Examination of conversion method of dose distribution of lung cancer IMRT using fluence reversible calculation function in O-ring type linac and C-type linac.

Generally, converting irradiation plans between C-arm linacs (C-linac) when the linac fails is possible without recalculating the dose distribution using a treatment planning system (TPS), because they have similar mechanical structure. However, the O-ring-type linac (O-linac) differs from the C-linac in forming the dose distribution. Therefore, if O-linac breaks down, it is necessary to formulate a treatment plan from scratch. In this study, we investigated a method for converting irradiation from an O-linac to a C-linac. Thirty patients with lung cancer who underwent volumetric-modulated arc therapy with an O-linac were included in this study. The O-linac dose distribution was converted into energy fluence by the function of the TPS. The alternative linac multi-leaf collimator (MLC) was then optimized to achieve energy fluence. The homogeneity index, conformity index, and planning treatment volume (D95%, D2%) of the converted plan were compared with the original plan. For organ at risk (OAR), the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the lung, esophagus, heart, and spinal cord were evaluated. Additionally, the shapes of the isodose curves were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). There was no significant difference between the target and OARs (p > 0.05). The mean DSCs of 30% to 100% isodose curves of the prescribed dose and the isodose ≥ 105% and ≤ 20%were > 0.8 and < 0.8, respectively. Due to the structural differences of MLC, the dose-volume and generation positions were different in the dose range of ≥ 105% and ≤ 20%; hence, DSCs decreased. However, no statistically significant difference in the DVH was identified for either treatment plan. Based on this result, we propose a simple replanning method for performing MLC fitting after converting the dose to the energy fluence.

Radiation pneumonitis after palliative radiotherapy in cancer patients with interstitial lung disease.

PURPOSE: The risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after palliative radiotherapy (RT) in cancer patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, severity, and predictive factors of RP among patients with ILD who received palliative RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of cancer patients with ILD who received palliative RT involving a lung field between January 2008 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Screening for ILD was performed by using the ICD-10 diagnosis code, and the ILD was evaluated on the basis of pretreatment computed tomography (CT). RP was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Associations between both clinical and dosimetric factors and RP were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in the analysis. The median prescribed physical dose of RT was 25 Gy (range, 6-40 Gy). The RP was graded 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in 6 (10%), 3 (5%), 1 (2%), 2 (3%), and 6 (10%) patients, respectively. The median time to onset of grade 3 or more RP (≥Gr3 RP) was 39 days (range, 10-155). The results of the multivariate analysis indicated that ILD pattern was a significant predictive factor for ≥Gr3 RP (odds ratio, 12.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1664; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RT involving a lung field, even when prescribed with palliative intent, should be administered carefully to ILD patients. Evaluation of the ILD pattern on pretreatment CT images may be of help in determining whether to perform RT.

Efficacy and safety of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy without elective nodal irradiation for T3N0 glottic cancer without vocal cord fixation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate accelerated fractionated radiotherapy (AFRT) without elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for T3N0 glottic cancer (GC) without vocal cord fixation, especially in comparison with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) both of which included ENI. METHODS: The medical charts of patients with T3N0GC without cord fixation received definitive radiotherapy between June 2005 and March 2018 were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were analyzed. After a median follow-up time of 46 months (range, 12-141), 3-year local failure in AFRT/CRT/HFRT (n = 41/10/23) was 10%/20%/26%, 3-year regional failure 6%/0%/9%, 3-year progression-free survival 71%/69%/74%, and 3-year overall survival 77%/100%/87%. There were no significant differences among three groups in recurrence or survival. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were noted in 5/2/8 patients (12%/20%/35%) in AFRT/CRT/HFRT, respectively. There were no Grade 4/5 AEs. CONCLUSIONS: AFRT without ENI is an effective and feasible treatment for T3N0GC without cord fixation.

Palliative Radiation Therapy for Macroscopic Hematuria Caused by Urothelial Cancer.

Background: To assess the efficacy and toxicity profiles of palliative radiation therapy (RT) for macroscopic hematuria (MH) caused by urothelial cancer. Methods: A total of 25 urothelial cancer patients with MH who underwent palliative RT between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed in this retrospective study. The hematuria-free survival (HFS) time was defined as the period from complete resolution of MH to the recurrence of MH, death, or the last follow-up examination. Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: By the end of the median follow-up duration of 90 days (11-886 days), complete resolution of MH had been achieved in 22 patients (88%), and the median interval between the start of RT and resolution of MH was 9 days (2-179 days). Of the 22 patients in whom the symptom resolved, 9 (41%) developed recurrent MH, and the median time to relapse of MH was 129 days (30-692 days). The median RT dose was 30 Gy (20-40 Gy). Nine (36%) patients received a blood transfusion before the RT. The three-month HFS rate was 52.1%. There was a significant difference in the three-month HFS rate between patients with and without a history of pretreatment blood transfusion (HFS rate: 34.6% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.03). Grade 2 urinary tract pain and grade 3 diarrhea were seen in one patient each. Conclusion: Palliative RT appeared to be effective with limited toxicities for urothelial cancer patients with MH.

Hypofractionated proton beam therapy for centrally located lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: To clarify the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT) for centrally located lung cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 39 patients who received hypofractionated [≧3 Gy (relative biological effectiveness: RBE)/fraction] PBT for centrally located cT1-2N0M0 (8th edition) lung cancer between 1999 and 2015. A tumour within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree was defined as a centrally located tumour. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (62%) were treated with 80 Gy (RBE) in 20 fractions (112 Gy10 ), whereas eight (21%) were treated with 66 Gy (RBE) in 10 fractions (109.56 Gy10 ). The median follow-up period for censored patients was 48 months (range: 4-140). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 86 and 100% for T1 disease and 56 and 94% for T2 disease, respectively. Patients who received 110 Gy10 or higher showed significantly better PFS than those who received less than 110 Gy10 , while no significant difference was noted in OS between the two groups. The sites of the first progression were local in six patients (27%), regional in seven (32%), distant in seven (32%), and local and distant in two (9%). Among the 13 patients with loco-regional recurrence, only two (15%) received treatments with curative intent. Dyspnoea of grade 3 was noted in one patient (3%), and pneumonitis of grade 2 was noted in four patients (10%). CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated PBT may be a very safe and effective treatment option for centrally located early lung cancer.