Efficacy and safety of colchicine for the treatment of myopericarditis.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of colchicine only in simple pericarditis, excluding cases of concomitant myocarditis. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine for the treatment of the first attack of acute pericarditis with concomitant myocardial involvement. METHODS: Double-centre retrospective cohort study analysing consecutive patients admitted for first attack of pericarditis with myocarditis and treated with or without colchicine. The primary efficacy end point was the time to the first recurrence. Propensity score matching was used to generate two groups of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Colchicine-associated side effects were analysed as safety end-point. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients (mean age 46.2±20.1 years, 25.1% females, 88.6% with idiopathic/viral aetiology) were included. Seventy-nine (45.1%) patients were treated with colchicine. After a median follow-up of 25.3 (IQR 8.3-45.6) months, 58 (33.1%) patients had recurrences. The propensity score generated two groups of 73 patients with similar baseline characteristics but the use of colchicine. Patients treated with colchicine had a lower incidence of recurrences (respectively, 19.2% vs 43.8%; p=0.001) and a longer event-free survival (p=0.005). In multivariable analysis, women (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.73; p=0.037) and corticosteroid use (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.47; p=0.018) were independent risk factors for recurrences. Colchicine-associated side effects were mild and occurred in 3 (1.7%) patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with first attack of pericarditis associated with myocardial involvement, colchicine was safe and efficacious for the reduction of recurrences.

Efficacy and safety of colchicine for the prevention of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 12 869 patients.

AIMS: The key role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is an urgent call for innovative treatments. Several trials have proposed colchicine as a therapeutic option for secondary prevention in CAD patients but its utilization is hampered by fears about drug-related adverse events (DAEs) and conflicting evidences. The aim of this meta-analysis was to consolidate evidence on the efficacy and safety of colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search in electronic bibliographic databases of Medline, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the cardiovascular effects of colchicine in CAD patients, compared with placebo. Outcomes of interest were the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and DAEs. Estimates were pooled using inverse-variance random-effects model. A total of 11 RCTs, including 12 869 patients, were identified as eligible. A total of 6501 patients received colchicine, while 6368 received placebo. After a median follow-up of 6 months (interquartile range, 1-16), patients receiving colchicine had a lower risk of MACCE [6% vs. 8.8%, relative risk (RR) = 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.80, I2 = 19%], myocardial infarction (3.3% vs. 4.3%, RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96, I2 = 17%), coronary revascularization (2.9% vs. 4.2%, RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.89, I2 = 40%), stroke (0.4% vs. 0.9%, RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.77, I2 = 0%), hospitalization for cardiovascular cause (0.9% vs. 2.9%, RR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.87, I2 = 0%). Colchicine was associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal DAEs (11% vs. 9.2%, RR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.20-2.34, I2 = 76%), myalgia (18% vs. 16%, RR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32, I2 = 0%) and DAEs-related discontinuation (4.1% vs. 3%, RR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.02-2.32, I2 = 65%). However, gastrointestinal DAEs and discontinuation may be prevented with a lower daily dose. Colchicine did not increase the risk of cardiovascular death (0.7% vs. 1%, RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.45-1.21, I2 = 14%), all-cause death (2% vs. 1.9%, RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.71-1.43, I2 = 16%), or other DAEs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of colchicine in patients with CAD is safe and efficacious for MACCE prevention.

Usefulness of Beta-Blockers to Control Symptoms in Patients With Pericarditis.

Exercise restriction is a nonpharmacological treatment of pericarditis that could reduce symptoms by slowing heart rate (HR). Beta-blockers allow pharmacological control of HR. Aim of this paper is to explore the possible efficacy of beta-blockers to improve control of symptoms in patients with pericarditis. We analyzed consecutive cases with pericarditis referred to our center. Beta-blockers were prescribed on top of standard anti-inflammatory therapy in symptomatic patients (chest pain and palpitations) with rest HR>75 beats/min. The primary end point was the persistence of pericardial pain at 3 weeks. The secondary end point was the occurrence of recurrent pericarditis at 18 months. Propensity score matching was used to generate 2 cohorts of 101 patients with and without beta-blockers with balanced baseline features. A clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 3 weeks, 1, 3, 6 months and then every 12 months. A total of 347 patients (mean age 53 years, 58% females, 48% with a recurrence, 81% with idiopathic/viral etiology) were included. Among them, 128 patients (36.9%) were treated with beta-blockers. Peak C-reactive protein values were correlated with heart rate on first observation (r=0.48, p<0.001). Using propensity-score matched cohorts, patients treated with beta-blockers had a lower frequency of symptoms persistence at 3 weeks (respectively 4% vs. 14%; p = 0.024) and a trend towards a reduction of recurrences at 18 months (p = 0.069). In conclusion the use of beta-blockers on top of standard anti-inflammatory therapies was associated with improved symptom control.

Adverse events of colchicine for cardiovascular diseases: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 14 188 patients from 21 randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: Colchicine has an emerging role in the cardiovascular field, although, concerns for side effects, especially gastrointestinal, limit its prescription. We aimed at evaluating reported side effects of colchicine for cardiovascular indications. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials on colchicine for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to assess the risk of adverse events and drug withdrawal. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger test, and meta-regression was performed to assess sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Among 14 188 patients, 7136 patients received colchicine while the other 7052 received placebo. The occurrence of any adverse event with colchicine was reported in 15.3 vs. 13.9% patients [relative risk (RR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.64, P = 0.09]. Gastrointestinal events were reported in 16.1 vs. 12.2% (RR 2.16, 95% CI 1.50-3.12, P < 0.001), while diarrhea was reported in 12.5 vs. 8.1% (RR 2.77, 95% CI 1.55-4.94, P < 0.001). The risk of gastrointestinal events increased with daily dose and shorter treatment duration. Myalgias were observed in 21 vs. 18% patients (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32, P = 0.03). Other adverse events such as myotoxicity, hepatic adverse events, hematologic adverse events, cutaneous adverse events, infection or death were not increased by colchicine treatment. Colchicine discontinuation was reported in 4.8 vs. 3.4% patients (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.20-1.99, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Colchicine is associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal events and myalgias, but not of other adverse events. The risk of gastrointestinal events may be avoided with lower dose (0.5 mg/daily) and is inversely related to treatment duration, possibly due to early drug discontinuation or drug tolerance.

Histone H1 interacts preferentially with DNA fragments containing a cisplatin-induced 1,2-intrastrand cross-link.

Cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) or cis-DDP], but not its stereoisomer transplatin, is suggested to be among the most powerful anticancer agents. It is believed that its therapeutic activity results from its interaction with DNA forming intra- and interstrand crosslinks. During our earlier investigations, we have observed a prominent preference of the linker histone H1 for binding to cis-platinated DNA (containing several different cross-links along the DNA fragment) compared with unmodified or transplatin-modified DNA. This report presents our recent experimental data obtained by band-shift analysis on the binding of H1 to a cisplatin-modified synthetic 34 bp DNA fragment containing a single target d(GG/CC) for 1,2 cis-intra-platination. Results obtained with another nuclear protein with similar DNA-binding properties, HMGB1, are also presented. The experimental data throw light on the precise preference of histone H1 for binding to different types of cisplatin-created cross-links in DNA.

Linker histones do not interact with DNA containing a single interstrand cross-link created by cisplatin.

During our earlier investigations we have observed a prominent preference of the linker histone H1 for binding to a cis-platinated DNA (a synthetic fragment with global type of platination in respect to targets for cisplatin) comparing with unmodified and trans-Pt-modified DNA. In the present work we report our recent experimental results on the binding of the linker histones H1 and H5 to a cisplatin-modified synthetic DNA fragment containing a single nucleotide target d(GC/CG) for inter-platination. Surprisingly, no preferential binding of linker histones to cis-inter-platinated DNA was observed by means of the electromobility-shift assay. The same negative results were obtained with a part of the linker histone molecule suggested to be responsible for DNA-binding--its globular domain. Contrary, the data with another nuclear protein with similar DNA-binding properties as linker histones--HMGB1--showed a strong afinity for interaction with DNA containing interstrand cross-links.