Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urology ; 158: 125-130, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34380055

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the feasibility and outcomes of renal mass biopsies (RMB) of anatomically complex vs non-complex renal masses. METHODS: Our institutional renal tumor database was queried for patients who underwent RMB between 2005 and 2019 and with available nephrometry score. Complex masses were: (1) small (<2 cm), (2) entirely endophytic (nephrometry E=3), (3) hilar (h) or (4) partially endophytic (E=2) and anterior. Demographic and pathologic data were compared. Biopsies were deemed adequate if they resulted in a diagnosis. Concordance with surgical pathology was assessed. These were both presented using proportions. Factors associated with biopsy outcomes were identified using multivariable logistic regression. RMB sensitivity and specificity were calculated using contingency methods. RESULTS: A total of 306 RBMs were included, 179 complex and 127 non-complex. A total of 199 (65%) had an extirpative procedure. Complex lesions were less likely to have an adequate biopsy (89% vs 96%, P = .03), and to be concordant with final surgical pathology from an oncologic standpoint (89% vs 97%, P = .03). There was no significant difference in concordance of histology (76% vs 86%, P = .10) or grade (48 vs 51%, P = .66). On multivariable analyses, only male gender was associated with biopsy adequacy (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.28-8.55, P = .01). Our overall sensitivity was 93%, specificity 93%, and accuracy 93%. There were no significant differences over time in biopsy outcomes during the study period. CONCLUSION: RMB of complex lesions is associated with excellent diagnostic yield, albeit lower than non-complex lesions. RMB should not be deferred in cases of anatomically complex lesions where additional data could improve clinical decision-making.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Rim/patologia , Idoso , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/normas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Nefrectomia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Carga Tumoral
2.
Urology ; 83(1): e1-2, 2014 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24200197

RESUMO

A 35-year-old man presented with a painless left scrotal mass. Pathologic examination after orchiectomy revealed splenogonadal fusion. Splenogonadal fusion is an exceptionally rare, typically benign, congenital anomaly. Splenogonadal fusion should be included in the differential diagnosis of a left-sided testicular mass.


Assuntos
Anormalidades Múltiplas/diagnóstico , Baço/anormalidades , Doenças Testiculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Testiculares/etiologia , Testículo/anormalidades , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Testiculares/congênito
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA