"It took so much of the humanness away": Health care professional experiences providing care to dying patients during COVID-19.

COVID-19 has affected healthcare in profound and unprecedented ways, distorting the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) alike. One area that has received little attention is how COVID-19 affected HCPs caring for dying patients. The goal of this study was to examine the experiences of HCPs working with dying patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Between July 2020-July 2021, we recruited HCPs (N = 25) across Canada. We conducted semi-structured interviews, using a qualitative study design rooted in constructivist grounded theory methodology. The core themes identified were the impact of the pandemic on care utilization, the impact of infection control measures on provision of care, moral distress in the workplace, impact on psychological wellbeing, and adaptive strategies to help HCPs manage emotions and navigate pandemic imposed changes. This is the first Canadian study to qualitatively examine the experiences of HCPs providing care to dying patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications include informing supportive strategies and shaping policies for HCPs providing palliative care.

Pregnancy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative examination of ways of coping.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health restrictions have impacted the mental health and coping strategies of many population groups, including people who are pregnant. Our study sought to explore the ways that pregnant people described coping with stressors associated with the pandemic. N = 5879 pregnant individuals completed the pan-Canadian Pregnancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic Survey between April and December 2020. We used descriptive statistics to quantify sociodemographic characteristics and thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006, 2019) to analyze n = 3316 open-ended text responses to the question "Can you tell us what things you are doing to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic?" The average age of participants was 32 years (SD = 4.4), with the majority identifying as White (83.6%), female (99.7%), married (61.5%), having completed post-secondary education (90.0%), and working full-time (75.4%). We categorized participant responses into two overarching thematic dimensions: (1) ways of coping and (2) coping challenges. Ways of coping included the following main themes: (1) taking care of oneself, (2) connecting socially, (3) engaging in pandemic-specific coping strategies, (4) keeping busy, (5) taking care of others, (6) creating a sense of normalcy, (7) changing perspectives, and (8) practicing spirituality. Coping challenges included the following: (1) the perception of coping poorly, (2) loss of coping methods, (3) managing frontline or essential work, and (4) worries about the future. Findings highlight important implications for targeted prenatal supports delivered remotely, including opportunities for social support, prenatal care, and mental health strategies.

Prevalence and predictors of anxiety disorder courses in the Canadian Armed Forces.

Few studies have examined the longitudinal courses of anxiety disorders in military members. This study examined the prevalence and predictors of courses of any anxiety disorder in members and veterans of the Canadian Armed Forces, including no lifetime, remitted, new onset, and persistent/recurrent anxiety disorder. The 2018 Canadian Armed Forces Members and Veterans Mental Health Follow-up Survey is a 16-year follow-up of n = 2941 participants from the Canadian Community Health Survey: Canadian Forces Supplement in 2002. Diagnoses of any DSM-IV anxiety disorder (i.e., generalized anxiety, social anxiety, and/or panic disorder) in 2002 and 2018 were used to create four anxiety course groups. A large proportion of the sample (36.3 %; new onset = 24.6 %, remitting = 6.9 %, and persistent/recurrent = 4.8 %) met criteria for an anxiety disorder during one or both time points. Factors at baseline and/or between 2002 and 2018, including income, education, military rank, comorbidity of PTSD or depression, deployment history, and traumatic events, were positively associated with most anxiety courses relative to no anxiety in analyses. Targeted interventions are needed to help mitigate anxiety disorders among this population. Social support and active coping were protective factors for most anxiety courses and may need to be incorporated into targeted interventions.

Perceived Need, Mental Health Literacy, Neuroticism and Self- Stigma Predict Mental Health Service Use Among Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Older adults are the least likely age group to seek mental health services. However, few studies have explored a comprehensive range of sociodemographic, psychological, and social barriers and facilitators to seeking treatment in later life. METHODS: A cross-sectional, national sample of Canadian older adults (55+, N = 2,745) completed an online survey including reliable and valid measures of predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics, based on Andersen's behavioral model of health, as well as self-reported use of mental health services. Univariate and hierarchical logistic regressions predicted past 5-year mental health service use. RESULTS: Mental health service use was most strongly and consistently associated with greater perceived need (OR = 11.48) and mental health literacy (OR = 2.16). Less self-stigma of seeking help (OR = .65) and greater neuroticism (OR = 1.57) also predicted help-seeking in our final model, although their effects were not as strong or consistent across gender, marital status, and age subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The need category was crucial to seeking help, but predisposing psychological factors were also significant barriers to treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Interventions that target older adults high in neuroticism by improving perceptions of need for treatment, mental health literacy, and self-stigma of seeking help may be particularly effective ways of improving access to mental health services.

COVID-19 and the Experiences and Needs of Staff and Management Working at the Front Lines of Long-Term Care in Central Canada.

Across the globe, long-term care has been under increased pressure throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This is the first study to examine the experiences and needs of long-term care staff and management during COVID-19, in the Canadian context. Our group conducted online survey research with 70 staff and management working at public long-term care facilities in central Canada, using validated quantitative measures to examine perceived stress and caregiver burden; and open-ended items to explore stressors, ways of coping, and barriers to accessing mental health supports. Findings indicate moderate levels of stress and caregiver burden, and highlight the significant stressors associated with working in long-term care during the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., rapid changes in pandemic guidelines, increased workload, "meeting the needs of residents and families", fear of contracting COVID-19 and COVID-19 coming into long-term care facilities, and concern over a negative public view of long-term care staff and facilities). A small subset (13.2%) of our sample identified accessing mental health supports to cope with work-related stress, with most participants identifying barriers to seeking help. Novel findings of this research highlight the significant and unmet needs of this high-risk segment of the population.

Moral Injury Among Frontline Long-Term Care Staff and Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: A growing body of research highlights the experiences of moral injury among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moral injury (i.e., participating in or witnessing acts that violate one's central moral values), is associated with a host of psychological sequelae and corresponding negative psychosocial impacts. There is a lack of research examining the experiences of moral injury among those working in long-term care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the drastic impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on long-term care facilities in Canada, it is important to understand the experiences of moral injury among those working in long-term care settings to inform the development of effective prevention and intervention strategies. Objectives & Method: The objectives of this study were to understand the experiences and impact of moral injury among Canadian frontline long-term care workers (staff and management) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants (N = 32 long-term care staff and management working in Ottawa and Manitoba) completed in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews and clinical diagnostic assessments (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interviews; MINI; Version 7.0.2) between March 2021-June 2021. Findings: The core category of our qualitative grounded theory model of moral injury in long-term care exemplified four shared types of morally injurious experiences, paired with cognitive, affective, and physiological symptom domains. Seven associated main themes emerged, contributing to the experiences and impact of moral injury in long-term care: 1) Beliefs about older adults and long-term care; 2) Interpretation of morally injurious experiences; 3) Management of morally injurious experiences; 4) Long-term care pandemic impacts; 5) Personal pandemic impacts; 6) Structural impacts in long-term care; and 7) Mental health needs and supports. Clinical assessments demonstrated anxiety disorders (n = 4) and feeding and eating disorders (n = 3) were among the most frequently classified current psychiatric disorders among long-term care workers. Conclusions: This is the first Canadian study to examine the experiences and impact of moral injury in long-term care during the COVID-19 pandemic using qualitative and clinical diagnostic methodologies. Implications and insights for screening and intervention are offered.

Shame's Associations with Depression and Problem Drinking: An Ecological Momentary Study.

INTRODUCTION: Depression and problem drinking are comorbid in emerging adulthood, yet the processes that link them are not well understood. Research has argued that shame has a unique influence on the experience of problematic drinking, but this has rarely been assessed at the state level. Using ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), we assessed whether shame, and not guilt, mediated the association between baseline depression and alcohol use and problems. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-four emerging adults (Mage= 19.27) completed a 12-day EMA study. Multilevel models were used to test hypotheses. RESULTS: In a model with alcohol use as the outcome, there were no significant associations between shame or guilt and alcohol use at the within- or between-subjects level. In a model with alcohol problems as the outcome, guilt was positively associated with alcohol problems but only at the daily level. At the between-subjects level and after controlling for guilt, there was a significant association between depression, shame, and alcohol problems; average levels of shame mediated the association between depression and alcohol problems. In post-hoc reverse directionality models, average alcohol problems mediated the relationship between depression and shame and guilt at the between-person level. No mediation was present for alcohol use. CONCLUSION: After controlling for guilt, shame is an emotion that helps explain risk for alcohol problems among depressed emerging adults, which has implications for targeted interventions. Reciprocal associations between shame, guilt, and alcohol problems emerged highlighting the need for more fulsome assessments of shame and guilt in future EMA research.