% of Ab(-) patients presented with polyuria and polydipsia. We therefore conclude that screening with antibodies, mainly ICA and GAD, but not age, BMI, or clinical presentation should be used to identify type 1(1/2) diabetes.

Improving the quality of outpatient care for older patients with diabetes: lessons from a comparison of rural and urban communities.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to compare the quality of diabetic care received by patients in rural and urban communities. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of claims data captured by the Medicare program. POPULATION: We included all fee-for-service Medicare patients 65 years and older living in the state of Washington who had 2 or more physician encounters for diabetes care during 1994. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes were the extent to which patients received 3 specific recommended services: glycated hemoglobin determination, cholesterol measurement, and eye examination. RESULTS: A total of 30,589 Medicare patients (8.4%) were considered to have diabetes; 29.1% lived in rural communities. Generalists provided most diabetic care in all locations. Patients living in small rural towns received almost half their outpatient care in larger communities. Patients living in large rural towns remote from metropolitan areas were more likely to have received the recommended tests than patients in all other groups. Patients who saw an endocrinologist at least once during the year were more likely to have received the recommended tests. CONCLUSIONS: Large rural towns may provide the best conditions for high-quality care: They are vibrant, rapidly growing communities that serve as regional referral centers and have an adequate-but not excessive-supply of both generalist and specialist physicians. Generalists provide most diabetic care in all settings, and consultation with an endocrinologist may improve adherence to guidelines.

Expression of GAD65 and islet cell antibody (ICA512) autoantibodies among cytoplasmic ICA+ relatives is associated with eligibility for the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1.

More than 71,000 relatives of type 1 diabetic patients have been screened for cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies (ICAs), GAD65 autoantibodies (GAAs), and ICA512 autoantibodies (ICA512AAs). Among those 71,148 relatives, 2,448 were cytoplasmic ICA+, and the remainder were ICA-. Of the ICA+ group, 1,229 (50.2%) were positive for GAAs and/or ICA512AAs. Among ICA- relatives, 1,897 (2.76%) were positive for GAAs and/or ICA512AAs. Given the large number of relatives positive for cytoplasmic ICA and negative for "biochemically" determined autoantibodies, and the converse, we analyzed the proportion of ICA+ relatives found eligible to participate in the intervention phase of Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1). To be eligible for the parenteral insulin DPT-1 trial, a relative had to have first-phase insulin secretion below the 1st percentile of cut-points (for parents) or below the 10th percentile (for siblings and offspring). To be eligible for the oral insulin trial, a relative had to have first-phase insulin secretion above cut-points (>1st percentile for parents, >10th percentile for siblings/offspring) and be positive for anti-insulin autoantibodies. For both trials, DQB1*0602 was an exclusion criteria, cytoplasmic ICA positivity had to be confirmed, and an oral glucose tolerance test had to result in nondiabetic levels. Of 572 relatives found to be eligible for trial entry, 442 (77.3%) were positive for GAAs and/or ICA512AAs, although overall only 50.2% of ICA+ relatives were positive for GAAs and/or ICA512AAs. The positive predictive value for trial eligibility for ICA+ relatives with GAAs or ICA512AAs who completed staging was 51.0%. In contrast, only 11.9% of ICA+ but GAA- and ICA512AA- relatives were found to be eligible by DPT criteria for trial entry. Positivity for biochemically determined autoantibodies among cytoplasmic antibody-positive relatives is associated with eligibility for the DPT-1 study.

Intermolecular antigen spreading occurs during the preclinical period of human type 1 diabetes.

Intra- and intermolecular spreading of T cell responses to autoantigens has been implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Therefore, we questioned whether T cell responses from subjects identified as at-risk (positive for autoantibody reactivity to islet proteins) for the development of type 1 diabetes, a cell-mediated autoimmune disease, would demonstrate intermolecular Ag spreading of T cell responses to islet cell proteins. Previously, we have demonstrated that by the time subjects develop type 1 diabetes, they have T cell responses to numerous islet proteins, whereas T cells from normal controls respond to a limited number of islet proteins. Initial testing of PBMC responses from 25 nondiabetic at-risk subjects demonstrated that 16 of the 25 subjects have PBMC responses to islet proteins similar to controls. Fourteen of these 16 subjects were available for follow-up. Eleven of the 14 developed T cell responses to increasing numbers of islet proteins, and 6 of these subjects developed type 1 diabetes. In the nine subjects who already demonstrated T cell Ag spreading at the initial visit, four were available for follow-up. Of these four, two had increases in T cell reactivity to islet proteins, while two maintained their initial levels of T cell reactivity. We also observed Ag spreading in autoantibody reactivity to islet proteins in nine of the 18 at-risk subjects available for follow-up. Our data strongly support the conclusion that intermolecular spreading of T cell and Ab responses to islet proteins occurs during the preclinical period of type 1 diabetes.

Islet cell autoimmunity and mitochondrial DNA mutation in Korean subjects with typical and atypical Type I diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The 1997 American Diabetes Association classification of diabetes mellitus included a subset of Type I diabetic patients who do not need insulin for several years but eventually progress to complete insulin deficiency i. e. atypical Type I diabetes mellitus. In Caucasian populations, most Type I diabetic patients have auto-antibodies against islet cells. We examined the frequency of the auto-antibodies against islet cells and mitochondrial DNA 3243 mutation in Koreans with typical and atypical Type I diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We measured plasma C-peptide level in 1870 consecutive Korean diabetic patients. Of these, 56 patients had insulin deficiency (fasting and glucagon-stimulated plasma C-peptide concentrations < or = 0.2 nmol/l and < or = 0.32 nmol/l, respectively), and they were subdivided into typical (n = 26) and atypical Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (n = 30) according to clinical manifestation. Islet cell antibody was measured by indirect immunofluorescence. Anti-GAD antibody and anti-ICA512 antibody were measured by radioimmunoassay. Mitochondrial DNA 3243 mutation was detected using restriction enzyme Apa-I digestion of the amplified genomic DNA. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of auto-antibodies in the typical and atypical groups was 77% and 57%, respectively. Mitochondrial DNA 3243 mutation was found in 3 out of 30 (10%) of atypical Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients but not in typical Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Autoimmunity might not be the only cause of progressive insulin deficiency in Koreans. Mitochondrial DNA mutation is another identifiable cause but the cause(s) of insulin deficiency in the remainder of Type I diabetic patients without autoimmunity is not clear.

A novel high-throughput method for accurate, rapid, and economical measurement of multiple type 1 diabetes autoantibodies.

Prediction of Type 1 diabetes for study of preventive therapies requires screening the general population, where 85% of new cases occur. Even with HLA-based prescreening, nearly 20% of all children will need multiple serum autoantibody testings. High-throughput, economical, and accurate methods are therefore essential. We have developed such a radiobinding method, using 96-well microtiter plates and a novel immune complex capture method via membrane-bound Protein A. Each microtiter plate contained a standard negative control serum, and low-, medium-, and high-level positive control sera. All sera were evaluated in triplicate. This readily allowed quality control criteria both for triplicates of individual sera and for each 96-well plate. Inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were all