An international study to develop the EAR-Q patient-reported outcome measure for children and young adults with ear conditions.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of patient-reported outcome measures for ear reconstruction. We developed the EAR-Q to measure ear appearance and post-operative adverse effects from the patient perspective. METHODS: Field-test data were collected from children and young adults in eight countries between 13 May 2016 and 12 December 2019. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analysis was used to refine the scales and to examine their psychometric properties. RESULTS: Participants had microtia (n = 607), prominent ears (n = 145) or another ear condition (n = 111), and provided 960 assessments for the Appearance scale (e.g., size, shape, photos), and 137 assessments for the Adverse Effects scale (e.g., itchy, painful, numb). RMT analysis led to the reduction of each scale to 10-items. Data fit the Rasch model for the Appearance (X2(80) = 90.9, p = 0.19) and Adverse Effects (X2(20) = 24.5, p = 0.22) scales. All items in each scale had ordered thresholds and good item fit. There was no evidence of differential item function for the Appearance scale by age, gender, language, or type of ear condition. Reliability was high for the Appearance scale, with person separation index (PSI) and Cronbach alpha values with and without extremes ≥0.92. Reliability for the Adverse Effects scale was adequate (i.e., PSI and Cronbach alpha values ≥0.71). Higher scores (liked appearance more) correlated with higher scores (better) on Psychological, Social and School scales. INTERPRETATION: The EAR-Q can be used in those 8-29 years of age to understand the patient perspective in clinical practice and research, and in addition, can be used to benchmark outcomes for ear reconstruction internationally.

Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Ear Conditions: The EAR-Q.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures are widely used to improve health services and patient outcomes. The aim of our study was to describe the development of 2 ear-specific scales designed to measure outcomes important to children and young adults with ear conditions, such as microtia and prominent ears. METHODS: We used an interpretive description qualitative approach. Semi-structured qualitative and cognitive interviews were performed with participants with any type of ear condition recruited from plastic surgery clinics in Canada, Australia, United States, and United Kingdom. Participants were interviewed to elicit new concepts. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using the constant comparison approach. Experts in ear reconstruction were invited to provide input via an online Research Electronic Data Capture survey. RESULTS: Participants included 25 patients aged 8-21 years with prominent ears (n = 9), microtia (n = 14), or another condition that affected ear appearance (n = 2). Analysis of participant qualitative data, followed by cognitive interviews and expert input, led to the development and refinement of an 18-item ear appearance scale (eg, size, shape, look up close, look in photographs) and a 12-item adverse effects scale (eg, itchy, painful, numb). CONCLUSIONS: The EAR-Q in currently being field-tested internationally. Once finalized, we anticipate the EAR-Q will be used in clinical practice and research to understand the patient's perspective of outcomes following ear surgery.

Development of the BODY-Q Chest Module Evaluating Outcomes following Chest Contouring Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery to improve chest appearance is becoming increasingly popular. The BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome instrument designed for weight loss and/or body contouring. In this article, the authors describe the development of a new module for masculinizing chest contouring surgery. METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to develop the BODY-Q Chest Module, which was subsequently field-tested in Canada, the United States, The Netherlands, and Denmark between June of 2016 and June of 2017. Participants were aged 16 years or older and seen for gynecomastia, weight loss, or transman chest surgery. Data were collected using either a Web-based application or paper questionnaire. Rasch measurement theory analysis was performed. RESULTS: The sample included 739 participants (i.e., 174 gynecomastia, 224 weight loss, and 341 gender-affirming). Rasch measurement theory analysis refined a 10-item chest scale and a five-item nipple scale. All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit, and scales evidenced reliability [i.e., person separation index and Cronbach alpha values were 0.95 and 0.98 (chest scale) and 0.87 and 0.94 (nipple scale), respectively]. Scores for both scales correlated more strongly with similar (satisfaction with the body) versus dissimilar (psychological and social function) BODY-Q scales. The mean scores for the chest and nipple scales were significantly higher (p < 0.001 on independent samples t tests) in participants who were postoperative compared with preoperative. CONCLUSION: This new BODY-Q Chest Module is a clinically meaningful and scientifically sound patient-reported outcome instrument that can be used to measure outcomes for masculinizing chest contouring surgery.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analog Scale.

BACKGROUND: The primary outcome measures for patients who undergo aesthetic facial procedures are quality of life and satisfaction with appearance. The FACE-Q, a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument composed of independently functioning scales, is designed to measure a broad range of important outcomes in patients who undergo cosmetic surgical and/or nonsurgical facial procedures. OBJECTIVES: The authors describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and the FACE-Q Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analog Scale (VAS). METHODS: International guidelines for creating PRO instruments were strictly observed throughout development of the FACE-Q scales. Qualitative methods were used to identify the concepts most important to patients who received aesthetic facial procedures. These were turned into "items"-and the resultant FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale was field tested, along with the Patient-Perceived Age VAS, in 288 patients who underwent cosmetic surgical and/or nonsurgical facial procedures. RESULTS: Rasch measurement theory and traditional psychometric methods confirmed the reliability and validity of the scales. CONCLUSIONS: The FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and Patient-Perceived Age VAS are psychometrically sound, condition-specific PRO instruments with excellent reliability and validity. They enable accurate outcome assessments in patients who undergo aesthetic facial procedures.

Digital artery pseudoaneurysm in a patient with previous radial artery harvest.

A post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm in the ulnar digital artery of the thumb in a patient with compromised vascularity due to a previous harvest of the ipsilateral radial artery is reported. To the authors' knowledge, the present case is the first such description of a pseudoaneurysm in the digital artery of a patient with compromised collateral blood flow.

Management of tuberous breast deformity with anatomic cohesive silicone gel breast implants.

BACKGROUND: Tuberous breast deformity is a rare congenital condition that often requires surgical correction. Numerous surgical techniques have been described, reflecting the reconstructive challenge of this deformity. The anatomic cohesive gel breast implant is a powerful tool in both aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. In the authors' experience, its use in treating tuberous breast deformity has provided the opportunity for a single-stage approach, with very good results. METHODS: The senior author has managed more than 50 cases of single-stage reconstruction for tuberous breast deformity using anatomic cohesive gel breast implants. His surgical technique is described with suggestions for achieving optimal results. Representative case examples are provided. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic cohesive silicone gel breast implant is an excellent device for treating tuberous breast deformity. It often can be used as a single-stage correction of the deformity with very good results. The authors strongly advocate consideration of its use in tuberous breast deformity reconstruction.

Role of thrombolysis in free-flap salvage.

Approximately 5 percent of microvascular free-tissue transfers fail; often this is due to microvascular or peri-anastomotic thrombosis. Various reports have advocated the use of thrombolytics for salvage of these flaps, although clinical evidence supporting this approach is sparse. The authors attempted to review their own and other published results and present an algorithm for the use of thrombolytics in the management of failing free flaps. A retrospective review of 590 free flaps, revealed 71 (12 percent) requiring re-exploration for impending flap failure, determined by standard clinical indicators. Forty-four (62 percent) were found to have pedicle thrombosis and 20 (28 percent) received thrombolysis with streptokinase or urokinase. All 44 flaps were grouped by final outcome and thrombolytic use for comparison. In 24 (55 percent) of the flaps with evidence of thrombosis, the use of thrombolytics was felt to be inappropriate or unnecessary; 13 (54 percent) of these were salvaged. Twenty flaps, however, did receive thrombolysis and 6 (30 percent) of these were salvaged. There was no statistically significant difference among groups with respect to preoperative risk factors, age, gender, flap type, and site of anastomotic thrombosis. There was a twofold higher use of vein grafts in the failed vs. salvaged flaps (36 percent vs. 15.7 percent), and no flaps with vessel grafts were salvaged with thrombolytics. Despite the fact that all flaps were re-explored within 3 hr of a problem being detected, the mean time from the initial operation to re-exploration was significantly higher in flaps that did not respond to thrombolytics (63. 8 vs. 32.8 hr, respectively, p=0.0457). Also, the mean time to re-exploration was significantly higher in the salvaged flaps receiving thrombolysis vs. those that did not (32.8 vs. 22.3 hr, respectively, p=0.0264). While early detection and re-exploration are crucial for salvaging failing free flaps, those flaps unresponsive to other standard interventions may benefit from the selective use of thrombolytics.