Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 115(3): 241-3, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26195439

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To sustain the long-lasting beneficial effects of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy, the recommended duration of treatment is 3 to 5 years. Nevertheless, many patients discontinue allergy injections prematurely and therefore might not appreciate the full therapeutic benefit. OBJECTIVE: To examine factors leading to premature discontinuation of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (cessation before completion of the recommended duration). METHODS: Patients who discontinued immunotherapy before the completion of the prescribed duration and received their final injection from January 2008 through September 2013 were contacted to identify the reason for stopping the allergy injections. Phase of treatment (escalation or maintenance) was used to measure the duration of treatment at the time of cessation and patients were grouped accordingly. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 555 patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma who terminated immunotherapy prematurely. Two hundred thirteen (38%) were men and 342 (62%) were women. The following reasons were cited by patients for non-adherence to immunotherapy: requirement of copayment for allergy injections and/or payment for allergen extract by their health insurer (40%); inconvenience of travel (15%); change of residence (8%); concurrent health problems (5%); patient-perceived ineffectiveness (4%); patient-perceived lack of need to continue immunotherapy (2%); adverse effects from injection (local reaction 1%; systemic allergic reaction 0.5%); and trial of alternative medicine (0.1%). The remaining 24.4% did not provide a reason for discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Of the various factors, inadequate reimbursement for allergen extract and allergy injections by health insurers is the most common reason cited for non-adherence to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Dessensibilização Imunológica/economia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/psicologia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente , Adulto , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Alérgenos/imunologia , Alérgenos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas/economia , Masculino , Rinite Alérgica/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 90(4): 170-3, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21500169

RESUMO

We conducted a study of 155 patients with allergic rhinitis who prematurely discontinued subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy to determine the reasons for their discontinuation. The most commonly cited factor, which was cited by 62 patients (40.0%), was the issue of cost-specifically, inadequate or nonexistent insurance coverage. Studies have shown that subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy is more cost-effective than pharmacologic treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis. Therefore, improved insurance coverage for this treatment of proven efficacy would not only improve quality of life, it would also be economically beneficial to the healthcare system in general.


Assuntos
Dessensibilização Imunológica/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/economia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/economia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA