Surgical complications after fixation of minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries.

PURPOSE: To review surgical complications after fixation of stress-positive minimally displaced (< 1 cm) lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries. METHODS: A retrospective study at a level one trauma center identified patients who received surgical fixation of isolated LC1 pelvic ring injuries. Surgical complications and additional procedures were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included. The median age was 61 years (Interquartile range 40-70), 65% (n = 39) were women, and 57% (n = 34) had high-energy mechanisms. Anterior-posterior, posterior-only, and anterior-only fixation constructs were used in 77% (n = 46), 15% (n = 9), and 8% (n = 5) of patients. Anterior fixation was performed with rami screw fixation in 82% (49/60), external fixation in 2% (1/60), and open reduction and plate fixation in 2% (1/60). There were 15 surgical complications in 23% (14/60), and 12 additional procedures in 17% (10/60). Complications included loss of reduction ≥ 1 cm (8%), symptomatic hematomas (8%), symptomatic backout of unicortical retrograde rami screws (5%), deep infection of the pelvic space after a retrograde rami screw (1.6%), and iatrogenic L5 nerve injury (1.6%). All losses of reduction involved geriatric females with distal rami fractures sustained in ground-level falls. Loss of reduction was found to be more likely in patients with low energy mechanisms (proportional difference (PD) 62%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18% to 76%; p = 0.01) and 2 versus 1 posterior pelvic screws (PD 36%; CI 0.4% to 75%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complications and additional procedures routinely occurred after fixation of LC1 injuries. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the risks of surgical fixation of these controversial injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level III.

The Effect of Crystal Arthropathy on the Diagnostic Criteria of Native Septic Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Distinguishing between septic arthritis and crystal arthropathy flares can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to determine how the presence of synovial crystals affects the diagnostic criteria of septic arthritis. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients undergoing joint aspirations to rule out native septic arthritis. Differences between septic arthritis presenting with and without synovial crystals were analyzed. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was plotted for laboratory markers to determine the area under the curve, or diagnostic accuracy, for septic arthritis and to evaluate thresholds that maximized sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: There were 302 joint aspirations in 267 patients. Septic arthritis was diagnosed in 17.9% (54/302). Patients with synovial crystals were less likely to have septic arthritis (4.2% [5/119] vs. 26.8% [49/183], P < 0.0001). Septic arthritis in patients with no synovial crystals was associated with fever and a higher synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear cell percentage (PMN%), serum WBC, and C-reactive protein (CRP) (P < 0.05). Septic arthritis in patients with synovial crystals was only associated with inability to bear weight and a higher synovial WBC and CRP (P < 0.05). Synovial PMN% was considered nondiagnostic of septic arthritis (area under the curve 0.56) in patients with crystals while synovial WBC and CRP had acceptable (0.76) and excellent (0.83) diagnostic utility, respectively. The WBC and CRP value thresholds that maximized sensitivity and specificity for septic arthritis were greater in patients with crystals (21,600 vs. 17,954 cells/µL and 125 vs. 69 mg/L, respectively). DISCUSSION: The presence of synovial crystals reduced the likelihood of septic arthritis and altered the laboratory diagnostic criteria. PMN% was nondiagnostic in the setting of synovial crystals.

Associations with unplanned repeat irrigation and debridement of native septic arthritis.

PURPOSE: To identify associations with unplanned repeat irrigation and debridement (I&D) after arthrotomy for native septic arthritis. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients with native septic arthritis treated with open arthrotomies. The primary outcome was unplanned repeat I&D within 90 days. Associations evaluated for included comorbidities, ability to bear weight, fever, immunosuppressed status, purulence, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count (synovial fluid and serum levels), and synovial fluid polymorphonuclear cell percentage (PMN%). RESULTS: There were 59 arthrotomies in 53 patients involving the knee (n = 32), shoulder (n = 10), elbow (n = 8), ankle (n = 6), and hip (n = 3). The median patient age was 52, and a 71.2% were male. An unplanned repeat I&D was required in 40.7% (n = 24). The median time to the second I&D was 4 days (interquartile range 3 to 9). On univariate analysis, unplanned repeat I&Ds were associated with fever (p = 0.03), purulence (p = 0.01), bacteria growth on cultures (p = 0.02), and the use of deep drains (p = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the only variables that remained associated with unplanned repeat I&Ds were fever (odds ratio (OR) 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3, 23.6, p = 0.02) and purulence (OR 5.3, CI 1.1, 24.4, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: An unplanned repeat I&D was required in 40.7% of patients and was associated with fever and purulence. These findings highlight the difficulty of controlling these infections and support the need for future research into better methods of management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level III.

Patient Preferences for Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of LC1 Pelvis Fracture: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify how patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvis fracture value attributes of operative versus nonoperative treatment. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Three US Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult survivors of an LC1 pelvis treated between June 2016 and March 2023 were identified from institutional registries. The choice experiment was administered as a survey from March through August 2023. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Participants chose between 12 hypothetical comparisons of treatment attributes including operative or nonoperative care, risk of death, severity of pain, risk of secondary surgery, shorter hospital stay, discharge destination, and independence in ambulation within 1 month of injury. The marginal utility of each treatment attribute, for example, the strength of participants' aggregate preference for an attribute as indicated by their survey choices, was estimated by multinomial logit modeling with and without stratification by treatment received. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-nine eligible patients were identified. The survey was distributed to 182 patients and collected from 72 patients (39%) at a median 2.3 years after injury. Respondents were 66% female with a median age of 59 years (IQR, 34-69 years). Before injury, 94% ambulated independently and 75% were working; 41% received operative treatment. Independence with ambulation provided the highest relative marginal utility (21%, P < 0.001), followed by discharge to home versus skilled nursing (20%, P < 0.001), moderate versus severe postdischarge pain (17%, P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (16%, P < 0.001), secondary surgery (15%, P < 0.001), and mortality (10%, P = 0.02). Overall, no relative utility for operative versus nonoperative treatment was observed (2%, P = 0.54). However, respondents strongly preferred the treatment they received: operative patients valued operative treatment (utility, 0.37 vs. -0.37, P < 0.001); nonoperative patients valued nonoperative treatment (utility, 0.19 vs. -0.19, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LC1 pelvis fracture patients valued independence with ambulation, shorter hospital stay, and avoiding secondary surgery and mortality in the month after their injury. Patients preferred the treatment they received rather than operative versus nonoperative care.

The Effect of Vancomycin and Tobramycin Local Antibiotic Powder on Surgical Site Infections After Open Treatment of Fracture: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of vancomycin/tobramycin local antibiotic powder (LAP) on surgical site infections (SSIs) after open treatment of fractures. DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative study with propensity matching. SETTING: The study was set in an urban level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients undergoing open procedures for fracture performed by a single surgeon before and after cessation of routine LAP use were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Deep and superficial SSIs were the measured outcomes. RESULTS: There were 652 open procedures for fracture performed by a single surgeon: LAP was used in 36.7% (114/310) of procedures before stopping its use, after which 342 procedures were performed without LAP. Comparison of all procedures performed with and without routine LAP use demonstrated no difference in infection rates, although there was a trend for the group without LAP to have fewer superficial SSIs (proportional difference [PD] -2.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.1% to 0.1%; P = 0.05) and more deep SSIs (PD 3.9%, 95% CI, -0.2% to 7.9%; P = 0.06). Prematch analysis demonstrated that LAP use was associated with external fixation (PD 8.5%, 95% CI, 1.6%-16.2%; P = 0.005), longer operative times (median difference 56.0 minutes, 95% CI, 39.0-74.0; P < 0.0001), greater estimated blood loss (median difference 70.0, 95% CI, 50.0-100.0; P < 0.0001), and no difference in superficial (PD 2.4%; 95% CI, -0.8% to 6.8%; P = 0.07) or deep SSIs (PD -1.6%, 95% CI, -6.2% to 4.1%; P = 0.54). After propensity matching (108 vs. 108) to control for the above differences, the LAP group, compared with the no LAP group, had no difference in superficial SSIs and was less likely to have deep SSIs (PD -8.3%, 95% CI, -16.2% to -0.2%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The use of vancomycin and tobramycin LAP lowered the rate of deep SSIs after open treatment of fractures on propensity-matched analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Variables Associated With Loss of Fixation of Retrograde Rami Screws in Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate variables associated with loss of fixation of retrograde rami screws in the treatment of stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Stress-positive minimally displaced (<1 cm) LC1 pelvic ring injuries treated with retrograde rami screws. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Loss of fixation, defined as >5 mm of pelvic fracture displacement based on the radiographic tear-drop distance or >5 mm of implant displacement on follow-up radiographs; revision surgery for loss of fixation. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with 40 retrograde rami screws were analyzed. Median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range 42.5-73.3 years), 71.1% (n = 27/38) were female, and 52.6% (n = 20/38) of injuries were secondary to low-energy mechanisms. Loss of fixation occurred in 17.5% (n = 7/40) of screws with 10% (n = 4/40) requiring revision surgery. On univariate analysis, patients who had a loss of fixation were more likely to have greater dynamic displacement on stress radiographs (22.0 vs. 15.2 mm; median difference 5.6 mm, confidence interval [CI] -19.2 to 10.3; P = 0.04), unicortical rami screws (71.4% vs. 9.1%; proportional difference 62.3%, CI 8.8%-22.6%; P = 0.001), and partially threaded rami screws (71.4% vs. 21.2%; proportional difference 50.2%, CI 10.0%-77.6%; P = 0.01). The remaining variables had no observed association ( P ≥ 0.05) with loss of fixation, including age, sex, body mass index, energy of injury mechanism, tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, sacral fracture type, distal rami fractures, rami comminution, number of sacral screws, fully threaded sacral screws, transsacral screws, or rami screw diameter. On multivariate analysis, only unicortical rami screws ( P = 0.01) remained associated with loss of fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde rami screws had a high rate of loss of fixation in minimally displaced LC1 pelvic ring injuries, and this was associated with unicortical screws. These screws should be avoided when possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Postoperative Computed Tomography Scans of Acetabular Fractures Routinely Identify Indications for Revision Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the utility of postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans in identifying indications for revision surgery after surgical fixation of acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with surgically treated acetabular fractures with surgical fixation (open reduction and internal fixation or percutaneous fixation) with routine postoperative CT scans. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Primary outcome-revision surgery based on postoperative imaging, including intra-articular osteochondral fragments, implant complications, and malreductions. Secondary outcome-quality of reduction on radiographs versus CT scans. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients were included. The revision surgery rate was 15.5% (23/148); indications included malpositioned implants (6.7%, n = 10), malreductions (5.4%, n = 8), and intra-articular loose bodies (3.4%, n = 5). Only 8.7% (2/23) of the indications for revision surgery were identified on postoperative radiographs, with the remainder being identified on CT scans. Revision surgeries were found to be associated with male gender (proportional difference: 19.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4%-29.4%; P = 0.04) and T-type fractures (PD 28.7%; CI, 9.0%-48.9%; P = 0.001). Revision surgery was not found to be associated with age, body mass index, posterior wall fractures, concurrent pelvic ring fractures, or surgical approach. On radiographs, 51.3% (n = 76/148) had anatomic reductions (<2 mm) compared with only 10.2% (n = 15/148) on CT scans. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for revision of acetabular fixation surgeries and poor reductions were frequently missed on plain radiography and identified on postoperative CT scans. This suggests that the use of advanced imaging such as intraoperative 3D imaging or postoperative CT scans may be beneficial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Should a history of pelvic fracture fixation be an indication for cesarean section?

PURPOSE: To compare the success rate of a trial of labor (TOL) in a cohort of patients with pelvic fractures, with and without internal fixation, in order to better counsel patients and avoid unnecessary cesarean section (CS). METHODS: A retrospective review of 35 female patients with 28 pelvic ring, five acetabular, and two combined fractures that had subsequent pregnancy; 12 patients had operative fixation and 23 did not. Fracture classification, treatment, type of fixation, mode of deliveries, and reason for CS were documented. RESULTS: The rate of vaginal delivery, unscheduled CS, and scheduled CS across all patients was 80.0% (n = 28), 14.3% (n = 5), and 5.7% (n = 2), respectively, which was similar to institutional rates of 87.0, 12.0, and 1.0%. A TOL was attempted in 91.4% (32/35) and successful in 87.5% (28/32). Patients who failed a TOL were more likely to have Tile B/C pelvic fractures (100.0 vs. 30.4%, observed difference (OD) 69.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16.4, 86.3%; p = 0.01) and more pelvic displacement (6.0 vs. 1.5 mm, OD 4.0, CI 1.0, 18.0; p = 0.01). The fixation and control groups had no observed difference in successful TOL (72.7% vs. 95.2%, OD 22.5%, - 49.7%, 5.5%; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of women had successful vaginal deliveries after pelvic fractures, with or without fixation, suggesting that these patients should consider a TOL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

Open Fixation After Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing Is Associated With a High Surgical Site Infection Rate.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of pelvic space surgical site infection (SSI) after preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) for persistent hemodynamic instability. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Urban Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 83 patients who received PPP and 55 patients who had open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the anterior pelvic ring without PPP. INTERVENTION: Operative fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pelvic space SSI. RESULTS: The SSI rate in the PPP group was 31.3% (26/83) compared with 10.9% (6/55) in the control group (proportional difference 20.4%, confidence interval (CI) 6.4-32.5, P = 0.007). Patients in the PPP group (n = 43) were 1:1 propensity score matched with patients in the control group to account for differences in Injury Severity Score and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. In this matched cohort, the rate of pelvic space SSI remained higher in the PPP group compared with that in the control group (30.2% vs. 9.3%; proportional difference 20.9%, CI, 3.7-36.3; P = 0.02). On multivariate analysis of the PPP group, anterior ORIF (odds ratio 6.56, CI, 2.00-21.47, P = 0.002) was found to be independently associated with SSI. CONCLUSIONS: PPP is an independent risk factor of space SSI. The likelihood of SSI after PPP is increased with anterior ORIF. The morbidity of SSI after PPP must be weighed against the risk of exsanguination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Disconnected: Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection in Orthopaedic Patients is Less Successful Than In-Person Collection at an Urban Safety Net Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVES: Electronic patient-reported outcome measure (E-PROM) collection is a technological advancement that has the potential to facilitate PROM collection in orthopaedic trauma. The purpose of this study was to compare E-PROM versus in-person PROM collection. DESIGN: This is a retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Urban Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty consecutive operative orthopaedic trauma patients. INTERVENTION: The Percent of Normal single assessment numerical evaluation and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function were collected through automated e-mails from an online patient-engagement platform (PatientIQ, Chicago, IL) 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month postoperatively. The Percent of Normal was also administered to patients in clinic at the same time intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Completion of PROMs; Loss to follow-up. RESULTS: The median clinical follow-up time was 4 months (interquartile range: 1.3-6 months), and 42.7% (64/150) were lost to follow-up. Loss to follow-up was associated with a more disadvantaged area deprivation index [observed difference, 7.0, 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 13.0; P = 0.01] and noncommercial/no insurance (observed difference 34.8%, confidence interval, 20.9%-45.5%; P < 0.0001). In-person PROM collection was more successful than E-PROM collection at all intervals [2-week (51.3% vs 20.7), 6-week (46.7% vs 20.0%), 3-month (50.0% vs 18.7%), and 6-month (38.0% vs 18.7%), P < 0.0001]. Patients who completed 3-month E-PROMs had longer clinical follow-up (5.2 vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.004) and a trend of being less likely to be lost to follow-up (28.6% vs 45.9%, P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: E-PROMs were less successful than in-person PROM collection in trauma patients at an urban safety net trauma center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

Single-Use Reamer Shafts for Intramedullary Nail Fixation: An Addressable Source of Extraneous Cost and Medical Waste in Orthopaedic Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the impact of switching from single-use reamer shafts to reusable reamer shafts for intramedullary nail fixation (IMN) of femur and tibia fractures at a single level-one trauma center, in terms of cost, metal waste, and infection rates. DESIGN: Retrospective comparison study. SETTING: Level one trauma centerPatients/Participants: Patients with operative femur and tibia fractures treated before and after adoption of a reusable reamer shaft. INTERVENTION: Reamed IMN fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Reductions in cost ($292 per shaft) and metal waste (0.44 pounds (lbs) per reamer shaft; reamer shaft failure (breakage and/or incarceration); superficial and deep infections. RESULTS: A single surgeon treated 125 and 135 fractures before and after adoption of a reusable reamer shaft. No reamer shaft failures were identified. The before and after groups did not differ in age, OTA/AO classification, or infection rates. By adopting reusable reamer shafts the surgeon avoided an estimated 54 single-use reamer shafts per year for an estimated cost and metal waste savings per year of $15,643 USD and 24 lbs. Over the same time period that the surgeon switched to using reusable reamer shafts, a total of 283 single-use reamer shafts were utilized by 12 surgeons in the same department. If the entire department had adopted reusable reamer shafts during that time period an estimated 164 reamer shafts per year would have been avoided for a total cost and metal waste savings per year of $47,763 USD and 72 lbs. DISCUSSION: Single-use reamer shafts represent an easily addressable source of extraneous cost and metal waste in orthopaedic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Nonoperative management of minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries with comminuted rami fractures is associated with late displacement.

PURPOSE: Rami comminution has been found to be predictive of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injury instability on examination under anesthesia (EUA) and lateral stress radiographs (LSR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate how rami comminution and subsequent operative vs. nonoperative management impact the late displacement of these injuries. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected LC1 database was performed to identify all patients with minimally displaced LC1 injuries (< 1 cm) and follow-up radiographs over a four-year period (n = 125). Groups were separated based on the presence of rami comminution and subsequent management, including rami comminution/operative (n = 49), rami comminution/nonoperative (n = 54), and no comminution/nonoperative (control group, n = 22). The primary outcome was late fracture displacement, analyzed as both a continuous variable and as late displacement ≥ 5 mm. RESULTS: As a continuous variable, late fracture displacement was lower in the comminuted rami/operative group as compared to the comminuted rami/nonoperative group (PD: -3.0 mm, CI: -4.8 to -1.6 mm, p = 0.0002) and statistically non-different from control. Late displacement ≥ 5 mm was significantly more prevalent in the comminuted rami/nonoperative group than in the comminuted rami/operative and no comminution/nonoperative groups (control)(PD: -33.9%, CI: -49.0% to -16.1%, p = 0.0002 and PD: -30.0%, CI: -48.2% to -6.5%, p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Late fracture displacement was greatest in the group with rami comminution/nonoperative management. Rami comminution, which has been previously associated with dynamic displacement on EUA and LSR, is also associated with a higher incidence of late displacement when managed nonoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic retrospective cohort study.

Percutaneous pelvic fixation model: an affordable and realistic simulator for pelvic trauma training.

PURPOSE: To describe the construction and use of a percutaneous pelvic fixation model, evaluate its translational validity among fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons, and investigate the importance of specific criteria for effective competency-based assessment of pelvic fixation techniques. METHODS: Five orthopedic trauma surgeons were asked to place percutaneous wires on a pelvic fixation model, including anterior column (antegrade/retrograde), posterior column (antegrade/retrograde), supra-acetabular, transsacral, and iliosacral. Evaluation criteria included successful wire placement, redirections, cortical breaches, procedure duration, radiation exposure, and quality of fluoroscopic views. Following completion, participants were provided a survey to rate the model. RESULTS: There were no differences between approaches on successful screw placement, wire redirections, or fluoroscopic quality. Antegrade approaches to the anterior and posterior columns took longer (p = 0.008) and used more radiation (p = 0.02). There was also a trend toward more cortical breaches with the antegrade anterior column approach (p = 0.07). Median ratings among surgeons were 4 out of 5 for their overall impression and its accuracy in tactile response, positioning constraints, and fluoroscopic projections. Learning parameters considered most important to the progression of trainees (most to least important) were successful screw placement, corridor breaches, wire redirections, quality of fluoroscopic views, radiation exposure, and procedure duration. CONCLUSION: In being affordable, accessible, and realistic, this percutaneous pelvic fixation model represents an opportunity to advance orthopedic surgery education globally. Future research is needed to validate the findings of this pilot study and to expand upon how trainees should be evaluated within simulations and the operating room to optimize skill progression.

Disconnected: Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection In Orthopaedic Patients at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in orthopaedic patients at safety-net hospitals is challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of electronic PROM (E-PROM) collection in this setting. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 207 consecutive orthopaedic patients undergoing 77 elective arthroplasty procedures and 130 trauma procedures. E-PROMs were collected through automated e-mails from an online patient engagement platform (PatientIQ) at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively. Patients with trauma received the percentage of normal Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF). Arthroplasty patients received the Hip/Knee SANE, Hip/Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (HOOS Jr/KOOS Jr), PROMIS Global Physical Health (PROMIS-G-PH), and Veterans RAND 12-Item (VR-12) Health Survey. RESULTS: Compared with patients with trauma, arthroplasty patients were older (median difference 18.0 years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.0-22.0; P < 0.0001), more likely to be Hispanic/Black (proportional difference 16.9%; CI 2.8-30.3%; P = 0.02), more likely to have noncommercial or no insurance (proportional difference 34.0%; CI 23.2-43.0%; P < 0.001), and did not differ in Area Deprivation Index or E-PROM completion at each time point. E-PROMs were completed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months by 25.1% (52 of 207), 24.6% (51 of 207), and 21.7% (45 of 207) of all patients, respectively. Trauma and arthroplasty patients had a similar rate of partial E-PROM completion. Patients who completed 3-month E-PROMs were less likely to be Hispanic/Black (PD -16.4%; CI -31.0 to -0.2%; P < 0.04); less likely to have noncommercial/no insurance (PD -20.0%; CI -35.5 to -4.5%; P = 0.01); and did not differ in age, sex, Area Deprivation Index, or procedure type. DISCUSSION: The low collection rate of E-PROMs from orthopaedic patients at safety-net hospitals should be weighed against their costs. E-PROM collection may exacerbate disparities in PROM collection among certain patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

Application of artificial intelligence in trauma orthopedics: Limitation and prospects.

The varieties and capabilities of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthopedic surgery are extensively expanding. One promising method is neural networks, emphasizing big data and computer-based learning systems to develop a statistical fracture-detecting model. It derives patterns and rules from outstanding amounts of data to analyze the probabilities of different outcomes using new sets of similar data. The sensitivity and specificity of machine learning in detecting fractures vary from previous studies. AI may be most promising in the diagnosis of less-obvious fractures that are more commonly missed. Future studies are necessary to develop more accurate and effective detection models that can be used clinically.

Acute Fixation Protocol for High-Energy Tibial Pilon Fractures Decreases Time to Fixation and Lowers Operative Costs Without Affecting Wound Complications and Reoperations.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an acute fixation protocol for high-energy tibial pilon fractures increases the rate of wound complications. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Urban level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-seven patients with OTA/AO 43B and 43C high-energy tibial pilon fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). INTERVENTION: Acute (<48 hours) versus delayed ORIF protocols. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Wound complications, reoperations, time to fixation, operative costs, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients were compared by protocol, regardless of ORIF timing, for an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-five and 112 high-energy pilon fractures were treated under the acute and delayed ORIF protocols, respectively. In the acute ORIF protocol group, 82.9% of patients received acute ORIF versus 15.2% of patients in the standard delayed protocol group. The 2 groups had no observed difference (OD) in the rate of wound complications (OD -5.7%, confidence interval (95% CI) -16.1% to 7.8%; P = 0.56) or reoperations (OD -3.9%, 95% CI, -14.1% to 9.4%; P = 0.76). The acute ORIF protocol group had a shorter LOS (OD -2.0, 95% CI, -4.0 to 0.0; P = 0.02) and lower operative costs (OD $-2709.27, 95% CI, -3582.02 to -1601.16; P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, wound complications were associated with open fractures (odds ratio 3.36, 95% CI, 1.06-10.69; P = 0.04) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2 (odds ratio 3.68, 95% CI, 1.07-12.67; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that an acute fixation protocol for high-energy pilon fractures decreases time to definitive fixation, lowers operative costs, and shortens hospital LOS without affecting wound complications or reoperations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early Outcomes of Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Stress-Positive Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the early outcomes of patients with stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1b) pelvic ring injuries managed with or without operative fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective comparison study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three patients with LC1b injuries. INTERVENTION: Operative versus nonoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Discharge to subacute rehabilitation (SAR); 2- and 6-week pain visual analog score, opioid use, assistive device use, percentage of normal single assessment numerical evaluation, SAR status; fracture displacement; and complications. RESULTS: The operative group did not differ in age, gender, body mass index, high-energy mechanism, dynamic displacement stress radiographs, complete sacral fractures, Denis sacral fracture classification, Nakatani rami fracture classification, follow-up length, or American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. The operative group was less likely to be using an assistive device at 6 weeks [observed difference (OD) -53.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -74.3% to -20.6%, OD/CI 1.00, P = 0.0005], less likely to remain in an SAR at 2 weeks (OD -27.5%, CI, -50.0% to -2.7%, OD/CI 0.58, P = 0.02), and had less fracture displacement at follow-up radiographs (OD -5.0 mm, CI, -9.2 to -1.0 mm, OD/CI 0.61, P = 0.02). There were no other differences in outcomes between treatment groups. Complications occurred in 29.6% (n = 8/27) of the operative group compared with 25.0% (n = 4/16) of the nonoperative group resulting in 7 and 1 additional procedures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Operative treatment was associated with early benefits over nonoperative management, including shorter time using assistive devices, less SAR use, and less fracture displacement at follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Osteomalacia Prevalence, Biochemical Profile, and Histology in Patients with Low-Energy Hip Fractures Over the Age of 45.

Our objective was to determine the prevalence of osteomalacia in low-energy hip fracture patients over the age of 45, based on biochemical and histological measures. This cross-sectional study included 72 patients over 45 with low-energy mechanism hip fractures. Samples of fasting venous blood were taken for hemograms and serum biochemistry analyses. Bicortical biopsies of the iliac crest were obtained, processed, and evaluated by an expert pathologist for osteomalacia. Biochemical osteomalacia (b-OM) is defined according to a distinct criterion. A low level of serum calcium, phosphorus, albumin, and 25OHD was found in 43.1, 16.7, 73.6, and 59.7% of patients, respectively. 50.0% of patients had high serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. b-OM was found in 30 (41.7%), and no significant association was found with PTH, Cr, Alb, age, sex, fracture type, side of the trauma, and season were not associated with osteomalacia. Osteomalacia was diagnosed on histopathological analysis in 19/72 (26.7%), and 54/72 (75.0%) of all cases fulfilled b-OM criteria. In the histologic evaluation, osteoid seam width, osteoid surface, and osteoid volume were 28.5 µm, 25.6, and 12.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the biochemical test for detecting osteomalacia were 73.6, 64.2, 42.4, 87.2, and 66.7%, respectively. Up to 30% of elderly patients with low-energy hip fractures are affected by osteomalacia. A biochemical screening along with a bone biopsy and histopathologic evaluation may be logical in a high-risk population for osteomalacia diagnosis.

Identifying Reasons for Nonmedical Delays in Fixation of Femur, Pelvis, and Acetabular Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE: To identify reasons for nonmedical delays in femur, pelvis, and acetabular fracture fixation at an institution with a dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) and an early appropriate care practice model. DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective registry. SETTING: Urban Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients undergoing 313 procedures for 226 femur, 63 pelvis, and 42 acetabular fractures. INTERVENTION: Definitive fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Reasons for delays in fixation after hospital day 2. RESULTS: Delays occurred in 12.5% of procedures (39/313), with 7.7% (24/313) having medical delays and 4.8% (15/313) having nonmedical delays. Nonmedical delays were most commonly due to the operating room being at-capacity (n = 6) and nonpelvic trauma specialists taking weekend call (n = 5). Procedures with nonmedical delays were associated with younger age (median difference -16.0 years, 95% confidence interval [CI], -28 to -5.0; P = 0.006), high-energy mechanisms (proportional difference [PD] 58.5%, 95% CI, 37.0-69.7; P < 0.0001), Thursday through Saturday hospital admission (PD 30.3%, 95% CI, 5.0-50.0; P < 0.0001), pelvis/acetabular fractures (PD 51.8%, 95% CI, 26.7-71.0%; P < 0.0001), and external fixation (PD 33.0%, 95% CI, 11.8-57.3; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Only 4.8% of procedures experienced nonmedical delays using an early appropriate care model and a DOTR. Nonmedical delays were most commonly due to 2 modifiable factors-the DOTR being at-capacity and nonpelvis trauma specialists taking weekend call. Patients with nonmedical delays were more likely to be younger, with pelvis/acetabular fractures, high-energy mechanisms, external fixation, and to be admitted between Thursday and Saturday. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.