Ganglion Cysts of the Proximal Tibiofibular Joint: Low Risk of Recurrence After Total Cyst Excision.

BACKGROUND: Peroneal nerve neuropathy due to compression from tumors or tumor-like lesions such as ganglion cysts is rare. Few case series have been published and reported local recurrence rates are high, while secondary procedures are frequently employed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the demographics of patients with ganglion cysts of the proximal tibiofibular joint, and what proportion of them present with intraneural cysts and peroneal nerve palsy? (2) What Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores do patients with this condition achieve after decompression surgery with removal of the ganglion cyst, but no arthrodesis of the tibiofibular joint? (3) What proportion of patients experience local recurrence after surgery? METHODS: Between 2009 to 2018, 30 patients (29 primary cases) were treated for chronic peroneal palsy or neuropathy due to ganglion cysts of the proximal tibiofibular joint at two tertiary orthopaedic medical centers with total resection of the cystic lesion. MRI with contrast and electromyography (EMG) were performed preoperatively in all patients. The minimum follow-up for this series was 1 year (median 48 months, range 13 to 120); 14% (4 of 29) were lost to follow-up before that time. The MSTS score was recorded preoperatively, at 6 weeks postoperatively, and at most-recent follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 90% of the patients were male (26 of 29 patients) and the median age was 67 years (range 20 to 76). In all, 17% (5 of 29) were treated due to intraneural ganglia. Twenty-eight percent (8 of 29) presented with complete peroneal palsy (foot drop). The mean MSTS score improved from 67 ± 12% before surgery to 89 ± 12% at 6 weeks postoperative (p < 0.001) and to 92 ± 9% at final follow up (p = 0.003, comparison with 6 weeks postop). All patients improved their scores. A total of 8% (2 of 25 patients) experienced local recurrence after surgery. CONCLUSION: Ganglion cysts of the proximal tibiofibular joint occurred more often as extraneural lesions in older male patients in this small series. Total excision was associated with improved functional outcome and low risk of neurologic damage and local recurrence, and we did not use any more complex reconstructive procedures. Tendon transfers may be performed simultaneously in older patients to stabilize the ankle joint, while younger patients may recover after decompression alone, although larger randomized studies are needed to confirm our preliminary observations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tenodesis Versus No Stabilization After Wide Resection of Distal Ulna Giant Cell Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The necessity of stabilizing the residual ulnar stump after distal ulna tumor resection remains controversial. The authors retrospectively compared the outcome of patients who underwent wide resection of distal ulna giant cell tumors (GCTs) and reconstruction with tenodesis of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) or without reconstruction. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2015, 9 patients (6 females, 3 males; mean age, 36.8 years; range, 24-65 years) who underwent distal ulna resection for GCT of bone were retrospectively reviewed. The mean resection length was 8.1 cm. Five patients had no reconstruction, whereas 4 patients had stabilization of the ulnar stump using ECU tenodesis. With a mean follow-up of 3.6 years (2-9 years), the functional outcome using the quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and grip strength; as well as the oncological outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores were more than 24 in 7 patients and 20 to 24 in 2 patients (mean, 27.6 or 92%). Quick DASH scores ranged from 0 to 27.3 (mean, 11.1). In both groups, similar scores were observed ( P > .5). No patient had instability or pain related to the stump. There was no ulnar translation or subluxation of the radiocarpal joint. Grip strength in the operated hand, controlled for handedness, was 11% less than in the contralateral hand, although there was no difference between groups ( P > .4). All patients were disease-free at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The distal ulna may be widely resected with or without stabilization of the residual ulnar stump, yielding satisfactory local disease control and functional outcome.

Is early vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty justified in multiple myeloma given the rapid vertebral fracture progression?

COMMENTARY ON: Xiao R, Miller JA, Margetis K, et al. Radiographic progression of vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma. Spine J 2016:16:822-32 (in this issue).

Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Kyphoplasty in Multiple Myeloma Patients and the Importance of Preoperative Planning.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study and technical note. PURPOSE: To determine if there is a difference in clinical and radiographic parameters between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasty in a uniform cancer population and to stress the importance of preoperative planning. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: While unipedicular kyphoplasty is gaining popularity, a few comparative studies have reported on superior kyphotic reduction with the bipedicular approach. METHODS: We reviewed 69 myeloma patients with 105 operated levels (51 levels were done bilaterally vs. 54 unilaterally). Pain reduction, height restoration, cement volume and complications were recorded up to three months postoperatively. A technical note to identify the skin entry point on the basis of the magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopy (lateral view) is being described. RESULTS: Both procedures resulted in significant pain reduction (5.4-5.6/10 points, p=0.8). There was significant height restoration after the operation (p<0.001), while there was no sustained difference between the procedures (p=0.5) up to three months postoperatively. More cement was injected in the bilateral group (4.1 mL vs. 4.9 mL, p=0.002); no difference in cement extravasation in the spinal canal was observed (p=0.5). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the clinical or radiological outcomes between the unilateral and bilateral approaches. Therefore, unilateral kyphoplasty may be performed whenever it is technically feasible and this may be determined preoperatively.

Embolization of hypervascular bone metastases reduces intraoperative blood loss: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Small case series suggest that preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization minimizes bleeding and facilitates surgery for hypervascular metastatic bone tumors. However, control groups would make our confidence in clinical recommendations stronger, but small patient numbers make prospective trials difficult to conduct on this topic. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this case-control study, we asked whether (1) patients who undergo embolization have less estimated blood loss and/or shorter operative time than patients who do not have embolization; (2) larger tumor size, greater initial tumor vascularity, and longer interval from embolization to surgery are associated with greater estimated blood loss and packed red blood cell transfusion volume; and (3) embolization does not affect renal function in patients with normal preoperative renal function. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients with hypervascular bone metastases treated at our institution between 1998 and 2008. Twenty-seven patients with renal cell carcinoma and 12 with thyroid carcinoma who underwent embolization before 41 surgical procedures were matched to 41 patients who did not have embolization with respect to age, diagnosis, tumor size and potential vascularity, and procedure type; matching was performed without knowledge of outcomes. In univariate and multivariate analyses, age, tumor size, use of embolization, surgery type and risk, embolization-to-surgery interval, and degree of devascularization were evaluated for correlations with estimated blood loss, packed red blood cell transfusion volume, operative time, and postembolization renal function. RESULTS: Overall, patients who had embolization had less mean estimated blood loss (0.90 versus 1.77 L; p = 0.002), packed red blood cell transfusion volume (2.15 versus 3.56 U; p = 0.020), and operative time (3.13 versus 3.91 hours; p < 0.001). Larger tumor size correlated with greater estimated blood loss (r = 0.451; p = 0.003), packed red blood cell transfusion volume (r = 0.50; p = 0.002), and operative time (r = 0.595; p < 0.001). Neither the interval for embolization to surgery nor the degree of devascularization correlated with estimated blood loss or transfusion volume. In open rodding with intralesional curettage, transcatheter arterial embolization was associated with reduced estimated blood loss, transfusion volume, and operative time. Packed red blood cell transfusion volume was not reduced by embolization in intramedullary nailing procedures with the patient numbers available. Among patients with normal preoperative renal function who had embolization, creatinine levels remained normal. Mild transient, reversible renal function change occurred in one patient with preoperatively abnormal renal function. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that preoperative embolization probably reduces estimated blood loss, particularly for large tumors and during open femoral procedures.

Controversial issues in kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) have been successfully employed for many years for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this review is to resolve the controversial issues raised by the two randomized trials that claimed no difference between VP and SHAM procedure. In particular we compare nonsurgical management (NSM) and KP and VP, in terms of clinical parameters (pain, disability, quality of life, and new fractures), cost-effectiveness, radiological variables (kyphosis correction and vertebral height restoration), and VP versus KP for cement extravasation and complications profile. Cement types and optimal filling are analyzed and technological innovations are presented. Finally unipedicular/bipedicular techniques are compared. Conclusion. VP and KP are superior to NSM in clinical and radiological parameters and probably more cost-effective. KP is superior to VP in sagittal balance improvement and cement leaking. Complications are rare but serious adverse events have been described, so caution should be exerted. Unilateral procedures should be pursued whenever feasible. Upcoming randomized trials (CEEP, OSTEO-6, STIC-2, and VERTOS IV) will provide the missing link.

Controversial issues in kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in malignant vertebral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) have been successfully employed in the treatment of pathological vertebral fractures. METHODS: A critical review of the medical literature was performed and controversial issues were analyzed. RESULTS: Evidence supports KP as the treatment of choice to control fracture pain and the possible restoration of sagittal balance, provided that no overt instability or myelopathy is present, the fracture is painful and other pain generators have been excluded, and positive radiological findings are present. Unilateral procedures yield similar results to bilateral ones and should be pursued whenever feasible. Biopsy should be routinely performed and 3 to 4 levels may be augmented in a single operation. Higher cement filling appears to yield better results. Radiotherapy is complementary with KP and VP but must be individualized. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of painful cancer fractures, if overt instability or myelopathy is not present, unilateral KP should be pursued, whenever feasible, followed by radiotherapy. The technological advances in hardware and biomaterials, as well as combining KP with other modalities, will help ensure a safe and more effective procedure. Address.

Adverse prognostic factors and optimal intervention time for kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty in osteoporotic fractures.

INTRODUCTION: While evidence supports the efficacy of vertebral augmentation (kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty) for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures, randomized trials disputed the value of vertebroplasty. The aim of this analysis is to determine the subset of patients that may not benefit from surgical intervention and find the optimal intervention time. METHODS: 27 prospective multiple-arm studies with cohorts of more than 20 patients were included in this meta-analysis. We hereby report the results from the metaregression and subset analysis of those trials reporting on treatment of osteoporotic fractures with kyphoplasty and/or vertebroplasty. RESULTS: Early intervention (first 7 weeks after fracture) yielded more pain relief. However, spontaneous recovery was encountered in hyperacute fractures (less than 2 weeks old). Patients suffering from thoracic fractures or severely deformed vertebrae tended to report inferior results. We also attempted to formulate a treatment algorithm. CONCLUSION: Intervention in the hyperacute period should not be pursued, while augmentation after 7 weeks yields less consistent results. In cases of thoracic fractures and significant vertebral collapse, surgeons or interventional radiologists may resort earlier to operation and be less conservative, although those parameters need to be addressed in future randomized trials.

Defining the indications, types and biomaterials of corpectomy cages in the thoracolumbar spine.

Osteomyelitis, tumors and fractures of the thoracolumbar spine comprise a wide spectrum of pathology of the anterior column that can be safely addressed with cages. Mesh cages have been traditionally used; however, expandable devices are gaining popularity due to better correction of sagittal deformity, less subsidence and technical advantages (easier to insert especially through a posterior approach and tighter fit). In addition, nonmetallic cages (poly-ether-ether-ketone/carbon fibers, hydroxyapatite and ceramics) offer some distinct advantages over titanium, being more inert/biocompatible, osteoconductive and radiolucent. Treatment is also shifted towards minimally invasive surgery, rendering corpectomy a far less-morbid operation than it used to be.

Double approach operation for large extracompartmental proximal thigh tumors.

Resection of large femoral triangle tumors that invade the bone (or vice versa) still remains a challenge. A lateral-only approach would hinder dissection of the mass, away from the femoral vessels, while an iliofemoral-only type of approach would make bone resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction very arduous. The authors describe a two-stage, one-position operation via a double surgical approach: the first stage is comprised by an iliofemoral approach and dissection of the femoral vessels, followed by proximal femoral resection and reconstruction stage. One illustrative case is presented along with the authors overall experience. We believe that this operation facilitates wide tumor resection in a safe and step-wise manner, as not to add to the morbidity of the procedure.

Is vertebral augmentation the right choice for cancer patients with painful vertebral compression fractures?

Cancer-related fractures of the spine are different from osteoporotic ones, not only in pathogenesis but also in natural history and treatment. Higher class evidence now supports offering balloon kyphoplasty to a patient with cancer, provided that the pain is significant in intensity, has a positional character, and correlates to the area of the fractured vertebrae. Absence of clinical spinal cord compression and overt instability are paramount. Because of the frequent disruption of the posterior vertebral body cortex in these patients, the procedure should be performed by experienced operators who could also quickly perform an open decompression if cement extravasation occurs. Patients will benefit from vertebral augmentation, even in chronic malignant fractures. A biopsy should be routinely performed and a combination with radiation treatment would be beneficial in most cases.

Comparing effects of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and non-surgical management in a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled studies.

PURPOSE: To determine if differences in safety or efficacy exist between balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), vertebroplasty (VP) and non-surgical management (NSM) for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). METHODS: As of February 1, 2011, a PubMed search (key words: kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty) resulted in 1,587 articles out of which 27 met basic selection criteria (prospective multiple-arm studies with cohorts of ≥ 20 patients). This systematic review adheres to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Pain reduction in both BKP (-5.07/10 points, P < 0.01) and VP (-4.55/10, P < 0.01) was superior to that for NSM (-2.17/10), while no difference was found between BKP/VP (P = 0.35). Subsequent fractures occurred more frequently in the NSM group (22 %) compared with VP (11 %, P = 0.04) and BKP (11 %, P = 0.01). BKP resulted in greater kyphosis reduction than VP (4.8º vs. 1.7°, P < 0.01). Quality of life (QOL) improvement showed superiority of BKP over VP (P = 0.04), along with a trend for disability improvement (P = 0.08). Cement extravasation was less frequent in the BKP (P = 0.01). Surgical intervention within the first 7 weeks yielded greater pain reduction than VCFs treated later. CONCLUSIONS: BKP/VP provided greater pain relief and fewer subsequent fractures than NSM in osteoporotic VCFs. BKP is marginally favored over VP in disability improvement, and significantly favored in QOL improvement. BKP had a lower risk of cement extravasation and resulted in greater kyphosis correction. Despite this analysis being restricted to Level I and II studies, significant heterogeneity suggests that the current literature is delivering inconsistent messages and further trials are needed to delineate confounding variables.

Ulnar nerve injuries in Guyon canal: a report of 32 cases.

PURPOSE: In this study, the surgical outcomes of 32 patients with ulnar nerve injuries in the Guyon canal are presented. Outcomes were analyzed in relation to various factors such as age, surgical timing, zone of injury, and type of nerve reconstruction. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2007, 32 patients with injury in Guyon canal were managed surgically. Twelve patients had ulnar nerve injury proximal to its bifurcation (zone I); 14 patients had isolated motor branch injury (zone II); and six patients had isolated sensory branch injury (zone III). End-to-end repair was achieved in 12 (38%) of 32 patients, while nerve grafting was performed in 20 (62%) cases. The mean follow-up period was 22 months. RESULTS: Good and excellent motor function was restored in 25 (96%) of 26 cases with motor branch injury. Good and excellent sensory results were achieved in 15 (83%) of 18 cases with sensory branch injury. Outcomes were significantly better for those who had early repair (<4 weeks) when compared with those who had repair 4 weeks after injury (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between outcomes after end-to-end repair or nerve grafting (P > 0.05) and between outcomes from repair of injuries in different zone (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and surgical treatment with careful dissection of the ulnar nerve branches within the canal is very important. Adequate exposure is usually required to repair the nerve in the Guyon canal. Nerve grafting in this level could give analogous results as the end-to-end repair.

Role of vertebral augmentation procedures in the management of vertebral compression fractures in cancer patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current status of vertebral augmentation procedures (VAPs) in the management of symptomatic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) in cancer patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The natural history of VCFs in the cancer setting is presumably different from the one seen with osteoporotic fractures. Factors contributing to the poor outcome with conservative treatment in cancer patients include continued bone loss due to tumor invasion, poor nutritional status, immobilization, prolonged steroid use, gonadal ablation, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. VAPs have been shown by retrospective and prospective randomized studies to be effective in treating symptomatic VCFs. Advantages of VAPs include immediate pain relief, avoiding delays in chemoradiation, outpatient care in the majority of cases, biopsy, vertebral height restoration, and potential antitumor effect of bone cement. Results from the prospective randomized Cancer Fracture Evaluation (CAFÉ) trial show superiority of balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) over conservative management in cancer patients with VCFs with similar rate of adverse events between treatment arms. Additionally, the field is still evolving with advances such as combination with radiosurgery and spinal radiofrequency ablation (RFA), use of kyphoplasty without a balloon and highly viscous cement to prevent leakage. SUMMARY: VAPs are well tolerated and effective methods to provide palliative care for cancer patients with VCFs and should be offered to symptomatic patients.

Fixation of femoral neck fractures using divergent versus parallel cannulated screws.

Controversy exists regarding the optimal method of internal fixation in femoral neck fractures. Biomechanical data suggest that calcar fixation is superior to central screws placement. We propose a divergent technique for placing 3 cannulated stainless steel screws engaging the calcar femorale. Fifty two patients admitted to our institution for a femoral neck fracture were treated with the divergent screw technique, over a 7-year period. Four patients were deceased and 4 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 44 patients there were 10 males and 34 females, aged from 33 to 78 years (mean, 58 years). All patients were operated on by the same surgeon and were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years (mean: 33.6 months, range: 2-6 years). Twenty four patients sustained a non-displaced fracture (Garden I-II) and 20 sustained a displaced fracture (Garden III-IV) of the femoral neck. Mean Harris hip score (HHS) was 89.6 points. Avascular necrosis was evident in 4 patients (9%) with displaced fractures. Non-unions or failed internal fixations were not encountered. There was a significant difference in the HHS, in favor of the divergent group (P = 0.006), while more complications were encountered in the parallel group including 6 cases with non-union. In conclusion, parallel screw placement is not critical for an excellent clinical outcome. Our proposed fixation method using 3 screws that diverge and lie in different coronal planes (1 engaging the calcar femorale) with a free-hand technique may offer enhanced fixation. Biomechanical data along with larger clinical studies are needed to establish our proposed method.

Vertebrectomy and expandable cage placement via a one-stage, one-position anterolateral retroperitoneal approach in L5 tumors.

Spinal reconstruction of the L5 vertebrae after tumor resection remains a challenge. Complex resection followed by circumferential fixation in the same setting, or in staged fashion, is often employed. The added operative time associated with this method potentially increases morbidity and mortality in an inherently high-risk procedure and anatomy in the lumbosacral area makes reconstruction more challenging. The authors describe a technique involving L5 vertebrectomy, placement of an expandable cage, and anterolateral L4-S1 screw fixation via a one-stage, one-position, anterolateral retroperitoneal approach. Two illustrative cases are presented along with the authors overall experience in L5 tumor operations. We believe that this is a feasible reconstructive option after tumor resection in lower lumbar metastatic spine disease. The approach may be also utilized in combined anteroposterior (two-stage) procedures in primary malignant tumors or oligometastatic disease.

Failure of cervical arthroplasty in a patient with adjacent segment disease associated with Klippel-Feil syndrome.

Cervical arthroplasty may be justified in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) in order to preserve cervical motion. The aim of this paper is to report an arthroplasty failure in a patient with KFS. A 36-year-old woman with KFS underwent two-level arthroplasty for adjacent segment disc degeneration. Anterior migration of the cranial prosthesis was encountered 5 months postoperatively and was successfully revised with anterior cervical fusion. Cervical arthroplasty in an extensively stiff and fused neck is challenging and may lead to catastrophic failure. Although motion preservation is desirable in KFS, the special biomechanical features may hinder arthroplasty. Fusion or hybrid constructs may represent more reasonable options, especially when multiple fused segments are present.