Implementation of a comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections in cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether using a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to implement an evidence-based bundle can reduce 30-day surgical site infection rates in women undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS: This observational study with a preintervention and postintervention design included 2576 consecutive women undergoing cesarean delivery at our tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was 30-day surgical site infection rate after cesarean delivery defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. The preintervention period span from the January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014. After initiation of a Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (ie, a continuous quality improvement program to improve patient safety using a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach adapted on local demands), we introduced a bundle of evidence-based interventions (including preoperative shower, hair removal with clippers, correct antibiotic prophylaxis, maintaining normothermia, glycemic control, and strict compliance with hygiene standards as well as practice good hand hygiene) per January 1, 2015 into clinical routine. The postintervention period span from January 1, 2015 to December 31 2017. RESULTS: In the preintervention period the overall surgical site infection rate was 16 of 1,060 cesarean deliveries versus in the postintervention period the overall surgical site infection rate was 9 of 1,516 cesarean deliveries (1.50% vs 0.56%; P = .033). This corresponds to a relative risk reduction of over 60% after implementation of the evidence-based bundle (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.89; P = .020). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we have adapted the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program strategy to implement an evidence based-bundle into clinical routine. Using this comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, we could markedly reduce 30-day surgical site infections.

Early postpartum hysterectomy: incidence and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and risk factors of early postpartum hysterectomy at the University Hospital in Vienna. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: General Hospital Vienna, a tertiary referral center. POPULATION: All 15,858 women who gave birth between 1st January 2003 and 31st December 2008. METHODS: Analysis of all cases of early postpartum hysterectomy using data from the clinical documentation system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postpartum hysterectomy done during or within 24 hours of birth. RESULTS: The incidence of early postpartum hysterectomy was 1.39/1,000. Abnormally adherent placenta was the most common cause for hysterectomy followed by uterine atony and uterine rupture. There were no maternal deaths. Abnormal placentation, increased blood loss and lower gestational age were significant risk factors in women undergoing hysterectomy. The newborns of these women had a lower birthweight, significantly lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes and were more often transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). An additional analysis in a sample of women with uterine atony identified age as risk factor for hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Abnormal placentation, increased blood loss, low gestational age and maternal age are risk factors for early postpartum hysterectomy.

Clinical outcome monitoring in a reproductive surgery unit: a prospective cohort study in 796 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically monitor the frequency and risk factors of adverse events (AEs) in a reproductive surgery endoscopy unit. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic research institution. PATIENT(S): All consecutive surgical patients of a reproductive surgery unit from December 2005 to March 2007. INTERVENTION(S): Monitoring for predefined AEs by trained observers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of preventable and not preventable AEs, medical errors, and system problems. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors of AEs. RESULT(S): Seven hundred ninety-six women were included. We identified 60 AEs in 45 patients (risk 6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1%-11%). Adverse events were postoperative fever (n = 1), wound breakdown (n = 1), intraoperative or postoperative administration of packed erythrocytes (n = 6), surgical revision (n = 7), unplanned readmission (n = 5), transfer to intensive care unit (n = 1), conversion (n = 8), intraoperative organ injury (n = 9), blood loss >500 mL (n = 3), surgery canceled (n = 15), and other AEs (n = 4). Six patients (risk 0.8%; 95% CI 0-2%) had multiple AEs. One (0.01%) and 11 (1.4%) AEs were deemed due to medical errors and system problems, respectively. Twelve and 48 AEs were deemed preventable and not preventable, respectively. In a univariate and multivariate analysis, only duration of surgery (odds ratio 3.78; 95% CI 1.95-7.33) was significantly associated with having an AE. CONCLUSION(S): Clinical outcome monitoring is a useful tool for assessing the outcome quality of reproductive surgery by identifying potentially preventable AEs and associated risk factors.

Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancy: a comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond term.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged pregnancy is the most frequent reason for induction of labor. This study aims to determine the effects of labor induction on delivery outcome and to quantify the risks of cesarean delivery associated with labor induction in post-date pregnancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included a total of 205 women who reached 42 weeks' gestation (41 weeks and 3 days) between January 2002 and April 2004 and who were scheduled for induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandins. These cases were matched for age and parity with controls in spontaneous labor beyond 41 weeks' gestation. Women with any additional medical or obstetric risk factors were excluded from the study. Maternal, neonatal and delivery outcomes were the main variables of interest. RESULTS: During the study period the data of 410 women were available for analysis. Our data revealed that the use of amniotomy (p=0.02), oxytocin (p=0.006) and epidural analgesia (p=0.001) was increased significantly in the induction group compared with the control group of women with spontaneous onset of labor beyond term. The frequency of cesarean delivery and vacuum extraction was also significantly higher in the induction group (p=0.0001). The Bishop score before induction was an important factor that affected the delivery outcome, resulting in significantly higher rates of cesarean section and vacuum extraction when the score was unfavorable (p=0.0001). A univariate regression model revealed induction per se (p=0.0001), primiparity (p= 0.0001), increased maternal age (p=0.006) and an unfavorable Bishop score (p=0.0001) as statistically significant risk factors for cesarean section. In a multivariate logistic regression model, primiparity (p=0.03), increased maternal age (p=0.02) and an unfavorable Bishop score (p=0.01) remained independent risk factors for cesarean section. High infant birth weight was also an independent risk factor (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that women undergoing labor induction because of prolonged pregnancy should be sufficiently informed regarding the risks of a cesarean section or a vacuum extraction. Furthermore, the option of elective cesarean section should be considered, particularly in primiparous women with an unfavorable cervix, higher age, and high estimated infant birth weight.