Simulation-based team training for healthcare professionals in pediatric departments: study protocol for a nonrandomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems worldwide face challenges related to patient safety, quality of care, and interprofessional collaboration. Simulation-based team training has emerged as a promising approach to address some of these challenges by providing healthcare professionals with a controlled and safe environment to enhance their teamwork and communication skills. The purpose of this study protocol is to describe an intervention using simulation-based team training in pediatric departments. METHODS: Using a parallel-group, non-randomized controlled trial design, a simulation-based team training intervention will be implemented across four pediatric departments in Denmark. Another four pediatric departments will serve as controls. The intervention implies that healthcare professionals engage in simulation-based team training at a higher quantity and frequency than they did previously. Development of the intervention occurred from April 2022 to April 2023. Implementation of the intervention occurs from April 2023 to April 2024. Evaluation of the intervention is planned from April 2024 to April 2025. All simulation activity both before and during the intervention will be registered, making it possible to compare outcomes across time periods (before versus after) and across groups (intervention versus control). To evaluate the effects of the intervention, we will conduct four analyses. Analysis 1 investigates if simulation-based team training is related to sick leave among healthcare professionals. Analysis 2 explores if the simulation intervention has an impact on patient safety culture. Analysis 3 examines if simulation-based team training is associated with the treatment of critically ill newborns. Finally, Analysis 4 conducts a cost-benefit analysis, highlighting the potential return on investment. DISCUSSION: The implemented simulation-based team training intervention can be defined as a complex intervention. Following the Medical Research Council framework and guidelines, the intervention in this project encompasses feasibility assessment, planning of intervention, implementation of intervention, and rigorous data analysis. Furthermore, the project emphasizes practical considerations such as stakeholder collaboration, facilitator training, and equipment management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered as a clinical trial on clinicaltrials.gov, with the identifier NCT06064045.

Effect of simulation-based team training in airway management: a systematic review.

Major complications associated with airway management are rare but often have serious consequences. Complications frequently result from failures in communication and teamwork. We performed a systematic review on the effect of simulation-based team training on patient outcomes, healthcare professionals' clinical performance and preparedness for airway management. We included studies with simulation-based team training in airway management as the educational intervention, using any comparator, outcome and design. Two authors independently selected articles and assessed risk of bias using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education. We screened 1248 titles and evaluated 116 full-text articles. Twenty-two studies were included. The Kirkpatrick model for evaluation of training was used to organise outcomes. Four studies reported patient-centred outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4), and three studies' outcomes related to healthcare professionals' clinical performance (Kirkpatrick level 3). The results were ambiguous and the studies had significant methodological limitations, making it difficult to draw conclusions on the effect of simulation-based team training. To describe preparedness for airway management, we used outcomes related to participants' attitudes or perceptions and outcomes related to knowledge or skills demonstrated in a test setting (Kirkpatrick level 2). Most studies reporting these outcomes were in favour of simulation-based team training, but were prone to bias. We consider the current evidence to be weak and recommend that future research should be based on randomised study designs and patient-centred outcomes.

A National Needs Assessment to Identify Technical Procedures in Vascular Surgery for Simulation Based Training.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Practical skills training in vascular surgery is facing challenges because of an increased number of endovascular procedures and fewer open procedures, as well as a move away from the traditional principle of "learning by doing." This change has established simulation as a cornerstone in providing trainees with the necessary skills and competences. However, the development of simulation based programs often evolves based on available resources and equipment, reflecting convenience rather than a systematic educational plan. The objective of the present study was to perform a national needs assessment to identify the technical procedures that should be integrated in a simulation based curriculum. DESIGN AND METHODS: A national needs assessment using a Delphi process was initiated by engaging 33 predefined key persons in vascular surgery. Round 1 was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that vascular surgeons should learn. Round 2 was a survey that used a needs assessment formula to explore the frequency of procedures, the number of surgeons performing each procedure, risk and/or discomfort, and feasibility for simulation based training. Round 3 involved elimination and ranking of procedures. RESULTS: The response rate for round 1 was 70%, with 36 procedures identified. Round 2 had a 76% response rate and resulted in a preliminary prioritised list after exploring the need for simulation based training. Round 3 had an 85% response rate; 17 procedures were eliminated, resulting in a final prioritised list of 19 technical procedures. CONCLUSION: A national needs assessment using a standardised Delphi method identified a list of procedures that are highly suitable and may provide the basis for future simulation based training programs for vascular surgeons in training.

[Diagnosis and treatment of postoperative nerve damage. Chronic neuropathic pain]. / Diagnose og behandling af perifere nerveskader efter operationer. Kroniske neuropatiske smerter.

Neuropathic pain is caused by lesions in the peripheral and/or central nervous system. Patients with pain due to nerve damage after operations are often misinterpreted and met with suspicion of malingering. Neuropathic pain typically presents with a characteristic set of sensory disorders independent of the cause. The sensory dysfunction may manifest itself as hypo- and/or hyperesthesia to one or more modalities, increased pain to painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) and/or pain to non-painful stimuli (allodynia). Conventional analgesics such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are often ineffective. Instead, antidepressants and anticonvulsants may be tried. The pain condition is unknown to most physicians. This may result in mistreated patients having undergone several unnecessary and ineffective investigations and treatments.