RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. Coronary artery disease, heart failure, and peripheral artery disease constitute the prevailing conditions. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) represents a cornerstone in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, since it has been associated with significant cardiovascular benefits in the above-mentioned conditions, by significantly reducing cardiovascular outcomes and improving functional independence and quality of life. Besides, CR offers the background for optimizing the control of cardiovascular risk factors and implementing physical exercise, also providing psychological and social support. SUMMARY: The prevalence of cardiovascular disease increases with age, associating high morbidity and mortality. In addition, comorbidities, frailty, and other geriatric conditions, entities that also entail poor prognosis, are often present in elderly patients. Indeed, frailty is recommended to be systematically addressed in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease, and there is growing evidence regarding the benefits of CR programs in this setting, also associated with lower adverse events during follow-up. However, elderly patients are less often referred to CR after a cardiovascular event when compared to their younger counterparts. In this review, we summarized the benefits of CR programs in the elderly population with established cardiovascular disease, proposing a comprehensive framework that integrates personalized care strategies. KEY MESSAGES: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbimortality, especially in the elderly. The management of cardiovascular disease in elderly patients poses unique challenges, since they represent a heterogeneous group and evidence is low. CR can provide significant benefits in older patients, encompassing physical training and specific management of geriatric syndromes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Heart failure (HF) is prevalent in advanced ages. Our objective was to assess the impact of frailty on 1-year mortality in older patients with ambulatory HF. METHODS: Our data come from the FRAGIC study (Spanish acronym for "Study of the impact of frailty and other geriatric syndromes on the clinical management and prognosis of elderly outpatients with heart failure"), a multicenter prospective registry conducted in 16 Spanish hospitals including outpatients ≥ 75 years with HF followed up by cardiology services in Spain. RESULTS: We included 499 patients with a mean age of 81.4±4.3 years, of whom 193 (38%) were women. A total of 268 (54%) had left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, and 84.6% was in NYHA II functional class. The FRAIL scale identified 244 (49%) pre-frail and 111 (22%) frail patients. Frail patients were significantly older, were more frequently female (both, P <.001), and had higher comorbidity according to the Charlson index (P=.017) and a higher prevalence of geriatric syndromes (P <.001). During a median follow-up of 371 [361-387] days, 58 patients (11.6%) died. On multivariate analysis (Cox regression model), frailty detected with the FRAIL scale was marginally associated with mortality (HR=2.35; 95%CI, 0.96-5.71; P=.059), while frailty identified by the visual mobility scale was an independent predictor of mortality (HR=2.26; 95%CI, 1.16-4.38; P=.015); this association was maintained after adjustment for confounding variables (HR=2.13; 95%CI, 1.08-4.20; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly outpatients with HF, frailty is independently associated with mortality at 1 year of follow-up. It is essential to identify frailty as part of the comprehensive approach to elderly patients with HF.