Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 8(2): 161-71, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20565374

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we assessed the immunosuppressive potential of curcumin, a pharmacologically safe and cost-effective naturally occurring polyphenolic phytochemical, on the induction of Th1 cytokines that are frequently overexpressed in patients experiencing rejection after renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood lymphocytes obtained from 68 renal transplant recipients and 17 healthy controls were treated with curcumin before stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate and were analyzed with flow cytometry for interferon-alpha and interleukin 4 positive cells. RESULTS: Patients experiencing acute rejection exhibited a high level of interferon-alpha (38.3% +/- 11.2%) and a low level of interleukin 4 (4.2% +/- 2.0%) in their activated peripheral blood lymphocytes. The use of curcumin dose-dependently decreased interferon-alpha induction in cultures from healthy controls (28.1% +/- 4.8%-10.7% +/- 5.3%, P < .001), patients experiencing acute rejection (38.3%-18.3%, P < .001), and those experiencing chronic rejection (40.6%-12.9%, P = .01) when compared with corresponding untreated cultures. In contrast, curcumin exerted only a marginal effect on interleukin 4 expression. Interestingly, curcumin was found to inhibit nuclear factor kappa beta activation by blocking the degradation of the inhibitory unit I kappa B alpha. We also noted the synergistic inhibitory effect of in vitro treatment with curcumin in combination with cyclosporine on the peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients experiencing acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide a rationale for the use of curcumin as an affordable, pharmacologically safe, adjuvant immunosuppressant when used with cyclosporine and suggest that curcumin can effectively suppress Th1 cytokine induction after renal transplant.


Assuntos
Curcumina/farmacologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Imunossupressores/farmacologia , Transplante de Rim , Doadores Vivos , Linfócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Células Cultivadas , Doença Crônica , Curcumina/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporina/farmacologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Índia , Interferon gama/metabolismo , Interleucina-4/metabolismo , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Linfócitos/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mitógenos/farmacologia , NF-kappa B/metabolismo , Acetato de Tetradecanoilforbol/farmacologia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Hum Immunol ; 68(5): 362-7, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17462503

RESUMO

This study was undertaken with the primary aim of analyzing the clinical relevance of posttransplant appearance of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and major histocompatibility (MHC) class I related chain A (MICA) antibodies in response to live related donor (LRD) renal transplantation. A total of 185 consecutive post renal transplant recipient serum samples were analyzed for the detection of anti-HLA by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) and MICA antibodies using Luminex techniques. Patients with IgG HLA class I antibodies had more acute rejection episodes compared to the negative group (67% vs. 20%, chi(2) = 7.95, p = 0.005) and also had poor graft survival (44% vs 86%, chi(2) = 6.67, p = 0.01). Similarly, patients with anti-HLA class II antibodies also had significantly lower graft survival and a higher number of rejection episodes as compared to the antibody negative group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.000, respectively). Following transplantation, 30 patients (16%) developed antibodies against any of the MICA alleles (MICA*001, MICA*002, MICA*004, MICA*008, or MIC*009). The graft survival was significantly compromised in these patients as compared to the negative group (60% vs 86%, chi(2) = 10.26, p = 0.001). Further, patients carrying both antibodies (MICA+/HLA+) were the worst affected and showed significantly poor graft survival as compared to the MICA-/HLA- group (17% vs 89%, chi(2) = 19.63, p = 0.000). Similarly, patients with only MICA antibodies or those with only HLA antibodies also had significantly lower graft survival and a higher number of acute rejection episodes (p = 0.035 and p = 0.001, respectively) as compared to the nonsensitized group. The study illustrates that posttransplant monitoring of antibodies to both MICA as well as HLA could be an important prognostic marker in renal transplant subjects.


Assuntos
Formação de Anticorpos/imunologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidade Classe I/imunologia , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Alelos , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/imunologia , Antígenos HLA-D/imunologia , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidade Classe I/genética , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Isoanticorpos/sangue , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Transplante Homólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA