HeartMate 3 implantation with an emphasis on the biventricular configuration.

OBJECTIVES: Right ventricular failure following implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a major driver of mortality. Reported survival following biventricular (BiVAD) or total artificial heart (TAH) implantation remains substantially inferior to LVAD alone. We report our outcomes with LVAD and BiVAD HeartMate 3 (HM3). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing implantation of an HM3 LVAD between November 2014 and December 2021, at The Alfred, Australia were included in the study. Comparison was made between the BiVAD and LVAD alone groups. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients, 65 patients with LVAD alone and 21 in a BiVAD configuration underwent implantation. The median age of the LVAD and BiVAD groups was 56 years (Interquartile range 46-62) and 49 years (Interquartile range 37-55), respectively. By 4 years after implantation, 54% of LVAD patients and 43% of BiVAD patients had undergone cardiac transplantation. The incidence of stroke in the entire experience was 3.5% and pump thrombosis 5% (all in the RVAD). There were 14 deaths in the LVAD group and 1 in the BiVAD group. The actuarial survival for LVAD patients at 1 year was 85% and BiVAD patients at 1 year was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The application of HM 3 BiVAD support in selected patients appears to offer a satisfactory solution to patients requiring biventricular support.

Alternatives to transvenous lead placement in a patient undergoing surgical tricuspid valve repair.

Tricuspid regurgitation is a widely recognised phenomenon in patients with transvenous cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices. If tricuspid valve repair or replacement is to be considered, what to do with the existing CRM system requires scrutiny with multidisciplinary input. We present a case of multifactorial tricuspid regurgitation in a 48-year-old female with giant cell myocarditis and a transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Key considerations in management and alternative CRM options are discussed.

Subcutaneous defibrillator use with unipolar pacemakers: Cautiously possible.

Implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a patient with existing unipolar pacemaker is against manufacturer recommendations. We report the case of a successful subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in a patient with Fontan circulation and concomitant active unipolar pacing and present a summary of recommendations when considering subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with unipolar pacing. Recommendations included: pre-procedure screening, rescreening during implantation and ventricular fibrillation induction, pacemaker programming, and post-procedure investigations.

Impact of Late Referral on Cardiac Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Late referral for heart transplantation (HTx) is associated with worse patient outcomes. There are no universally accepted definitions of what constitutes a timely referral for HTx assessment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of late referral (LR) on HTx outcomes. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective observational study included 80 patients undergoing HTx between 2016-2019. We applied a simple clinical tool, derived from markers of advanced heart failure (HF), to classify LR in HTx patients and assess the impact of LR on HTx outcomes. Outcome measures included duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, total hospitalisation stay, cost of transplant admission and one-year mortality. RESULTS: Based upon the clinical profile, LR was defined by the presence of four or more out of 10 criteria for more than 6 months in HTx patients. In this model, 34 patients were timely referrals and 46 were LR. Patients who were LR had: a longer median time between initial diagnosis and referral (3 vs 7 ys; p=0.03); more features of advanced HF, including inotrope requirements (p=0.004); more comorbidities (p=0.014); and hospitalisations (p<0.0001). Late referral was not associated with longer ICU (p=0.14) or hospital stay (p=0.051), however LR incurred greater total in-hospital costs (p=0.011). There was no difference in one-year mortality (6% vs 9%; p=0.64). CONCLUSION: Patients referred late for HTx are more unwell at time of referral and require greater in-hospital resource usage at the time of transplantation. Earlier referral for transplant assessment in patients with advanced HF should be encouraged.

Incidence and Predictors of Eosinophilic Myocardial Hypersensitivity in Patients Receiving Home Dobutamine.

ABSTRACT: We sought to examine incidence and predictors of eosinophilic myocardial hypersensitivity (EMH) in a cohort of patients in the home inotrope program of a quaternary cardiac transplant center. Patients on home inotropes with progression to heart transplantation or ventricular assist device (VAD) between January 2000 and May 2020 were included. EMH was diagnosed by the presence of an interstitial predominate eosinophilic infiltrate within the myocardium by experienced cardiac pathologists. From a cohort of 74 patients, 58% (43) were on dobutamine and 42% (31) were on milrinone. Dobutamine was associated with EMH incidence of 14% (6/43), with zero cases in the milrinone cohort. Mean age was 52 ± 12 years, 22% were female. More than half (62%) were nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathies, the remainder were ischemic cardiomyopathy. Dobutamine dose [250 (200-282) vs. 225 (200-291) µg/min] and duration of therapy [41 (23-79) vs. 53 (24-91) days] was similar between those with and without EMH. Median change in eosinophil count was 0.31 × 10 9 /L in the EMH group compared with only 0.03 × 10 9 /L in the non-EMH cohort, P = 0.02. Increase in peripheral eosinophil count of >0.20 × 10 9 /L demonstrated good discrimination between those with and without EMH, c-statistic 0.83 (95% CI 0.66-1.0). Heart failure hospitalization occurred in 83% of the EMH group versus 59% in the non-EMH group, P = 0.26. Requirement for VAD was significantly higher in the EMH group (83% vs. 41%, P = 0.05). In conclusion, EMH occurred in 14% of patients receiving home dobutamine. Rising eosinophil count should prompt physicians to consider EMH and switch to milrinone to avoid possible escalation to VAD.

Prediction of Pacemaker Requirement in Patients With Unexplained Syncope: The DROP Score.

BACKGROUND: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are increasingly utilised in the evaluation of unexplained syncope. However, they are expensive and do not protect against future syncope. OBJECTIVES: To compare patients requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation during ILR follow-up with those without abnormalities detected on ILR in order to identify potential predictors of benefit from upfront pacing. METHODS: We analysed 100 consecutive patients receiving ILR: Group 1 (n=50) underwent PPM insertion due to bradyarrhythmias detected on ILR; Group 2 (n=50) had no arrhythmias detected on ILR over >3 years follow-up. Baseline clinical characteristics, syncope history, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were assessed to identify predictors of ultimate requirement for pacing. RESULTS: Group 1 (64% male, median age 70.8 years; IQR 65.5-78.8) were older than Group 2 (58% male, median 60.2 years; IQR 44.0-73.0 p=0.001) and were less likely to have related historical factors such as overheating, posture and exercise (98% vs 70% p<0.001). PR interval was also longer in Group 1 (192±51 vs 169±23 p=0.006) with greater prevalence of distal conduction system disease (30% vs 4.3% p=0.002). Significant univariate predictors for PPM insertion were distal conduction disease (p=0.007), first degree atrioventricular (AV) block (p=0.003), absence of precipitating factors (p=0.004), and age >65 years (p=0.001). Injury sustained, recurrent syncope, history of atrial fibrillation (AF) or heart failure, left atrial (LA) size and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were not predictive. These significant predictors were incorporated into the DROP score1 (0-4). Using time-to-event analysis, no patients with a score of 0 progressed to pacing, while higher scores (3-4) strongly predicted pacing requirement (log-rank p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The DROP score may be helpful in identifying patients likely to benefit from upfront permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion following unexplained syncope. Larger prospective studies are required to validate this tool.

Long-Term Implications of Pacemaker Insertion in Younger Adults: A Single Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: The long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults are poorly described in the literature. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive younger adult patients (18-50 yrs) undergoing pacemaker implantation at a quaternary hospital between 1986-2020. Defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices were excluded. All clinical records, pacemaker checks and echocardiograms were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-one (81) patients (median age 41.0 yrs IQR=35-47.0, 53% male) underwent pacemaker implantation. Indications were complete heart block (41%), sinus node dysfunction (33%), high grade AV block (11%) and tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (7%). During a median 7.9 (IQR=1.1-14.9) years follow-up, nine patients (11%) developed 13 late device-related complications (generator or lead malfunction requiring reoperation [n=11], device infection [n=1] and pocket revision [n=1]). Five (5) of these patients were <40 years old at time of pacemaker insertion. At long-term follow-up, a further nine patients (11%) experienced pacemaker-related morbidity from inadequate lead performance managed with device reprogramming. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was detected in two patients (2%). Deterioration in ventricular function (LVEF decline >10%) was observed in 14 patients (17%) and seven of these patients required subsequent biventricular upgrade. Furthermore, four patients (5%) developed new tricuspid regurgitation (>moderate-severe). Of 69 patients with available long-term pacing data, minimal pacemaker utilisation (pacing <5% at all checks) was observed in 13 (19%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pacemaker insertion in younger adults has significant long-term implications. Clinicians should carefully consider pacemaker insertion in this cohort given risk of device-related complications, potential for device under-utilisation and issues related to lead longevity. In addition, patients require close follow-up for development of structural abnormalities and arrhythmias.

Levosimendan and Continuous Outpatient Support With Inotropes in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: A Single-Centre Descriptive Study.

ABSTRACT: To describe the use of levosimendan in a quaternary referral center with a dedicated heart failure service and compare its efficacy and safety to continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) among patients with advanced heart failure (AHF) who require bridge-to-decision (BTD) or bridge-to-transplant (BTT) therapy. This study was a retrospective, single-center, descriptive study of patients with AHF who received either a single levosimendan infusion or COSI between 2018 and 2021. A total of 23 patients received a levosimendan infusion, and 14 were started on COSI. Three indications for levosimendan were identified: (1) to facilitate weaning of continuous inotropes, (2) to augment diuresis in cardiorenal syndrome, and (3) as first-line therapy for cardiogenic shock in selected patients. Eighty-three percent (19 of 23) of patients who received levosimendan survived to discharge, and there were few clinically significant adverse events. Overall survival at 12 months among patients who received levosimendan was 74%. No statistically significant difference in survival was observed at 12 months (P = 0.68) or beyond (P = 0.63) between patients who received levosimendan and were discharged with a plan for BTD or BTT and those who received COSI. Levosimendan is a safe and effective short-term therapy in AHF and offers comparable long-term survival to COSI in patients who require BTD or BTT therapy.

Vasoplegia Following Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: Prevalence, Predictors and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing heart transplant are at high risk for postoperative vasoplegia. Despite its frequency and association with poor clinical outcomes, there remains no consensus definition for vasoplegia, and the predisposing risk factors for vasoplegia remain unclear. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcomes associated with vasoplegia in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing heart transplantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing heart transplantation from January 2015 to December 2019. A binary definition of vasoplegia of a cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2 or greater and requirement for norepinephrine (≥5 µg/min), epinephrine (≥4 µg/min), or vasopressin (≥1 unit/h) to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 65 mm Hg, for 6 consecutive hours during the first 48 hours postoperatively, was used in determining prevalence. Given the relatively low threshold for the binary definition of vasoplegia, patients were divided into tertiles based on their cumulative vasopressor requirement in the 48 hours following transplant. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, intubation time, intensive care unit length of stay, and length of total hospitalization. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients with primary cardiogenic shock, major bleeding, or overt sepsis, data were collected on 95 eligible patients. By binary definition, vasoplegia incidence was 66.3%. We separately stratified by actual vasopressor requirement tertile (high, intermediate, low). Stratified by tertile, patients with vasoplegia were older (52.7 ± 10.2 vs 46.8 ± 12.7 vs 44.4 ± 11.3 years, P = .02), with higher rates of chronic kidney disease (18.8% vs 32.3% vs 3.1%, P = .01) and were more likely to have been transplanted from left ventricular assist device support (n = 42) (62.5% vs 32.3% vs 37.5%, P = .03). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was prolonged in those that developed vasoplegia (155 min [interquartile range 135-193] vs 131 min [interquartile range 117-152] vs 116 min [interquartile range 102-155], P = .003). Intubation time and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were significantly increased in those that developed vasoplegia; however, this difference did not translate to a significant increase in all-cause mortality at 30 days or 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Vasoplegia occurs at a high rate after heart transplantation. Older age, chronic kidney disease, mechanical circulatory support, and prolonged bypass time are all associated with vasoplegia; however, this study did not demonstrate an associated increase in all-cause mortality LAY SUMMARY: Patients undergoing heart transplantation are at high risk of vasoplegia, a condition defined by low blood pressure despite normal heart function. We found that vasoplegia was common after heart transplant, occurring in 60%-70% of patients after heart transplant after excluding those with other causes for low blood pressure. Factors implicated included age, poor kidney function, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time and preoperative left ventricular assist device support. We found no increased risk of death in patients with vasoplegia despite longer lengths of stay in intensive care and in hospital.

Prescription trends and costs of diabetes medications in Australia between 2003 and 2019: an analysis and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Since the turn of the century, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Australia has increased, primarily due to rising rates of Type 2 diabetes. Simultaneously, the landscape of diabetes medications has evolved significantly. The change in prescribing trends and public spending on diabetes medications within Australia during this period are not well defined. AIMS: To establish the frequency and cost of dispensed diabetes medications in the Australian public healthcare system between 2003 and 2019. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal nationwide observational study using data obtained from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and Medicare Benefits Schedule websites, which contain information on frequency and spending of diabetes medications dispensed in Australia. RESULTS: The total number of PBS-subsidised prescriptions dispensed for diabetes increased from 5 218 690 in 2003 to 12 188 568 in 2019, and spending increased from $117 241 031 to $598 904 983. Of the non-insulin agents, metformin was consistently the most frequently dispensed agent, with a rapid growth in metformin combination tablets. Dispensation of sulphonylureas and thiazolidinediones have declined, with a simultaneous increase in dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a large growth in the use of diabetes medications between 2003 and 2019. The rapid growth in dispensing of drugs with proven cardiovascular and renal benefits reflect the evolving approach of diabetes treatment, from a historical approach targeting glycaemic control alone, to a modern individualised approach targeting specific co-morbidities.

Impact on survival of combination inhalers in patients with COPD at high risk of cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease often co-exist and are both leading causes of death worldwide. Published data have previously suggested trends toward improved survival for patients taking long-acting ß agonists combined with inhaled corticosteroids (LABA-ICS) through beneficial actions on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. We sought to explore this in a real-world setting. METHODS: A population-based longitudinal propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted in the United Kingdom, 1998-2015. Patients were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) which is linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality records. All patients had a validated diagnosis of COPD and were at high risk for cardiovascular events (history of myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, stroke and peripheral arterial disease). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The treatment group was composed of 2687 new users of LABA-ICS with COPD and comparisons were made in a control population of 2687 COPD patients prescribed LABAs alone. At three years follow-up death occurred in 358 (13.3%) patients in the treatment group and 427 (15.9%) patients in the control group. The use of LABA-ICS was modestly associated with improved survival compared to use of LABAs (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with COPD with either established cardiovascular disease or at high risk of an index cardiovascular event, LABA-ICS inhaled therapy, compared with LABAs alone, was associated with a significantly improved survival.