Closed loop stimulation in patients with chronic heart failure and severe chronotropic incompetence: Responders versus non-responders.

BACKGROUND: Clinical effects of rate-adaptive pacing (RAP) are unpredictable and highly variable among cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients with chronotropic incompetence. Physiologic sensors such as Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS), measuring intracardiac impedance changes (surrogate for ventricular contractility), may add clinical benefit and help identify predictors of response to RAP. The objective of the present BIOlCREATE study subanalysis was to identify criteria for selection of CRT patients who are likely to respond positively to CLS-based RAP. METHODS: In the randomized, crossover BIO|CREATE study, CRT patients with severe chronotropic incompetence and NYHA class II/III were randomized to CLS with conventional upper sensor rate programming or to no RAP for 1 month, followed by crossover for another month. At 1-month and 2-month follow-ups, patients underwent treadmill-based cardiopulmonary exercise test. Positive CLS response was defined as a ≥ 5% reduction in ventilatory efficiency slope. Eight of 17 patients (47%) were CLS responders. In this subanalysis, we compared responders and non-responders to explore outcomes, mechanisms, and predictors. RESULTS: All cardiopulmonary variables, health-related quality of life, patient activity status, and NT-proBNP concentration showed favorable trend in CLS responders and unfavorable trend in non-responders, underlining the need to find predictors. Following all analyses, we recommend CLS in heart failure patients with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF >40%, after a ≥ 10-point increase from a CRT-pre-implant value of ≤40%), corresponding to 'HFimpEF' in the universal classification system. CONCLUSION: HFimpEF patients are likely to benefit from CLS-based RAP, in contrast to 'HFrEF' (heart failure with reduced LVEF [≤40%]).

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with silent brain injury on brain magnetic resonance imaging.

AIMS: Whether hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) carries a risk of subclinical brain injury (SBI) is unknown. We investigated whether HALT is associated with SBI detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whether post-TAVI SBI impacts the patients' cognition and outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 153 patients (age: 78.1 ± 6.3 years; female 44%) who underwent TAVI. Brain MRI was performed shortly post-TAVI and 6 months later to assess the occurrence of acute silent cerebral ischaemic lesions (SCIL) and chronic white matter hyperintensities (WMH). HALT was screened by cardiac computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) 6 months post-TAVI. Neurocognitive evaluation was performed before, shortly after and 6 months following TAVI. At 6 months, 115 patients had diagnostic CTA and 10 had HALT. HALT status, baseline, and follow-up MRIs were available in 91 cases. At 6 months, new SCIL was evident in 16%, new WMH in 66%. New WMH was more frequent (100 vs. 62%; P = 0.047) with higher median volume (319 vs. 50 mm3; P = 0.039) among HALT-patients. In uni- and multivariate analysis, HALT was associated with new WMH volume (beta: 0.72; 95%CI: 0.2-1.39; P = 0.009). The patients' cognitive trajectory from pre-TAVI to 6 months showed significant association with the 6-month SCIL volume (beta: -4.69; 95%CI: -9.13 to 0.27; P = 0.038), but was not related to the presence or volume of new WMH. During a 3.1-year follow-up, neither HALT [hazard ratio (HR): 0.86; 95%CI: 0.202-3.687; P = 0.84], nor the related WMH burden (HR: 1.09; 95%CI: 0.701-1.680; P = 0.71) was related with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months post-TAVI, HALT was linked with greater WMH burden, but did not carry an increased risk of cognitive decline or mortality over a 3.1-year follow-up (NCT02826200).

Switching From Proximal to Distal Radial Artery Access for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization.

Background: Distal radial access (DRA) was recently introduced in the hopes of improving patient comfort by allowing the hand to rest in a more ergonomic position throughout percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and potentially to further reduce the rate of complications (mainly radial artery occlusion, [RAO]). Its safety and feasibility in chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI have not been thoroughly explored, although the role of DRA could be even more valuable in these procedures. Methods: From 2016 to 2021, all patients who underwent CTO PCI in 3 Hungarian centers were included, divided into 2 groups: one receiving proximal radial access (PRA) and another DRA. The primary endpoints were the procedural and clinical success and vascular access-related complications. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and procedural characteristics (volume of contrast, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, procedure time, hospitalization time). Results: A total of 337 consecutive patients (mean age 64.6 ± 9.92 years, 72.4% male) were enrolled (PRA = 257, DRA = 80). When compared with DRA, the PRA group had a higher prevalence of smoking (53.8% vs. 25.7%, SMD = 0.643), family history of cardiovascular disease (35.0% vs. 15.2%, SMD = 0.553), and dyslipidemia (95.0% vs. 72.8%, SMD = 0.500). The complexity of the CTOs was slightly higher in the DRA group, with higher degrees of calcification and tortuosity (both SMD >0.250), more bifurcation lesions (45.0% vs. 13.2%, SMD = 0.938), more blunt entries (67.5% vs. 47.1%, SMD = 0.409). Contrast volumes (median 120 ml vs. 146 ml, p = 0.045) and dose area product (median 928 mGy×cm2 vs. 1,300 mGy×cm2, p < 0.001) were lower in the DRA group. Numerically, local vascular complications were more common in the PRA group, although these did not meet statistical significance (RAO: 2.72% vs. 1.25%, p = 0.450; large hematoma: 0.72% vs. 0%, p = 1.000). Hospitalization duration was similar (2.5 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.4). The procedural and clinical success rates were comparable through DRA vs. PRA (p = 0.6), moreover, the 12-months rate of MACCE was similar across the 2 groups (9.09% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.35). Conclusion: Using DRA for complex CTO interventions is safe, feasible, lowers radiation dose and makes dual radial access more achievable. At the same time, there was no signal of increased risk of periprocedural or long-term adverse outcomes.

The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: characterization of anatomical parameters impacting substernal implantation and defibrillation efficacy.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to provide a thorough, quantified assessment of the substernal space as the site of extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead placement using computed tomography (CT) scans and summarizing adverse events and defibrillation efficacy across anatomical findings. Subcutaneous ICDs are an alternative to transvenous defibrillators but have limitations related to ICD lead distance from the heart. An alternative extravascular system with substernal lead placement has the potential to provide defibrillation at lower energy and pacing therapies from a single device. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multi-centre, non-randomized, retrospective analysis of 45 patient CT scans quantitatively and qualitatively assessing bony, cardiac, vascular, and other organ structures from two human clinical studies with substernal lead placement. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate 15 anatomical parameters for impact on defibrillation outcome and adjusted for multiple comparisons. Adverse events were summarized. Substernal implantation was attempted or completed in 45 patients. Defibrillation testing was successful in 37 of 41 subjects (90%) using ≥10 J safety margin. There were two intra-procedural adverse events in one patient, including reaction to anaesthesia and an episode of transient atrial fibrillation during ventricular fibrillation induction. Anatomical factors associated with defibrillation failure included large rib cage width, myocardium extending very posteriorly, and a low heart position in the chest (P-values <0.05), though not significant adjusting for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION: Retrospective analysis demonstrates the ability to implant within the substernal space with low intra-procedural adverse events and high defibrillation efficacy despite a wide range of anatomical variability.

Predicting the survival benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator function for non-ischemic heart failure-Role of the Goldenberg risk score.

Aims: Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in non-ischemic heart failure (HF) patients remains a topic of debate at cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation requiring individual risk assessment. Using the Goldenberg SCD risk score, we aimed to predict, which non-ischemic HF patients will benefit from the addition of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to CRT at long-term. Methods: Between 2000 and 2018 non-ischemic HF patients undergoing CRT implantation were collected into our retrospective registry. The Goldenberg risk score (GRS) was calculated by the presence of atrial fibrillation, New York Heat Association (NYHA) class > 2, age > 70 years, blood urea nitrogen > 26 mg/dl and QRS > 120 ms. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation. Results: From 667 patients, 347 (52%) underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker (CRT-P), 320 (48%) cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantations. During the median follow up time of 4.3 years, 306 (46%) patients reached the primary endpoint (CRT-D 37% vs. CRT-P 63%; p < 0.001). CRT-D patients were younger (64 vs. 69 years; p < 0.001), infrequently females (26 vs. 39%; p < 0.001), and had a lower ejection fraction (27 vs. 29%; p < 0.01) compared to CRT-P patients. After GRS calculation, patients were dichotomized by low (< 3) and high (≥ 3) scores. CRT-D patients with low GRS showed a mortality benefit compared to CRT-P (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.48-0.96; p = 0.03), high-risk patients did not (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.62-1.13; p = 0.26). Conclusion: In our non-ischemic cohort, patients with low GRS showed a clear long-term mortality benefit by adding ICD to CRT, however, in high-risk patients no further benefit could be observed.

Long-term survival following upgrade compared with de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: a single-centre, high-volume experience.

AIMS: Patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator are often considered for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, limited comprehensive data are available regarding their long-term outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our retrospective registry included 2524 patients [1977 (78%) de novo, 547 (22%) upgrade patients] with mild to severe symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS ≥ 130ms. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation (HTX), or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation; secondary endpoints were death from any cause and post-procedural complications. In our cohort, upgrade patients were older [71 (65-77) vs. 67 (59-73) years; P < 0.001], were less frequently females (20% vs. 27%; P = 0.002) and had more comorbidities than de novo patients. During the median follow-up time of 3.7 years, 1091 (55%) de novo and 342 (63%) upgrade patients reached the primary endpoint. In univariable analysis, upgrade patients exhibited a higher risk of mortality/HTX/LVAD than the de novo group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.61; P < 0.001]. However, this difference disappeared after adjusting for covariates (adjusted HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.86-1.48; P = 0.402), or propensity score matching (propensity score-matched HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.95-1.29; P = 0.215). From device-related complications, lead dysfunction (3.1% vs. 1%; P < 0.001) and pocket infections (3.7% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.014) were more frequent in the upgrade group compared to de novo patients. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective analysis, upgrade patients had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than de novo patients, which might be attributable to their more significant comorbidity burden. The occurrence of lead dysfunction and pocket infections was more frequent in the upgrade group.

Impact of closed loop stimulation on prognostic cardiopulmonary variables in patients with chronic heart failure and severe chronotropic incompetence: a pilot, randomized, crossover study.

AIMS: Clinical effects of rate-adaptive pacing in heart failure patients with chronotropic incompetence (CI) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain unclear. Closed loop stimulation (CLS) is a new rate-adaptive sensor in CRT devices. We evaluated the effectiveness of CLS in CRT patients with severe CI, focusing primarily on key prognostic variables assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) testing. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the randomized, crossover, multicentre BIO|CREATE study, 20 CRT patients with severe CI and NYHA Class II/III (60%/40%) were randomized 1:1 to the sequence DDD-40 mode to DDD-CLS mode, or the sequence DDD-CLS mode to DDD-40 mode (1 month in each mode). Patients underwent symptom-limited treadmill-based CPX test in each mode. An improvement (decrease) of the ventilatory efficiency (VE) slope of ≥5% during CLS was regarded as positive response to CLS. Seventeen patients with full data sets had a mean intra-individual VE slope change of -1.8 ± 3.0 (-4.1%) with CLS (P = 0.23). Eight patients (47%) were CLS responders, with a -6.1 ± 2.7 (-16.4%) slope change (P = 0.029). Compared to non-responders, CLS responders had a higher left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (46 ± 3 vs. 36 ± 9%; P = 0.0070), smaller end-diastolic LV volume (121 ± 34 vs. 181 ± 41 mL; P = 0.0085), smaller end-systolic LV volume (65 ± 23 vs. 114 ± 39 mL; P = 0.0076), and were predominantly in NYHA Class II (P = 0.0498). CONCLUSION: The data of the present pilot study are compatible with the notion that CLS activation may improve VE slope in CRT patients with severe CI and less advanced heart failure. Further research is needed to determine the long-term clinical outcomes of CLS.

Safety and feasibility of transradial aortic valve valvuloplasty (TRAV study).

INTRODUCTION: The importance of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era emerged in the past decades, but the access site related complication rate remained significant. AIM: To establish the safety and technical success of transradial balloon aortic valvuloplasty (trBAV). The secondary objective was to determine the effectiveness and appropriate role of trBAV. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2019, 36 consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AoS) were treated with trBAV in this prospective, single-center study. During the procedure, the efficacy and the aortic valve insufficiency were controlled by hemodynamic measurements and later by echocardiography. The primary end-points were technical success and major adverse events (MAE). Secondary end-points were the access site complication rate, hemodynamic and clinical result of the intervention, procedure-related factors, crossover rate to the femoral access site and hospitalization duration. RESULTS: Clinical and technical success was achieved in all cases. Invasively measured peak-to-peak gradient decreased from 76.8 ±27.2 to 54.7 ±21.1 mm Hg (p = 0.001), and the aortic-valve area increased from 0.69 ±0.2 to 0.91 ±0.3 cm2 (p = 0.001). No major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events or vascular complications (according to VARC 2 criteria) occurred during the procedures. The perioperative death rate was 2.7% (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, radial artery access is a safe and effective option for balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Biventricular pacing during cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

AIMS: We aimed to assess the effect of cardiac resynchronization on left ventricular (LV) function, volumes, geometry, and mechanics in order to demonstrate reverse remodelling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with resynchronization on. METHODS AND RESULTS: New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-III patients on optimal medical therapy with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and complete LBBB with broad QRS (>150 ms) were prospectively recruited. Cardiac magnetic resonance examination was performed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up, applying both biventricular and AOO pacing. The following data were measured: conventional CMR parameters, remodelling indices, global longitudinal, circumferential, radial strain, global dyssynchrony [mechanical dispersion (MD) defined as the standard deviation of time to peak longitudinal/circumferential strain in 16 LV segments], and regional dyssynchrony (maximum differences in time between peak septal and lateral transversal displacement). Thirteen patients (64 ± 7 years, 38% male) were enrolled. Comparing the baseline and follow-up CMR parameters measured during biventricular pacing, significant increase in LVEF, and decrease in LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) were found. Left ventricular remodelling indices, global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain values showed significant improvement. Circumferential MD decreased (20.5 ± 5.5 vs. 13.4 ± 3.4, P < 0.001), while longitudinal MD did not change. Regional dyssynchrony drastically improved (362 ± 96 vs. 104 ± 66 ms, P < 0.001). Applying AOO pacing resulted in an immediate deterioration in LVEF, LVESVi, circumferential strain, global and regional dyssynchrony. CONCLUSION: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during biventricular pacing is feasible and enables a more precise quantification of LV function, morphology, and mechanics. As a result, it may contribute to a better understanding of the effects of resynchronization therapy and might improve responder rate in the future.