Optimizing Binding Site Spacing in Fluidic Self-Assembly for Enhanced Microchip Integration Density.

This manuscript presents a comprehensive study on the assembly of microchips using fluidic self-assembly (FSA) technology, with a focus on optimizing the spacing between binding sites to improve yield and assembly. Through a series of experiments, we explored the assembly of microchips on substrates with varying binding site spacings, revealing the impact of spacing on the rate of undesired chip assembly across multiple sites. Our findings indicate a significant reduction in incorrect assembly rates as the spacing increases beyond a critical threshold of 140 µm. This study delves into the mechanics of chip alignment within the fluid medium, hypothesizing that the extent of the alloy's grip on the chips at different spacings influences assembly outcomes. By analyzing cases of undesired assembly, we identified the relationship between binding site spacing and the area of chip contact, demonstrating a decrease in the combined left and right areas of chips as the spacing increases. The results highlight a critical spacing threshold, which, when optimized, could significantly enhance the efficiency and precision of microchip assembly processes using FSA technology. This research contributes to the field of microcomponent assembly, offering insights into achieving higher integration densities and precision in applications, such as microLED displays and augmented reality (AR) devices.

To do or not to do; dilemma of intra-arterial revascularization in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: There has still been lack of evidence for definite imaging criteria of intra-arterial revascularization (IAR). Therefore, IAR selection is left largely to individual clinicians. In this study, we sought to investigate the overall agreement of IAR selection among different stroke clinicians and factors associated with good agreement of IAR selection. METHODS: From the prospectively registered data base of a tertiary hospital, we identified consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke. IAR selection based on the provided magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results and clinical information were independently performed by 5 independent stroke physicians currently working at 4 different university hospitals. MRI results were also reviewed by 2 independent experienced neurologists blinded to clinical data and physicians' IAR selection. The Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) was calculated on initial DWI and MTT. We arbitrarily used ASPECTS differences between DWI and MTT (D-M ASPECTS) to quantitatively evaluate mismatch. RESULTS: The overall interobserver agreement of IAR selection was fair (kappa = 0.398). In patients with DWI-ASPECTS >6, interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial (0.398-0.620). In patients with D-M ASPECTS >4, interobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect (0.532-1.000). Patients with higher DWI or D-M ASPECTS had better agreement of IAR selection. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that DWI-ASPSECTS >6 and D-M ASPECTS >4 had moderate to substantial agreement of IAR selection among different stroke physicians. However, there is still poor agreement as to whether IAR should not be performed in patients with lower DWI and D-M ASPECTS.