A pilot recruitment strategy to enhance ethical and equitable access to Covid-19 pediatric vaccine trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic disproportionately impacted communities with lower access to health care in the United States, particularly before vaccines were widely available. These same communities are often underrepresented in clinical trials. Efforts to ensure equitable enrollment of participants in trials related to treatment and prevention of Covid-19 can raise concerns about exploitation if communities with lower access to health care are targeted for recruitment. METHODS: To enhance equity while avoiding exploitation, our site developed and implemented a three-part recruitment strategy for pediatric Covid-19 vaccine studies. First, we publicized a registry for potentially interested participants. Next, we applied public health community and social vulnerability indices to categorize the residence of families who had signed up for the registry into three levels to reflect the relative impact of the pandemic on their community: high, medium, and low. Finally, we preferentially offered study participation to interested families living in areas categorized by these indices as having high impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on their community. RESULTS: This approach allowed us to meet goals for study recruitment based on public health metrics related to disease burden, which contributed to a racially diverse study population that mirrored the surrounding community demographics. While this three-part recruitment strategy improved representation of minoritized groups from areas heavily impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic, important limitations were identified that would benefit from further study. CONCLUSION: Future use of this approach to enhance equitable access to research while avoiding exploitation should test different methods to build trust and communicate with underserved communities more effectively.

Pediatric Decision Making: Consensus Recommendations.

Despite apparent disagreement in the scholarly literature on standards of pediatric decision making, a recognition that similar norms underpin many of the dominant frameworks motivated a June 2022 symposium "Best Interests and Beyond: Standards of Decision Making in Pediatrics" in St Louis, MO. Over the course of this 3-day symposium, 17 expert scholars (see author list) deliberated on the question "In the context of US pediatric care, what moral precepts ought to guide parents and clinicians in medical decision making for children?" The symposium and subsequent discussion generated 6 consensus recommendations for pediatric decision making, constructed with the primary goals of accessibility, teachability, and feasibility for practicing clinicians, parents, and legal guardians. In this article, we summarize these recommendations, including their justification, limitations, and remaining concerns.

Refusals of the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria: A Mixed Methods Study of Physician Perspectives on Refusals Cases.

OBJECTIVES: Refusals to allow examination for determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC) challenge pediatric physicians and create distress for medical teams and families of patients suspected to meet criteria for DNC. The objective of this study was to inquire about and assess experiences with such refusals from the perspective of physicians. DESIGN: We conducted a mixed-methods survey and interview-based study to understand physicians' experiences with refusals. SETTING: An online survey was sent to pediatric intensivists and neurologists; phone interviews were conducted in a subset. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: The study included 80 physician survey respondents and 12 interview physician respondents. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Refusals occur for many reasons regarding patients with both acute and progressive brain injury. The most common reasons were consistent in surveys and interviews and include "waiting on a miracle," not wanting to give up, religious objections and disbelief in brain death. Time was an important mediator in many cases. Physicians described several approaches to managing refusals, highlighting the impact on medical teams, distraction from other patients, and need for resources to support physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Refusals may have important sociodemographic associations that should be considered in managing complex cases. Physicians seek more guidance in law and policies to manage refusals.

Screening for Social Determinants of Health in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Recommendations for Clinicians.

Social determinants of health (SDoH) play a significant role in the health and well-being of children in the United States. Disparities in the risk and outcomes of critical illness have been extensively documented but are yet to be fully explored through the lens of SDoH. In this review, we provide justification for routine SDoH screening as a critical first step toward understanding the causes of, and effectively addressing health disparities affecting critically ill children. Second, we summarize important aspects of SDoH screening that need to be considered before implementing this practice in the pediatric critical care setting.

Barriers to enrollment in a pediatric critical care biorepository.

BACKGROUND: Individuals of minority race/ethnicity have lower rates of participation in genomic research. This study evaluated sociodemographic characteristics associated with decisions to enroll in a pediatric critical care biorepository. METHODS: Parents of children admitted to the PICU between November 2014 and May 2017 were offered to enroll their child in a biorepository using a single-page opt-in consent. Missed enrollment was assessed by failure to complete the form or declining consent on the form. We conducted a retrospective chart review for sociodemographic and clinical information. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In 4055 encounters, representing 2910 patients with complete data, 1480 (50%) completed the consent form and 1223 (83%) enrolled. We found higher odds of incomplete consent for non-English-speaking parents (OR = 2.1, p < 0.0001) and parents of children of all races except non-Hispanic white (OR = 1.27-1.99, p < 0.0001). We found higher odds of declined consent in patients with Medicaid (OR = 1.67, p = 0.003) and parents of children of all races except non-Hispanic white (OR = 1.32-2.9, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Inability to enroll patients in a critical care biorepository may be associated with several sociodemographic factors at various points in recruitment/enrollment. IMPACT: Individuals of minority race/ethnicity are less likely to enroll in genomic research and in critical care research. This study evaluated sociodemographic characteristics associated with decisions to enroll a child in a pediatric critical care biorepository. Sociodemographic factors including race/ethnicity, primary language, and insurance status and patient clinical characteristics are associated with differential enrollment into a pediatric critical care biorepository. More research is needed to understand how study team-participant interactions may play a role in differential enrollment. Barriers to enrollment occur both at the time of approaching and consenting for enrollment.

Addressing Racism in the Healthcare Encounter: The Role of Clinical Ethics Consultants.

Clinical ethicists move in different environments and interface with a variety of stakeholders, and are therefore uniquely positioned to answer the call for equity and anti-racism. We describe why a clinical ethicist should contribute to anti-racism efforts and describe general approaches for addressing racism across institutional contexts, including: (1) addressing racism as bedside clinical ethics consultant, (2) addressing wider lens of anti-racism work across multiple ethics consults over time, and (3) addressing racism at the organizational level.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Their Work's Intersection with Clinical Ethics.

Palliative care (PC) subspecialists and clinical ethics consultants often engage in parallel work, as both function primarily as interprofessional consultancy services called upon in complex clinical scenarios and challenging circumstances. Both practices utilize active listening, goals-based communication, conflict mediation or mitigation, and values explorations as care modalities. In this set of tips created by an interprofessional team of ethicists, intensivists, a surgeon, an attorney, and pediatric and adult PC nurses and physicians, we aim to describe some paradigmatic clinical challenges for which partnership may improve collaborative, comprehensive care.

Interprofessional Education in Medical-Legal Partnerships (MLPs) to Address Social Determinants of Health.

Medical-legal partnerships (MLP) address legal needs that contribute to health inequities. Health providers express discomfort accessing legal services and a desire for greater training, however best practices remain unclear. METHODS: We conducted a scoping literature review and interviews with key informants to identify essential components of MLP training and best practices in MLP training. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles out of an initial 1,247 met criteria. Most learners were medical (11; 52%) or law (13; 62%) students or residents (12; 57%). Training was primarily led by lawyers (18; 86%). Educational approaches included didactics (15; 71%). Content was focused on skill-acquisition (18; 86%). Most training was presented as stand-alone (5; 24%) courses. Essential skills included issuespotting, adaptability, and trauma-informed care. CONCLUSION: Medical-legal partnerships make use of varied perspectives to address unmet legal needs. This review helped identify best practices in training and a need for future study on evaluation. Future research should explore how best to evaluate the effectiveness of MLP training.

Pediatric Intensivist and Pediatric Neurologist Perspectives and Practices on Death by Neurologic Criteria.

Controversies surrounding the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC), also known as brain death, have become increasingly common over the last decade, occasionally leading to parental refusal of all or part of an evaluation or declaration of DNC. We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric neurologists and intensivists who participate in professional listservs to ascertain perspectives and practices concerning the evaluation of DNC, specifically on obtaining permission for evaluations and managing refusals. Of the 334 respondents who had performed an evaluation for DNC, 35 percent reported they had experienced at least one parental refusal, and 64.4 percent reported that they did not seek permission to perform an evaluation. Pediatric neurologists, careproviders who had less experience doing evaluations, and careproviders who had experienced parental refusal of an evaluation were more likely to obtain permission from parents. Most (80.8 percent) of respondents reported that their institution had a DNC policy. We found variability in many aspects of DNC evaluations and declarations, as well as the handling of refusals. Lack of consistency may make it more difficult for careproviders and families. Greater understanding of parental refusal of DNC evaluation is essential to inform efforts to increase consistency.

Creating a Research Ethics Consultation Service: Issues to Consider.

This article provides pragmatic advice for organizations interested in creating a research ethics consultation service (RECS). A robust RECS has the potential to build capacity among investigators to identify and consider the ethical issues they encounter while conducting their research. Determining whether to establish an RECS should begin with an institutional-needs assessment that includes three key questions: What are the current resources available to research teams to navigate ethical concerns that arise from their research? Is there a demand or perceived need for more resources? Is there institutional support (financial and otherwise) to establish and maintain an RECS? If this results in the decision to establish the consultation service, relevant institutional stakeholders must be identified and consulted, and personnel with the requisite skills recruited. The next step is to establish an RECS and build the infrastructure to process and respond to requests. The RECS's long-term sustainability will depend on a stable source of funding and a mechanism to receive constructive feedback to ensure that the service is meeting the institutional needs it set out to address.