Comparative biological study between quinazolinyl-triazinyl semicarbazide and thiosemicarbazide hybrid derivatives.

Practical synthesis and biological activities of quinazolinyl-triazinyl semicarbazides (10a-j) and quinazolinyl-triazinyl thiosemicarbazides (11a-j) have been described. The novel semicarbazides and thiosemicarbazides were prepared by condensation of different nucleophiles like isocyanate and isothiocyanate by the displacement of chlorine atoms on the basis of functionality concept on varying conditions. The synthesized quinazolinyl-triazinyl semicarbazide and thiosemicarbazide derivatives were evaluated for their expected antimicrobial activity. All the final synthesized derivatives were characterized by their melting point, mass spectra, 1H NMR and 13C NMR as well as elemental microanalysis. The final analogues were then analyzed for their in vitro antimicrobial activity against bacteria (Gram positive and negative) and fungus using the agar streak dilution method as well as in vitro anti-HIV activity against two types of viral strains, viz. HIV type I (IIIB) and type II (ROD) by using MTT assay method. SAR and HOMO-LUMO studies were also carried out for proving the structural biological activity. Among them, compounds 10e, 10f, 11h and 11j gave best results as their energy gap is very low which makes their activity higher.

Integrating Image-Based Design and 3D Biomaterial Printing to create Patient Specific Devices within a Design Control Framework for Clinical Translation.

Despite significant advances in 3D biomaterial printing, the potential of 3D printing for patient specific implants and tissue reconstruction has not been fully exploited. This is due in part to the lack of integration of image-based patient specific design with 3D biomaterial printing within a relevant regulatory framework, namely design control, required by the FDA. In this manuscript, we describe the integration of image-based, multi-scale patient specific design with 3D biomaterial printing within a design control framework for clinical translation. Specifically, we define design inputs for patient specific implants and scaffolds, and utilize image-based patient specific design to achieve these design inputs. We then illustrate realization of these topology designed patient specific implants by laser sintering of polycaprolactone (PCL). Finally, we present initial results in large animal models using 3D printed PCL implants addressing two challenging problems in tissue reconstruction: 1) designing and 3D printing implantable devices to allow growth in pediatric airway applications and 2) utilizing 3D printed scaffolds as foundations for pre-fabricated flaps to obtain vascularization and bone formation for large volume bone/soft tissue reconstruction. We illustrate these challenging problems as they need to be incorporated in design control, but as of yet there is little data to direct how growth and vascularization should be utilized in design control.

Design control for clinical translation of 3D printed modular scaffolds.

The primary thrust of tissue engineering is the clinical translation of scaffolds and/or biologics to reconstruct tissue defects. Despite this thrust, clinical translation of tissue engineering therapies from academic research has been minimal in the 27 year history of tissue engineering. Academic research by its nature focuses on, and rewards, initial discovery of new phenomena and technologies in the basic research model, with a view towards generality. Translation, however, by its nature must be directed at specific clinical targets, also denoted as indications, with associated regulatory requirements. These regulatory requirements, especially design control, require that the clinical indication be precisely defined a priori, unlike most academic basic tissue engineering research where the research target is typically open-ended, and furthermore requires that the tissue engineering therapy be constructed according to design inputs that ensure it treats or mitigates the clinical indication. Finally, regulatory approval dictates that the constructed system be verified, i.e., proven that it meets the design inputs, and validated, i.e., that by meeting the design inputs the therapy will address the clinical indication. Satisfying design control requires (1) a system of integrated technologies (scaffolds, materials, biologics), ideally based on a fundamental platform, as compared to focus on a single technology, (2) testing of design hypotheses to validate system performance as opposed to mechanistic hypotheses of natural phenomena, and (3) sequential testing using in vitro, in vivo, large preclinical and eventually clinical tests against competing therapies, as compared to single experiments to test new technologies or test mechanistic hypotheses. Our goal in this paper is to illustrate how design control may be implemented in academic translation of scaffold based tissue engineering therapies. Specifically, we propose to (1) demonstrate a modular platform approach founded on 3D printing for developing tissue engineering therapies and (2) illustrate the design control process for modular implementation of two scaffold based tissue engineering therapies: airway reconstruction and bone tissue engineering based spine fusion.

Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Adsorption onto Poly-ɛ-caprolactone Better Preserves Bioactivity In Vitro and Produces More Bone In Vivo than Conjugation Under Clinically Relevant Loading Scenarios.

BACKGROUND: One strategy to reconstruct large bone defects is to prefabricate a vascularized flap by implanting a biomaterial scaffold with associated biologics into the latissimus dorsi and then transplanting this construct to the defect site after a maturation period. This strategy, similar to all clinically and regulatory feasible biologic approaches to surgical reconstruction, requires the ability to quickly (<1 h within an operating room) and efficiently bind biologics to scaffolds. It also requires the ability to localize biologic delivery. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of binding bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) to poly-ɛ-caprolactone (PCL) using adsorption and conjugation as a function of time. METHODS: BMP2 was adsorbed (Ads) or conjugated (Conj) to PCL scaffolds with the same three-dimensional printed architecture while altering exposure time (0.5, 1, 5, and 16 h), temperature (4°C, 23°C), and BMP2 concentration (1.4, 5, 20, and 65 µg/mL). The in vitro release was quantified, and C2C12 cell alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression was used to confirm bioactivity. Scaffolds with either 65 or 20 µg/mL Ads or Conj BMP2 for 1 h at 23°C were implanted subcutaneously in mice to evaluate in vivo bone regeneration. Micro-computed tomography, compression testing, and histology were performed to characterize bone regeneration. RESULTS: After 1 h exposure to 65 µg/mL BMP2 at 23°C, Conj and Ads resulted in 12.83 ± 1.78 and 10.78 ± 1.49 µg BMP2 attached, respectively. Adsorption resulted in a positive ALP response and had a small burst release; whereas conjugation provided a sustained release with negligible ALP production, indicating that the conjugated BMP2 may not be bioavailable. Adsorbed 65 µg/mL BMP2 solution resulted in the greatest regenerated bone volume (15.0 ± 3.0 mm³), elastic modulus (20.1 ± 3.0 MPa), and %bone ingrowth in the scaffold interior (17.2% ± 5.4%) when compared with conjugation. CONCLUSION: Adsorption may be optimal for the clinical application of prefabricating bone flaps due to BMP2 binding in a short exposure time, retained BMP2 bioactivity, and bone growth adhering to scaffold geometry and into pores with healthy marrow development.