Decoding the Conundrum: Navigating Intra-operatively Encountered Suspicious Gallbladder Wall Thickening with Laparoscopic Transhepatic Needle Decompression and Beyond Cystic Plate Cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Suspicious gallbladder wall thickening encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses challenges in its management. This study aims to address this problem by proposing a technique that involves laparoscopic transhepatic needle decompression and modified cystic plate cholecystectomy. METHODS: In this report, we describe the case of a 36-year-old female with symptomatic gallstone disease and ultrasound findings of a well-distended gallbladder with a uniform wall thickness. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a distended, tense gallbladder with suspicious areas of thickness. Transhepatic aspiration was performed for gallbladder decompression, followed by modified cystic plate cholecystectomy with preservation of the thin rim of liver tissue over the cystic plate. The gallbladder was removed in a specimen bag, and final histopathology showed a hyalinized gallbladder wall with calcification and pyloric gland metaplasia, with liver tissue adhered to the gallbladder wall (Video). RESULTS: The proposed technique aimed to minimize the risk of bile spillage and violation of oncological planes while maintaining surgical integrity. It offers a middle path between standard and extended cholecystectomy, reducing the chance of over- or under-treatment. This approach ensures patient safety, minimizes the need for conversion to open surgery, and preserves the tumour-tissue interface. CONCLUSION: Intraoperatively encountered suspicious gallbladder wall thickening can be effectively managed with laparoscopic transhepatic needle decompression and modified cystic plate cholecystectomy.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Portal Annular Pancreas-Mesopancreas Triangle Approach (with Video).

BACKGROUND: Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP) is a relatively uncommon entity with 4% reported incidence. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is challenging in cases with PAP and is associated with higher postoperative pancreatic fistula rate and overall morbidity. PAP is classified according to the pattern and location of fusion around the portal vein as-supra-splenic, infra-splenic & mixed fusion type. Also, the ductal anatomy can vary as pancreatic duct present only in the ante-portal portion or only in the retro-portal portion or ducts in both ante and retro-portal portion. At present, ideal surgical strategy is not defined as per the PAP types. METHODS: The case demonstrated in the video presented with a localized, large duodenal mass with type IIA PAP (supra-splenic fusion with both ante and retro-portal ducts) detected on the preoperative triphasic CT scan. To achieve a single pancreatic cut surface with a single pancreatic duct for anastomosis, an extended pancreatic resection was performed using meso-pancreas triangle approach. RESULTS: Patient had a smooth intraoperative course & the postoperative recovery was also uneventful. Pathology reported pT3 duodenal cancer with negative margins and uninvolved lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: A preoperative knowledge of PAP and its various types is extremely important in order to tailor intraoperative management, specially of the retro-portal portion. In patients with retro-portal duct or both ante and retro-portal ducts (as the case presented in the video), an extended resection is recommended to mitigate postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Impact of Covid-19 on gastrointestinal cancer surgery: A National Survey.

PURPOSE: To understand the actual impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and frame the future strategies, we conducted a pan India survey to study the impact on the surgical management of gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS: A national multicentre survey in the form of a questionnaire from 16 tertiary care gastrointestinal oncology centres across India was conducted from January 2019 to June 2021 that was divided into a 15-month pre-Covid era and a similar period of active Covid pandemic era. RESULTS: There was significant disruption of services; 13 (81%) centres worked as dedicated Covid care centres and 43% reported suspension of essential care for more than 6 months. In active Covid phase, there was a 14.5% decrease in registrations and proportion of decrease was highest in the centres from South zone (22%). There was decrease in resections across all organ systems; maximum reduction was noted in hepatic resections (33%) followed by oesophageal and gastric resections (31 and 25% respectively). There was minimal decrease in colorectal resections (5%). A total of 584 (7.1%) patients had either active Covid-19 infection or developed infection in the post-operative period or had recovered from Covid-19 infection. Only 3 (18%) centres reported higher morbidity, while the rest of the centres reported similar or lower morbidity rates when compared to pre-Covid phase; however, 6 (37%) centres reported slightly higher mortality in the active Covid phase. CONCLUSION: Covid-19 pandemic resulted in significant reduction in new cancer registrations and elective gastrointestinal cancer surgeries. Perioperative morbidity remained similar despite 7.1% perioperative Covid 19 exposure.

"Mitigation strategies for post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy in high-risk pancreas: an evidence-based algorithmic approach"-a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is associated with a mortality of up to 25% apart from significant morbid sequelae related to abdominal sepsis and post pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Numerous strategies to curtail the risk of POPF and associated morbidity have been largely unsuccessful. The pancreaticoenteric anastomosis post pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-risk pancreas represents a significant surgical and clinical challenge. In this narrative review, we present the strategies for early identification and comprehensive management of the high-risk pancreas as per the available literature and present a stepwise algorithmic approach of different fistula mitigation strategies in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and various center-specific guidelines were searched for the pancreas, pancreatic cancer, pancreatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, Whipple's operation, postoperative, complications, fistula, High-risk pancreas, risk assessment, different predictors, and scoring systems for the high-risk pancreas, current and emerging concepts in the development of POPF and mitigation strategies management and treatment in various combinations. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Over the years, literature has mainly addressed the technical aspects of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis; however, the impact of different technical modifications has been at the most elusive. Recent literature has focused on other aspects like remnant ischemia, locoregional inflammation, and postoperative acute pancreatitis among others, defining their evolving role in pathophysiology of POPF. Although many pre-operative risk prediction models are available; their intra-operative implications are not clear. Furthermore, the evidence available on the mitigation strategies is limited, heterogeneous, and center specific. Fistula prediction includes numerous potentiating factors in addition to the factors described in various Fistula Risk Scores. Early identification of these high-risk scenarios allows the algorithmic application of mitigation strategies. Management of the high-risk pancreas starts in the pre-operative period by early identifications of the risk factors and then continues into the intra-operative period with strategies to decrease intraoperative blood loss, precise anastomosis, and external stenting wherever feasible; goal-directed fluid therapy as well as total pancreatectomy (TP) in certain highly selected scenarios followed by early identification of complications in the postoperative period and appropriate and early management of the same. The coherent application of these mitigation strategies provides the opportunity for the best possible outcome in this complicated scenario. CONCLUSIONS: At present, the zero post-operative pancreatic fistulae seem unattainable, and time has come to study the strategies outside the operation theatre. Till preventive strategies become mainstream, a strategic personalized algorithmic approach may yield best outcomes.

Towards standardization of management of gallbladder carcinoma with obstructive jaundice: Analysis of 113 cases over 10 years at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Presence of jaundice in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is considered a sign of inoperability with no defined treatment pathways. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all surgically treated GBC patients from January 2010 to December 2019 was performed for evaluating etiology of obstructive jaundice, resectability, postoperative morbidity, mortality, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Out of 954 patients, 521 patients (54.61%) were locally advanced gallbladder carcinoma (LAGBC: Stage III and IV) and 113 patients (11.84%) had jaundice at presentation. Thirty-four (30%) patients had benign cause of obstructive jaundice. Median OS of the whole cohort (n=113) was 22 months (16.5-27.49 months) with resectability rate of 62% (70/113). Median OS of curative resection group (n=70) was 32 months and DFS was 25 months. Treatment completion was achieved in 30% (n= 21/70) patients with median OS of 46 months and median DFS of 27 months. Isolated bile duct infiltration subgroup fared the best with median OS of 74 months with a 5-year survival of 66.7%. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection as a part of multimodality treatment improves survival in carefully selected locally advanced gallbladder cancer patients with jaundice. Early introduction of systemic therapy is the key in the management of this disease with aggressive tumor biology.