Safety and efficacy of molecularly targeted agents in patients with metastatic kidney cancer with renal dysfunction.

Multiple molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) have been approved for the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Sunitinib and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (temsirolimus, everolimus) are primarily metabolized in the liver, whereas the metabolism of bevacizumab is unclear. There are limited data on the toxicity profile and the efficacy of these agents in patients with renal insufficiency (RI). This is clinically relevant, especially as about one-third of patients with mRCC have renal dysfunction. The primary objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of targeted agents in patients with mRCC with RI. Medical records of patients with mRCC at Wayne State University, started on sunitinib, temsirolimus, everolimus, or bevacizumab, were reviewed. Patients with a calculated creatinine clearance of less than or equal to 60 ml/min were deemed to have RI. Data on safety and efficacy of MTA therapy were collected and analyzed with respect to renal function. RI was observed in 33% of our patients with mRCC. The incidence of toxicities, responses, time to progression, and overall survival were not significantly different in patients with RI compared with patients with normal renal function. Patients with RI had larger median increases in blood pressure with sunitinib and bevacizumab, increased incidence of thyroid dysfunction with sunitinib, and increased incidence of rash and dose interruptions with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, than did patients with normal renal function. In conclusion, RI was commonly observed in our patients with mRCC. Molecularly targeted agents are well tolerated, and efficacy seems to be maintained in patients with RI. Vigilant monitoring of hypertension would be recommended for patients receiving sunitinib and bevacizumab.

Clinicopathological analysis of primary epithelial appendiceal neoplasms.

Appendiceal carcinomas are classified into three distinct histopathological disease entities: disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM), peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA), or peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis with intermediate or discorant features (PMCA I/D). The treatment of appendiceal tumors should be based on accurate histopathological classification, per previously reported case series. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic presentation and outcome of patients with appendiceal tumors treated at our institution over a 15-year period. We identified patients with appendiceal tumors diagnosed or treated at our institution from January 1989 through May 2004. Chart review for age, gender, signs and symptoms at diagnosis, and treatment was performed. Review of the pathologic specimens was performed and tumors were classified as DPAM, PMCA I/D, or PMCA. Forty patients were identified (median age 52.5 years; males 38%). The number of patients with DPAM, PMCA I/D, and PMCA was 15 (38%), 6 (15%), and 18 (46%), respectively. Peritoneal involvement was seen in 11 (73%) of patients with DPAM, 5 (83%) of PMCA I/D, and 11 (61%) of PMCA. The median survival for patients with DPAM, PMCA I/D, and PMCA was 7.7 years (90% CI: 2.9--upper limit not estimable), 1.2 years (90% CI: 0.9-1.6), and 0.7 years (90% CI: 0.4-1.5), respectively. The difference in survival across the three groups was statistically significant. Three distinct histopathological disease entities exist in appendiceal tumors. The prognosis and management of these tumors should be based on the extent of disease and pathologic diagnosis.

Safety and efficacy of sorafenib therapy in patients with metastatic kidney cancer with impaired renal function.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib is an oral Raf kinase inhibitor, approved for the treatment of advanced renal cancer. Clinical investigation of the safety and feasibility of sorafenib therapy in patients with impaired renal function was performed in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The protocol was approved by the Human Investigation Committee of Wayne State University. Medical records of patients with metastatic renal cancer at Wayne State University started on sorafenib between November 2005 to January 2007 were reviewed. Patients with a calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 60 mL/min or less (chronic kidney disease stage 3 or greater per Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines) were deemed to have renal insufficiency. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients who met the selection criteria were analyzed. Fourteen of 32 (44%) patients had renal insufficiency (range, 32-60 mL/min). Median age was 71 years in patients with CrCl < or = 60 mL/min and 54 years in those with > 60 mL/min. Incidence of diarrhea (57% vs. 33%) and hand-foot syndrome (86% vs. 56%) were higher in the renal-dysfunction group. Dose interruptions and dose reductions were noted in 57% and 43% of patients with renal dysfunction versus 28% and 22% in those without. No significant differences were noted in response rate, progression-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Renal insufficiency is frequently observed in patients with advanced renal cancer. Sorafenib therapy can be safely delivered in patients with mild and moderate renal dysfunction, and efficacy appears to be maintained.

Trastuzumab-induced hepatotoxicity.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of probable trastuzumab-induced hepatotoxicity. CASE SUMMARY: A 54-year-old African American woman presented with locally advanced right-sided breast cancer that was found to be strongly positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) by fluorescence in situ hybridization. She was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 4 cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Laboratory test results, including liver function tests (LFTs), were normal at that time. Therapy consisting of weekly doses of paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) and a loading dose of trastuzumab 4 mg/kg for the first week and 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter was started. Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase levels began to increase after the initial dose; the levels were significantly elevated after the fifth cycle. Paclitaxel was withheld, and trastuzumab was continued, as there were no prior reported cases of trastuzumab-induced hepatotoxicity at that time. Other possible etiologies for the elevated enzyme levels, including metastasis to the liver, were excluded. The patient continued to receive trastuzumab for a total of 8 weeks; it was discontinued at that time because enzyme levels continued to increase. When trastuzumab was discontinued, enzyme levels returned to normal. Subsequently, surgical resection of the cancer was performed. The patient's lymph nodes were found to be involved and, because of the high risk of disease recurrence, she was rechallenged with trastuzumab. LFTs showed enzyme levels rising again and trastuzumab was discontinued after 2 cycles, with subsequent normalization of the levels. She was then treated with weekly paclitaxel and her LFT values continued to be in the near-normal range. DISCUSSION: There were no comorbidities in this patient and, on initiation of trastuzumab, her liver enzyme levels were normal. The levels became elevated after initiation of trastuzumab, normalized after its discontinuation, and increased upon rechallenge. According to a validated drug-induced hepatotoxicity scale, trastuzumab was the probable cause of hepatotoxicity in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: Liver enzyme levels must be closely monitored in patients receiving trastuzumab. To our knowledge, this is the first report of trastuzumab-induced hepatotoxicity requiring discontinuation of the drug.