Nature and Mental Health in Urban Texas: A NatureScore-Based Study.

In this cross-sectional study, we examined the impact of access to nature on mental health utilization in urban neighborhoods using Texas outpatient encounters data merged with NatureScoreTM (0-100; low to high nature levels) and US census data (household income, education, employment, poverty, and insurance coverage) at the zipcode level. Our sample size included 61 million outpatient encounters across 1169 zipcodes, with 63% women and 30% elderly. A total of 369,344 mental health encounters were identified, with anxiety/stress and depression encounters representing 68.3% and 23.6%, respectively. We found that neighborhoods with a NatureScore of 60+ had lower overall mental health utilization than those below 40 (RR 0.51, 95%CI 0.38-0.69). This relationship persisted for depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety/stress and in neighborhoods with a NatureScore above 80 (p < 0.001). Compared to neighborhoods with a NatureScore below 40, those above 80 had significantly lower depression (aRR 0.68, 95%CI 0.49-0.95) and bipolar (aRR 0.59, 95%CI 0.36-0.99) health encounters after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors. This novel approach, utilizing NatureScore as a proxy for urban greenness, demonstrates the correlation between a higher NatureScore and reduced mental health utilization. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating nature into our healthcare strategies to promote well-being and mental health.

Poor haemorrhagic stroke outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic are driven by socioeconomic disparities: analysis of nationally representative data.

Background: Nationally representative studies evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on haemorrhagic stroke outcomes are lacking. Methods: In this pooled cross-sectional analysis, we identified adults (≥18 years) with primary intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) or subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) from the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020). We evaluated differences in rates of in-hospital outcomes between the prepandemic (January 2016-February 2020) and pandemic (March-December 2020) periods using segmented logistic regression models. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate differences in mortality between patients admitted from April to December 2020, with and without COVID-19, and those admitted from April to December 2019. Stratified analyses were conducted among patients residing in low-income and high-income zip codes, as well as among patients with extreme loss of function (E-LoF) and those with minor to major loss of function (MM-LoF). Results: Overall, 309 965 patients with ICH (47% female, 56% low income) and 112 210 patients with SAH (62% female, 55% low income) were analysed. Prepandemic, ICH mortality decreased by ~1% per month (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 0.99 (0.99 to 1.00); p<0.001). However, during the pandemic, the overall ICH mortality rate increased, relative to prepandemic, by ~2% per month (1.02 (1.00 to 1.04), p<0.05) and ~4% per month (1.04 (1.01 to 1.07), p<0.001) among low-income patients. There was no significant change in trend among high-income patients with ICH (1.00 (0.97 to 1.03)). Patients with comorbid COVID-19 in 2020 had higher odds of mortality (versus 2019 cohort) only among patients with MM-LoF (ICH, 2.15 (1.12 to 4.16), and SAH, 5.77 (1.57 to 21.17)), but not among patients with E-LoF. Conclusion: Sustained efforts are needed to address socioeconomic disparities in healthcare access, quality and outcomes during public health emergencies.

Cumulative social disadvantage and health-related quality of life: national health interview survey 2013-2017.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the association between social determinants of health (SDoH) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is largely based on single SDoH measures, with limited evaluation of cumulative social disadvantage. We examined the association between cumulative social disadvantage and the Health and Activity Limitation Index (HALex). METHODS: Using adult data from the National Health Interview Survey (2013-2017), we created a cumulative disadvantage index by aggregating 47 deprivations across 6 SDoH domains. Respondents were ranked using cumulative SDoH index quartiles (SDoH-Q1 to Q4), with higher quartile groups being more disadvantaged. We used two-part models for continuous HALex scores and logistic regression for poor HALex (< 20th percentile score) to examine HALex differences associated with cumulative disadvantage. Lower HALex scores implied poorer HRQoL performance. RESULTS: The study sample included 156,182 respondents, representing 232.8 million adults in the United States (mean age 46 years; 51.7% women). The mean HALex score was 0.85 and 17.7% had poor HALex. Higher SDoH quartile groups had poorer HALex performance (lower scores and increased prevalence of poor HALex). A unit increase in SDoH index was associated with - 0.010 (95% CI [-0.011, -0.010]) difference in HALex score and 20% higher odds of poor HALex (odds ratio, OR = 1.20; 95% CI [1.19, 1.21]). Relative to SDoH-Q1, SDoH-Q4 was associated with HALex score difference of -0.086 (95% CI [-0.089, -0.083]) and OR = 5.32 (95% CI [4.97, 5.70]) for poor HALex. Despite a higher burden of cumulative social disadvantage, Hispanics had a weaker SDoH-HALex association than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative social disadvantage was associated with poorer HALex performance in an incremental fashion. Innovations to incorporate SDoH-screening tools into clinical decision systems must continue in order to accurately identify socially vulnerable groups in need of both clinical risk mitigation and social support. To maximize health returns, policies can be tailored through community partnerships to address systemic barriers that exist within distinct sociodemographic groups, as well as demographic differences in health perception and healthcare experience.

Minimally Invasive Surgery With Thrombolysis for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation: Bayesian Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can extend the value of trial data beyond interpretations based on conventional p value-based binary cutoffs. We conducted an exploratory post hoc Bayesian reanalysis of the minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) evacuation (MISTIE-3) trial and derived probabilities of potential intervention effect on functional and survival outcomes. METHODS: MISTIE-3 was a multicenter phase 3 RCT designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the MISTIE intervention. Five hundred and six adults (18 years or older) with spontaneous, nontraumatic, supratentorial ICH of ≥30 mL were randomized to receive either the MISTIE intervention (n = 255) or standard medical care (n = 251). We provide Bayesian-derived estimates of the effect of the MISTIE intervention on achieving a good 365-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS score 0-3) as relative risk (RR) and absolute risk difference (ARD), and the probabilities that these treatment effects are greater than prespecified thresholds. We used 2 sets of prior distributions: (1) reference priors, including minimally informative, enthusiastic, and skeptical priors, and (2) data-derived prior distribution, using a hierarchical random effects model. We additionally evaluated the potential effects of the MISTIE intervention on 180-day and 30-day mRS and 365-, 180-, and 30-day mortality using data-derived priors. RESULTS: The Bayesian-derived probability that MISTIE intervention has any beneficial effect (RR >1) on achieving a good 365-day mRS score was 70% using minimally informative prior, 87% with enthusiastic prior, 68% with skeptical prior, and 73% with data-derived prior. However, these probabilities were ≤55% for RR >1.10 and 0% for RR >1.52 across a range of priors. The probabilities of achieving RR >1 for 180- and 30-day mRS scores are 65% and 80%, respectively. Furthermore, the probabilities of achieving RR <1 for 365-, 180-, and 30-day mortality are 93%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our exploratory analyses indicate that across a range of priors, the Bayesian-derived probability of MISTIE intervention having any beneficial effect on 365-day mRS for patients with ICH is between 68% and 87%. These analyses do not change the frequentist-based interpretation of the trial. However, unlike the frequentist p values, which indirectly evaluate treatment effects and only provide an arbitrary binary cutoff (such as 0.05), the Bayesian framework directly estimates the probabilities of potential treatment effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01827046. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) + recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) does not significantly improve functional outcome in patients with ICH. However, this study lacks the precision to exclude a potential benefit of MIS + rt-PA.

Seasonal variation in the incidence of primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a 16-year nationwide analysis.

Introduction: Data on nationwide trends and seasonal variations in the incidence of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) in the United States (US) are lacking. Methods: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2004-2019) and Census Bureau data to calculate the quarterly (Q1:January-March; Q2:April-June; Q3:July-September; Q4:October-December) incidence rates (IR) of adult (≥18 years) ICH hospitalizations, aggregated across Q1-Q4 and Q2-Q3. We report adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for differences in the quarterly incidence of ICH, as compared to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), between Q1Q4 and Q2Q3 using a multivariable Poisson regression model. We additionally performed stratified analyses across the four US regions. Results: Among 822,143 (49.0% female) ICH and 6,266,234 (51.9% female) AIS hospitalizations, the average quarterly crude IR of ICH was consistently higher in Q1Q4 compared to Q2Q3 (5.6 vs. 5.2 per 100,000) (aIRR, CI: 1.09, 1.08-1.11)-this pattern was similar across all four US regions. However, a similar variation pattern was not observed for AIS incidence. The incidence (aIRR, CI) of both ICH (1.01, 1.00-1.02) and AIS (1.03, 1.02-1.03) is rising. Conclusion: Unlike AIS, ICH incidence is consistently higher in colder quarters, underscoring the need for evaluation and prevention of factors driving seasonal variations in ICH incidence.

Lifelong cerebrovascular disease burden among CADASIL patients: analysis from a global health research network.

Introduction: Data reporting on patients with Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) within the United States population is limited. We sought to evaluate the overt cerebrovascular disease burden among patients with CADASIL. Methods: Harmonized electronic medical records were extracted from the TriNetX global health research network. CADASIL patients were identified using diagnostic codes and those with/without history of documented stroke sub-types (ischemic stroke [IS], intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH] and transient ischemic attack [TIA]) were compared. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of stroke incidence and mortality associated with sex were computed. Results: Between September 2018 and April 2020, 914 CADASIL patients were identified (median [IQR] age: 60 [50-69], 61.3% females); of whom 596 (65.2%) had documented cerebrovascular events (i.e., CADASIL-Stroke patients). Among CADASIL-Stroke patients, 89.4% experienced an IS, co-existing with TIAs in 27.7% and hemorrhagic strokes in 6.2%; initial stroke events occurred ≤65 years of age in 71% of patients. CADASIL-Stroke patients (vs. CADASIL-non-Stroke) had higher cardiovascular and neurological (migraines, cognitive impairment, epilepsy/seizures, mood disorders) burden. In age- and comorbidity-adjusted models, males had higher associated risk of stroke onset (OR: 1.37, CI: 1.01-1.86). Mortality risk was higher for males (OR: 2.72, CI: 1.53-4.84). Discussion: Early screening and targeted treatment strategies are warranted to help CADASIL patients with symptom management and risk mitigation.

A Neuro-Informatics Pipeline for Cerebrovascular Disease: Research Registry Development.

BACKGROUND: Although stroke is well recognized as a critical disease, treatment options are often limited. Inpatient stroke encounters carry critical information regarding the mechanisms of stroke and patient outcomes; however, these data are typically formatted to support administrative functions instead of research. To support improvements in the care of patients with stroke, a substantive research data platform is needed. OBJECTIVE: To advance a stroke-oriented learning health care system, we sought to establish a comprehensive research repository of stroke data using the Houston Methodist electronic health record (EHR) system. METHODS: Dedicated processes were developed to import EHR data of patients with primary acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), transient ischemic attack, and subarachnoid hemorrhage under a review board-approved protocol. Relevant patients were identified from discharge diagnosis codes and assigned registry patient identification numbers. For identified patients, extract, transform, and load processes imported EHR data of primary cerebrovascular disease admissions and available data from any previous or subsequent admissions. Data were loaded into patient-focused SQL objects to enable cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Primary data domains (admission details, comorbidities, laboratory data, medications, imaging data, and discharge characteristics) were loaded into separate relational tables unified by patient and encounter identification numbers. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and angiography images were retrieved. Imaging data from patients with ICH were assessed for hemorrhage characteristics and cerebral small vessel disease markers. Patient information needed to interface with other local and national databases was retained. Prospective patient outreach was established, with patients contacted via telephone to assess functional outcomes 30, 90, 180, and 365 days after discharge. Dashboards were constructed to provide investigators with data summaries to support access. RESULTS: The Registry of Neurological Endpoint Assessments among Patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke (REINAH) database was constructed as a series of relational category-specific SQL objects. Encounter summaries and dashboards were constructed to draw from these objects, providing visual data summaries for investigators seeking to build studies based on REINAH data. As of June 2022, the database contains 18,061 total patients, including 1809 (10.02%) with ICH, 13,444 (74.43%) with acute ischemic stroke, 1221 (6.76%) with subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 3165 (17.52%) with transient ischemic attack. Depending on the cohort, imaging data from computed tomography are available for 85.83% (1048/1221) to 98.4% (1780/1809) of patients, with magnetic resonance imaging available for 27.85% (340/1221) to 85.54% (11,500/13,444) of patients. Outcome assessment has successfully contacted 56.1% (240/428) of patients after ICH, with 71.3% (171/240) of responders providing consent for assessment. Responders reported a median modified Rankin Scale score of 3 at 90 days after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: A highly curated and clinically focused research platform for stroke data will establish a foundation for future research that may fundamentally improve poststroke patient care and outcomes.

Stroke severity mediates the effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on poor outcomes among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Background: Socioeconomic deprivation drives poor functional outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Stroke severity and background cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden have each been linked to socioeconomic status and independently contribute to worse outcomes after ICH, providing distinct, plausible pathways for the effects of deprivation. We investigate whether admission stroke severity or cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) mediates the effect of socioeconomic deprivation on 90-day functional outcomes. Methods: Electronic medical record data, including demographics, treatments, comorbidities, and physiological data, were analyzed. CSVD burden was graded from 0 to 4, with severe CSVD categorized as ≥3. High deprivation was assessed for patients in the top 30% of state-level area deprivation index scores. Severe disability or death was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6. Stroke severity (NIH stroke scale (NIHSS)) was classified as: none (0), minor (1-4), moderate (5-15), moderate-severe (16-20), and severe (21+). Univariate and multivariate associations with severe disability or death were determined, with mediation evaluated through structural equation modelling. Results: A total of 677 patients were included (46.8% female; 43.9% White, 27.0% Black, 20.7% Hispanic, 6.1% Asian, 2.4% Other). In univariable modelling, high deprivation (odds ratio: 1.54; 95% confidence interval: [1.06-2.23]; p = 0.024), severe CSVD (2.14 [1.42-3.21]; p < 0.001), moderate (8.03 [2.76-17.15]; p < 0.001), moderate-severe (32.79 [11.52-93.29]; p < 0.001), and severe stroke (104.19 [37.66-288.12]; p < 0.001) were associated with severe disability or death. In multivariable modelling, severe CSVD (3.42 [1.75-6.69]; p < 0.001) and moderate (5.84 [2.27-15.01], p < 0.001), moderate-severe (27.59 [7.34-103.69], p < 0.001), and severe stroke (36.41 [9.90-133.85]; p < 0.001) independently increased odds of severe disability or death; high deprivation did not. Stroke severity mediated 94.1% of deprivation's effect on severe disability or death (p = 0.005), while CSVD accounted for 4.9% (p = 0.524). Conclusion: CSVD contributed to poor functional outcome independent of socioeconomic deprivation, while stroke severity mediated the effects of deprivation. Improving awareness and trust among disadvantaged communities may reduce admission stroke severity and improve outcomes.

Geographic Disparities in Case Fatality and Discharge Disposition Among Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Background We evaluate nationwide trends and urban-rural disparities in case fatality (in-hospital mortality) and discharge dispositions among patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods and Results In this repeated cross-sectional study, we identified adult patients (≥18 years of age) with primary ICH from the National Inpatient Sample (2004-2018). Using a series of survey design Poisson regression models, with hospital location-time interaction, we report the adjusted risk ratio (aRR), 95% CI, and average marginal effect (AME) for factors associated with ICH case fatality and discharge dispositions. We performed a stratified analysis of each model among patients with extreme loss of function and minor to major loss of function. We identified 908 557 primary ICH hospitalizations (overall mean age [SD], 69.0 [15.0] years; 445 301 [49.0%] women; 49 884 [5.5%] rural ICH hospitalizations). The crude ICH case fatality rate was 25.3% (urban hospitals: 24.9%, rural hospitals:32.5%). Urban (versus rural) hospital patients had a lower likelihood of ICH case fatality (aRR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89]). ICH case fatality is declining over time; however, it is declining faster in urban hospitals (AME, -0.049 [95% CI, -0.051 to -0.047]) compared with rural hospitals (AME, -0.034 [95% CI, -0.040 to -0.027]). Conversely, home discharge is increasing significantly among urban hospitals (AME, 0.011 [95% CI, 0.008-0.014]) but not significantly changing in rural hospitals (AME, -0.001 [95% CI, -0.010 to 0.007]). Among patients with extreme loss of function, hospital location was not significantly associated with ICH case fatality or home discharge. Conclusions Improving access to neurocritical care resources, particularly in resource-limited communities, may reduce the ICH outcomes disparity gap.

Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies against postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of a COVID-19 observational registry for a diverse US metropolitan population.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective cohort study using a COVID-19 specific, electronic medical record-based surveillance and outcomes registry from an eight-hospital tertiary hospital system in the Houston metropolitan area. Analyses were replicated across a global research network database. PARTICIPANTS: We identified adult (≥18) patients with PASC. PASC was defined as experiencing constitutional (palpitations, malaise/fatigue, headache) or systemic (sleep disorder, shortness of breath, mood/anxiety disorders, cough and cognitive impairment) symptoms beyond the 28-day postinfection period. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We fit multivariable logistic regression models and report estimated likelihood of PASC associated with vaccination or mAb treatment as adjusted ORs with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Primary analyses included 53 239 subjects (54.9% female), of whom 5929, 11.1% (95% CI 10.9% to 11.4%), experienced PASC. Both vaccinated breakthrough cases (vs unvaccinated) and mAb-treated patients (vs untreated) had lower likelihoods for developing PASC, aOR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.52-0.66), and 0.77 (0.69-0.86), respectively. Vaccination was associated with decreased odds of developing all constitutional and systemic symptoms except for taste and smell changes. For all symptoms, vaccination was associated with lower likelihood of experiencing PASC compared with mAb treatment. Replication analysis found identical frequency of PASC (11.2%, 95% CI 11.1 to 11.3) and similar protective effects against PASC for the COVID-19 vaccine: 0.25 (0.21-0.30) and mAb treatment: 0.62 (0.59-0.66). CONCLUSION: Although both COVID-19 vaccines and mAbs decreased the likelihood of PASC, vaccination remains the most effective tool for the prevention of long-term consequences of COVID-19.

Favorable Neighborhood Walkability is Associated With Lower Burden of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Patients Within an Integrated Health System: The Houston Methodist Learning Health System Outpatient Registry.

This is the first study to investigate the relationship between neighborhood walkability and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in the United States using a large population-based database. Cross-sectional study using data from 1.1 million patients over the age of 18 in the Houston Methodist Learning Health System Outpatient Registry (2016-2022). Using the 2019 WalkScore, patients were assigned to one of the 4 neighborhood walkability categories. The burden of CV risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and smoking) was defined as poor, average, or optimal (>3, 1-2, 0 risk factors, respectively). We included 887,654 patients, of which 86% resided in the two least walkable neighborhoods. The prevalence of CV risk factors was significantly lower among participants in the most walkable neighborhoods irrespective of ASCVD status. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors, we found that adults living in the most walkable neighborhoods were more likely to have optimal CV risk profile than those in the least walkable ones (RRR 2.77, 95% CI 2.64-2.91). We observed an inverse association between neighborhood walkability and the burden of CV risk factors. These findings support multilevel health system stakeholder engagements and investments in walkable neighborhoods as a viable tool for mitigating the growing burden of modifiable CV risk factors.

COVID-19 associated disruptions in routine health care of people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia.

Introduction: We report the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on health-care use disruption among people with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (MCI/ADRD). Methods: We compared the pandemic-period health-care use between MCI/ADRD and matched non-MCI/ADRD patients. Using 4-year pre-pandemic data, we modeled three health-care use types (inpatient, outpatient, emergency encounters) to predict pandemic-period use, disaggregated for lockdown and post-lockdown periods. Observed health-care use was compared to the predicted. Proportional differences (confidence intervals) are reported. Results: Both MCI/ADRD and non-MCI/ADRD patients (n = 5479 each) experienced pandemic-related health-care use disruptions, which were significantly larger for the MCI/ADRD group for outpatient, -13.2% (-16.2%, -10.2%), and inpatient encounters, -12.8% (-18.4%, -7.3%). Large health-care disruptions during lockdown were similar for both groups. However, post-lockdown outpatient, -14.4% (-17.3%, -11.5%), and inpatient, -15.2% (-21.0%, -9.5%), disruptions were significantly greater for MCI/ADRD patients. Conclusion: MCI/ADRD patients experienced greater and sustained pandemic-related health-care use disruptions, highlighting the need for robust strategies to sustain their essential health care during pandemic-like catastrophes.

Sex differences in post-stroke cognitive decline: A population-based longitudinal study of nationally representative data.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in post-stroke cognitive decline have not been systematically evaluated in a nationally representative cohort. We use a quasi-experimental design to investigate sex differences in rate of post-stroke cognitive decline. METHODS: Utilizing the event study design, we use the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data (1996-2016) to evaluate the differences (percentage points [95% Confidence interval]) in the rate of change in cognitive function, measured using the modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) score, before and after incident stroke, and among patients with and without incident stroke. We estimated this event study model for the overall study population and separately fit the same model for male and female participants. RESULTS: Of 25,872 HRS participants included in our study, 14,459 (55.9%) were females with an overall mean age (SD) of 61.2 (9.3) years. Overall, 2,911 (11.3%) participants reported experiencing incident stroke. Participants with incident stroke (vs. no stroke) had lower baseline TICS-m score (15.6 vs. 16.1). Among participants with incident stroke, the mean pre-stroke TICS-m score was higher than the mean post-stroke TICS-m score (14.9 vs. 12.7). Event study revealed a significant short-term acceleration of cognitive decline for the overall population (4.2 [1.7-6.6] percentage points, p value = 0.001) and among female participants (5.0 [1.7-8.3] percentage points, p value = 0.003). We, however, found no evidence of long-term acceleration of cognitive decline after stroke. Moreover, among males, incident stroke was not associated with significant changes in rate of post-stroke cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: Females, in contrast to males, experience post-stroke cognitive deficits, particularly during early post-stroke period. Identifying the sex-specific stroke characteristics contributing to differences in post stroke cognitive decline may inform future strategies for reducing the burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment and dementia.

Contemporary Trends in the Nationwide Incidence of Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: We report contemporary trends in nationwide incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) across demographic and regional strata over a 15-year period. METHODS: Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2004-2018) and US Census Bureau data, we calculated ICH incidence rates for age, race/ethnicity, sex, and hospital region sub-cohorts across 5 consecutive 3-year periods (2004-2006 to 2016-2018). We fit Poisson and log binomial regression models to evaluate demographic and regional differences in ICH incidence and trends in prevalence of hypertension and past/current anticoagulant use among hospitalized ICH patients. RESULTS: Overall, the annual incidence rate (95% CI) of ICH per 100 000 was 23.15 (23.10-23.20). The 3-year incidence of ICH (per 100 000) increased from 62.79 in 2004 to 2006 to 78.86 in 2016 to 2018 (adjusted incidence rate ratio, CI: 1.11 [1.02-1.20]), coinciding with increased 3-year prevalence of hypertension and anticoagulant use among hospitalized ICH patients (adjusted risk ratio, CI: hypertension-1.16 [1.15-1.17]; anticoagulant use-2.30 [2.14-2.47]). We found a significant age-time interaction, whereby ICH incidence increased significantly faster among those aged 18 to 44 years (adjusted incidence rate ratio, CI: 1.10 [1.05-1.14]) and 45 to 64 years (adjusted incidence rate ratio, CI: 1.08 [1.03-1.13]), relative to those aged ≥75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Rising ICH incidence among young and middle-aged Americans warrants ICH prevention strategies targeting these economically productive age groups.

Impact of mRNA vaccines in curtailing SARS-CoV-2 infection and disability leave utilisation among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional analysis from a tertiary healthcare system in the Greater Houston metropolitan area.

OBJECTIVES: We provide an account of real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers (HCWs) at a tertiary healthcare system and report trends in SARS-CoV-2 infections and subsequent utilisation of COVID-19-specific short-term disability leave (STDL). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Summary data on 27 291 employees at a tertiary healthcare system in the Greater Houston metropolitan area between 15 December 2020 and 5 June 2021. The initial 12-week vaccination programme period (15 December 2020 to 6 March 2021) was defined as a rapid roll-out phase. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: At the pandemic onset, HCW testing and surveillance was conducted where SARS-CoV-2-positive HCWs were offered STDL. Deidentified summary data of SARS-CoV-2 infections and STDL utilisation among HCWs were analysed. Prevaccination and postvaccination trends in SARS-CoV-2 positivity and STDL utilisation rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Updated for 5 June 2021, 98.2% (n=26 791) of employees received a full or partial dose of one of the approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The vaccination rate during the rapid roll-out phase was approximately 3700 doses/7 days. The overall mean weekly SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates among HCWs were significantly lower following vaccine roll-out (2.4%), compared with prevaccination period (11.8%, p<0.001). An accompanying 69.8% decline in STDL utilisation was also observed (315 to 95 weekly leaves). During the rapid roll-out phase, SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate among Houston Methodist HCWs declined by 84.3% (8.9% to 1.4% positivity rate), compared with a 54.7% (12.8% to 5.8% positivity rate) decline in the Houston metropolitan area. CONCLUSION: Despite limited generalisability of regional hospital-based studies-where factors such as the emergence of viral variants and population-level vaccine penetrance may differ-accounts of robust HCW vaccination programmes provide important guidance for sustaining a critical resource to provide safe and effective care for patients with and without COVID-19 across healthcare systems.

Cognitive Impairment After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is commonly observed after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). While a growing number of studies have explored this association, several evidence gaps persist. This review seeks to investigate the relationship between CI and ICH. Methods: A two-stage systematic review of research articles, clinical trials, and case series was performed. Initial search used the keywords ["Intracerebral hemorrhage" OR "ICH"] AND ["Cognitive Impairment" OR "Dementia OR "Cognitive Decline"] within the PubMed (last accessed November 3rd, 2020) and ScienceDirect (last accessed October 27th, 2020) databases, without publication date limits. Articles that addressed CI and spontaneous ICH were accepted if CI was assessed after ICH. Articles were rejected if they did not independently address an adult human population or spontaneous ICH, didn't link CI to ICH, were an unrelated document type, or were not written in English. A secondary snowball literature search was performed using reviews identified by the initial search. The Agency for Healthcare research and Quality's assessment tool was used to evaluate bias within studies. Rates of CI and contributory factors were investigated. Results: Search yielded 32 articles that collectively included 22,631 patients. Present evidence indicates a high rate of post-ICH CI (65-84%) in the acute phase (<4 weeks) which is relatively lower at 3 (17.3-40.2%) and 6 months (19-63.3%). Longer term follow-up (≥1 year) demonstrates a gradual increase in CI. Advanced age, female sex, and prior stroke were associated with higher rates of CI. Associations between post-ICH CI and cerebral microbleeds, superficial siderosis, and ICH volume also exist. Pre-ICH cognitive assessment was missing in 28% of included studies. The Mini Mental State Evaluation (44%) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (16%) were the most common cognitive assessments, albeit with variable thresholds and definitions. Studies rarely (<10%) addressed racial and ethnic disparities. Discussion: Current findings suggest a dynamic course of post-ICH cognitive impairment that may depend on genetic, sociodemographic and clinical factors. Methodological heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis, limiting results. There is a need for the methodologies and time points of post-ICH cognitive assessments to be harmonized across diverse clinical and demographic populations.

National Trends in Transfer of Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Analysis of 12-Year Nationwide Data.

OBJECTIVES: The guidelines of the American Hospital Association encourage transferring intracerebral hemorrhage patients from community hospitals to centers with stroke expertise. However, research on the differences in outcomes between transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations and directly admitted hospitalizations have been largely limited to small single-center studies. In this study, we explored the national trends in transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations, as well as evaluated the differences, in terms of demographic characteristics, co-morbidity, resource utilization, and outcomes, between transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations and directly admitted hospitalizations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the National Inpatient Sample (2004 - 2016), we assessed the linear trends in the proportion of interhospital transfers for intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations. We constructed a series of multivariate logistic regression models to explore the association of transfer status with inpatient mortality and discharge disposition, controlling for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics. We used survey design variables to report nationally weighted estimates. RESULTS: Among 786,999 hospitalizations, 137,340 (17.5%, 95% CI: 16.4-18.6) were transferred. Overall, interhospital transfers for intracerebral hemorrhage has been increasing over the 12-year period of this study. Patients in transferred hospitalizations were younger, more likely to be white, and more likely to have private insurance. Transferred hospitalizations were associated with significantly lower adjusted odds of inpatient mortality, compared to directly admitted hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: As the US healthcare system continues shifting towards value-based care, evidence on the short- and long-term outcomes of transfer of intracerebral hemorrhage patients will inform optimal management of intracerebral hemorrhage patients.

SARS-CoV-2 Susceptibility and COVID-19 Mortality Among Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Cross-Sectional Analysis From Hospital Records in a Diverse US Metropolitan Area.

Introduction: Persistent knowledge gaps exist as to the extent that preexisting cognitive impairment is a risk factor for susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and mortality from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adults tested for SARS-CoV-2 at a tertiary healthcare system. Cognitive impairment was identified utilizing diagnosis codes (mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, vascular, and other dementias) or cognitive impairment-specific medication use. Propensity score (PS) matched analyses were utilized to report odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for association of cognitive impairment with SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility and COVID-19 mortality. Results: Between March-3rd and December-11th, 2020, 179,979 adults were tested, of whom 21,607 (12.0%) tested positive. We identified 6,364 individuals with preexisting cognitive impairment (mean age: 78.5 years, 56.8% females), among whom 843 (13.2%) tested positive and 139 (19.5%) of those hospitalized died. In the pre-PS matched cohort, cognitive impairment was significantly associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility (OR, CI: 1.12, 1.04-1.21) and COVID-19 mortality (OR, CI: 2.54, 2.07-3.12). One-to-one matches were identified for 6,192 of 6,364 (97.3%) individuals with prior cognitive impairment and 687 of 712 (96.5%) hospitalized patients with prior cognitive impairment. In the fully balanced post-matched cohort, preexisting cognitive impairment was significantly associated with higher likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR, CI: 1.51, 1.35-1.70); however, cognitive impairment did not confer higher risk of COVID-19 mortality (OR, CI: 0.96, 0.73-1.25). Discussion: To mitigate the effects of healthcare catastrophes such as the COVID-19 pandemic, strategies for targeted prevention and risk-stratified comorbidity management are warranted among the vulnerable sub-population living with cognitive impairment.

Disparities in COVID-19 hospitalizations and mortality among black and Hispanic patients: cross-sectional analysis from the greater Houston metropolitan area.

BACKGROUND: Disparate racial/ethnic burdens of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may be attributable to higher susceptibility to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or to factors such as differences in hospitalization and care provision. METHODS: In our cross-sectional analysis of lab-confirmed COVID-19 cases from a tertiary, eight-hospital healthcare system across greater Houston, multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate hospitalization and mortality odds for non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) vs. non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) and Hispanics vs. non-Hispanics. RESULTS: Between March 3rd and July 18th, 2020, 70,496 individuals were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 12,084 (17.1%) tested positive, of whom 3536 (29.3%) were hospitalized. Among positive cases, NHBs and Hispanics were significantly younger than NHWs and Hispanics, respectively (mean age NHBs vs. NHWs: 46.0 vs. 51.7 years; p < 0.001 and Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic: 44.0 vs. 48.7 years; p < 0.001). Despite younger age, NHBs (vs. NHWs) had a higher prevalence of diabetes (25.2% vs. 17.6%; p < 0.001), hypertension (47.7% vs. 43.1%; p < 0.001), and chronic kidney disease (5.0% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.001). Both minority groups resided in lower median income (median income [USD]; NHBs vs. NHWs: 63,489 vs. 75,793; p < 0.001, Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic: 59,104 vs. 68,318; p < 0.001) and higher population density areas (median population density [per square mile]; NHBs vs. NHWs: 3257 vs. 2742; p < 0.001, Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic: 3381 vs. 2884; p < 0.001). In fully adjusted models, NHBs (vs. NHWs) and Hispanics (vs. non-Hispanic) had higher likelihoods of hospitalization, aOR (95% CI): 1.42 (1.24-1.63) and 1.61 (1.46-1.78), respectively. No differences were observed in intensive care unit (ICU) utilization or treatment parameters. Models adjusted for demographics, vital signs, laboratory parameters, hospital complications, and ICU admission vital signs demonstrated non-significantly lower likelihoods of in-hospital mortality among NHBs and Hispanic patients, aOR (95% CI): 0.65 (0.40-1.03) and 0.89 (0.59-1.31), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data did not demonstrate racial and ethnic differences in care provision and hospital outcomes. Higher susceptibility of racial and ethnic minorities to SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent hospitalization may be driven primarily by social determinants.