Effects of Perioperative Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare functional outcomes and perioperative complications between patients on a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and those who are not on an SSRI preoperatively at the time of total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 28,386 patients who received a primary total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Patients were compared based on SSRI utilization. We measured patient-reported function and health-related quality of life using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) instruments. Chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables and t-test was used to compare the continuous variables of 2 study groups. RESULTS: Patients on SSRIs have lower preoperative baseline WOMAC and EQ-5D-5L scores than those not using SSRI (P < .001). Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly following surgery, but functional outcome scores remained inferior in patients using SSRI. After adjusting for baseline variables, SSRI use in TKA predicted lower EQ-5D-5L scores than non-SSRI users (P = .036) while the WOMAC scores were not different (P = .118). For the THA cohort, SSRI use predicted lower EQ-5D-5L (P = .001) and WOMAC scores than non-SSRI users (P = .008). SSRI use was associated with increased transfusion rate, length of stay, readmission rate, and medical events. About 11.3% of TKA and 13.3% of THA patients stopped using SSRI at 12 months after arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Patients using an SSRI show improvement comparable to patients not on an SSRI, but their 12-month functional scores continue to be inferior. SSRI utilization was associated with increased adverse events including needing a blood transfusion.

Evidence-based approach to providing informed consent for hip fracture surgery during the COVID-19 era.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are the most common reason for inpatient orthopaedic trauma admission. Urgent surgical intervention for hip fractures has remained a clinical priority throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Despite this, there is a paucity of clinical guidance addressing the informed consent process for hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 positive patients. This is of paramount medicolegal importance in a high-risk patient population. AIM: To quantify the additional perioperative risks for COVID-19 positive patients undergoing hip fracture surgery and provide clinicians with an evidence-based framework to establish an informed consent process. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty nine consecutive patients undergoing surgical intervention for hip fractures in four hospitals in the United Kingdom were recruited. 51 patients were confirmed positive for COVID-19. Predefined outcomes were analyzed over a 30-d postoperative period. COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients were compared after adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: COVID-19 positive patients had more intensive care admissions (27% vs 5%, P < 0.001), longer inpatient stays (median 23 d vs 9 d, P < 0.001) and a higher 30-d mortality (29% vs 10%, P = 0.001) than COVID-19 negative patients. Postoperative complications were evident in 74.5% of COVID-19 positive patients. 35.3% of COVID-19 positive patients suffered postoperative lower respiratory tract infections with 13.7% developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and 9.8% experiencing symptomatic thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has created uncertainty in the medical community worldwide and poses unique challenges in providing informed consent for surgery. COVID-19 positive patients undergoing hip fracture surgery should be consented for the additional risk of postoperative complications (including lower respiratory tract infection, ARDS, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), increased requirement for intensive care admission, longer inpatient stay and higher risk of mortality. Further, clinicians must be transparent about the potential for unknown risks as research into the long-term surgical outcomes of COVID-19 positive patients continues to evolve.

Revolving doors of tendinopathy: definition, pathogenesis and treatment.

The ultimate cure for the tendon pathology continues to elude current science. Despite great steps in technology, the causation and treatment is still not clear. The number of different theories and treatment modalities in the literature may confuse clinicians and patients. In this paper we outline the definitions, evolution of pathogenesis and treatment for tendinopathy. By highlighting these, the aim of this paper is to guide the practitioner in counselling and treating their patients.

Acetabular liner dissociation: A case report and review of the literature.

Dissociation of the polyethylene liner from the acetabular shell is a rare but catastrophic complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). There have been reports of polyethylene liner dissociation (PLD) as well as ceramic liner dissociation (CLD) in the literature. Amongst the commonly used implants, liner dissociation has been reported with the Pinnacle (DePuy), Harris-Galante (Zimmer) and Trident (Stryker) acetabular components. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of PLD in an R3 (Smith & Nephew) acetabular component. This case report highlights the implant choice for treatment of the liner dissociation and the role of constrained implants in such cases.

Periorbital oedema and surgical emphysema, an unusual complication of a dental procedure: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: We report a case of subcutaneous emphysema and periorbital oedema following a dental procedure. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old female who attended Accident and Emergency department with subcutaneous emphysema of the neck and periorbital oedema several hours after having undergone root canal treatment. She was admitted for prophylactic intravenous antibiotics and was discharged the next day with oral antibiotics and recovered completely in about 10 days. CONCLUSION: Although there are existing case reports documenting the occurrence of surgical emphysema following dental procedure, there was no literature documenting a case of periorbital oedema. This can be managed with close observation and antibiotic prophylaxis as in this case but it is important that the potential seriousness of such a complications resulting from dental procedures are not overlooked.