Cataract Outcomes Following Scleral Buckle Surgery for Retinal Detachment.

Purpose: To investigate refractive, visual, and safety outcomes of cataract surgery performed after scleral buckling (SB) for retinal detachment (RD). Patients and methods: A chart review at an academic medical center identified eyes with history of SB followed by subsequent cataract extraction between 2010 and 2022. Eyes with less than 3 weeks follow-up, silicone oil at time of biometry measurement, previous cornea surgery, or co-existing pathology impacting refractive outcomes were excluded. Predicted postoperative spherical equivalents (SE) were calculated with the Barrett Universal II (BU2), Kane, and SRK/T formulas for the implanted intraocular lens (IOL), and complications occurring within 1 year of surgery were abstracted. Results: Sixty eyes of 60 patients met criteria for inclusion, and 40 (66.7%) had postoperative refraction recorded. Absolute prediction errors were 0.49, 0.45, and 0.52D with BU2, Kane, and SRK/T, respectively. Actual postoperative refraction was within 0.5 and 1.0 D of predicted in 26 (65.0%) and 36 (90.0%) using BU2, 23 (58%) and 37 (93%) using Kane, and 21 (52.5%) and 36 (90.0%) using SRK/T. In eyes with macula-on RD, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of logMAR 0.301 (≈20/40) and logMAR 0.544 (≈20/70) or better was achieved in 12 (75.0%) and 15 (93.8%) of eyes. For macula-off RD eyes, these proportions were 19 (63.3%) and 24 (80.0%), respectively. Posterior capsular opacification requiring Nd: YAG capsulotomy was the most frequent complication in 30 (56.7%) eyes. Conclusion: Refractive outcomes of cataract surgery following SB may be modestly reduced, even when using modern formulas. Nevertheless, cataract surgery in this population results in favorable visual outcomes.

The retina is the part of the eye that is responsible for converting incoming light into a signal that the brain can interpret. A retinal detachment is an emergent condition in which the retina is torn away from its normal position. Scleral buckling is one method of surgically reattaching the retina. Although quite successful, scleral buckling can cause changes to the shape of the eye, and also increases the risk of opacification of the natural lens of the eye, otherwise known as a cataract. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with prior scleral buckle surgery. The results show that despite advancements in methods of measuring the shape of the eye, calculating the appropriately powered IOL to implant, and surgical technique, cataract surgery in eyes with prior scleral buckling may result in poorer outcomes compared to eyes with no history of scleral buckling.

Spontaneous Corneal Clearing after Descemet Membrane Rupture and Near-Total Detachment in Keratoglobus: A Case Report.

Introduction: We present a case of a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and keratoglobus (KG) who had a near-total rupture of Descemet's membrane followed by spontaneous corneal clearing. This case is unique in that it demonstrates the potentially excellent outcome of conservative treatment for Descemet's rupture in patients with KG and illustrates the impressive migratory potential of healthy endothelial cells. Case Presentation: An 11-year-old girl with OI and KG who had rupture and near-total detachment of Descemet's membrane presented for evaluation. This was managed conservatively and resulted in the eventual spontaneous clearing of the cornea. A similar process happened in the fellow eye some years later. Given the result of conservative management originally, the patient was once again treated conservatively, with significant improvement in corneal edema and visual acuity. Conclusion: Given the size of the ruptures, this case highlights the dynamic nature of the corneal endothelium and provides an extreme example of the migratory potential of corneal endothelial cells.

Differences Between Keratometry and Total Keratometry Measurements in a Large Dataset Obtained With a Modern Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the concept of total keratometry (TK) by analyzing extensive international datasets representing diverse ethnic backgrounds. The primary objective was to quantify the disparities between traditional keratometry (K) and TK values in normal eyes and assess their impact on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using various formulas. DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter intra-instrument reliability analysis. METHODS: The study involved the analysis of biometry data collected from ten international centers across Europe, the United States, and Asia. Corneal power was expressed as equivalent power and astigmatic vector components for both K and TK values. The study assessed the influence of these differences on IOL power calculations using different formulas. The results were analyzed and plotted using Bland-Altman and double angle plots. RESULTS: The study encompassed a total of 116,982 measurements from 57,862 right eyes and 59,120 left eyes. The analysis revealed a high level of agreement between K and TK values, with 93.98% of eyes exhibiting an absolute difference of 0.25 D or less. Astigmatism vector differences exceeding 0.25 D and 0.50 D were observed in 39.43% and 1.08% of eyes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study underscores the similarity between mean K and TK values in healthy eyes, with rare clinical implications for IOL power calculation. Noteworthy differences were observed in astigmatism values between K and TK. Future investigations should delve into the practicality of TK values for astigmatism correction and their implications for surgical outcomes.

An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated recommendations. RECENT FINDINGS: Postmyopic LASIK/PRK eyes have the best refractive outcomes when multiple methods are averaged, or when Barrett True-K is used. Posthyperopic LASIK/PRK eyes also seem to do best when Barrett True-K is used, but with more variable results. With both aforementioned methods, using measured total corneal power incrementally improves results. For post-SMILE eyes, the first nontheoretical data favors raytracing. SUMMARY: Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery are less accurate and more variable compared to virgin eyes. Surgeons may simplify their approach to IOL power calculations in postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK/PRK by using Barrett True-K, and employing measured total corneal power when available. For post-SMILE eyes, ray tracing seems to work well, but lack of accessibility may hamper its adoption.

Toric Monofocal Intraocular Lenses for the Correction of Astigmatism during Cataract Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the published literature evaluating the visual and refractive outcomes and rotational stability of eyes implanted with toric monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for the correction of keratometric astigmatism during cataract surgery and to compare those outcomes with outcomes of eyes implanted with nontoric monofocal IOLs and other astigmatism management methods performed during cataract surgery. This assessment was restricted to the toric IOLs available in the United States. METHODS: A literature search of English-language publications in the PubMed database was last conducted in July 2022. The search identified 906 potentially relevant citations, and after review of the abstracts, 63 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one studies ultimately were determined to be relevant to the assessment criteria and were selected for inclusion. The panel methodologist assigned each a level of evidence rating; 12 studies were rated level I and 9 studies were rated level II. RESULTS: Eyes implanted with toric IOLs showed excellent postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), reduction of postoperative refractive astigmatism, and good rotational stability. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was better and postoperative cylinder was lower with toric IOLs, regardless of manufacturer, when compared with nontoric monofocal IOLs. Correcting pre-existing astigmatism with toric IOLs was more effective and predictable than using corneal relaxing incisions (CRIs), especially in the presence of higher magnitudes of astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Toric monofocal IOLs are effective in neutralizing pre-existing corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery and result in better UCDVA and significant reductions in postoperative refractive astigmatism compared with nontoric monofocal IOLs. Toric IOLs result in better astigmatic correction than CRIs, particularly at high magnitudes of astigmatism. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy performed under general anesthesia in the sitting position: a novel approach.

We present a novel approach for performing an Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy under general anesthesia with the patent in a seated position. We illustrate this approach in 2 cases, a young child and an adult patient with developmental delay. This technique may facilitate YAG capsulotomy in patients who cannot sit for the procedure.

Vision and patient-reported outcomes with nondiffractive EDOF or neutral aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes in patients who underwent cataract extraction with implantation of nondiffractive extended depth-of-focus (ND-EDOF; Alcon AcrySof Vivity) or neutral aspheric monofocal (Bausch & Lomb enVista) intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Academic medical center. DESIGN: Prospective single-center double-arm patient- and assessor-masked randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either a ND-EDOF or monofocal IOL in both eyes, targeted for emmetropia. Uncorrected and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), level of spectacle independence, and severity of photic phenomena were assessed at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: 56 patients were enrolled, of which 24 in the ND-EDOF group and 27 in the monofocal group completed follow-up. The binocular mean CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA were 20/20, 20/19, and 20/21 for the ND-EDOF IOL and 20/18 ( P = .188), 20/31 ( P < .001), and 20/30 ( P = .004) for the monofocal IOL, respectively. At intermediate, 88% of the ND-EDOF vs 30% of the monofocal patients had a binocular DCIVA of 20/25 or better ( P < .001). Moderate or severe glare occurred in 20.8% of ND-EDOF vs 7.4% of monofocal patients ( P = .228), whereas moderate or severe halos occurred in 16.7% of ND-EDOF vs 11.1% of monofocal patients ( P = .697). CONCLUSIONS: The ND-EDOF and monofocal IOLs provided similarly excellent distance vision. Patients implanted with the ND-EDOF IOL had 2 more lines of vision at both intermediate and near, and a greater proportion reported spectacle independence. Most patients in both groups reported low severity of photic phenomena.

The CRW1 Index: Identification of Eyes with Previous Myopic Laser Vision Correction Using Only a Swept-Source OCT Biometer.

PURPOSE: To develop and test a novel index (Cooke-Riaz-Wendelstein [CRW1]) that uses swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometry measurements (IOLMaster700, Zeiss Meditec), including total keratometry, to alert clinicians that previous myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC) was present in a measured eye. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter, comparative diagnostic analysis. METHODS: The study took place at 6 centers in the United States and Austria. Anonymized SS-OCT biometry datasets acquired between 2018 and 2020 and containing 49,199 eyes were analyzed. The LVC status, as identified by the biometrist, was used to segregate eyes into LVC and non-LVC eyes. Data were split into training (10,780 eyes) and validation (38,419 eyes) sets. Subset analysis was performed for CRW1 Index accuracy compared to posterior/anterior corneal curvature ratio (Rpost/Rant), topography with corneal analysis software (Atlas 9000 with Pathfinder II, Zeiss Meditec), tomography (Pentacam, Oculus), dual Scheimpflug-Placido system (Galilei G6, Ziemer), and a cloud-based platform for cataract surgery planning (Veracity, Zeiss Meditec). A positive predictive value (PPV) of ≥90% was targeted for the CRW1 index. True positives, true negatives, sensitivity, and specificity were recorded. RESULTS: The CRW1 Index compared favorably against Rpost/Rant showing a higher PPV (93% vs 65%), with fewer false-positive results (29 vs 180). CRW1 performed similarly to topography software and better than the corneal imaging devices. The CRW1 cutoff value can be adjusted to increase sensitivity (CRW1-IS) to detect additional M-LVC eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The CRW1 and CRW1-IS indices offer surgeons and researchers a readily accessible method to use only SS-OCT biometry measurements to detect eyes with a high probability of previous M-LVC.

Management of Pain after Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current best practices for postoperative photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain control. METHODS: Literature searches in the PubMed database were last conducted in October 2021 and were restricted to publications in English. This search identified 219 citations, of which 84 were reviewed in full text for their relevance to the scope of this assessment. Fifty-one articles met the criteria for inclusion; 16 studies were rated level I, 33 studies were rated level II, and 2 studies were rated level III. RESULTS: Systemic opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); topical NSAIDs; postoperative cold patches; bandage soft contact lenses (BCLs), notably senofilcon A contact lenses; and topical anesthetics were demonstrated to offer significantly better pain control than comparison treatments. Some other commonly reported pain mitigation interventions such as systemic gabapentinoids, chilled intraoperative balanced salt solution (BSS) irrigation, cycloplegia, and specific surface ablation technique strategies offered limited improvement in pain control over control treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic NSAIDs and opioid medications, topical NSAIDs, cold patches, BCLs, and topical anesthetics have been shown to provide improved pain control over alternative strategies and allow PRK-associated pain to be more tolerable for patients.

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To evaluate refractive outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS). METHODS: A PubMed search of FLACS was conducted in August 2020. A total of 727 abstracts were reviewed and 33 were selected for full-text review. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this assessment. The panel methodologist assigned a level of evidence rating of I to all 12 studies. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean uncorrected distance visual acuity, best-corrected distance visual acuity, or the percentage of eyes within ± 0.5 and ± 1 diopter of intended refractive target between FLACS and PCS. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar between the 2 groups, and most studies showed no difference in endothelial cell loss between FLACS and PCS at various time points between 1 and 6 months. In large randomized controlled studies in the United Kingdom and France, FLACS was less cost-effective than PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Both FLACS and PCS have similar excellent safety and refractive outcomes. At this time, one technique is not superior to the other, but economic analyses performed in some populations have shown that FLACS is less cost-effective.

Safety and efficacy of topical vs intracanalicular corticosteroids for the prevention of postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of topical prednisolone and intracanalicular dexamethasone ophthalmic insert for the prevention of postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery. SETTING: Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective phacoemulsification cataract surgery with a plan to receive inflammation prophylaxis with topical prednisolone (prednisolone acetate 1 mg/1 mL) between January 2018 and November 2019 or intracanalicular dexamethasone (Dextenza, 0.4 mg) between December 2019 and March 2021 were screened. Patients were seen 1 day, 1 week, and 4 to 16 weeks postoperatively. Medical records were also reviewed for any urgent messages between visits. Primary end points were proportion of eyes with (1) breakthrough inflammation requiring escalation of anti-inflammatory therapy and (2) intraocular pressure (IOP) increase ≥10 mm Hg at 4 to 16 weeks of follow-up. Secondary end points included incidence of intraoperative complications, cystoid macular edema, and infectious sequelae. RESULTS: 358 patient charts (358 eyes) were screened. Of these, 262 eyes of 262 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study; 131 eyes received topical drops, and 131 eyes received the intracanalicular insert. Among eyes that completed follow-up, 9 eyes (6.9%) in the drops group and 12 eyes (9.2%) in the insert group experienced breakthrough inflammation necessitating treatment ( P = .50). 2 eyes in the drops group and 1 eye in the insert group had elevated IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative inflammation prophylaxis with the intracanalicular insert may be associated with similar rates of breakthrough inflammation and IOP elevation as topical drops.

Outcomes of a multicenter U.S. clinical trial of a new monofocal single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the CT LUCIA 611P intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with cataracts. SETTING: 23 surgeons at 15 different clinical sites. DESIGN: Prospective single-arm clinical trial. METHODS: The study was conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption for premarket approval of a new hydrophobic acrylic IOL in the United States. Patients were followed for 12 months, and the main measured variables included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, manifest refraction, and adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 339 eyes of 339 patients were implanted with the study device, of which 310 (91.4%) reached the 12-month visit. The percentage of eyes within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.00 D of emmetropia was 85.8% (266/310) and 96.8% (300/310), respectively. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) remained stable over the first year with the mean 12-month MRSE of -0.03 ± 0.45 D. The mean 12-month UDVA and CDVA were 0.09 ± 0.15 (≈20/25) and -0.02 ± 0.09 (≈20/19) logMAR, respectively. Of all patients, 99.4% (308/310) achieved postoperative CDVA ≥20/40. The incidence of Nd:YAG capsulotomy within the first year was 3.5% (11/310). Only 2 eyes had IOL tilt present at the 12-month postoperative visit with no associated visual symptoms. There were 2 cases of IOL decentration; one required removal of the IOL, whereas the other had no visual side effects related to decentration. There were no findings of glistening at any visit. CONCLUSIONS: The CT LUCIA 611P IOL demonstrated excellent safety, efficacy, and stability of refractive outcomes. No significant issues related to the biocompatibility of the IOL material were observed.

Comparison of Barrett and Emmetropia Verifying Optical Toric Calculators.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the Barrett (BTC) and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) Toric Calculators' performance with regards to prediction of residual post-operative astigmatism after cataract surgery. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of de-identified data that was collected as part of a prospective multicenter clinical trial in which 109 eyes from 109 patients were implanted with a monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL). Post-operative biometry was used to calculate the predicted post-operative residual astigmatism for each eye using the two different calculators. The vector difference between the actual and predicted residual astigmatism was calculated. RESULTS: The mean absolute astigmatism prediction errors were 0.59 ± 0.38 D and 0.59 ± 0.36 D for the BTC and EVO calculators, respectively (p = 0.98). The centroid of the prediction errors were 0.18 D @ 89° ± 0.68 D and 0.20 D @ 89° ± 0.66 D, respectively (p = 0.21). The proportion of eyes in which the astigmatism prediction error was ≤0.5 D was 50% for BTC and 46% for EVO (p = 0.28). The proportion of eyes in which the post-operative astigmatism orientation was correctly predicted as being against-the-rule, with-the-rule, or oblique was 81% for BTC and 77% for EVO (p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: The Barrett and Emmetropia Verifying Optical Toric Calculators had similar performance with regards to their astigmatism prediction accuracy.

Correlation Between Keratometric and Refractive Astigmatism in Pseudophakes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between measured anterior, posterior, and total keratometric astigmatism and post-operative refractive astigmatism (RA) after cataract surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of eyes that consecutively underwent pre-operative measurements of keratometric astigmatism with a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)-based optical biometer and dual-Scheimpflug/Placido disc corneal topographer, cataract surgery with implantation of a monofocal intraocular lens, and post-operative manifest refraction. The difference between post-operative refractive astigmatism and keratometric astigmatism measured using four different ways [Keratometry (K), Simulated Keratometry (SimK), Total Keratometry (TK), and Total Corneal Power (TCP)] was calculated. RESULTS: For all 118 eyes, a smaller mean vector difference between post-operative refractive astigmatism and measured keratometric astigmatism was realized with TK (0.08 @ 151) vs TCP2 (0.30 @ 174; p < 0.0006), as well as with K (0.26 @ 173) vs SimK (0.52 @ 177; p = 0.036). The mean vector difference between post-operative refractive astigmatism and TK astigmatism was 0.31 @ 097, 0.21 @ 163, and 0.69 @ 179 in eyes with against-the rule (ATR), oblique, and with-the-rule (WTR) anterior corneal astigmatism, respectively (p < 0.0006). On the other hand, posterior corneal astigmatism did not significantly change with the orientation of anterior corneal astigmatism [0.10 @ 180 for ATR, 0.22 @ 180 for oblique, and 0.28 @ 180 for WTR (p = 0.58)]. CONCLUSION: Compared with the other measures of corneal astigmatism, total keratometric astigmatism from the SS-OCT device most closely correlated with post-operative RA. The difference between anterior corneal astigmatism and refractive astigmatism is not completely explained by the contribution from the posterior cornea. Other contributors, such as lens tilt or neuro-adaptation, may be at play.

Multifocal and Accommodating Intraocular Lenses for the Treatment of Presbyopia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the published literature assessing the efficacy and safety of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) for the treatment of presbyopia after cataract removal. METHODS: Literature searches were undertaken in January 2018 and September 2020 in the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases. This yielded 761 articles, of which 34 met the criteria for inclusion in this assessment and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. Thirteen studies were rated level I and 21 studies were rated level II. RESULTS: Presbyopia-correcting lenses were effective at improving distance and near visual acuity after cataract surgery. Near acuity at different focal lengths was related directly to the effective add power of multifocal and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs. Most multifocal and EDOF lenses that were compared with a control monofocal lens demonstrated that patient-reported spectacle independence was superior to the monofocal lens. All patients who had multifocal and EDOF lenses implanted showed decreased contrast sensitivity and reported more visual phenomena as compared with control participants who received monofocal lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Presbyopia-correcting lenses improve uncorrected near and distance visual acuity and decrease spectacle dependence after cataract surgery. Mesopic contrast sensitivity is decreased compared with monofocal lenses, and patient-reported visual phenomena are more likely in patients receiving multifocal or EDOF lenses.

Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Eyes with Previous Excimer Laser Surgery for Myopia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the literature to evaluate the outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes with a history of myopic LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in the PubMed database in January 2020. Separate searches relevant to cataract surgery outcomes and corneal refractive surgery returned 1169 and 162 relevant citations, respectively, and the full text of 24 was reviewed. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for this assessment; all were assigned a level III rating of evidence by the panel methodologist. RESULTS: When automated keratometry was used with a theoretical formula designed for eyes without previous laser vision correction, the mean prediction error (MPE) was universally positive (hyperopic), the mean absolute errors (MAEs) and median absolute errors (MedAEs) were relatively high (0.72-1.9 diopters [D] and 0.65-1.73 D, respectively), and a low (8%-40%) proportion of eyes were within 0.5 D of target spherical equivalent (SE). Formulas developed specifically for this population requiring both prerefractive surgery keratometry and manifest refraction (i.e., clinical history, corneal bypass, and Feiz-Mannis) produced a proportion of eyes within 0.5 D of target SE between 26% and 44%. Formulas requiring only preoperative keratometry or no history at all had lower MAEs (0.42-0.94 D) and MedAEs (0.30-0.81 D) and higher (30%-68%) proportions within 0.5 D of target SE. Strategies that averaged several methods yielded the lowest reported MedAEs (0.31-0.35 D) and highest (66%-68%) proportions within 0.5 D of target SE. Even after using the best-known methods, refractive outcomes were less accurate in eyes that had previous excimer laser surgery for myopia compared with those that did not have it. CONCLUSIONS: Calculation methods requiring both prerefractive surgery keratometry and manifest refraction are no longer considered the gold standard. Refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes that had previous excimer laser surgery are less accurate than in eyes that did not. Patients should be advised of this refractive limitation when considering cataract surgery in the setting of previous corneal refractive surgery. Conclusions are limited by the small sample sizes and retrospective nature of nearly all existing literature in this domain.

Sex Differences in Academic Rank, Scholarly Productivity, National Institutes of Health Funding, and Industry Ties Among Academic Cornea Specialists in the United States.

PURPOSE: This study analyzed sex differences among cornea specialists with regards to academic rank, scholarly productivity, National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, and industry partnerships. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: This was a study of faculty at 113 US academic programs. Sex, residency graduation year, and academic rank were collected from institutional websites between January and March 2019. H-indices and m-quotients were collected from the Scopus database. The NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services databases were queried for data on NIH funding and industry partnerships. RESULTS: Of the 440 cornea specialists identified, 131 (29.8%) were female. The proportions of females and males at each academic rank (assistant 69.5% vs 41.8%; associate 17.6% vs 21.0%; full professor 13.0% vs 37.2%) were not significant after adjusting for career duration (P = .083, .459, and .113, respectively). Females had significantly lower median h-indices (4.0 [interquartile range {IQR} 7.0] vs 11.0 [IQR 17.0], P < .001) and shorter median career duration (12.0 [IQR 11.0] vs. 25.0 [IQR 20.0] years, P < .001) than males but similar median m-quotients (0.5 [IQR 0.8] vs 0.5 [IQR 0.8], P = 1.00). Sex differences in h-indices were not seen at each academic rank or career duration interval. Among NIH-funded investigators, the median grant funding was $1.6M (IQR $2.2M) for females and $1.2M (IQR $4.6M, P = .853) for males. Overall, 25.5% of females and 58.6% of males (P = .600) had industry partnerships. CONCLUSION: Sex differences within academic ranks and h-indices are likely due to a smaller proportion of females with advanced career duration.

Sex Disparities in Productivity among Oculoplastic Surgeons.

Purpose The aim of the study is to investigate sex differences in academic rank, publication productivity, and National Institute of Health (NIH) funding among oculoplastic surgeons and whether there is an association between American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) membership and scholarly output. Methods Sex, residency graduation year, and academic rank were obtained from institutional websites of 113 U.S. ophthalmology programs. H-indices and m-quotients were obtained from the Scopus database. NIH funding information was obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool. Results Of the 272 surgeons, 74 (30.2%) were females. When adjusted for career duration, differences in female to male proportions were only significant at the rank of assistant professor (assistant: 74.3 vs. 48.5%, p = 0.047; associate: 18.9 vs. 24.6%, p = 0.243; full professor: 13.0 vs. 37.2%, p = 0.114). Women had a shorter career duration than men [10.0 (interquartile range or IQR 12.0) vs. 21.0 (IQR 20.0) years; p < 0.001] and a lower h-index [4.0 (IQR 5.0) vs. 7.0 (IQR 10.0); p < 0.001], but similar m-quotients [0.4 (IQR 0.4) vs. 0.4 (IQR 0.4); p = 0.9890]. Among ASOPRS members, females had a lower h-index than males [5.0 (IQR 6.0) vs. 9.0 (IQR 10.0); p < 0.001] due to career length differences. No difference in productivity between sexes was found among non-ASOPRS members. ASOPRS members from both sexes had higher scholarly output than their non-ASOPRS counterparts. Just 2.7% (2/74) of females compared with 5.3% (9/171) of males received NIH funding ( p = 0.681). Conclusion Sex differences in academic ranks and h-indices are likely due to the smaller proportion of females with long career durations. ASOPRS membership may confer opportunities for increased scholarly output.

Anterior, posterior, and nonkeratometric contributions to refractive astigmatism in pseudophakes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between measured anterior (ACA) and posterior (PCA) keratometric astigmatism and postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA) and to quantify noncorneal astigmatism (NCA) contributions to RA. SETTING: Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. METHODS: Consecutive eyes underwent preoperative biometry (IOLMaster 700) and tomography/topography using a dual Scheimpflug-placido disk-based device (Galilei G4), cataract surgery with implantation of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), and postoperative manifest refractions. RA was compared with keratometric astigmatism using the following methods: IOLMaster, SimK, CorT, SimK + measured PCA, total corneal power at the corneal plane (TCP2), and CorT(Total). An ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) vector was calculated between RA and each measured astigmatism. RESULTS: Analysis was based on 296 eyes. ORA centroids were 0.28 @ 179, 0.45 @ 001, 0.37 @ 001, 0.19 @ 003, 0.19 @ 001, and 0.23 @ 178 diopter (D) for the 6 aforementioned methods, respectively (P < .000001 [ORAx, ORAy]). Based on TCP2 measurements, eyes with against-the-rule ACA and with-the-rule (WTR) ACA had ORA centroids of 0.09 @ 082 and 0.58 @ 001 D (P < .000001 [ORAx, ORAy]), respectively. ORA was nonzero and not entirely explained by the cornea, especially in those with WTR ACA. CONCLUSIONS: Total keratometric astigmatism did not explain all ocular astigmatism. Noncorneal contributions were significant, especially in eyes with WTR ACA.