The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of marginal donors allocated by standardized pretransplant donor biopsy assessment: distribution and association with graft outcomes.

Pretransplant donor biopsy (PTDB)-based marginal donor allocation systems to single or dual renal transplantation could increase the use of organs with Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) in the highest range (e.g. >80 or >90), whose discard rate approximates 50% in the United States. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively calculated the KDPI and analyzed the outcomes of 442 marginal kidney transplants (340 single transplants: 278 with a PTDB Remuzzi score<4 [median KDPI: 87; interquartile range (IQR): 78-94] and 62 with a score=4 [median KDPI: 87; IQR: 76-93]; 102 dual transplants [median KDPI: 93; IQR: 86-96]) and 248 single standard transplant controls (median KDPI: 36; IQR: 18-51). PTDB-based allocation of marginal grafts led to a limited discard rate of 15% for kidneys with KDPI of 80-90 and of 37% for kidneys with a KDPI of 91-100. Although 1-year estimated GFRs were significantly lower in recipients of marginal kidneys (-9.3, -17.9 and -18.8 mL/min, for dual transplants, single kidneys with PTDB score<4 and =4, respectively; p<0.001), graft survival (median follow-up 3.3 years) was similar between marginal and standard kidney transplants (hazard ratio: 1.20 [95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.79; p=0.38]). In conclusion, PTDB-based allocation allows the safe transplantation of kidneys with KDPI in the highest range that may otherwise be discarded.

Native kidney function after renal transplantation combined with other solid organs in preemptive patients.

Kidney transplantations combined with other solid organs are progressively increasing in number. There are no guidelines regarding the nephrologic indications for combined transplantations, namely liver-kidney (LKT), or heart-kidney (HKT), in preemptive patients with chronic kidney failure who are not on regular dialysis therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the functional contribution of the native kidneys after preemptive kidney transplantation combined with other solid organs. From 2004, 9 patients (aged 50.3 +/- 8.5 years) with chronic kidney failure (creatinine 2.5 +/- 1.0 mg/dL) caused by polycystic kidney disease (n = 4), vascular nephropathy (n = 2), interstitial nephropathy (n = 1), glomerulonephritis (n = 1), or end-stage kidney disease (n = 1), underwent combined transplantations (8 LKT, 1 HKT). A scintigraphic functional study (Tc-99DMSA or Tc-99mMAG3), was performed at 4 +/- 3 months after transplantation to evaluate the functional contribution of both the native kidneys and the graft. All patients were given immunosuppressive drugs, including a calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus/or cyclosporine). At the time of scintigraphy, renal function in all patients was 1.3 +/- 0.3 mg/dL. The functional contribution of the transplanted kidneys was on average 77 +/- 18%. Only in 1 patient was the contribution of the graft <50%. At follow-up after 36 months, patient and kidney survivals were 100%. The study confirmed a high risk of loss of native kidney function in the presence of organic nephropathy. In light of our experience, a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min in an appropriate cutoff for a combined transplantation. Close clinical and instrumental assessment pretransplant is essential before proceeding with a combined transplant program to exclude functional forms and to optimize the use of organs.

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after bone-graft transplantation. Impact on a subsequent renal transplantation: a case report.

Immunological evaluation by panel-reactive antibody (PRA) and determination of anti-HLA specificity are important phases in the evaluation of patients awaiting kidney transplantation. The main causes of immunization are previous solid organ transplantation, hemotransfusion, and pregnancy. It is also possible that immunogenicity can be triggered by vascularized tissue grafts. Immune induction by cryopreserved bone prostheses is not yet understood. A 19-year-old patient with osteosarcoma had undergone resection of the left proximal tibia with reconstruction using human bone in 1997. The donor HLA typing was as follows: A3, A29 (19); B44 (12), Bw4; DR13 (6), DR7, DR52, DR53. The patient was subsequently enrolled onto the waiting list for cadaveric donor kidney transplantation due to chronic kidney failure caused by cisplatin toxicity. Pretransplantation immunological screening using the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique revealed a PRA of 63%. IgG antibody specificities were detected against class I and class II donor antigens, specifically anti-A3, B44, DR7 antibodies, using flow cytometry (Tepnel Luminex). Further immunological studies using single HLA specificity analysis (LSA Class I degrees -II degrees , Tepnel-Luminex) showed direct antibodies against all donor antigen specificities. This case showed immune induction after the implantation of bone prosthesis in a kidney transplant candidate, underlining the importance of the availability of HLA typing data of donors of a human prosthesis.

[Preventing and reducing comorbidity in candidates for kidney transplantation for the improvement of post-operative results]. / Prevenire e ridurre le comorbilita' nei candidati al trapianto di rene per migliorare i risultati post-trapianto.

The correct and constant management of transplant waiting lists is necessary for the optimal utilization of the limited number of organs available for transplantation. The guidelines regarding placement on transplant waiting lists (absolute and relative contraindications) are well documented, even though they are in constant development. The criteria for the monitoring of patients on waiting lists, however, are not so well defined; this aspect is subject to careful evaluation on account of the widening of the criteria for transplantation suitability, the increase in the average age of patients, a rise in the number of enrolments and, as a result, prolonged waiting time (in Italy, the average time spent on a waiting list is 37 months). During the waiting period, a greater risk of clinically significant comorbidities and mortality, above all from cardiovascular events, has been noted (the annual mortality is 5-7% in the US, 1.3% in Italy). An in-depth clinical and instrumental study of patients with chronic renal failure is necessary when screening eligible candidates for transplant programs, individualizing therapeutic strategies, and identifying patients for whom the risks outweigh the potential benefits. Clinical and instrumental monitoring, as well as adequate treatment of comorbidities during the waiting period, can help improve the post-transplant outcome. This work examines the study algorithms and monitoring procedures for patients on kidney transplant waiting lists.

Anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters (TCC) thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic oral anticoagulation is currently used to avoid thrombosis and the malfunction of tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) for hemodialysis (HD). The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of early warfarin administration, after TCC placement, in comparison to its administration after the first thrombosis or malfunction event of the TCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four chronic dialysis patients, who underwent TCC placement between June 2001 and June 2005, were randomized into two groups: 81 patients, group A, started oral anticoagulation 12 hr after the TCC placement (target international normalized ratio (INR) 1.8-2.5), in association with ticlopidine 250 mg/die; 63 patients, group B, started warfarin after the first thrombosis/malfunction episode (target INR 1.8-2.5) in association with ticlopidine 250 mg/die. The efficacy of oral anticoagulation therapy in preventing TCC thrombotic complications was evaluated in a 12-month follow-up period, after TCC placement, in terms of: a) the number of patients with thrombotic-malfunction events; b) the number of thrombotic-malfunction events with urokinase infusion (events/patient/year); c) intradialytic blood flow rate (BFR, ml/min); d) negative blood pressure (BP) from the arterial line of the TCC (AP, mmHg); e) positive BP, in the extracorporeal circuit from the venous line (VP, mmHg); and f) bleeding complications. RESULTS: Ten patients (12%) in group A showed TCC thrombosis/malfunction vs. 33 patients (52%) in group B (p < 0.01). In group A, 0.16 events of thrombosis/malfunction per patient/year vs. 1.65 in group B (p < 0.001) were ob-served. BFR was respectively 305 +/- 34 vs. 246 +/- 42 ml/min (p < 0.001). AP was -124 +/- 13 in group A vs. -174 +/- 21 mmHg in group B (p < 0.05). VP was 112 +/- 28 in group A vs. 168 +/- 41 mmHg in group B (p < 0.05). No patient showed any bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Early warfarin therapy allows a significant reduction in TCC thrombotic complications and an improvement in both arterial and venous fluxes in comparison with the same therapy administered after the first TCC thrombotic/malfunction event. This therapy did not induce any bleeding complications in the patients included in the study.