Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome. CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21 [7]/46,XY [33]. At 23 weeks of gestation, repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21 [4]/46,XY [22], and cord blood sampling revealed the karyotype of 47,XY,+21 [5]/46,XY [35]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded UPD 21, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.3, consistent with 30% mosaicism for trisomy 21. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 43.8% (35/80 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 3,340-g male baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation. The cord blood had a karyotypes of 46,XY (40/40 cells). QF-PCR on placenta showed mosaic trisomy 21. When follow-up at age three months, the neonate was normal in phenotype and development. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells showed 9% (10/101 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21, compared with 0% (0/100 cells) in the normal control. CONCLUSION: Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

High-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46,X,+mar at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing for Turner syndrome, normal male external genitalia and positive SRY in the fetus, a favorable fetal outcome, postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.

OBJECTIVE: We present high-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46,X,+mar at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Turner syndrome, normal male external genitalia and positive SRY in the fetus, a favorable fetal outcome, postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues. CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of positive NIPT for Turner syndrome (Z score = -11.72 for X chromosome) at 10 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X[13]/46,X,+mar[8]. Simultaneous molecular analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the results of arr (X) × 1, (Yp) × 0-1 (0.63), (Yq) × 0, (1-22) × 2 in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and rsa(X) × 1, Yp11.31 × 0-1, Yq11.21 × 0, (13, 18, 21) × 2 in multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). The parental karyotypes were normal. Prenatal ultrasound revealed normal male external genitalia. She was referred for genetic counseling, and continuing pregnancy was advised. A 2875-g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation with normal male external genitalia. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 46,X,+mar[27]/45,X[13], 46,X,+mar[24]/45,X[16] and 45,X[22]/46,X,+mar[18], respectively. SRY testing on cord blood revealed a positive result. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was normal in development. The karyotype of peripheral blood was 46,X,+mar[25]/45,X[13]/46,X,idic r(Y) [2]. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 103 buccal mucosal cells using Yp11.2-specific probe RP11-119E4 and Xp22.31-specific probe RP11-143E20 showed that 90 cells (90/103 = 87%) had double Yp signals, 3 cells (3/103 = 3%) had single Yp signal and 10 cells (10/103 = 10%) had no Yp signal. CONCLUSION: High-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46,X,+mar at amniocentesis with positive Yp and SRY can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome, postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive NIPT and CVS results for trisomy 2, maternal uniparental disomy 2, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, intrauterine growth restriction and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) results for trisomy 2, maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 2, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a favorable fetal outcome. CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because both NIPT at 9 weeks of gestation and CVS at 11 weeks of gestation revealed trisomy 2. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+2[11]/46,XY[19]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. She was referred to the hospital for genetic counseling at 20 weeks of gestation, and repeat amniocentesis performed at 24 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XY (22/22 colonies). The parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods revealed maternal uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 2. Simultaneous molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes showed the results of arr 2p25.3q37.3 × 2.4 with a log2 ratio = 0.26, consistent with 40% mosaicism for trisomy 2 by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and 28% (28/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 2 by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Despite IUGR on fetal ultrasound, the woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a 2252-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 46,XY (40/40 colonies), 46,XY (40/40 colonies) and 47,XY,+2[9]/46,XY[31], respectively. QF-PCR analysis on cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta confirmed uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 2 in the cord blood and umbilical cord, and maternal origin of trisomy 2 in the placenta. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells at age 1.5 months revealed 8.7% (9/104 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 2. When follow-up at age four months, the neonate manifested a normal phenotype except intermittent hypoventilation. Molecular analysis of the PHOX2B gene revealed a normal result. When follow-up at age one year, he manifested normal development. CONCLUSION: Mosaic trisomy 2 at prenatal diagnosis should alert the possibility of UPD 2 and include a UPD 2 testing. Low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis can be associated with perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a positive NIPT result suspicious of trisomy 13, a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result suspicious of trisomy 13, a chorionic villus sampling (CVS) result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome. CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation because of a positive NIPT result (Z-score = 20.9, positive ≥3) suspicious of trisomy 13 at 11 weeks of gestation and a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13 at 14 weeks of gestation. At 14 weeks of gestation, CVS revealed the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) result of rea X,Y (P095) × 1, 13 (P095) × 3, 18,21 (P095) × 2/X,Y (P095) × 1, 13,18,21 (P095) × 2 and a karyotype of 48,XY,+13,+mar [9]/47,XY,+mar[16]. She was referred to the hospital for genetic counseling at 15 weeks of gestation, and cytogenetic analysis of parental blood revealed 47,XY,+mar in the father and 46, XX in the mother. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on the paternal blood showed that the extra dicentric marker was derived from chromosome 15 without the locus SNRPN (15q11.2), and the result was 47,XY,+mar.ish dic(15) (D15Z1++, SNRPN-, PML-)[20]. Amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar pat (20/20). Simultaneous interphase FISH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 32% (32/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 13. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis using the DNA extracted from the parental bloods and uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 13. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 2708-g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation, The cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta had the karyotypes of 47,XY,+mar pat and did not have UPD 13. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells detected 5.3% (5/95 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 13, compared with 0% in the normal control. CONCLUSION: Low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis can be associated with a positive NIPT result suspicious of trisomy 13, a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome.

Mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 16, placental trisomy 16, intrauterine growth restriction, intrauterine fetal death, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, and prenatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.

OBJECTIVE: We present mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 16, placental trisomy 16, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, and prenatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line. CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of positive NIPT for trisomy 16 at 12 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [10]/46,XX[17], and simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (16) × 3 [0.43] consistent with 43% mosaicism for trisomy 16. She was referred for genetic counseling at 19 weeks of gestation, and a fetus with IUGR was noted to have a size equivalent to 16 weeks of gestation. At 23 weeks of gestation, the fetus manifested oligohydramnios, fetal cardiomegaly and severe IUGR (fetal size equivalent to 20 weeks of gestation). Repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX (20/20 colonies) in cultured amniocytes and mosaic trisomy 16 by aCGH in uncultured amniocytes. aCGH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 16p13.3q24.3 × 2.3, consistent with 30% (log2 ratio = 0.2) mosaicism for trisomy 16. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays on the DNA extracted from parental bloods and uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 16. The parental karyotypes were normal. IUFD was noted at amniocentesis. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a 288-g female fetus was delivered with no phenotypic abnormalities. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 46,XX (40/40 cells), and the placenta had a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 (40/40 cells). QF-PCR assays of the placenta confirmed a maternal origin of trisomy 16. CONCLUSION: Mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis can be associated with positive NIPT for trisomy 16, placental trisomy 16, IUGR, IUFD, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, and prenatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of del(X)(p22.33)mat and de novo dup(4)(q34.3q35.2) in a male fetus with multiple anomalies of facial dysmorphism, ventriculomegaly, congenital heart defects, short long bones and clinodactyly.

OBJECTIVE: We present molecular cytogenetic characterization of del(X) (p22.33)mat and de novo dup(4) (q34.3q35.2) in a male fetus with multiple anomalies of facial dysmorphism, ventriculomegaly, congenital heart defects, short long bones and clinodactyly. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old, gravida 3, para 1, woman with short stature (152 cm) underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,Y,del(X)(p22.33)mat, dup(4)(q34.3q35.2). The mother had a karyotype of 46,X,del(X)(p22.33). Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from cultured amniocytes revealed arr Xp22.33 × 0, 4q34.3q35.2 × 3. Prenatal ultrasound at 23 weeks of gestation revealed multiple anomalies of flat nasal bridge, ventriculomegaly, atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) and clinodactyly. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism. Cytogenetic analysis of the umbilical cord revealed 46,Y,del(X)(p22.33)mat, dup(4)(q34.3q35.2)dn. aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from the umbilical cord revealed arr [GRCh37 (hg19)] 4q34.3q35.2 (181,149,823-188,191,938) × 3.0, arr Xp22.33 (470,485-2,985,006) × 0 with a 7.042-Mb duplication of 4q34.3-q35.2 and a 2.514-Mb deletion of Xp22.33. CONCLUSION: A male fetus with del(X)(p22.33) and dup(4)(q34.3q35.2) may present congenital heart defects and short long bones on prenatal ultrasound.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis associated with a positive non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 9, maternal uniparental disomy 9, intrauterine growth restriction and a favorable fetal outcome in a pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis associated with a positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 9, maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 9, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a favorable fetal outcome in a pregnancy. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old, gravida 3, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of NIPT at 10 weeks of gestation suspicious of trisomy 9 in the fetus. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9 [2]/46,XY[23]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (1-22) × 2, (X,Y) × 1 and detected no genomic imbalance. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis showed maternal uniparental heterodisomy 9 in the amniocytes. Prenatal ultrasound was normal. The woman was referred for genetic counseling at 22 weeks of gestation. The soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFlt)/placental growth factor (PlGF) = 13.1 (normal < 38). There was no gestational hypertension. Continuing the pregnancy was advised. No repeat amniocentesis was performed because of persistent irregular contractions. IUGR was noted. A 2156-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered at 37 weeks of gestation. The cord blood and umbilical cord had a karyotype of 46,XY (40/40 cells). The placenta had a karyotype of 47,XY,+9 (40/40 cells). The parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) on the DNA extracted from parental bloods, cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta revealed maternal uniparental heterodisomy 9 in cord blood and umbilical cord, and trisomy 9 of maternal origin in placenta. When follow-up at age three months, the neonate was normal in development and phenotype. The buccal mucosal cells had 3% (3/101 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 9 by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. CONCLUSION: Mosaic trisomy 9 at prenatal diagnosis should alert the possibility of UPD 9 and include a UPD 9 testing. Low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis can be associated with UPD 9 and a favorable fetal outcome.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome, intrauterine growth restriction, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[11]/46,XY[32], and simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (X,Y) × 1, (1-22) × 2 without genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. Repeat amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[5]/46,XY[19], and simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 9p24.3q34.3 × 2.1 (log2 ratio = 0.1) compatible with 10-15% mosaicism for trisomy 9. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 9. A third amniocentesis at 29 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[5]/46,XY[18], and simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 9p24.3q34.3 × 2.1 (log2 ratio = 0.1) compatible with 10-15% mosaicism for trisomy 9. Interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 9% (9/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 9. IUGR was noted on prenatal ultrasound. The pregnancy was carried to 38 weeks of gestation, and a 2375-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered. The karyotypes of umbilical cord, cord blood and placenta were 46,XY (40/40 cells), 47,XY,+9[1]/46,XY[39] and 47,XY,+9[12]/46,XY[28], respectively. QF-PCR assays on placenta showed trisomy 9 of maternal origin. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was normal in development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XY (40/40 cells), and the buccal mucosal cells had 7.5% (8/106 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 9 by interphase FISH analysis. CONCLUSION: Low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 17 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured and uncultured amniocytes.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 17 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured and uncultured amniocytes. CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of an increased nuchal translucency thickness of 3 mm in the first trimester sonographic screening. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+17 [2]/46,XX [20]. Among 22 colonies of cultured amniocytes, two colonies had a karyotype of 47,XX,+17, whereas the rest 20 colonies had a karyotype of 46,XX. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (1-22,X) × 2 with no genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from the parental bloods and cultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 17. The woman was encouraged to continue the pregnancy. A normal 3178-g female baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation without any phenotypic abnormalities. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were all 46, XX (40/40 cells). When follow-up at age six months, the neonate was normal in physical and psychosomatic development. CONCLUSION: Low-level mosaic trisomy 17 at amniocentesis can be a transient and benign condition, and can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured and uncultured amniocytes.

Mosaic 45,X/46, XX at amniocentesis with high-level mosaicism for 45,X in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome and postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line.

OBJECTIVE: We present mosaic 45,X/46, XX at amniocentesis with high-level mosaicism for 45,X in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome and postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line. CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of the non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result of -4.82 Z score in sex chromosome at 12 weeks of gestation suggestive of Turner syndrome in the fetus. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X [18]/46,XX [15], and simultaneous multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes showed mosaic Turner syndrome. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. She was referred for genetic counseling at 24 weeks of gestation, and continuing pregnancy was encouraged. At 39 weeks of gestation, a 2550-g phenotypically normal female baby was delivered. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 45,X [24]/46,XX [16], 45,X [23]/46,XX [17] and 45,X [28]/46,X,del(X) (q23)[12], respectively. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal in development. The peripheral blood had a karyotypes of 45,X [16]/46,XX [24]. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 103 buccal mucosal cells showed normal disomy X signals in all cells. CONCLUSION: High-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46, XX at amniocentesis can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues, and postnatal decrease of the 45,X cell line.

Mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line.

OBJECTIVE: We present mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old woman underwent elective amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of anxiety, and the karyotype of cultured amniocytes was 47,XX,+21[4]/46,XX[13]. In 17 colonies of cultured amniocytes, four colonies had 47,XX,+21, while the other 13 colonies had 46,XX. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (21) × 3 [0.32] consistent with 32% mosaicism for trisomy 21. Repeat amniocentesis performed at 25 weeks of gestation revealed 47,XX,+21[4]/46,XX[24] with four colonies of 47,XX,+21 and 24 colonies of 46, XX on cultured amniocytes, and arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.25 by aCGH, 19.2% mosaicism for trisomy 21 (20/104 cells) by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and no uniparental disomy (UPD) 21 by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) on uncultured amniocytes. The parental karyotypes were normal, and prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. A phenotypically normal 2815-g female baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. Cytogenetic analysis on the cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta revealed the karyotype of 47,XX,+21[10]/46,XX[30]. 47,XX,+21[5]/46,XX[35] and 47,XX,+21[38]/46,XX[2], respectively. QF-PCR analysis on the DNA extracted from parental bloods, uncultured amniocytes, cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta confirmed a paternal origin of trisomy 21. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal, the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[6]/46,XX[34], and no trisomy 21 signals by interphase FISH was found on 100 buccal mucosal cells. When follow-up at age 13 months, the neonate was phenotypically normal, and the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[3]/46,XX[37]. CONCLUSION: Mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be a transient and benign condition, and the abnormal trisomy 21 cell line may decrease and disappear after birth.

Mosaic tetrasomy 9p at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.

OBJECTIVE: We present mosaic tetrasomy 9p at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissue. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old primigravid woman underwent elective amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of anxiety, and the karyotype of cultured amniocytes was 47,XX,+i (9) (p10)[20]/46,XX [55]. Cordocentesis was performed at 20 weeks of gestation, and the karyotype of cord blood was 47,XX,+i (9) (p10)[7]/46,XX [15]. She was referred for genetic counseling at 23 weeks of gestation, and repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+i (9) (p10)[1]/46,XX [16] with seven cells in one colony having tetrasomy 9p in cultured amniocytes, and in uncultured amniocytes, quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 9 and determined paternal origin of the extra i (9p), array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 9p24.3p13.1 × 3.0 consistent with 50% mosaicism for tetrasomy 9p, and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on uncultured amniocytes showed 22.6% (12/53 cells) mosaicism for tetrasomy 9p. A third amniocentesis at 27 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46, XX (10/10 colonies) in cultured amniocytes, and interphase FISH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 20% (20/100 cells) mosaicism for tetrasomy 9p. The parental karyotypes and prenatal ultrasound were normal. At 39 weeks of gestation, a phenotypically normal 3388-g female baby was delivered. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 47,XX,+idic (9) (q12)[19]/46,XX [21] or 47,XX,+idic (9) (pter→q12:q12→pter)[19]/46,XX [21], 47,XX,+idic (9) (q12)[1]/46,XX [39] and 47,XX,+idic (9) (q12)[4]/46,XX [36], respectively. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal, the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+idic (9) (q12)[18]/46,XX [22], and interphase FISH analysis on 100 buccal mucosal cells revealed 1% (1/100 cells) mosaicism for tetrasomy 9p. When follow-up at age seven months, the neonate was phenotypically normal, and the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+idic(9)(q12)[14]/46,XX[26]. CONCLUSION: Mosaic tetrasomy 9p at amniocentesis can be a transient and benign condition, and can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissue.

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo duplication of 2q12.2→q13 encompassing MALL, NPHP1, RGPD6 and BUB1.

OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo duplication of 2q12.2→q13 encompassing MALL, NPHP1, RGPD6 and BUB1. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(2) (q12.2q13). Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis revealed a 6.1-Mb 2q12.2q13 duplication. aCGH analysis of the parental bloods did not find such a duplication. Prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. After genetic counseling, the parents decided to terminate the pregnancy at 21 weeks of gestation, and a 420-g female fetus was delivered with no gross abnormalities. Postnatal cytogenetic analysis of the umbilical cord confirmed the prenatal diagnosis. The parental karyotypes were normal. aCGH analysis of the umbilical cord revealed the result of arr [GRCh37 (hg19)] 2q12.2q13 (107, 132, 950-113,065,779) × 3.0 with a 2q12.2→q13 duplication encompassing 20 OMIM genes including MALL, NPHP1, RGPD6 and BUB1. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis of quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) on the DNAs extracted from the umbilical cord and parental bloods confirmed a maternal origin of the duplication of 2q12.2→q13. CONCLUSION: Amniocentesis may incidentally detect a de novo chromosomal segmental duplication of maternal origin in the fetus. The genetic information acquired by molecular analyses such as aCGH and QF-PCR are useful for genetic counseling under such a circumstance.

Prenatal diagnosis of pseudomosaicism for trisomy 20 at amniocentesis with a negative non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis of pseudomosaicism for trisomy 20 at amniocentesis with a negative non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation, which revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[8]/46,XX[31]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1-22,X) × 2, consistent with no genomic imbalance. She was referred to the hospital for repeat amniocentesis at 23 weeks of gestation. At repeat amniocentesis, cultured amniocytes had a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[2]/46,XX[33]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes using SurePrint G3 Unrestricted CGH ISCA v2, 8 × 60 K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1-22,X) × 2, Y × 0. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) probes of RP11-266K16 [20q13.33; fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), spectrum green] and RP11-348I14 (20q11.1-q11.21; Texas Red, spectrum red) detected trisomy 20 signals in 4/104 uncultured amniocytes (3.8%), compared with 0/100 in the normal control. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis using the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy 20. NIPT analysis on maternal blood revealed a negative result without gene dosage increase in chromosome 20. The pregnancy was carried to term, and a healthy 2830-g female baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormality. Both cord blood and placenta had a karyotype of 46,XX. CONCLUSION: NIPT is useful for rapid differential diagnosis of pseudomosaicism from true mosaicism in case of mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis.

Cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 18 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome and maternal uniparental disomy 18.

OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 18 in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome and maternal uniparental disomy 18. CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old, primigravid woman underwent the first amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX [22/22] in cultured amniocytes, and 36% mosaicism for trisomy 18 and a maternally inherited Xp22.31 microdeletion by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in uncultured amniocytes. The second amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation revealed 47,XX,+18 [14]/46,XX [36] in cultured amniocytes and 36% mosaicism for trisomy 18 by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) P095 in cultured amniocytes. Prenatal ultrasound was normal. The parents were phenotypically normal. The third amniocentesis at 23 weeks of gestation revealed 47,XX,+18 [3]/46,XX [17] in cultured amniocytes, and in uncultured amniocytes, aCGH revealed 45%-50% mosaicism for trisomy 18, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed 36% (36/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 18, and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) showed mosaic maternal uniparental heterodisomy for chromosome 18 and mosaic trisomy 18 of maternal origin. The fourth amniocentesis at 32 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XX [20/20] in cultured amniocytes, and in uncultured amniocytes, aCGH revealed 50%-60% mosaicism for trisomy 18, FISH revealed 21.8% (22/101 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 18, and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) showed chromosome 18 gene dosage increase in the maternal blood. At 34 weeks of gestation, a 1480-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The cord blood had 47,XX,+18 [10]/46,XX [30]. The umbilical cord had 47,XX,+18 [4]/46,XX [36]. The placenta had 47,XX,+18 [40/40], and QF-PCR analysis confirmed trisomy 18 of maternal origin. When follow-up at age four months, the neonate was phenotypically normal, FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells revealed 2% (2/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 18, and the peripheral blood had 47,XX,+18 [18]/46,XX [22]. When follow-up at age eight months, the neonate had normal development, the peripheral blood had 47,XX,+18 [15]/46,XX [25], and the buccal mucosal cells showed maternal uniparental heterodisomy for chromosome 18. CONCLUSION: Cytogenetic discrepancy may occur between uncultured and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 18 at amniocentesis. Cultured amniocytes may present progressive decrease in the levels of mosaicism for trisomy 18 as the fetus grows. Mosaic trisomy 18 at amniocentesis can be associated with a favorable outcome.

Mosaic trisomy 18 at amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome in a pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 18 by amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome in a pregnancy. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old, gravida 4, para 2, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+18[6]/46,XX[17]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on uncultured amniocytes showed the result of 45% mosaicism for trisomy 18. At 25 weeks of gestation, the woman underwent repeat amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+18[10]/46,XX[24]. Simultaneous aCGH on uncultured amniocytes showed the result of arr 18p11.32q23 (148,963-78,012,829) × 2.3 [GRCh (hg19)] with a log2 ratio of 0.2-0.25 compatible with 30-38% mosaicism for trisomy 18. The parental karyotypes were normal. Prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on uncultured amniocytes showed 27% (27/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 18. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) on uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 18. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) analysis at 34 weeks of gestation revealed a significant gene dosage increase of chromosome 18 (29.95; normal control: -3.0-3.0). At 39 weeks of gestation, a 2840-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The cord blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+18[8]/46,XX[32]. The placenta was trisomy 18 of maternal origin. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 47,XX,+18[2]/46,XX[38]. At age 1½ months, the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+18[5]/46,XX[35], and FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells revealed 2% (2/102 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 18. When follow-up at age seven months, the neonate was phenotypically normal, and the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+18[1]/46,XX[39]. CONCLUSIONS: Mosaic trisomy 18 at amniocentesis without abnormal fetal ultrasound can be associated with a favorable outcome, and the abnormal trisomy 18 cell line may decrease progressively after birth.

High-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46, XY at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.

OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis of high-level mosaicism for 45,X by amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome. CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X[13]/46,XY[11]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of Yp11.3q11.21 × 0-1 [0.1], Yq11.21q11.23 × 0-1 [0.6]. At 19 weeks of gestation, she underwent the second amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 45,X[13]/46,XY[12], and aCGH and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) on uncultured amniocytes showed 37% mosaicism for Y-deleted cells. At 28 weeks of gestation, she underwent the third amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 45,X[25]/46,XY[25], and aCGH on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of Yq11.21q11.23 × 0.5, Yq11.23q12 × 0.7. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed that 16.67% (20/120 cells) were Y-deleted cells. The parental karyortypes and prenatal ultrasound were normal. At 37 weeks of gestation, a 2707-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered with normal male external genitalia. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 45,X[25]/46,XY[15], 45,X[18]/46,XY[22] and 45,X[25]/46,XY[15], respectively. When follow-up at age five months, the neonate was normal in external genitalia and physical development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 45,X[29]/46,XY[11], and FISH analysis on 100 buccal mucosal cells showed no abnormal signals. When follow-up at age 11 months, the neonate was physically normal, and the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 45,X[17]/46,XY[23]. CONCLUSION: High-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46, XY at amniocentesis can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome despite the presence of cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.

Cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic 46,XX,dup(9)(q22.3q34.1)/46,XX at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present our observation of cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic dup(9)(q22.3q34.1) at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old, gravida 4, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX, dup(9)(q22.3q34.1)[8]/46,XX[16]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling, and repeat amniocentesis was performed at 21 weeks of gestation, which revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(9)(q22.3q34.1)[7]/46,XX[25]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1-22,X) × 2. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 105 uncultured amniocytes detected only one cell with the dup 9q signal with a mosaic dup 9q level of 1%, compared with 0% in normal control. At 37 weeks of gestation, a 2640-g female baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormality. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(9) (q22.3q34.1)[4]/46,XX[36], the umbilical cord had a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(9) (q22.3q34.1)[2]/46,XX[38], and the placenta had a karyotype of 46,XX. aCGH analysis on cord blood revealed no genomic imbalance. At age 2½ months, the baby was doing well, the peripheral blood of the baby had a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(9) (q22.3q34.1)[4]/46,XX[36], and interphase FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells revealed no dup 9q signal in 100 buccal mucosal cells. CONCLUSION: Cytogenetic discrepancy may occur between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic dup(9) (q22.3q34.1). Molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes is useful for rapid distinguishing pseudomosaicism from true mosaicism under such a circumstance.

Cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present our observation of cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome. CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[10]/46,XX[15]. Among 25 colonies of cultured amniocytes, 10 colonies had a karyotype of 47,XX,+20, while the rest were normal. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1-22,X) × 2. The parental karyotypes were normal. Following genetic counseling, the woman underwent repeat amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation. Repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[3]/46,XX[35]. Among 38 colonies of cultured amniocytes, three colonies had a karyotype of 47,XX,+20, while the rest were normal. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1-22,X) × 2. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on 101 uncultured amniocytes detected only one cell with three chromosome 20 signals with a mosaic trisomy 20 level of 1% (1/101 cells), compared with 0% in normal control. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy 20. At 38 weeks of gestation, a phenotypically normal 3120-g female baby was delivered. Cytogenetic analysis of cord blood, placental tissue and umbilical cord revealed a karyotype of 46,XX. The neonate was normal at postnatal follow-ups. Postnatal interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on 100 buccal mucosal cells revealed no trisomy 20 signals. CONCLUSION: Mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis can be a cultured artifact. Complete cytogenetic discrepancy may occur between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis, and molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes is useful for rapid distinguishing true mosaicism from pseudomosaicism under such as circumstance.