A systematic review of epinephrine stability and sterility with storage in a syringe.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is a lifesaving medication in the treatment of anaphylaxis. Epinephrine auto-injectors are the preferred method of epinephrine administration, but are not universally available or affordable. Little is known about the effects on epinephrine when it is drawn up in advance and stored as prefilled syringes. OBJECTIVE: To study the stability and sterility of epinephrine when stored in syringes. METHODS: We searched Embase, Medline, and Web of Science in June 2016 for all studies of epinephrine stored in syringes in concentrations between 0.1 and 1 mg/mL that measured epinephrine stability and/or sterility over time, regardless of date published or language. RESULTS: Three studies were included, one testing two concentrations of epinephrine. Only one study tested epinephrine 1 mg/mL, the concentration clinically relevant for intramuscular use during anaphylaxis. Neither this study nor the one study testing 0.7 mg/mL epinephrine found significant degradation after 56 and 90 days, respectively. One of the two studies testing epinephrine at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL found significant degradation by 14 days; the other found no degradation up to 168 days. Two studies tested for bacterial growth, with none detected after 28 and 90 days, respectively. One study tested for fungal growth, with none detected after 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests that syringes filled with 1 mg/mL epinephrine are stable and sterile for 90 days. More research is needed testing the duration of stability and sterility of prefilled syringes with the 1 mg/mL concentration most commonly used in anaphylaxis, testing more extensively in different storage conditions and across a wider range of marketed syringe brands.

A systematic review of epinephrine degradation with exposure to excessive heat or cold.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is a lifesaving drug in the treatment of anaphylaxis and cardiac resuscitation. Current US storage recommendations are for controlled room temperature (20°C-25°C), with excursions permitted from 15°C to 30°C. Maintaining epinephrine within this required range is challenging, particularly for patients carrying autoinjectors and during storage in emergency vehicles. OBJECTIVE: To study epinephrine degradation with extreme temperature exposure for epinephrine concentrations used in anaphylaxis and cardiac resuscitation. METHODS: We searched the literature for all studies of epinephrine in sealed syringes, vials, or ampules in concentrations between 1:1,000 and 1:10,000, that measured epinephrine in samples exposed to temperatures above and/or below the recommended storage temperature compared with control samples. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. Heat exposure resulted in epinephrine degradation but only with prolonged exposure. Constant heat resulted in more degradation. None of the studies that evaluated epinephrine exposure to extreme cold found significant degradation. None of the studies evaluating the effects of real-world temperature fluctuations detected significant degradation. Only 2 small studies (1 evaluating heat and 1 freezing) involved autoinjectors, and all 40 devices tested fired correctly. CONCLUSION: Temperature excursions in real-world conditions may be less detrimental than previously suggested. Freezing and limited heat excursions did not result in epinephrine degradation. Refrigeration of epinephrine appears to reduce degradation. However, the effect of extreme temperatures, particularly freezing, on autoinjectors is not sufficiently well established. More research in needed at clinically relevant high temperatures, with limited exposure to heat, and involving autoinjector devices.

Upper aerodigestive magnetic foreign bodies in children.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Small, powerful magnets are increasingly available in toys and other products, and are responsible for increasing numbers of foreign body injuries in children. Small, spherical, neodymium magnets available since 2008 are of particular concern. We aimed to identify all cases of upper aerodigestive foreign bodies at our institution over 15.5 years of study. STUDY DESIGN: Case series including all patients treated at an urban, tertiary care children's hospital who had upper aerodigestive magnetic foreign bodies, from January 1, 1998 through April 30, 2013. METHODS: We manually reviewed 7,049 patient records abstracted from billing data to identify all patients 0 to 20 years of age who had upper aerodigestive magnetic foreign bodies. RESULTS: We identified four cases of upper aerodigestive magnetic foreign bodies, one involving the hypopharynx, and three involving the upper esophagus. Three occurred in 2010 or later. Two cases involve the ingestion of multiple, spherical, neodymium magnets recently marketed as desktop toys. In both of these cases, there was a rapid development of mucosal injury at the site of attraction between two magnets. CONCLUSIONS: As small, powerful magnets become more ubiquitous, pediatric magnet foreign body injuries are increasing. Although most are gastrointestinal, we identified four recent cases involving the upper aerodigestive tract. Multiple magnets lodged in the hypopharynx or esophagus can rapidly cause pressure necrosis of mucosal tissues, and merit prompt management. Education regarding magnet safety and improved magnet safety standards are needed to reduce the risk of these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.