A Comparative Study on Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Findings in the Knee Joint Injuries.

Introduction: The knee joint primarily allows for flexion and extension and is essentially a hinge joint. The knee joint, like all hinge joints, is strengthened by collateral ligaments - one on each side of the joint. Objective: Our study sought to investigate potential correlations between arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRl) examination in the diagnosis of traumatic diseases of the knee. Methods and Materials: A prospective study was conducted on 30 persons who showed signs of having traumatic knee disease. Following a comprehensive evaluation of the patient s medical history and current state of health, we opted to undergo an arthroscopic evaluation and knee MRL. Results: The sensitivity of the MRI was 93.87%, the specificity was 91.54%, the accuracy was 92.50%, and the negative predictive value was 95.58% when compared to arthroscopic inspection as the gold standard. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that MRIs frequently misdiagnose individuals with multiple knee injuries or fail to detect a lesion while doing a diagnostic evaluation. Therefore, if the MRI comes out normal, there is no reason to deny the patient arthroscopy. Due to this MRI flaw, researchers have determined that arthroscopy can be performed following a comprehensive clinical assessment without the need for an MRI.

Effect of ascending and descending medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy on patella height and functional outcomes-a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a popular joint-preserving option for medial compartmental osteoarthritis. However, this is associated with alterations in the patellar height (PH) and tibial slope (TS). This study aims to compare the effect of ascending (AMHTO) and descending medial opening wedge HTO (DMHTO) on patella height, posterior tibial slope and functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between February 2018 and July 2021. Patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis, varus alignment, and complete pre- and postoperative lateral and full-length anteroposterior radiographs were included. Pre- and postoperative radiological measurements include the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), and the posterior tibial slope. The functional outcomes were measured using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). The osteotomy union was checked with serial X-rays every 6 weeks till a satisfactory union was achieved. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Thirty-four (58%) patients received AMHTO, and 24 (42%) received DMHTO. There was no baseline difference in the demographic variables or functional scores between the two groups. The preoperative mean MAD of - 9.65° ± 3.67° was corrected significantly to + 0.08 ± 2.80° (varus -, valgus + , P = 0.034). A significant difference in preoperative and postoperative CDI of 0.93 ± 0.45 and 0.83 ± 0.27, respectively, was noted (P = 0.023). In the AMHTO group, a statistically significant decrease in PH from preoperative 1.03 ± 0.77 to 0.84 ± 0.12 was noted (P = 0.003). There was a significant improvement in functional outcomes between baseline and 9-month follow-up in both groups. There was no significant difference between the functional outcomes of the two groups at 9-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The study confirmed our hypothesis that descending HTO caused less alteration in the patella height compared to ascending HTO. There is no significant difference in the functional outcomes between the groups. However, in patients with PFOA, and when attempting higher degree of correction through AMHTO, the possibility of worsening of symptoms due to change in PH must be considered.

The Modified PROMT Score: A Better Prognosticative Tool to Assess Traumatic Meniscal Tear Reparability.

Background: Considering various factors that influence meniscal repairability, Ortho One PROMT score (OPS) was proposed in 2019. With an increased understanding of factors influencing meniscal repair and by analysis of OPS predictions and repair results, a modified PROMT score (MPS) has been formulated. The objective of this study is to assess the superiority of MPS over OPS. Methods: Age, chronicity, and pattern of tears were found to be important contributors to false-negative results of OPS. Considering these factors, MPS was designed. A prospective, double-blinded study was conducted between November 2020 and May 2021. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of both scores were calculated. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted. Results: Of 133 meniscal tears, 100 met the inclusion criteria. In predicting meniscal repairability, OPS demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 90.32% and 83.33% medially and 64.71% and 79.41% laterally. MPS had sensitivity and specificity of 96.77% and 88.89% medially and 82.35% and 88.24% laterally. Both scores showed good statistical significance (p < 0.05) in predicting meniscal reparability. For medial meniscus repairability, area under the ROC curve was 0.868 for OPS and 0.928 for MPS. For lateral repairability, the area under the curve was 0.721 for OPS and 0.853 for MPS. Conclusion: MPS will serve as a simple and more effective tool for surgeons to predict meniscal repairability, thus enhancing their pre-surgical preparedness. This tool will also help surgeons to realistically counsel their patients and to achieve optimal patient.