Clinical Features of Non-Lateralized Tinnitus.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze and confirm the clinical features of patients with non-lateralized tinnitus and to identify clues that can be used in their management. METHODS: Data from 469 patients who visited a university hospital complaining of tinnitus between March 2020 and December 2021 were reviewed. The patients' medical histories, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and numerical rating scale scores on tinnitus awareness, annoyance, loudness, and effect on life, audiological profiles, and quantitative electroencephalography findings were documented. RESULTS: Forty-nine (10.4%) patients had non-lateralized tinnitus. They were older and had a shorter duration of symptoms (13.91 ± 34.16 months) than patients with bilateral tinnitus (duration: 39.15 ± 80.82 months) (P -lt; .05). The accompanying symptoms, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores, and numerical rating scale scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P -gt; .05). Patients with non-lateralized tinnitus had worse hearing at 12 kHz on the left side than those with unilateral tinnitus. Hearing asymmetry was least common in non-lateralized tinnitus (n=11/49, 10.4%), followed by bilateral tinnitus (n=54/198, 42.2%) and unilateral tinnitus (n=97/222, 47.3%) (P-lt; .001). Regarding quantitative electroencephalography, there were significant differences in the absolute power of the theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and total frequency bands based on tinnitus lateralization (P -lt; .001). CONCLUSION: Non-lateralized tinnitus can be perceived in elderly patients with symmetric and extended high-frequency hearing loss before habituation is achieved at an early stage of tinnitus. However, there was no difference in the questionnaire scores and accompanying symptoms; therefore, it may not be worth managing non-lateralized tinnitus separately from tinnitus in the ear.

The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory is a better indicator of the overall status of patients with tinnitus than the Numerical Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVES: The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for awareness, annoyance, loudness, and effect on life are two of the most commonly used questionnaires for patients with tinnitus. This study aimed to determine whether these two questionnaires can comprehensively evaluate the patient's condition and which questionnaire is better as a primary endpoint for tinnitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 90 patients who visited a university hospital with subjective, non-pulsatile tinnitus and without a history of any psychiatric disorders were reviewed between March 2020 and May 2022. The patients' medical histories, audiological profiles, questionnaires including the THI and NRS, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Depression (BAI), Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HAD), and the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI) were analyzed. RESULTS: The THI had a moderately positive correlation with the NRS for effect on life, annoyance, and loudness. It also had a low positive correlation with the BDI, HAD-A, BEPSI, and BAI. Considering annoyance and loudness, the NRS did not correlate with the other questionnaires, except for the THI (p > 0.05). The NRS for tinnitus awareness correlated with most audiological profiles. The ROC curve analysis revealed that the THI significantly predicted depression, anxiety, and stress. Conversely, none of the four NRS items significantly predicted these psychiatric problems (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using the THI as a primary endpoint after interventions rather than the NRS is more reasonable because the THI covers the emotional, functional, and catastrophic aspects of tinnitus, although not the audiological status. To compensate for this, the auxiliary use of NRS for awareness should also be considered.

Audiological and psychological assessment of tinnitus patients with normal hearing.

Introduction: This study was performed to assess identifiable abnormalities in tinnitus patients with normal hearing. Methods: The medical records of subjective non-pulsatile tinnitus patients with normal hearing confirmed by conventional pure-tone audiometry who visited our tinnitus clinic between March 2020 and May 2022 were reviewed. The loudness discomfort level (LDL), extended high-frequency hearing loss (EHFHL), summating potential (SP)/action potential (AP) ratio, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), thresholds of auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave V, somatic modulation, and psychiatric symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and stress were evaluated by questionnaires. Results: Decreased LDL (n = 48, 59.8%) was the most frequent finding, followed by EHFHL (n = 29, 35.4%), increased SP/AP ratio (n = 27, 32.9%), psychiatric symptoms (n = 24, 29.3%), decreased DPOAE (n = 17, 20.7%), somatic modulation (n = 8, 9.8%), and increased ABR threshold (n = 3, 3.7%); 75.6% of patients had one or more of these findings. The presence of psychiatric symptoms was independently associated with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score. Conclusion: Tinnitus in patients with normal hearing may be accompanied by a combination of various subclinical abnormal audiological findings. However, the presence of psychiatric symptoms alone was independently associated with tinnitus distress.

The Deficit of Early Selective Attention in Adults With Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: In Comparison With Those With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) is a cluster of attentional symptoms characterized by slow information processing and behavior, distractibility, mental confusion, absent-mindedness, and hypoactivity. The present study aimed to compare early and late selective attention in the information processing speed of adults with SCT to those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and adults without any attentional problems. The participants were screened using Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale-IV and divided into the following groups: SCT (N = 24), ADHD (N = 24), and controls (N = 25). All participants completed the irrelevant distractor task measuring early and late selective attention under load condition (low vs. high) and distractor condition (no-distractor vs. distractor). The inefficiency index was calculated by subtracting the reaction time of no-distractor condition of correct trials from the reaction time of distractor condition to control the impact of accuracy. Upon analysis, the SCT group showed a lower efficiency compared to the ADHD group under high load, while the ADHD group showed lower efficiency under low load than high load. This meant that the ADHD group had increased efficiency of selective attention with higher load, while the SCT group had low efficiency of selective attention even under high loads. These results suggest that the symptoms of "slow" or "distracted" in SCT could be attributed to the reduced speed and efficiency of selective attention in early information processing and the problem can be pronounced in situations with distractors. The results of the study imply that the attention-deficit-like symptoms shown in those with SCT and ADHD can be distinguished in specific stage of information processing.