Adverse quality of life consequences of antiretroviral medications.

To identify the effects of antiretroviral therapy on quality of life, we performed a qualitative content analysis of the Medical Outcomes Study-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (MOS-HIV) Health Survey. We used focus groups to elicit views about antiretroviral effects on quality of life from a purposive sample of treatment-experienced participants. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach. We appraised the content of the MOS-HIV against the themes identified from our analysis. Participants also completed the MOS-HIV survey and were asked whether the survey captured all important medication-related aspects of quality of life. Participants (n=38) viewed the use of antiretrovirals as a trade-off between poorer quality of life and being alive. The net effect was increased longevity but without hope and future. Features of quality of life included the downstream consequences of side effects and toxicities, tensions with health care providers and loss of independent decision-making, dilemmas regarding drugs and career, burdens of medication-taking responsibilities, and the stress of living life under a pretense and hiding an HIV diagnosis. The MOS-HIV missed or under-emphasised these features. Quality of life concerns of people living with HIV, particularly those related to medication use, are not well captured by the MOS-HIV. A broad concept of quality of life is needed to encompass all dimensions important to people living with HIV.

Patient support and education for promoting adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to prescribed regimens is required to derive maximal benefit from many highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in people living with HIV/AIDS. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of the research literature on the effectiveness of patient support and education to improve adherence to HAART. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed from January 1996 to May 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of patient support and education to improve adherence to HAART were considered for inclusion. Only those studies that measured adherence at a minimum of six weeks were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection, quality assessments and data abstraction were performed independently by two reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Nineteen studies involving a total of 2,159 participants met criteria for inclusion. It was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis due to study heterogeneity with respect to populations, interventions, comparison groups, outcomes, and length of follow-up. Sample sizes ranged from 22 to 367. The populations studied ranged from general HIV-positive populations to studies focusing exclusively on children, women, Latinos, or adults with a history of alcohol dependence, to studies focusing almost exclusively on men. Study interventions included cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational interviewing, medication management strategies, and interventions indirectly targeting adherence, such as programs directed to reduce risky sexual behaviours. Ten studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of the intervention on adherence. We found that interventions targeting practical medication management skills, those administered to individuals vs groups, and those interventions delivered over 12 weeks or more were associated with improved adherence outcomes. We also found that interventions targeting marginalized populations such as women, Latinos, or patients with a past history of alcoholism were not successful at improving adherence. We were unable to determine whether effective adherence interventions were associated with improved virological or immunological outcomes. Most studies had several methodological shortcomings leaving them vulnerable to potential biases. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence to support the effectiveness of patient support and education interventions intended to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Interventions targeting practical medication management skills, those interventions administered to individuals vs groups, and those interventions delivered over 12 weeks or more were associated with improved adherence outcomes. There is a need for standardization and increased methodological rigour in the conduct of adherence trials.

Birth defects after maternal exposure to corticosteroids: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are first-line drugs for the treatment of a variety of conditions in women of childbearing age. Information regarding human pregnancy outcome with corticosteroids is limited. METHODS: We collected prospectively and followed up 184 women exposed to prednisone in pregnancy and 188 pregnant women who were counseled by Motherisk for nonteratogenic exposure. The primary outcome was the rate of major birth defects. A meta-analysis of all epidemiological studies was conducted. The Mantel-Haenszel summary odds ratio was calculated for the pooled studies with 95% confidence intervals. A cumulative summary odds ratio was also calculated by combining studies in chronological order. Chi-squared for homogeneity was determined to establish the comparability of the studies. RESULTS: In our prospective study, there was no statistical difference in the rate of major anomalies between the corticosteroid-exposed and control groups. In the meta-analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel summary odds ratio for major malformations with all cohort studies was 1.45 [95% CI 0.80, 2.60] and 3.03 [95% CI 1.08, 8. 54] when Heinonen et al. ('77) was removed. This suggests a marginally increased risk of major malformations after first-trimester exposure to corticosteroids. In addition, summary odds ratio for case-control studies examining oral clefts was significant (3.35 [95% CI 1.97, 5.69]). CONCLUSIONS: Although prednisone does not represent a major teratogenic risk in humans at therapeutic doses, it does increase by an order of 3.4-fold the risk of oral cleft, which is consistent with the existing animal studies.