Cost-utility analysis of Ruconest(®) (conestat alfa) compared to Berinert(®) P (human C1 esterase inhibitor) in the treatment of acute, life-threatening angioedema attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema.

INTRODUCTION: Administration of human C1 esterase inhibitor (Berinert(®) P) from target import is the most widespread treatment strategy for patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE). However, a therapeutic health program including Ruconest(®) (conestat alfa) could shorten a patient's expectancy for a life-saving treatment. AIM: To evaluate the cost-utility of Ruconest(®) (conestat alfa) financed from public funds within the newly introduced therapeutic health program compared with Berinert(®) P (human C1 esterase inhibitor) in the treatment of acute angioedema attacks in adults with HAE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cost-utility analysis from the Polish healthcare payer's perspective was performed for 1 year (2012). The costs and health outcomes were simulated for three pairs of eligible HAE patient groups (active treatment and corresponding placebo). The incremental costs of each intervention compared with placebo were listed together (direct or indirect comparisons between options were impossible due to limited clinical data available). RESULTS: The incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) for the evaluated interventions compared with placebo were as follows: EUR 15,226 per QALY (Ruconest(®)) and EUR 27,786 per QALY (Berinert(®) P). The probability of cost-utility (ICUR < EUR 24,279 per QALY) assessed for Ruconest(®) administered in the case of acute angioedema attack was 61% and 41% for Berinert(®) P. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of Ruconest(®) in acute life-threatening angioedema attacks is economically justified from the Polish healthcare payer's perspective, results in lower costs and is characterized by higher cost-utility probability compared with Berinert(®) P.

[Clinical efficacy and safety of prolonged use of the valganciclovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus disease in patients after kidney transplantation]. / Skutecznosc kliniczna oraz bezpieczenstwo przedluzonego stosowania walgancyklowiru w leczeniu choroby cytomegalowirusowej u chorych po przeszczepie nerki.

UNLABELLED: Cytomegalovirus infection is particularly dangerous for patients undergoing solid organs transplantation. Among these patients cytomegalovirus disease (CMV) may occur. CMV disease is associated with increased mortality, organ damage and reduced graft survival. THE AIM OF THE STUDY was to determine the clinical outcomes (clinical efficacy and safety profile) for the use of valganciclovir administered for 200 days compared to standard period of 100 days in the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in seronegative patients after kidney transplantation from infected donor (high risk patients). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of literature published during the period: 1st January 1966-31st October 2010, was performed in order to assess the efficacy and safety of valganciclovir in the treatment of cytomegalovirus disease. Databases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane were searched. RESULTS: A systematic review yielded 1 randomized and 3 nonrandomized clinical trials. 200 days prophylaxis with valganciclovir significantly decreased a risk of: cytomegalovirus disease, CMV viral load, opportunistic infections; percentage of patients with high viral load was also significantly decreased compared to 100 days therapy. The safety profile of extended therapy was similar to that observed within 100 days prophylaxis. The higher risk of leucopenia in the 200 days than 100 days group was the only one adverse event that met statistical significance. The results of non-randomized trials were comparable to those mentioned above. CONCLUSION: Prolonged prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus till 200 days in high-risk patients (D+/B-) is safe and provides significant therapeutic benefits.

[The evaluation of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of valganciclovir for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease to 200 days after kidney transplantation]. / Ocena kosztowej efektywnosci i kosztowej uzytecznosci stosowania walgancyklowiru w profilaktyce wystapienia choroby cytomegalowirusowej do 200. dnia od przeszczepu nerki.

UNLABELLED: Standard procedure for cytomegalovirus disease (CMV) prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients was the administration of valganciclovir for up to 110 days after organ transplant. This prophylaxis has been extended up to 200 days in Poland since 2011. The decision was based on the results of clinical trials which showed significant clinical benefit in case of prolonged administration of the drug. The aim of the analysis was to provide the economic evaluation of extending the CMV prophylaxis with co-financed from public funds Valcyte (valganciclovirum; 60 tab. a 450 mg; Roche Polska Sp. z o.o.) from 110 to 200 days, in the high risk patients group after kidney transplant (seronegative recipient and infected donor, D+/R-). The analysis was performed from the Polish healthcare payer's perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All methods used in the following study were consistent with the Requirements of the Polish HTA Agency (AHTAPOL). The cost-effectiveness and the cost-utility analysis were performed on the basis of a randomised study which was identified as a result of the systematic search of the medical databases, comparing 200 days valgancyclovir administration with 100 days drug use as a prophylaxis of CMV disease in the patients group mentioned above. The Markov model was developed, simulating the disease evolution over time considering a high risk patient after kidney transplant treated with valgancicloviras the CMV disease prophylaxis. The disease period was divided into health states that are the most probable for this condition and the transitions probabilities between them were identified and assigned. Based on the clinical trial results, registry database of health conditions usability and experts' opinion, all health states (i.e. death, kidney transplant, CMV disease) were attributed with utilities and costs. The direct costs, important from the Polish healthcare payer's perspective, were included in the analysis. Extension of the proposed model in the series of one month time cycles made it possible to assess long-term (assumed time horizon was median patient's life expectancy--23,5 years) costs and clinical effects of the compared technologies. RESULTS: The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was 39 669 008 PLN and The Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) was 48 008 PLN in the specified time horizon. The result is well below the accepted threshold of profitability in Poland (assuming tripled GDP per capita cost-utility threshold, i.e. 99 543 PLN), which means that the therapy is cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the analysis confirmed that the 200 days use of valganciclovirin the prevention of CMV disease compared to standard 110 days therapy is economically justified from the Polish healthcare payer's perspective.

[Administration of conestat alfa, human C1 esterase inhibitor and icatibant in the treatment of acute angioedema attacks in adults with hereditary angioedema due to C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency. Treatment comparison based on systematic review results]. / Konestat alfa, ludzki inhibitor C1 esterazy oraz ikatybant w leczeniu ostrych ataków obrzeku u osób doroslych z dziedzicznym obrzekiem naczynioruchowym spowodowanym niedoborem inhibitora C1 esterazy. Porównanie opcji terapeutycznych na podstawie przegladu systematycznego.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a genetic disease caused by C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency, characterized by recurrent attacks of intense, massive, localized subcutaneous oedema that can involve all parts of the body. The aim of this study is a comparison of the clinical effectiveness of conestat alfa, human C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH), and icatibant in the treatment of acute angioedema attacks in adults with HAE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of literature published up to May 2012 was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of conestat alfa, C1INH, and icatibant in the treatment of acute angioedema attacks in adults with HAE. Databases were searched at MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane. The general search structure was designed as a combination of keywords or synonyms: (hereditary angioedema) AND (conestat alfa OR human C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate OR synonyms OR icatibant). Only randomized clinical studies were selected. RESULTS: Systematic review yielded no clinical trials directly comparing the therapeutic options mentioned. Two randomized clinical trials were found which compared each of the following: conestat alfa, C1INH, and icatibant with placebo. Based on the gathered evidence it was demonstrated that taking any of the medicinal substances mentioned in the treatment of acute angioedema attack results in shorter time to beginning of relief of symptoms, time to minimal symptoms, the probability of the treatment response after 4 hours is increased, and the safety profile is comparable to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Due to significant heterogeneity of identified trials, the scientific evidence available was insufficient to point out the most effective therapeutic option in the treatment of acute oedemas in HAE.

Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Sipuleucel-T is a novel active cellular immunotherapy for the treatment of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). It is assumed to be associated with less adverse events than conventional docetaxel-based chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of literature published between January, 1 1966 and February, 6 2012 was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of sipuleucel-T in patients with mCRPC. Databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, CancerLit as well as ASCO and ESCO websites. RESULTS: Three randomized clinical trials with a total of 737 participants fulfilled established criteria. The overall survival of patients who received sipuleucel-T in comparison to the control group was significantly longer with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.61-0.88; p = 0.001). Time to disease progression was not prolonged using sipuleucel-T compared to placebo, HR = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75-1.05; p = 0.18). Relative benefit (RB) of serum PSA level reduction of at least 50% for sipuleucel-T compared to placebo did not meet statistical significance, RB = 1.97 (95% CI: 0.48-8.14; p = 0.38). The safety population consisted of 729 patients with mCRPC. Compared to the control group, the pooled relative risks (RR) of all adverse events - RR = 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00-1.05; p = 0.06), grade 3 to 5 adverse events - RR = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.79-1.22; p = 0.86) and cerebrovascular events - RR = 1.93 (95% CI: 0.73-5.09; p = 0.18) were not significantly higher for men treated with sipuleucel-T. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sipuleucel-T prolonged the overall survival among men with mCRPC. No effect on time to disease progression was observed and the safety profile was acceptable.