Systemic Immune Response to a CD40-Agonist Antibody in Nonhuman Primates.

The cell surface molecule CD40 is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily and is broadly expressed by immune cells including B cells, dendritic cells (DC), and monocytes, as well as other normal cells and some malignant cellsCD40 is constitutively expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and ligation promotes functional maturation leading to an increase in antigen presentation, cytokine production, and a subsequent increase in the activation of antigen specific T cells. It is postulated that CD40 agonists can mediate both T-cell-dependent and T-cell-independent immune mechanisms of tumor regression in mice and patients. In addition, it is believed that CD40 activation also promotes apoptotic death of tumor cells and that the presence of the molecule on the surface of cancer cells is an important factor in the generation of tumor-specific T-cell responses that contribute to tumor cell elimination. Notably, CD40-agonistic therapies were evaluated in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies with reported success as a single agent. Preclinical studies have shown that subcutaneous administration of CD40-agonistic antibodies reduces systemic toxicity and elicits a stronger and localized pharmacodynamic response. Two independent studies in cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) studies were performed to further evaluate, potentially immunotoxicological effects associated with drug-induced adverse events seen in human subjects. Studies conducted in monkeys showed that when selicrelumab is administered at doses currently used in clinical trial patients, via subcutaneous injection, it is safe and effective at stimulating a systemic immune response.

Tumor Cells Hijack Macrophage-Produced Complement C1q to Promote Tumor Growth.

Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) possesses an unmet medical need, particularly at the metastatic stage, when surgery is ineffective. Complement is a key factor in tissue inflammation, favoring cancer progression through the production of complement component 5a (C5a). However, the activation pathways that generate C5a in tumors remain obscure. By data mining, we identified ccRCC as a cancer type expressing concomitantly high expression of the components that are part of the classical complement pathway. To understand how the complement cascade is activated in ccRCC and impacts patients' clinical outcome, primary tumors from three patient cohorts (n = 106, 154, and 43), ccRCC cell lines, and tumor models in complement-deficient mice were used. High densities of cells producing classical complement pathway components C1q and C4 and the presence of C4 activation fragment deposits in primary tumors correlated with poor prognosis. The in situ orchestrated production of C1q by tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and C1r, C1s, C4, and C3 by tumor cells associated with IgG deposits, led to C1 complex assembly, and complement activation. Accordingly, mice deficient in C1q, C4, or C3 displayed decreased tumor growth. However, the ccRCC tumors infiltrated with high densities of C1q-producing TAMs exhibited an immunosuppressed microenvironment, characterized by high expression of immune checkpoints (i.e., PD-1, Lag-3, PD-L1, and PD-L2). Our data have identified the classical complement pathway as a key inflammatory mechanism activated by the cooperation between tumor cells and TAMs, favoring cancer progression, and highlight potential therapeutic targets to restore an efficient immune reaction to cancer.

Open-label, multicentre expansion cohort to evaluate imgatuzumab in pre-treated patients with KRAS-mutant advanced colorectal carcinoma.

AIM: Imgatuzumab (GA201) is a novel anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody glycoengineered for enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). We investigated the efficacy of imgatuzumab in patients with EGFR-positive, KRAS-mutant advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients received single-agent imgatuzumab (1400mg on day 1 and 8 followed by q2W) as third line therapy in an open-label, multicentre, non-randomised, expansion study. The primary end-point was tumour response. Pre- and on-treatment biopsies and blood samples were investigated for biomarkers related to imgatuzumab's believed mechanism of action (MoA). RESULTS: 25 patients were treated and the best overall response was stable disease occurring in 40% of patients at 8weeks, 24% at 16weeks and 8% (two patients) at 32weeks. Median overall survival was 9.3months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.1-12.3). Treatment-related rash, hypomagnesaemia and infusion-related reactions were the most common adverse events. Comparison of pre- and post-treatment biopsies revealed that the number of tumour-infiltrating immune cells increased notably after one cycle of therapy (median compound immune reactive score of 1491 versus 898 cells/mm(3) at baseline), whereas the number of peripheral natural killer cells decreased. A potential association between baseline tumour immune infiltration and clinical efficacy was seen. CONCLUSIONS: These data may suggest that the MoA of imgatuzumab involves ADCC-related immune effects in the tumour and is not limited to simple receptor blockade.

Biomarkers for malignant pleural mesothelioma: current status.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis, whose main etiology is exposure to asbestos fibers. The incidence of MPM is anticipated to increase worldwide during the first half of this century. For various reasons, MPM is difficult to diagnose and is notoriously refractory to most treatments. However, recently two active chemotherapy regimens have been demonstrated to significantly increase survival in patients with MPM, and several therapeutic agents and strategies are currently under evaluation.Researchers have actively sought MPM biomarkers for more than 20 years. Biomarkers would be helpful in managing three clinical aspects of MPM: early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcome prediction. The aims of the present review are to summarize the published and recently presented data on MPM biomarkers and to identify the prospects for future translational research projects.Among the 'classical' diagnostic biomarkers measured in biological fluids, such as cytokeratins and cell surface antigens, none discriminate patients with MPM from those with other malignancies and nonmalignant diseases. Osteopontin, soluble mesothelin, and megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF) appear to be the most promising of the recent biomarkers, but are still subject to some limitations. Osteopontin lacks specificity for mesothelioma, while both soluble mesothelin and MPF lack sensitivity for detecting non-epithelial subtypes. Panels consisting of a small set of biomarkers do not improve the diagnostic yield, and results from molecular profiling are too preliminary to be brought into daily clinical practice. While a large number of biomarkers have been assessed in biological fluids and tumor tissue for their prognostic value, none have had a widespread impact on clinical practice. In contrast, data concerning predictive biomarkers are very limited, even though they are most interesting from the perspective of clinicians.Additional prospective studies, in large and independent samples of patients, with rigorous statistical methodology and standardized laboratory techniques are now warranted to validate and define the precise value of diagnostic and prognostic MPM biomarkers. Future research efforts should focus on biomarkers predictive of the efficacy and toxicity of standard chemotherapy. Translational research should be systematically incorporated into the design of clinical trials assessing new targeted agents in MPM.