Translational Research Techniques for the Facial Plastic Surgeon: An Overview.

The field of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS) is an incredibly diverse, multispecialty field that seeks innovative and novel solutions for the management of physical defects on the head and neck. To aid in the advancement of medical and surgical treatments for these defects, there has been a recent emphasis on the importance of translational research. With recent technological advancements, there are now a myriad of research techniques that are widely accessible for physician and scientist use in translational research. Such techniques include integrated multiomics, advanced cell culture and microfluidic tissue models, established animal models, and emerging computer models generated using bioinformatics. This study discusses these various research techniques and how they have and can be used for research in the context of various important diseases within the field of FPRS.

Comparison of Distal Spine Anchors and Distal Pelvic Anchors in Children With Hypotonic Neuromuscular Scoliosis Treated With Growth-friendly Instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Lower preoperative pelvic obliquity (PO) and L5 tilt have been associated with good radiographic outcomes when the fusion ended short of the pelvis in children with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Our purpose was to identify indications to exclude the pelvis in children with hypotonic NMS treated with growth-friendly instrumentation. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review. Children with spinal muscular atrophy and muscular dystrophy treated with dual traditional growing rod, magnetically controlled growing rod, or vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib with minimum 2-year follow-up after the index surgery were identified. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients had distal spine anchors (DSAs) and 87 patients had distal pelvic anchors (DPAs) placed at the index surgery. Demographics and length of follow-up were similar between the groups but there was a greater percentage of DPA patients who were nonambulatory [79 patients (91%) vs. 18 patients (47%), P <0.0001]. Preindex radiographic measures were similar except the DSA patients had a lower PO (11 vs. 19 degrees, P =0.0001) and L5 tilt (8 vs. 12 degrees, P =0.001). Postindex and most recent radiographic data were comparable between the groups. There was no difference in the complication and unplanned returns to the operating room rates.Subanalysis of the DSA group based on ambulatory status showed similar radiographic measures except the ambulatory patients had a lower PO at all time points (preindex: 5 vs. 16 degrees, P =0.011; postindex: 6 vs. 10 degrees, P =0.045; most recent follow-up: 5 vs. 14 degrees, P =0.028). Only 1 ambulatory DSA patient had a PO ≥10 degrees at most recent follow-up compared with 6 nonambulatory DSA patients. Three (8%) DSA patients, all nonambulatory, underwent extension of their instrumentation to the pelvis. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic fixation should be strongly considered in nonambulatory children with hypotonic NMS treated with growth-friendly instrumentation. At intermediate-term follow-up, revision surgery to include the pelvis was rare but DSAs do not seem effective at maintaining control of PO in nonambulatory patients. DSA and DPA were equally effective at maintaining major curve control, and complication and unplanned returns to the operating room rates were similar. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

The Genus Alistipes: Gut Bacteria With Emerging Implications to Inflammation, Cancer, and Mental Health.

Alistipes is a relatively new genus of bacteria isolated primarily from medical clinical samples, although at a low rate compared to other genus members of the Bacteroidetes phylum, which are highly relevant in dysbiosis and disease. According to the taxonomy database at The National Center for Biotechnology Information, the genus consists of 13 species: Alistipes finegoldii, Alistipes putredinis, Alistipes onderdonkii, Alistipes shahii, Alistipes indistinctus, Alistipes senegalensis, Alistipes timonensis, Alistipes obesi, Alistipes ihumii, Alistipes inops, Alistipes megaguti, Alistipes provencensis, and Alistipes massiliensis. Alistipes communis and A. dispar, and the subspecies A. Onderdonkii subspecies vulgaris (vs. onderdonkii subsp.) are the newest strains featured outside that list. Although typically isolated from the human gut microbiome various species of this genus have been isolated from patients suffering from appendicitis, and abdominal and rectal abscess. It is possible that as Alistipes spp. emerge, their identification in clinical samples may be underrepresented as novel MS-TOF methods may not be fully capable to discriminate distinct species as separate since it will require the upgrading of MS-TOF identification databases. In terms of pathogenicity, there is contrasting evidence indicating that Alistipes may have protective effects against some diseases, including liver fibrosis, colitis, cancer immunotherapy, and cardiovascular disease. In contrast, other studies indicate Alistipes is pathogenic in colorectal cancer and is associated with mental signs of depression. Gut dysbiosis seems to play a role in determining the compositional abundance of Alistipes in the feces (e.g., in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatic encephalopathy, and liver fibrosis). Since Alistipes is a relatively recent sub-branch genus of the Bacteroidetes phylum, and since Bacteroidetes are commonly associated with chronic intestinal inflammation, this narrative review illustrates emerging immunological and mechanistic implications by which Alistipes spp. correlate with human health.