Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in normotensive patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) changes caused by hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: A prospective, observational, comparative 24-hour trial was performed on consecutive subjects with normal IOP undergoing maintenance HD 3 days a week between 13:00 and 17:00 hours in an academic setting. Following a comprehensive ocular assessment, those with conditions that may influence IOP were excluded and one eye was randomly selected. Twenty-four-hour IOP monitoring was performed on HD day 1 and then on a day without HD. The IOP was measured at 10:00, 13:00, 15:00, 17:00, 22:00, 02:00, and 06:00 employing Goldmann and Perkins tonometry on habitual position. During the course of 1 year, 18 patients completed the study. RESULTS: Monitoring of IOP on HD day showed a significantly higher mean 24-hour IOP (15.4 ± 2.7 vs 14.1 ± 2.2 mm Hg; p = 0.025), higher mean peak 24-hour IOP (18.5 ± 3.5 vs 15.8 ± 2.5 mm Hg; p = 0.003), and wider 24-hour IOP fluctuation (6.2 ± 2.3 vs 4.0 ± 1.9 mm Hg; p = 0.001). When individual time points were compared, IOP was significantly higher at 17:00 on HD day, reflecting a gradual IOP elevation during HD (p = 0.021). Further, during the HD procedure (13:00-17:00), the mean IOP was significantly higher on a HD day (16.4 ± 3.0 vs 14.7 ± 2.4 mm Hg; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, before/after trial suggests that HD significantly impacts 24-hour IOP characteristics in normotensive eyes. The long-term significance of these findings requires further elucidation in normotensive patients and, predominantly, in patients with glaucoma undergoing HD.

24-hour efficacy of travoprost/timolol BAK-free versus latanoprost/timolol fixed combinations in patients insufficiently controlled with latanoprost.

INTRODUCTION: To compare the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) control and tolerability of travoprost/timolol benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-free (TTFC) vs. latanoprost/timolol fixed combination preserved with BAK (LTFC) in open-angle glaucoma patients insufficiently controlled with latanoprost 0.005% monotherapy given once in the evening. METHODS: The authors have conducted a prospective, observer-masked, active-controlled, cross-over, comparison study. Qualified open-angle glaucoma patients who demonstrated a latanoprost-treated morning IOP (10:00 ± 1 h) greater than 20 mmHg on two separate visits were randomized for 3 months to receive either TTFC or LTFC. Patients were then crossed over to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the latanoprost run-in and after each 3-month therapy period patients underwent 24-h IOP monitoring in the habitual position using Goldmann applanation tonometry in the sitting position during the day (10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and 22:00) and Perkins tonometry in the supine position at night (02:00 and 06:00). Selected ocular surface parameters were evaluated after each therapy period. RESULTS: Forty-two open-angle glaucoma patients completed the study. The mean 24-h baseline IOP on latanoprost was 21.5 ± 1.6 mmHg. Both fixed combinations significantly reduced the IOP at each time point, for the mean, peak and fluctuation of 24-h IOP compared with latanoprost monotherapy (P < 0.01). When the two fixed combinations were compared directly, TTFC provided significantly lower mean 24-h IOP (18.9 ± 2.2 mmHg) vs. LTFC (19.3 ± 2.3 mmHg) (P = 0.004) and significantly lower IOP at 18:00 (18.6 ± 2.5 vs. 19.5 ± 2.7 mmHg for LTFC) (P < 0.001). Further, TTFC demonstrated significantly better tear film break-up time (5.15 vs. 4.65 s), corneal stain (1.5 vs. 1.8) and Schirmer I test (9.9 vs. 9.2 mm) compared with LTFC after 3 months of therapy (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: The mean 24-h IOP lowering of TTFC was statistically more significant compared to LTFC in patients insufficiently controlled with latanoprost monotherapy. Measurement of ocular surface health and tear film status favored the BAK-free TTFC compared to LTFC.

Twenty-four hour efficacy with preservative free tafluprost compared with latanoprost in patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

AIM: To compare 24 h intraocular pressure (IOP) control obtained with preservative free (PF) tafluprost 0.0015% versus branded preservative containing latanoprost 0.005% administered as first choice monotherapy in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: This prospective, observer-masked, crossover study included consecutive newly diagnosed patients with POAG or OHT, and baseline IOP between 24 and 33 mm Hg. Qualifying patients underwent baseline untreated 24 h IOP monitoring in habitual positions, with Goldmann tonometry at times 10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and 22:00, and Perkins supine tonometry at times 02:00 and 06:00. They were then randomised to either latanoprost or tafluprost, administered in the evening, for 3 months and then switched to the opposite therapy for another 3 months. 24 h monitoring was repeated at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: 38 patients completed the study. Mean untreated 24 h IOP (24.9 mm Hg) was significantly reduced with both prostaglandins (p<0.001). Tafluprost demonstrated similar mean 24 h efficacy compared with latanoprost (17.8 vs 17.7 mm Hg; p=0.417). Latanoprost demonstrated significantly better 24 h trough IOP (15.9 vs 16.3 mm Hg; p=0.041) whereas tafluprost provided significantly lower 24 h IOP fluctuation (3.2 vs 3.8 mm Hg; p=0.008). No significant difference existed between the two prostaglandins for any adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: PF tafluprost achieved similar 24 h IOP reduction to branded latanoprost. The current study highlights the importance of complete assessment of efficacy over 24 h. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01162603.

Comparison of 24-hour intraocular pressure reduction obtained with brinzolamide/timolol or brimonidine/timolol fixed-combination adjunctive to travoprost therapy.

BACKGROUND: To determine the adjunctive 24-h efficacy obtained with brinzolamide/timolol, or brimonidine/timolol fixed combinations (FCs) in open-angle glaucoma patients insufficiently controlled on travoprost monotherapy. METHODS: Prospective, observer-masked, active controlled, crossover, comparison. Qualified primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma patients with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >18 mm Hg at 10:00 on travoprost monotherapy were randomized for 3 months to either brinzolamide/timolol, or brimonidine/timolol FC therapy adjunct to travoprost. Patients were then crossed-over to the opposite therapy for another 3 months. At baseline and at the end of each treatment period, the patients underwent 24-h IOP monitoring. RESULTS: Fifty patients completed the study. The mean 24-h baseline IOP on travoprost monotherapy was 20.1 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI): 19.6, 20.7 mm Hg]. Both adjunctive FC therapies significantly reduced the IOP at each time point and for the mean 24-h IOP (P<0.001) compared with travoprost monotherapy. Brinzolamide/timolol FC provided a significantly lower mean 24-h IOP (17.2 mm Hg, 95% CI: 16.4, 17.9 mm Hg) than brimonidine/timolol FC (18.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: 17.3, 18.8 mm Hg) (P<0.001). For all the 3 timepoints between 18:00 and 02:00, the brinzolamide/timolol FC provided a significantly lower IOP than the brimonidine/timolol FC (P≤0.036). For the other 3 timepoints, no significant differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that both FCs provide statistically and clinically significant incremental 24-h IOP lowering to travoprost monotherapy. The brinzolamide/timolol FC however achieves a better mean 24-h IOP control owing to the greater efficacy in late afternoon and during the night.