Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 137
Filtrar
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 2024 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642868
3.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 16(2): e012781, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36802805

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of hemostatic compression post transradial access is controversial. Longer duration increases the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO) while shorter duration increases the risk of access site bleeding or hematoma. As such, a target of 2 hours is typically used. Whether a shorter or longer duration is better is not known. METHODS: A PubMed, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for randomized clinical trials of different duration (<90 minutes, 90 minutes, 2 hours, and 2-4 hours) of hemostasis banding. The efficacy outcome was RAO, primary safety outcome was access site hematoma, and secondary safety outcome was access site rebleeding. Primary analysis compared the effect of various duration in reference to the 2 hours duration using a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 10 randomized clinical trials included with 4911 patients, when compared to the 2-hour reference duration, there was a significantly higher risk of access site hematoma with 90 minutes (odds ratio, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.40-4.06]) and <90 minutes (odds ratio, 3.61 [95% CI, 1.79-7.29]) but not with the 2 to 4 hours duration. When compared with the 2-hour reference, there was no significant difference in access site rebleeding or RAO with shorter or longer duration but the point estimates favored longer duration for access site rebleeding and shorter duration for RAO. Duration of <90 minutes and 90 minutes ranked 1 and duration of 2 hours ranked 2 as the most efficacious duration whereas duration of 2 hours ranked 1 and 2 to 4 hours ranked 2 as the safest duration. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing transradial access for coronary angiography or intervention, a hemostasis duration of 2 hours offers the best balance for efficacy (prevention of RAO) and safety (prevention of access site hematoma/rebleeding).


Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas , Cateterismo Periférico , Hemostáticos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Hemostasia , Angiografia Coronária , Hematoma/etiologia , Hematoma/prevenção & controle , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagem , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/etiologia , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/prevenção & controle , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos
4.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 53S: S220-S223, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36216701

RESUMO

6 French percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), has become widely adopted. We describe a case of successful 8 French transradial access (TRA) coronary intervention using state of the art hemostasis technique with preservation of radial patency after the procedure.


Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Coração , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 101(1): 87-96, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36490230

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in radiation exposure between transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA) for coronary procedures. BACKGROUND: TRA is associated with increased radiation exposure as compared to TFA. We compared radiation exposure between the two access sites. METHODS: Databases were searched from June 2014 to August 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting coprimary outcomes of fluoroscopy time (FT) and/or dose area product (DAP) comparing TRA with TFA. Meta-regression was performed to assess the behavior of weighted mean difference (WMD) in FT from 1995 to 2021. Observational study data was used for corroborative evidence. RESULTS: Data from 8 RCTs (11,611 patients) showed the WMD of FT was 0.62 min (37 s) (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.08-1.17], p = 0.023) in favor of TFA, WMD in DAP (9169 patients) was 1.94 Gy.cm2 (95% CI: [-2.1 to 5.9], p = 0.35) showing no significant difference. Pooled data from OBS and RCTs (83,990 patients) showed a similar trend. Studies from outside US between 1995 and 2021 showed WMD of FT between TRA and TFA of 0.88 min (52 s) (95% CI: [0.67-1.09], p = 0.005) versus 2.1 min (126 s) (95% CI: [1.38-2.8], p = 0.005) for US in favor of TFA. Meta-regression showed a declining WMD of FT between TRA and TFA from 1.6 min (96 s) in 1996 to 0.5 min (30 s) in 2020 with the lower limit of CI crossing the zero line in 2019. CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure between TRA and TFA continues to decrease overtime and is becoming clinically nonsignificant.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Exposição à Radiação , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Artéria Radial , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto
6.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 15(22): 2297-2311, 2022 11 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36423974

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing distal radial access (DRA) with conventional radial access (RA) is available. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative appraisal of the effects of DRA) vs conventional RA for coronary angiography with or without intervention. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for RCT comparing DRA vs conventional RA for coronary angiography and/or intervention. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was radial artery occlusion (RAO) at the longest available follow-up. RESULTS: Fourteen studies enrolling 6,208 participants were included. Compared with conventional RA, DRA was associated with a significant lower risk of RAO, either detected at latest follow-up (risk ratio [RR]: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23-0.56; P < 0.001; number needed to treat [NNT] = 30) or in-hospital (RR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.19-0.53; P < 0.001; NNT = 28), as well as EASY (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries) ≥II hematoma (RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.96; P = 0.04; NNT = 107). By contrast, DRA was associated with a higher risk of access site crossover (RR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.88-5.06; P < 0.001; NNT = 12), a longer time for radial puncture (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 3.56; 95% CI: 0.96-6.16; P < 0.001), a longer time for sheath insertion (SMD: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.16-0.58; P < 0.001), and a higher number of puncture attempts (SMD: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional RA, DRA is associated with lower risks of RAO and EASY ≥II hematoma but requires longer time for radial artery cannulation and sheath insertion, more puncture attempts, and a higher access site crossover.


Assuntos
Hematoma , Artéria Radial , Humanos , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
7.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 961160, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36093161

RESUMO

Background: There is limited insight into the epidemiological characteristics and effect of race and ethnicity on Primary Malignant Cardiac Tumors (PMCTs). Objectives: Comparison of clinical characteristics and cancer-specific survival outcomes of major races in the United States from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Result (SEER) registry. Methods: ICD-O-3 codes were used to identify PMCTs for the years 1975 to 2015. Three major races were identified-"White", "Black", and "Asian/Pacific Islander". Cancer-specific survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis across and amongst races, based on tumor histology. A subgroup analysis of cancer-specific survival was performed between "Hispanics" and "non-Hispanics." Results: Seven hundred and twenty patients were identified-47% females and 79% White, mean age at diagnosis (47 ± 20 years). Black patients were significantly younger (39 ± 18 years) and presented more commonly with angiosarcomas (53%). Non-angiogenic sarcomas and lymphomas were the most common tumors in the White (38%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (34%) cohorts. For a median follow-up period of 50 (IQR3-86) months, cancer-specific survival (mean ± SD, in months) was worse in Blacks (9 ± 3) as compared to Whites (15 ± 1) and Asian/Pacific Islander (14 ± 1) (p-value; Black vs. White <0.001; Black vs. Asian/Pacific Islanders = 0.017, White vs. Asian/Pacific Islanders = 0.3). Subgroup analysis with 116 (16%) Hispanics (40% females; mean age of 40 ± 20 years) showed a longer mean cancer-specific survival of 16.9 ± 2.4 months as compared to 13.6 ± 1.1 months in non-Hispanics (p = 0.011). Conclusion: Black and non-Hispanic patients have poorer cancer-specific survival in PMCTs.

8.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 24(7): 817-821, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35587853

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robotics has been used in multiple areas of procedural medical intervention. Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been available since 2004. Its adoption has been slow with initial application in simple cases. RECENT FINDINGS: With increasing adoption, robotic PCI has been applied to a broader variety of coronary substrates with demonstration of safety and efficacy. Improvements in the robotic console with future generation devices should add to the utility of this platform. Robotic PCI advances the innovations in endovascular space into a different dimension, removing the dependence of the procedure on patient-operator ergonomics and likely operator skill.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Robótica , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 40S: 154-156, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34053873

RESUMO

Although echocardiography remains the key tool for evaluation of aortic valve stenosis severity, in a fair minority of patients invasive evaluation is still needed. Dual-lumen catheters allow for simultaneous trans-aortic pressure measurements with single arterial access. We describe a technique where traditional hardware using non-dedicated catheters can be used to obtain simultaneous pressure measurements using a 6 French single arterial access.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Pressão Arterial , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Catéteres , Ventrículos do Coração , Humanos
10.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 36: 100878, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34611545

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Association of history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with clinical outcomes in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear from current data. METHODS: Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2003 to 2014, adult patients hospitalized with principal diagnosis of STEMI were extracted. The cohort was divided into patients with a history of CABG and those without a history of CABG. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality (IHM). RESULTS: 2,710,375 STEMI patients were included in final analysis of which 110,066 had history of CABG. Patients with history of CABG had higher unadjusted (12.2% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.001) and adjusted (odds ratio [OR]1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to1.19, P < 0.001) IHM compared to those without previous CABG. Compared to a trend of decreasing IHM in STEMI patients without previous CABG, a trend of increasing IHM was observed over the study period in those with a history of previous CABG. Although patients with previous CABG when treated with primary PCI (PPCI) had a higher unadjusted IHM compared to those without previous CABG, (4.8% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001), after adjusting for comorbidities and in-hospital complications no significant increase in IHM was observed in patients with previous CABG treated with PPCI. CONCLUSION: STEMI patients with previous CABG have a significantly higher IHM compared to those without previous CABG. PPCI improves IHM with no independent mortality disadvantage attributable to previous CABG.

11.
Clin Case Rep ; 9(8): e04549, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34429984

RESUMO

In selected cases, when STEMI caused by mild or moderate degree lesion with a large concomitant thrombus, additional OCT-guided PCI strategy after thrombus removal allows us to defer stenting with the follow-up natural healing of the vessel wall.

13.
Clin Cardiol ; 44(4): 511-517, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33660870

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lack of health insurance is associated with adverse clinical outcomes; however, the association between health insurance status and in-hospital outcomes after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (OHVFA) arrest is unclear. HYPOTHESIS: Lack of health insurance is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest. METHODS: From January 2003 to December 2014, hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of OHVFA in patients ≥18 years of age were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were categorized into insured and uninsured groups based on their documented health insurance status. Study outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, utilization of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and cost of hospitalization. Inverse probability weighting adjusted binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and ICD utilization and linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors of cost of hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 188 946 patients included in the final analyses, 178 005 (94.2%) patients were insured and 10 941 (5.8%) patients were uninsured. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher (61.7% vs. 54.7%, p < .001) and ICD utilization was lower (15.3% vs. 18.3%, p < .001) in the uninsured patients. Lack of health insurance was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (O.R = 1.53, 95% C.I. [1.46-1.61]; p < .001) and lower utilization of ICD (O.R = 0.84, 95% C.I [0.79-0.90], p < .001). Cost of hospitalization was significantly higher in uninsured patients (median [interquartile range], p-value) ($) (39 650 [18 034-93 399] vs. 35 965 [14 568.50-96 163], p < .001). CONCLUSION: Lack of health insurance is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, lower utilization of ICD and higher cost of hospitalization after OHVFA.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Fibrilação Ventricular , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Ventricular/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Ventricular/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Ventricular/terapia
14.
Am J Cardiol ; 144: 46-51, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33385353

RESUMO

The temporal trends and preprocedural predictors of emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery (ECABG) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the contemporary era are largely unknown. From January 2003 to December 2014 elective hospitalizations with PCI as the primary procedure were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. ECABG was identified as CABG within 24 hours of elective PCI. Temporal trends of elective PCI, ECABG, comorbidities, and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Logistic regression model was used to identify preprocedural independent predictors of ECABG and post-PCI ECABG risk score was developed using the regression coefficients from the logistic regression model in the development cohort. The score was then validated in the validation cohort. Of 1,605,641 elective PCI procedures included in the final analysis, 5,561 (0.3%) patients underwent ECABG. The incidence of ECABG, co-morbidities and overall in-hospital mortality increased over the study period, whereas the in-hospital mortality after ECABG remained unchanged. An increasing trend of elective PCI performed at facilities without on-site CABG was noted, with a higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality in this cohort. ECABG risk score, performed well with a significantly higher risk of ECABG in those patients with a score in the highest tertile compared with those with lower ECABG score (0.6% vs 0.3%, p = 0.0005). In conclusion, an increasing trend of adverse outcomes after elective PCI is observed. We describe an easy-to-use predictive score using preprocedural variables that may allow the operator to triage the patient to an appropriate setting in an effort to improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/tendências , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Complicações Intraoperatórias/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Idoso , Dissecção Aórtica/epidemiologia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Aorta/lesões , Estudos de Coortes , Vasos Coronários/lesões , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Calcificação Vascular/epidemiologia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/epidemiologia
15.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 27: 52-56, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32855082

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Duplex Doppler ultrasonography (USG) remains the gold standard for evaluation of radial artery occlusion (RAO) after transradial access (TRA). The diagnostic accuracy of digital plethysmography, which is cheaper and widely available, for evaluation of RAO after TRA is not known. METHODS: Patients undergoing TRA were prospectively studied. After undergoing TRA for diagnostic or interventional coronary procedure and obtaining radial artery hemostasis, the radial artery was evaluated for presence or absence of RAO using digital plethysmography of the ipsilateral index finger and the thumb using modified reverse Barbeau's test (MRBT) and USG. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and other metrics of evaluation of diagnostic performance of MRBT in reference to USG, the current gold standard, were evaluated. RESULTS: 503 patients who underwent TRA for coronary procedures were studied. MRBT demonstrated a sensitivity = 96.2%, specificity = 99.8%, positive predictive value = 96.1, negative predictive value = 99.8, likelihood ratio (+) = 481, likelihood ratio (-) = 0.38, diagnostic accuracy = 99.6, diagnostic odds ratio = 11,904, Youden's index = 0.96, receiver operator characteristic derived c-statistic = 0.98 and Cohen's k = 0.98 when compared to USG. MRBT performed using the ipsilateral index finger and the thumb was no different. Agreement between absence of ipsilateral radial artery pulsation and RAO was weak (Cohen's k = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: MRBT using ipsilateral digital plethysmography performs comparably to USG for assessment of presence of RAO after TRA. There is no significant difference between MRBT performed using the ipsilateral thumb or the index finger.


Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas , Artéria Radial , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagem , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/etiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Humanos , Pletismografia , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla
16.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(6): E810-E816, 2021 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32881383

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the association between distance from radiation source and radiation exposure. BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure during medical procedures is associated with increased risk of cancer and other adverse effects. METHODS: An American National Standards Institute phantom was used to study the relationship between measured entrance surface exposure (MESE) and distance from the X-ray source in postero-anterior, left anterior oblique, and right anterior oblique projections. Three distance settings for table height were evaluated with "low" defined as 52 cm, "mid" 66 cm, and "high" 80 cm from the focal point of the X-ray source. Air-kerma and dose-area product measurements were recorded. Operator exposure with each of these conditions was measured, in a short operator (150 cm) as well as in a tall operator (190 cm). RESULTS: Aggregate results for the three projections were as follows. MESE (µGy/frame) significantly decreased as table-height increases (median, interquartile range, p-value) (low table-height 192.5 [122.4-201.2], mid table-height 105.8 [82.7-115.8], and high table-height 71.7 [58.4-75], p < .0005). The operator exposure (µGy/frame), significantly increased as the table-height increased (low table-height 0.0943 [0.0598-0.1157], medium table-height 0.1128 [0.0919-0.1397], and high table-height 0.158 [0.1339-0.2165], p < .0005). A shorter operator received higher radiation exposure compared to a taller operator (short operator 0.1405 [0.1155-0.1758] and tall operator 0.0995 [0.0798-0.1212], p < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing table-height is associated with a significant decrease in MESE. Operator radiation exposure increases with increasing table-height and shorter operators receive greater radiation exposure compared to taller operators.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional , Exposição à Radiação , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(5): e008888, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32406263

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) has been shown to benefit the operator but has not shown any significant benefit to the patient. We sought to compare a large cohort of R-PCI to traditional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures performed at a tertiary care center in the same time frame. METHODS: A total of 996 consecutive patients referred for PCI between December 2017 and March 2019 were studied, of which 310 (31.1%) patients were selected to undergo R-PCI and 686 (68.9%) patients underwent traditional PCI. The coprimary study outcome measures were air kerma, dose-area product, fluoroscopy time, volume of contrast, and total procedural time. Caliper propensity-matching technique was used (caliper, 0.05) to match each R-PCI patient to the nearest traditional PCI patient without replacement. RESULTS: Air kerma (mGy; median [interquartile range]; P; 884 [537-1398] versus 1110 [699-1498]; P=0.002) and dose-area product (cGycm2; 4734 [2695-7746] versus 5746 [3751-7833]; P=0.003) were significantly lower in the R-PCI group. There was no difference in fluoroscopy time (minutes; 5.51 [3.53-8.31] versus 5.48 [3.31-9.37]; P=0.936) and contrast volume (mL; 130 [103-170] versus 140 [100-180]; P=0.905). Total procedural time (minutes) was significantly higher in the R-PCI group (27 [21-40] versus 37 [27-50]; P<0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: R-PCI is associated with a significant decrease in radiation exposure to the patient with no increase in fluoroscopy time, as well as contrast utilization, and a minor increase in procedure duration compared with traditional PCI.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Idoso , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Segurança do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Pontuação de Propensão , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 21(3): 404-408, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31327711

RESUMO

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common atherosclerotic disease approximately affecting 8.5 million Americans above age 40 and is associated with significant functional impairment, morbidity and mortality from both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. PAD has increasing prevalence in females contrary to previous findings. Compared to men, women with PAD are more asymptomatic or have atypical symptoms. Women with PAD have increased quality of life impairment, increased risk of depression and increased cardiovascular mortality. The intent of this review is to provide an update on gender differences in PAD that can help in timely diagnosis and appropriate management through intensive cardiovascular risk factor modification, exercise program and guideline directed therapy to improve cardiovascular outcomes.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Doença Arterial Periférica , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente , Masculino , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco
19.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(3): 354-361, 2020 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31812224

RESUMO

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions are common and costly. The association between comprehensive ACS care pathways, outcomes, and costs are lacking. From 434,172 low-risk, uncomplicated ACS patients eligible for early discharge (STEMI 35%, UA/NSTEMI 65%) from the Premier database, we identified ACS care pathways, by stratifying low-risk, uncomplicated STEMI and UA/NSTEMI patients by access site for PCI (trans-radial intervention [TRI] vs transfemoral intervention [TFI]) and by length of stay (LOS). Associations with costs and outcomes (death, bleeding, acute kidney injury, and myocardial infarction at 1-year) were tested using hierarchical, mixed-effects regression, and projections of cost savings with change in care pathways were obtained using modeling. In low-risk uncomplicated STEMI patients, compared with TFI and LOS ≥3 days, a strategy of TRI with LOS <3 days and TFI with LOS <3 days were associated with cost savings of $6,206 and $4,802, respectively. Corresponding cost savings for UA/NSTEMI patients were $7,475 and $6,169, respectively. These care-pathways did not show an excess risk of adverse outcomes. We estimated that >$300 million could be saved if prevalence of the TRI with LOS <3 days and TFI with LOS <3 days strategies are modestly increased to 20% and 70%, respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrate the potential opportunity of cost savings by repositioning ACS care pathways in low-risk and uncomplicated ACS patients, toward transradial access and a shorter LOS without an increased risk of adverse outcomes.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/economia , Previsões , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Sistema de Registros , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
20.
Interv Cardiol Clin ; 9(1): 87-97, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31733744

RESUMO

Transradial access has increased in utilization and has been shown to be superior compared with transfemoral access. Although infrequent, several transradial access site-related complications occur. By understanding potential mechanisms related to these complications, several prevention and treatment strategies can be implemented to mitigate adverse outcomes.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/métodos , Artéria Radial , Doenças Vasculares/etiologia , Doenças Vasculares/terapia , Falso Aneurisma/etiologia , Falso Aneurisma/terapia , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/etiologia , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/terapia , Humanos , Doenças Vasculares/prevenção & controle , Punho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...