Changes in body weight and body mass index among psychiatric patients receiving lithium, valproate, or topiramate: an open-label, nonrandomized chart review.

BACKGROUND: Subsets of psychiatric patients gain excess body weight while receiving mood-stabilizing agents such as lithium carbonate or valproate sodium. Patients who gain excess weight may discontinue therapy, with severe consequences. Among the newer anticonvulsant agents, topiramate is a candidate agent for bipolar disorder and is associated with weight loss when used as adjunctive treatment. OBJECTIVE: This open-label, nonrandomized, chart-review study assessed changes in body weight and body mass index (BMI) in patients receiving topiramate, lithium, or valproate. METHODS: Data were extracted from the medical charts of patients admitted in 1999 and 2000 to a state psychiatric hospital with either schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or other psychiatric diagnoses who were prescribed valproate, lithium, or topiramate and were reviewed for changes in body weight and BMI. The use of concomitant psychotropic medicines was recorded (eg, antipsychotic agents, antidepressant agents, other mood stabilizers such as gabapentin or carbamazepine). Continuous variables were analyzed using a factorial analysis of variance and the Student t test. Contingency statistics were used to analyze categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were included in the chart review (123 men, 91 women; mean age, 39.4 years). Significantly more women than men received topiramate (P = 0.004). Patients receiving either lithium or valproate gained a mean (SD) of 6.3 (9.0) kg and 6.4 (9.0) kg, respectively, whereas patients receiving topiramate lost a mean 1.2 (6.3) kg (F = 11.54, df = 2,198; P < 0.001). Lithium- or valproate-treated patients experienced an increase in BMI (mean, 2.1 [3.0] for both groups), whereas topiramate-treated patients experienced a reduction in BMI (mean, -0.5 [2.4]); this result was statistically significant (F = 11.40, df = 2,198; P < 0.001). Finally, lithium- or valproate-treated patients gained >8% of their baseline body weight (8.2% [11.5%] for lithium-treated patients and 8.5% [11.9%] for valproate-treated patients), whereas topiramate-treated patients lost 0.7% (7.2%) of their body weight (F = 9.93, df= 2,198; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Controlled studies for the efficacy of topiramate therapy in various psychiatric conditions are awaited. These data indicate that patients receiving topiramate experience body weight loss and a reduction in BMI. This advantage of topiramate may promote long-term adherence to treatment among psychiatric patients and possibly decrease the medical risks associated with obesity.

Long-term effects of topiramate on bipolar mood instability, weight change and glycemic control: a case-series.

Topiramate is an antiepileptic agent, which is being investigated as a mood-stabilizer. Three obese individuals with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder and type II diabetes mellitus received topiramate treatment in combination with antipsychotics and valproate or carbamazepine. In addition to improved mood stability, these individuals lost between 16 to 20.5% of their pre-topiramate body weight and also achieved significant glycemic control.

Obesity and medical illnesses in psychiatric patients admitted to a long-term psychiatric facility.

Obesity and associated medical conditions may have an impact on morbidity and even mortality in patients with psychiatric disorders. The authors present the results of a survey of the prevalence of obesity and selected medical conditions among 420 consecutively admitted psychiatric inpatients at a long-stay facility and compare these data with those reported in the literature. Female psychiatric subjects had considerably higher rates of being either overweight or obese (69%) as compared to women in the general U.S. population (51%). Male psychiatric subjects did not differ significantly from their counterparts in the general population in being overweight or obese (nearly 55%). The majority of psychiatric subjects with essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemias, cardiovascular disease, or sleep apnea were either overweight or obese (72%-87%). In this cross-sectional study, no associations could be deduced between psychotropic drug classes and specific medical conditions. No specific psychiatric diagnostic category was associated with a significantly greater prevalence of any specific medical condition, except that subjects with schizoaffective disorder appeared to have a higher prevalence of type II diabetes mellitus (11.6%). Subjects with predominant substance or alcohol abuse or dependence disorders had a lower prevalence of obesity and associated medical conditions.Obesity-either independently or additively along with a sedentary lifestyle, unhealthy dietary habits, and nicotine dependence-may have a serious impact on coexisting medical comorbidity in psychiatric patients. Judicious monitoring for obesity and rapid pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention, where appropriate, by concerned clinicians may improve several coexisting medical conditions in psychiatric patients and thereby improve patients' overall quality of life.

Anticholinergic differences among patients receiving standard clinical doses of olanzapine or clozapine.

This study evaluated anticholinergic effects among patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar I disorder who were receiving either olanzapine (N = 12) or clozapine (N = 12) at standard clinical doses in a naturalistic setting. Serum anticholinergic levels were determined in adult male and female subjects using a radioreceptor binding assay. The Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Scale was used to evaluate anticholinergic side effects clinically, and the Mini-Mental State Examination provided a global cognitive measure. Patients had achieved target doses that were stable at the time at which blood samples were obtained, and no other concomitant medicine with known anticholinergic potential was allowed. Patients receiving olanzapine (average dose, 15 mg/day) had serum anticholinergic levels of 0.96 (+/-0.55) pmol/ atropine equivalents compared with levels of 5.47 (+/-3.33) pmol/atropine equivalents for those receiving clozapine (average dose, 444 mg/day) (p < 0.001). Rates of increased and decreased salivation were significantly more common among the clozapine- and olanzapine-treated patients, respectively, whereas constipation, urinary disturbances, and tachycardia/palpitations were significantly more common among clozapine-treated patients. Neither group showed any global cognitive deficits. Olanzapine-treated patients had serum anticholinergic levels that were less than one fifth those of the clozapine-treated patients. Furthermore, clinical evaluations confirmed that clozapine-treated patients experienced more frequent and severe anticholinergic side effects (except dry mouth). However, none of the patients in either group expressed any desire to discontinue these medications as a result of the anticholinergic side effects.

Impact of risperidone on seclusion and restraint at a state psychiatric hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of risperidone on seclusion and restraint in patients at a state psychiatric facility, shortly after risperidone's release. METHODS: Patients who were in the hospital for at least 3 months prior to receiving risperidone and subsequently received risperidone for at least 3 months formed the cohort. A mirror-image design was used with duration to a maximum of 1 year before and 1 year after initiation of risperidone. The hospital population that did not receive either risperidone or clozapine during the same time period was used for comparison of trends of seclusion and restraint. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (most with schizophrenia) met the inclusion criteria of the risperidone group. There were statistically significant decreases in the number of seclusion hours (2.2 [SD 5.5] to 0.26 [SD 0.06]) and of events (0.23 [SD 0.59] to 0.05 [SD 0.14]) per person per month during risperidone treatment, compared with the prerisperidone treatment period (P = 0.01). The comparison group also evidenced decreases on these measures during the same time period, but the risperidone-treated cohort achieved a proportionally greater reduction. There were similar trends toward reduction in the restraint measures during risperidone treatment compared with prerisperidone, but these did not achieve statistical significance. The comparison group also showed slightly decreased use of restraints over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone appears to have had a positive impact on seclusion in this state-hospital psychiatric population. These data support the positive impact of risperidone on violence found in other studies. Violence and aggression are major factors that affect morale among psychiatric patients and staff. So, any benefit in this regard as a result of antipsychotic drug treatment is salutary for patients, families, and health care providers.

Clozapine reduces severe self-mutilation and aggression in psychotic patients with borderline personality disorder.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine has been reported to be effective in diminishing violence toward others in psychotic patients. This article describes the impact of clozapine on severe self-mutilation among patients with the dual diagnoses of borderline personality disorder and persistent psychoses. METHOD: Seven subjects known to the authors were selected for careful chart audits. These subjects had been admitted to 2 state psychiatric hospitals owing to severe self-mutilation and/or violence and subsequently treated with clozapine. A mirror-image design anchored to the start date of clozapine treatment and extending in either direction to a maximum of 1 year was used to extract data. Data extracted included incidents of self-mutilation (restraint), seclusion, the as and when needed (p.r.n.) use of medications, injuries to staff and peers, hospital privileges, and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. RESULTS: The subjects were all white women with a mean age of 37 years. All subjects carried DSM-III-R or DSM-IV borderline personality disorder diagnoses and an Axis I disorder diagnosis. They had received trials of several psychotropic agents, often in combination and mostly without benefit. After clozapine treatment, there were statistically significant reductions in incidents of self-mutilation (restraint), seclusion, the use of p.r.n. antianxiety medications, and injuries to staff and peers. These subjects received higher levels of hospital privileges, and their GAF scores nearly doubled following clozapine treatment. Four subjects were subsequently discharged from hospital. CONCLUSION: These preliminary but nonetheless favorable results suggest that clozapine deserves careful consideration for a controlled study in patients with borderline personality disorder and psychoses, especially if the clinical issues include severe self-mutilation, aggression, and violence. Until such studies are done, the risk-to-benefit ratio of clozapine treatment needs to be carefully evaluated on an individualized basis in such subjects.

Risperidone use at a state hospital: a clinical audit 2 years after the first wave of risperidone prescriptions.

BACKGROUND: In spite of some inherent limitations, naturalistic data can provide information on populations that have greater heterogeneity than can controlled clinical trials and on functional outcomes that may be especially important in clinical practice. In the present retrospective naturalistic study, we evaluated key clinical outcomes among the first wave of risperidone-treated patients at a state psychiatric hospital. METHOD: Outcome data were extracted from the charts of 142 patients 2 years after initiation of treatment with risperidone. Their diagnoses included DSM-III-R schizophrenia (57%), schizoaffective disorder (22%), dementia and other organic conditions (7%), bipolar disorder (5%), and other psychiatric disorders (9%). RESULTS: During the 2-year period, 92 of 142 patients were discharged from the hospital: 61 (43%) were discharged on risperidone treatment and 31 (22%) were discharged on treatment with other drugs. At the time of the study, 50 of 142 patients were still in the hospital: of these, 18 (13%) were still receiving risperidone. The modal maximum daily dose of risperidone was 4.1 mg in patients discharged on risperidone treatment and 7.5 mg in patients still in the hospital. All groups were granted more ward privileges after starting risperidone, the most being granted to patients discharged from the hospital on risperidone treatment (p<.05 versus patients discharged on treatment with other drugs) and those still receiving risperidone in the hospital. Significantly fewer patients discharged on risperidone treatment than on treatment with other drugs were readmitted to the hospital within 2 years after discharge (p<.01). CONCLUSION: Improved privilege levels and a reduced readmission rate indicate that risperidone was an effective antipsychotic agent among a heterogeneous patient population in a state hospital. These factors may be especially important to justify use of this agent in the current fiscal climate.

Topiramate as add-on treatment for patients with bipolar mania.

OBJECTIVE: Anticonvulsant agents such as carbamazepine and valproate are alternatives to lithium in treating subjects with bipolar disorder. Topiramate (Topamax), a new antiepileptic agent, is a candidate drug for bipolar disorder. We evaluated topiramate as adjunctive treatment for bipolar patients. METHODS: Eighteen patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder [mania (n = 12), hypomania (n = 1), mixed episode (n = 5), and rapid cycling (n = 6)], and two subjects with schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, resistant to current mood-stabilizer treatment were initiated on topiramate, 25 mg/day, increasing by 25-50 mg every 3 7 days to a target dose between 100 and 300 mg/day, as other medications were held constant for 5 weeks. The Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D), and Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version Scale (CGI-BP) were used to rate subjects weekly. RESULTS: By 5 weeks, 12 (60%) subjects were responders, i.e., 50% reduction in the Y-MRS scores and a CGI of 'much' or 'very much improved'. Three subjects were 'minimally improved', four showed no change, and one was 'minimally worse'. Six subjects had parasthesia, three experienced fatigue, and two had 'word-finding' difficulties; in all cases, side effects were transient. All patients lost weight with a mean of 9.4 lb in 5 weeks, and a significant reduction in body mass index (BMI) occurred too. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate appears to have efficacy for the manic and mixed phases of bipolar illness. Other preliminary data suggest antidepressant efficacy too. Among obese bipolar subjects, the weight loss potential of topiramate may be beneficial. If controlled trials confirm these initial results, topiramate may be a significant addition to the available treatments for bipolar disorder.

Clozapine withdrawal-emergent dystonias and dyskinesias: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Severe psychotic decompensation during clozapine withdrawal has been reported previously. Less attention has been paid to movement disorders following abrupt clozapine withdrawal. This report describes 4 subjects who experienced severe dystonias and dyskinesias upon abrupt clozapine withdrawal. METHOD: Current and past medical records of 4 subjects with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder were reviewed. RESULTS: All subjects had a history of neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms, 1 had a history of severe dystonias, and 1 had neuroleptic malignant syndrome. All had mild orolingual tardive dyskinesia prior to clozapine treatment. All subjects had received clozapine for several months, and 3 of the 4 subjects stopped clozapine abruptly. Two subjects experienced cholinergic rebound symptoms within hours, which resolved quickly. These subjects had severe limb-axial and neck dystonias and dyskinesias 5 to 14 days after clozapine withdrawal. Two subjects were unable to ambulate, and 1 had a lurching gait. Two gagged while eating or drinking. Two subjects were returned to clozapine, 1 was started on low-dose risperidone treatment, and 1 was started on olanzapine treatment. All experienced significant improvements in their mental state and movement disorders. CONCLUSION: Severe movement disorders, which may be worse than the movements prior to clozapine treatment, and cholinergic rebound symptoms may occur upon abrupt clozapine withdrawal and must be recognized in addition to the severe psychotic decompensation noted in some patients. Patients, families, and caregivers must be alerted to this possibility. Where possible, a slow clozapine taper, the use of anticholinergic agents, and symptomatic treatment may help minimize these withdrawal symptoms, and reintroduction of clozapine or treatment with the newer atypical agents can help in the clinical management of these symptoms.

The effects of clozapine on negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia with minimal positive symptoms.

The effectiveness of clozapine in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia remains controversial, as improvements in negative symptoms are invariably accompanied by improvements in positive symptoms and neurological side effects. We examined the effectiveness of treatment with clozapine on negative symptoms in a cohort of patients with minimal positive symptoms. Improvements in positive and negative symptoms were measured by BPRS ratings in a subgroup of schizophrenic patients (n=17, from a state hospital cohort of 75) with minimal positive symptoms, who had received clozapine for 6 months. In this subgroup, significant improvements were noted by a composite score on the three negative symptom items of emotional withdrawal, blunted affect, and motor retardation. Positive and depressive symptoms remained unchanged. The remaining cohort (n=58) showed improvements in overall psychopathology including positive, negative, and depressive symptoms. Interestingly, nearly 50% of each group were discharged from the hospital. These findings suggest that clozapine may be beneficial in the treatment of core negative symptoms, even in the absence of other improvements in psychopathology. This effect of clozapine may be a function of its unique pharmacological profile.