Dosimetric evaluation of high-Z inhomogeneity with modern algorithms: A collaborative study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate modern dose calculation algorithms with high-Z prosthetic devices used in radiation treatment. METHODS: A bilateral hip prosthetic patient was selected to see the effect of modern algorithms from the commercial system for plan comparisons. The CT data with dose constraints were sent to various institutions for dose calculations. The dosimetric parameters, D98%, D90%, D50% and D2% were compared. A water phantom with an actual prosthetic device was used to measure the dose using a parallel plate ionization chamber. RESULTS: Dosimetric variability in PTV coverage was significant (>10%) among various treatment planning algorithms. The comparison of PTV dosimetric parameters, D98%, D90%, D50% and D2% as well as organs at risk (OAR) have large discrepancies compared to our previous publication with older algorithms (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.02.007) but provides realistic dose distribution with better homogeneity index (HI). Backscatter and forward scatter attenuation of the prosthesis was measured showing differences <15.7% at the interface among various algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Modern algorithms dose distributions have improved greatly compared to older generation algorithms. However, there is still significant differences at high-Z-tissue interfaces compared to the measurements. To ensure accuracy, it's important to take precautions avoiding placing any prosthesis in the beam direction and using type C algorithms.

Relative thoracic changes from supine to upright patient position: A proton collaborative group study.

This study presents position changes of a few radiotherapy-relevant thoracic organs between upright and typical supine patient orientations. Using tools in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS), key anatomical distances were measured for four-dimensional CT data sets and analyzed for the two patient orientations. The uncertainty was calculated as the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the relative difference for each of the four analyzed changes for upright relative to supine, as follows: the distance of the bottom of the heart to the top of the sternum, it changed +2.6% or +4 mm (95% CI [+0.30%,+4.9%]); the distance of the center of the C3 vertebra to the backrest, it changed +29% (95% CI [+22%,+36%]); the contoured left and right lungs increased their volumes respectively: +17% (95% CI [+12%,+21%]) for the left, and +9.9% (95% CI [+4.1%,+16%]); and lastly, the distance from the top of the sternum to the top of the liver, but its uncertainty far exceeded the average change by a factor of two. This last result is therefore inconclusive, the others show that with 95% confidence that a change in internal positions is observed for lung volumes and heart position that could be important for upright treatments.

Comparative accuracy and resolution assessment of two prototype proton computed tomography scanners.

BACKGROUND: Improving the accuracy of relative stopping power (RSP) in proton therapy may allow reducing range margins. Proton computed tomography (pCT) has been shown to provide state-of-the-art RSP accuracy estimation, and various scanner prototypes have recently been built. The different approaches used in scanner design are expected to impact spatial resolution and RSP accuracy. PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to perform the first direct comparison, in terms of spatial resolution and RSP accuracy, of two pCT prototype scanners installed at the same facility and by using the same image reconstruction algorithm. METHODS: A phantom containing cylindrical inserts of known RSP was scanned at the phase-II pCT prototype of the U.S. pCT collaboration and at the commercially oriented ProtonVDA scanner. Following distance-driven binning filtered backprojection reconstruction, the radial edge spread function of high-density inserts was used to estimate the spatial resolution. RSP accuracy was evaluated by the mean absolute percent error (MAPE) over the inserts. No direct imaging dose estimation was possible, which prevented a comparison of the two scanners in terms of RSP noise. RESULTS: In terms of RSP accuracy, both scanners achieved the same MAPE of 0.72% when excluding the porous sinus insert from the evaluation. The ProtonVDA scanner reached a better overall MAPE when all inserts and the body of the phantom were accounted for (0.81%), compared to the phase-II scanner (1.14%). The spatial resolution with the phase-II scanner was found to be 0.61 lp/mm, while for the ProtonVDA scanner somewhat lower at 0.46 lp/mm. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison between two prototype pCT scanners operated in the same clinical facility showed that they both fulfill the requirement of an RSP accuracy of about 1%. Their spatial resolution performance reflects the different design choices of either a scanner with full tracking capabilities (phase-II) or of a more compact tracker system, which only provides the positions of protons but not their directions (ProtonVDA).

Chemoradiation with Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Proton Collaborative Group Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiation therapy has been safely implemented in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but not locally advanced NSCLC owing to prohibitive toxicities with photon therapy. Proton therapy, however, may allow for safe delivery of hypofractionated radiation therapy. We sought to determine whether hypofractionated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy improves overall survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Proton Collaborative Group conducted a phase 1/2 single-arm nonrandomized prospective multicenter trial from 2013 through 2018. We received consent from 32 patients, of whom 28 were eligible for on-study treatment. Patients had stage II or III unresectable NSCLC (based on the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer's staging manual) and received hypofractionated proton therapy at 2.5 to 4 Gy per fraction to a total 60 Gy with concurrent platin-based doublet chemotherapy. The primary outcome was 1-year overall survival comparable to the 62% reported for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9410 trial. RESULTS: The trial closed early owing to slow accrual, in part, from a competing trial, RTOG 1308. Median patient age was 70 years (range, 50-86 years). Patients were predominantly male (n = 20), White (n = 23), and prior smokers (n = 27). Most had stage III NSCLC (n = 22), 50% of whom had adenocarcinoma. After a median follow-up of 31 months, the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 89% and 49%, respectively, and progression-free survival rates were 58% and 32%, respectively. No acute grade ≥3 esophagitis occurred. Only 14% developed a grade ≥3 radiation-related pulmonary toxic effect. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated proton therapy delivered at 2.5 to 3.53 Gy per fraction to a total 60 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy provides promising survival, and additional examination through larger studies may be warranted.

A comparison of proton stopping power measured with proton CT and x-ray CT in fresh postmortem porcine structures.

PURPOSE: Currently, calculations of proton range in proton therapy patients are based on a conversion of CT Hounsfield units of patient tissues into proton relative stopping power. Uncertainties in this conversion necessitate larger proximal and distal planned target volume margins. Proton CT can potentially reduce these uncertainties by directly measuring proton stopping power. We aim to demonstrate proton CT imaging with complex porcine samples, to analyze in detail three-dimensional regions of interest, and to compare proton stopping powers directly measured by proton CT to those determined from x-ray CT scans. METHODS: We have used a prototype proton imaging system with single proton tracking to acquire proton radiography and proton CT images of a sample of porcine pectoral girdle and ribs, and a pig's head. We also acquired close in time x-ray CT scans of the same samples and compared proton stopping power measurements from the two modalities. In the case of the pig's head, we obtained x-ray CT scans from two different scanners and compared results from high-dose and low-dose settings. RESULTS: Comparing our reconstructed proton CT images with images derived from x-ray CT scans, we find agreement within 1% to 2% for soft tissues and discrepancies of up to 6% for compact bone. We also observed large discrepancies, up to 40%, for cavitated regions with mixed content of air, soft tissue, and bone, such as sinus cavities or tympanic bullae. CONCLUSIONS: Our images and findings from a clinically realistic proton CT scanner demonstrate the potential for proton CT to be used for low-dose treatment planning with reduced margins.

An empirical artifact correction for proton computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To reduce image artifacts of proton computed tomography (pCT) from a preclinical scanner, for imaging of the relative stopping power (RSP) needed for particle therapy treatment planning using a simple empirical artifact correction method. METHODS: We adapted and employed a correction method previously used for beam-hardening correction in x-ray CT which makes use of a single scan of a custom-built homogeneous phantom with known RSP. Exploiting the linearity of the filtered backprojection operation, a function was found which corrects water-equivalent path lengths (RSP line integrals) in experimental scans using a prototype pCT scanner. The correction function was applied to projection values of subsequent scans of a homogeneous water phantom, a sensitometric phantom with various inserts and an anthropomorphic head phantom. Data were acquired at two different incident proton energies to test the robustness of the method. RESULTS: Inaccuracies in the detection process caused an offset and known ring artifacts in the water phantom which were considerably reduced using the proposed method. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of mean RSP values of all inserts of the sensitometric phantom and the water phantom was reduced from 0.87% to 0.44% and from 0.86% to 0.48% for the two incident energies respectively. In the head phantom a clear reduction of artifacts was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Image artifacts of experimental pCT scans with a prototype scanner could substantially be reduced both in homogeneous, heterogeneous and anthropomorphic phantoms. RSP accuracy was also improved.

Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Breast Cancer Subcommittee.

Radiation therapy plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Recent years have seen improvements in breast cancer survival and a greater appreciation of potential long-term morbidity associated with the dose and volume of irradiated organs. Proton therapy reduces the dose to nontarget structures while optimizing target coverage. However, there remain additional financial costs associated with proton therapy, despite reductions over time, and studies have yet to demonstrate that protons improve upon the treatment outcomes achieved with photon radiation therapy. There remains considerable heterogeneity in proton patient selection and techniques, and the rapid technological advances in the field have the potential to affect evidence evaluation, given the long latency period for breast cancer radiation therapy recurrence and late effects. In this consensus statement, we assess the data available to the radiation oncology community of proton therapy for breast cancer, provide expert consensus recommendations on indications and technique, and highlight ongoing trials' cost-effectiveness analyses and key areas for future research.

Selection of Mediastinal Lymphoma Patients for Proton Therapy Within the Proton Collaborative Group Registry: Concordance With the ILROG Guidelines.

PURPOSE: As patients with mediastinal lymphoma are typically young with curable disease, advanced radiation techniques such as proton therapy are often considered to minimize subacute and late toxicity. However, it is unclear which mediastinal lymphoma patients are treated with proton therapy. Within a prospective, multi-institutional proton registry, we characterized mediastinal lymphoma patients treated with proton therapy and assessed concordance with consensus recommendations published in 2018 by the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG). METHODS: Eligible patients included those with lymphoma of the mediastinum treated exclusively with proton therapy for whom digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) treatment data were available for review. Given the challenge with reliably visualizing the left mainstem coronary artery, the inferior-most aspect of the left pulmonary artery (PA) was used as a surrogate. Extent of disease was characterized as upper mediastinum (above level of left PA), middle mediastinum (below left PA but at or above level of T8), or low mediastinum (below T8). RESULTS: Between November 2012 and April 2019, 56 patients were treated and met inclusion criteria. Patients treated with proton therapy were young (median, 24 y; range: 12 to 88), with over half being female (55%). Patients were most commonly treated at initial diagnosis (86%) and had Hodgkin lymphoma (79%). Most patients (96%) had mediastinal disease that extended down to the level of the heart: 48% had middle and 48% had low mediastinal involvement. Nearly all patients (96%) met the ILROG consensus recommendations: 95% had lower mediastinal disease, 46% were young females, and 9% were heavily pretreated. Heart (mean) and lung dose (mean, V5, V20) were significantly associated with lowest extent of mediastinal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinal lymphoma patients treated with proton therapy are typically young with lower mediastinal involvement. Within a prospective, multi-institutional proton registry, nearly all treated patients fit the ILROG consensus recommendations regarding which mediastinal lymphoma patients may most benefit from proton therapy.

Analysis of characteristics of images acquired with a prototype clinical proton radiography system.

PURPOSE: Verification of patient-specific proton stopping powers obtained in the patient's treatment position can be used to reduce the distal and proximal margins needed in particle beam planning. Proton radiography can be used as a pretreatment instrument to verify integrated stopping power consistency with the treatment planning CT. Although a proton radiograph is a pixel by pixel representation of integrated stopping powers, the image may also be of high enough quality and contrast to be used for patient alignment. This investigation quantifies the accuracy and image quality of a prototype proton radiography system on a clinical proton delivery system. METHODS: We have developed a clinical prototype proton radiography system designed for integration into efficient clinical workflows. We tested the images obtained by this system for water-equivalent thickness (WET) accuracy, image noise, and spatial resolution. We evaluated the WET accuracy by comparing the average WET and rms error in several regions of interest (ROI) on a proton radiograph of a custom peg phantom. We measured the spatial resolution on a CATPHAN Line Pair phantom and a custom edge phantom by measuring the 10% value of the modulation transfer function (MTF). In addition, we tested the ability to detect proton range errors due to anatomical changes in a patient with a customized CIRS pediatric head phantom and inserts of varying WET placed in the posterior fossae of the brain. We took proton radiographs of the phantom with each insert in place and created difference maps between the resulting images. Integrated proton range was measured from an ROI in the difference maps. RESULTS: We measured the WET accuracy of the proton radiographic images to be ±0.2 mm (0.33%) from known values. The spatial resolution of the images was 0.6 lp/mm on the line pair phantom and 1.13 lp/mm on the edge phantom. We were able to detect anatomical changes producing changes in WET as low as 0.6 mm. CONCLUSION: The proton radiography system produces images with image quality sufficient for pretreatment range consistency verification.

Proof of concept image artifact reduction by energy-modulated proton computed tomography (EMpCT).

PURPOSE: To reduce imaging artifacts and improve image quality of a specific proton computed tomography (pCT) prototype scanner by combining pCT data acquired at two different incident proton energies to avoid protons stopping in sub-optimal detector sections. METHODS: Image artifacts of a prototype pCT scanner are linked to protons stopping close to internal structures of the scanner's multi-stage energy detector. We aimed at avoiding such protons by acquiring pCT data at two different incident energies and combining the data in post-processing from which artifact-reduced images of the relative stopping power (RSP) were calculated. Energy-modulated pCT (EMpCT) images were assessed visually and quantitatively and compared to the original mono-energetic images in terms of RSP accuracy and noise. Data were acquired for a homogeneous water phantom. RESULTS: RSP images reconstructed from the mono-energetic datasets displayed local image artifacts which were ring-shaped due to the homogeneity of the phantom. The merged EMpCT dataset achieved a superior visual image quality with reduced artifacts and only minor remaining rings. The inter-quartile range (25/75) of RSP values was reduced from 0.7% with the current standard acquisition to 0.2% with EMpCT due to the reduction of ring artifacts. In this study, dose was doubled compared to a standard scan, but we discuss strategies to reduce excess dose. CONCLUSIONS: EMpCT allows to effectively avoid regions of the energy detector that cause image artifacts. Thereby, image quality is improved.

Individualized quality of life benefit and cost-effectiveness estimates of proton therapy for patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Proton therapy is a promising advancement in radiation oncology especially in terms of reducing normal tissue toxicity, although it is currently expensive and of limited availability. Here we estimated the individual quality of life benefit and cost-effectiveness of proton therapy in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT), as a decision-making tool for treatment individualization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Normal tissue complication probability models were used to estimate the risk of dysphagia, esophagitis, hypothyroidism, xerostomia and oral mucositis for 33 patients, comparing delivered photon intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) plans to intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost were calculated for each complication while accounting for patient-specific conditional survival probability and assigning quality-adjustment factors based on complication severity. Cost-effectiveness was modeled based on upfront costs of IMPT and IMRT, and the cost of acute and/or long-term management of treatment complications. Uncertainties in all model parameters and sensitivity analyses were included through Monte Carlo sampling. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) showed considerable variability in the cost of QALYs spared between patients, with median $361,405/QALY for all patients, varying from $54,477/QALY to $1,508,845/QALY between individual patients. Proton therapy was more likely to be cost-effective for patients with p16-positive tumors ($234,201/QALY), compared to p16-negative tumors ($516,297/QALY). For patients with p16-positive tumors treated with comprehensive nodal irradiation, proton therapy is estimated to be cost-effective in ≥ 50% of sampled cases for 8/9 patients at $500,000/QALY, compared to 6/24 patients who either have p16-negative tumors or receive unilateral neck irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Proton therapy cost-effectiveness varies greatly among oropharyngeal cancer patients, and highlights the importance of individualized decision-making. Although the upfront cost, societal willingness to pay and healthcare administration can vary greatly among different countries, identifying patients for whom proton therapy will have the greatest benefit can optimize resource allocation and inform prospective clinical trial design.

Proton Radiotherapy to Preserve Fertility and Endocrine Function: A Translational Investigation.

PURPOSE: Photon radiation therapy (x-ray radiation therapy [XRT] and gamma-ray radiation therapy [GRT]) of tumors close to ovaries causes reproductive and endocrine sequelae due to ovarian primordial follicle depletion. Given its finite range, proton radiation therapy (PRT) can preserve ovarian function when ovaries are positioned distal to the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) in tumors of the abdominopelvic region. This study compared anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels (a biomarker of ovarian function) and primordial follicle survival after in vivo mouse pelvic GRT versus PRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred twenty-four female prepubertal mice received sham, GRT, or PRT with ovaries positioned at various depth with respect to the proton SOBP, with single doses of 1.8 or 0.2 Gy. AMH was measured at baseline, 1, 3, and 8 weeks after treatment, and the total number of surviving primordial follicles was counted. Multivariable linear mixed-effects modeling was used to assess the relationship between radiation therapy modality and dose on AMH and primordial follicle survival. RESULTS: For ovaries beyond the SOBP, ovarian function (P = .5) and ovarian primordial follicle (OPF; P = 1.0) were spared relative to sham controls. For ovaries in the SOBP plateau, ovarian function and primordial follicle reserve 8 weeks after treatment were reduced for all groups: 1.8 Gy GRT (ßAMH = -4.9 ng/mL; ßOPF = -728.2/animal), 1.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE] = 1.1) PRT (ßAMH = -5.1 ng/mL; ßOPF = -728.2/animal), 0.2 Gy GRT (ßAMH = -2.5 ng/mL; ßOPF = -595.1/animal), and 0.2 Gy (RBE = 1.1) PRT (ßAMH = -3.0 ng/mL; ßOPF = -555.4/animal) relative to sham controls (all differences P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study uses an animal model to demonstrate the safety of proton therapy in sparing fertility. Ovaries positioned beyond the SOBP during PRT maintain ovarian reserve, suggesting that a proton beam has no energy and exit dose beyond SOBP. This study proposes that proton therapy is much safer than photon radiation therapy to protect ovarian follicles with the same dose, and it supports further testing of proton therapy for abdominopelvic tumors in young women.

Technical Note: A fast and monolithic prototype clinical proton radiography system optimized for pencil beam scanning.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate a proton-imaging system based on well-established fast scintillator technology to achieve high performance with low cost and complexity, with the potential of a straightforward translation into clinical use. METHODS: The system tracks individual protons through one (X, Y) scintillating fiber tracker plane upstream and downstream of the object and into a 13-cm -thick scintillating block residual energy detector. The fibers in the tracker planes are multiplexed into silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) to reduce the number of electronics channels. The light signal from the residual energy detector is collected by 16 photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). Only four signals from the PMTs are output from each event, which allows for fast signal readout. A robust calibration method of the PMT signal to residual energy has been developed to obtain accurate proton images. The development of patient-specific scan patterns using multiple input energies allows for an image to be produced with minimal excess dose delivered to the patient. RESULTS: The calibration of signals in the energy detector produces accurate residual range measurements limited by intrinsic range straggling. We measured the water-equivalent thickness (WET) of a block of solid water (physical thickness of 6.10 mm) with a proton radiograph. The mean WET from all pixels in the block was 6.13 cm (SD 0.02 cm). The use of patient-specific scan patterns using multiple input energies enables imaging with a compact range detector. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a prototype clinical proton radiography system for pretreatment imaging in proton radiation therapy. We have optimized the system for use with pencil beam scanning systems and have achieved a reduction of size and complexity compared to previous designs.

Experimental and Monte Carlo characterization of a dynamic collimation system prototype for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

PURPOSE: There has been a growing interest in the development of energy-specific collimators for low-energy pencil beam scanning (PBS) to reduce the lateral penumbra. One particular device that has been the focus of several recent published works is the dynamic collimation system (DCS), which provides energy-specific collimation by intercepting the scanned proton beam as it nears to target edge with a set of orthogonal trimmer blades. While several computational studies have shown that this dynamic collimator can provide additional healthy tissue sparing, there has not been any rigorous experimental work to benchmark the theoretical models used in these initial studies. Therefore, it was the purpose of this work to demonstrate an experimental method that could integrate an experimental prototype with a clinical PBS system and benchmark the Monte Carlo methods that have been used to model the DCS. METHODS: An experimental DCS prototype was designed and built in house to actively collimate individual proton beamlets during PBS within a well-characterized experimental setup. Monte Carlo methods were initially used to assess construction tolerances and later benchmarked against measurements, including integral depth dose and lateral asymmetric beamlet profiles. The experimental apparatus and measurement geometry were modeled using MCNP6 benchmarked from measurements performed at the Northwestern Chicago Proton Center. RESULTS: Gamma analysis tests were used to evaluate the agreement between the measured and simulated profiles with a strict 1 mm/1% criteria and 5% dose threshold. Excellent agreement was observed between the simulated and measured profiles, which included 1 mm/1% gamma analysis pass rates of at least 100% and 95% for the integral depth dose (IDD) profiles and lateral profiles, respectively. Differences in the relative profile shape were observed experimentally between beamlets collimated on- and off-axis, which was attributed to the partial transmission of the beam through an unfocused collimator. Exposure rates resulting from the activation of the device were monitored with survey meter measurements and were found to agree with Monte Carlo estimates of the exposure rate to within 20%. CONCLUSION: A DCS prototype was constructed and integrated into a clinical dose delivery system. While the results of this work are not exhaustive, they demonstrate the effects of beam source divergence, device activation, and beamlet deflection during scanning, which were found to be successfully modeled using Monte Carlo methods and experimentally benchmarked. Excellent agreement was achieved between the simulated and measured lateral spot profiles of collimated beamlets delivered on- and off-axis in PBS. The Monte Carlo models adequately predicted the measured elevated plateau region in the integral depth-dose profiles from the low-energy scatter off the collimators.

Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: A broad range of stakeholders have called for randomised evidence on the potential clinical benefits and harms of proton therapy, a type of radiation therapy, for patients with breast cancer. Radiation therapy is an important component of curative treatment, reducing cancer recurrence and extending survival. Compared with photon therapy, the international treatment standard, proton therapy reduces incidental radiation to the heart. Our overall objective is to evaluate whether the differences between proton and photon therapy cardiac radiation dose distributions lead to meaningful reductions in cardiac morbidity and mortality after treatment for breast cancer. METHODS: We are conducting a large scale, multicentre pragmatic randomised clinical trial for patients with breast cancer who will be followed longitudinally for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, health-related quality of life and cancer control outcomes. A total of 1278 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer will be randomly allocated to receive either photon or proton therapy. The primary outcomes are major cardiovascular events, defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for unstable angina, heart failure, valvular disease, arrhythmia or pericardial disease. Secondary endpoints are urgent or unanticipated outpatient or emergency room visits for heart failure, arrhythmia, valvular disease or pericardial disease. The Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Clinical Events Centre will conduct centralised, blinded adjudication of primary outcome events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RadComp trial has been approved by the institutional review boards of all participating sites. Recruitment began in February 2016. Current version of the protocol is A3, dated 08 November 2018. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, stakeholder engagement efforts and presentation to the public via lay media outlets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02603341.

Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.

Proton computed tomography (pCT) has been proposed as an alternative to x-ray computed tomography (CT) for acquiring relative to water stopping power (RSP) maps used for proton treatment planning dose calculations. In parallel, it has been shown that dual energy x-ray CT (DECT) improves RSP accuracy when compared to conventional single energy x-ray CT. This study aimed at directly comparing the RSP accuracy of both modalities using phantoms scanned at an advanced prototype pCT scanner and a state-of-the-art DECT scanner. Two phantoms containing 13 tissue-mimicking inserts of known RSP were scanned at the pCT phase II prototype and a latest generation dual-source DECT scanner (Siemens SOMATOM Definition FORCE). RSP accuracy was compared by mean absolute percent error (MAPE) over all inserts. A highly realistic Monte Carlo (MC) simulation was used to gain insight on pCT image artifacts which degraded MAPE. MAPE was 0.55% for pCT and 0.67% for DECT. The realistic MC simulation agreed well with pCT measurements ([Formula: see text]). Both simulation and experimental results showed ring artifacts in pCT images which degraded the MAPE compared to an ideal pCT simulation ([Formula: see text]). Using the realistic simulation, we could identify sources of artifacts, which are attributed to the interfaces in the five-stage plastic scintillator energy detector and calibration curve interpolation regions. Secondary artifacts stemming from the proton tracker geometry were also identified. The pCT prototype scanner outperformed a state-of-the-art DECT scanner in terms of RSP accuracy (MAPE) for plastic tissue mimicking inserts. Since artifacts tended to concentrate in the inserts, their mitigation may lead to further improvements in the reported pCT accuracy.

AAPM task group 224: Comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance.

PURPOSE:  Task Group (TG) 224 was established by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Science Council under the Radiation Therapy Committee and Work Group on Particle Beams. The group was charged with developing comprehensive quality assurance (QA) guidelines and recommendations for the three commonly employed proton therapy techniques for beam delivery: scattering, uniform scanning, and pencil beam scanning. This report supplements established QA guidelines for therapy machine performance for other widely used modalities, such as photons and electrons (TG 142, TG 40, TG 24, TG 22, TG 179, and Medical Physics Practice Guideline 2a) and shares their aims of ensuring the safe, accurate, and consistent delivery of radiation therapy dose distributions to patients. METHODS:  To provide a basis from which machine-specific QA procedures can be developed, the report first describes the different delivery techniques and highlights the salient components of the related machine hardware. Depending on the particular machine hardware, certain procedures may be more or less important, and each institution should investigate its own situation. RESULTS:  In lieu of such investigations, this report identifies common beam parameters that are typically checked, along with the typical frequencies of those checks (daily, weekly, monthly, or annually). The rationale for choosing these checks and their frequencies is briefly described. Short descriptions of suggested tools and procedures for completing some of the periodic QA checks are also presented. CONCLUSION:  Recommended tolerance limits for each of the recommended QA checks are tabulated, and are based on the literature and on consensus data from the clinical proton experience of the task group members. We hope that this and other reports will serve as a reference for clinical physicists wishing either to establish a proton therapy QA program or to evaluate an existing one.

LET response variability of Gafchromic TM EBT3 film from a 60 Co calibration in clinical proton beam qualities.

PURPOSE: To establish a method of accurate dosimetry required to quantify the expected linear energy transfer (LET) quenching effect of EBT3 film used to benchmark the dose distribution for a given treatment field and specified measurement depth. In order to facilitate this technique, a full analysis of film calibration which considers LET variability at the plane of measurement and as a function of proton beam quality is demonstrated. Additionally, the corresponding uncertainty from the process was quantified for several measurement scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The net change in optical density (OD) from a single version of Gafchromic TM EBT3 film was measured using an Epson flatbed scanner and NIST-traceable OD filters. Film OD response was characterized with respect to the known dose to water at the point of measurement for both a NIST-traceable 60 Co beam at the UWADCL and several clinical single-energy and spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) proton beam qualities at the Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center. Increasing proton LET environments were acquired by placing film at increasing depths of Gammex HE Solid Water® whose water-equivalent thickness was characterized prior to measurement. RESULTS: A strong LET dependence was observed near the Bragg peak (BP) consistent with previous studies performed with earlier versions of EBT3 film. The influence of range straggling on the film's LET response appears to have a uniform effect toward the BP regardless of the nominal beam energy. Proximal to this depth, the film's response decreased with decreasing energy at the same dose-average LET. The opposite trend was observed for depths past the BP. Changes in the SOBP energy modulation showed a linear relationship between the film's relative response and dose-averaged LET. Relative effectiveness factors (RE) were observed to range between 2%-7% depending on the width of the SOBP and depth of the film. Using the field-specific calibration technique, a total k = 1 uncertainty in the absorbed dose to water was estimated to range from 4.68%-5.21%. CONCLUSION: While EBT3 film's strong LET dependence is a common problem in proton beam dosimetry, this work has shown that the LET dependence can be taken into account by carefully considering the depth and energy modulation across the film using field-specific corrections. RE factors were determined with a combined k = 1 uncertainty of 3.57% for SOBP environments and between 3.17%-4.69% for uniform, monoenergetic fields proximal to the distal 80% of the BP.

Reconstructed and Real Proton Radiographs for Image-Guidance in Proton Beam Therapy.

One of the major challenges to proton beam therapy at this time is the uncertainty of the true range of a clinical treatment proton beam as it traverses the various tissues and organs in a human body. This uncertainty necessitates the addition of greater "margins" to the planning target volume along the direction of the beam to ensure safety and tumor target coverage. Proton radiography holds promise as both an image-guidance method for proton beam therapy and as a means of estimating particle beam range in the clinic. In this brief report, we present some of the first real and reconstructed proton radiographs using our particular system. Our qualitative review of these images indicates that this method has excellent potential as a proton radiography-based image guidance system. Based on the encouraging results of our preliminary work, more rigorous and quantitative analyses will be performed shortly and we shall continue to explore the potential of this approach for addressing the particle beam range uncertainty issue.