Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Pegfilgrastim On-body Injector in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Requiring Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support.

Objectives: Pegfilgrastim is a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens that have greater than 20% risk of developing febrile neutropenia (FN). Historically, pegfilgrastim has been administered 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy, necessitating a return to clinic to receive the provider-administered injection. An alternative option is the pegfilgrastim on-body injector (OBI). With the OBI device, patients have their pegfilgrastim administered 27 hours after receiving chemotherapy while remaining at home, avoiding an additional clinic appointment. Concerns with pegfilgrastim OBI include lack of experience with the device in both the patient and provider, device-related failures, and the success of delivery. This study evaluates pegfilgrastim OBI failure rates through associated patient outcomes among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy requiring G-CSF. Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review was conducted of adult patients with cancer who received chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim OBI from July 1, 2016, to July 31, 2018. The primary objective of this study was the incidence of FN in patients receiving pegfilgrastim OBI. Results: There were no reported cases of hospitalization due to FN in patients who received pegfilgrastim OBI. Dose delays and dosage modifications were not observed in our review. The OBI device failure rate was found to be low (1.92%). Conclusion: The low device failure rate from this study suggests that the OBI is a viable option for administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy requiring G-CSF.

Neutropenia-Associated Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy With Reduced Doses of Pegfilgrastim.

BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim can be utilized to prevent neutropenia-associated complications in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer. A common adverse event associated with pegfilgrastim is bone pain. Clinicians may opt to reduce the dose of pegfilgrastim when administering it to patients with previous severe or refractory bone pain. There is limited and conflicting evidence with regard to the safety and efficacy of this practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of administering reduced doses of pegfilgrastim on neutropenia-associated outcomes in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a large, multistate health system with several different medical oncology practice sites. The primary outcome was the incidence of febrile neutropenia. Secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of neutropenia, hospitalization for febrile, use of intravenous antimicrobials for febrile, delays in chemotherapy or dose reductions in chemotherapy secondary to neutropenia or febrile, rationale for dose reduction of pegfilgrastim, and improvement in bone pain. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients received reduced dose pegfilgrastim. Most patients had their doses reduced secondary to bone pain (54%) or leukocytosis (14%). One (1.25%) patient experienced febrile neutropenia that did not require hospitalization or intravenous antimicrobials. Chemotherapy treatment delays and dose reductions secondary to neutropenia or febrile neutropenia occurred in 1 (1.25%) and 2 (2.5%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Reduced doses of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer resulted in a low incidence of neutropenia-associated events, including febrile neutropenia and grade 3/4 neutropenia.

Rucaparib: A Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor for BRCA-Mutated Relapsed Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, safety, efficacy, and the role of rucaparib in the treatment of relapsed, advanced ovarian cancer. SUMMARY: A total of 2 phase I/II trials and 1 phase II trial have evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral rucaparib in ovarian cancer. In patients with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation, an overall response rate of 80% was achieved in the phase II trial Assessment of Rucaparib in Ovarian CancEr Trial 2 (ARIEL2). In the same trial, progression-free survival was higher in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation and BRCA wild types with high loss of heterozygosity (LOH) than BRCA wild types with low LOH. Rucaparib was found to be relatively well tolerated in clinical trials, with the most common adverse events being anemia, fatigue, and nausea. CONCLUSION: Rucaparib appears to be a safe and effective new option in the treatment of relapsed, advanced BRCA1/2 mutant ovarian cancer. The role of rucaparib in this setting will likely expand and be further elucidated as results from several ongoing studies become available.

Case series of docetaxel-induced dorsal hand-foot syndrome.

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, also known as hand-foot syndrome (HFS), is a well-known dermatologic adverse event that can occur with a variety of cytotoxic chemotherapies including fluoropyrimidines, cytarabine, liposomal doxorubicin, and taxanes. HFS often presents as painful erythemas and desquamation of the skin involving the palms of the hands and the soles of the feet. Three cases are presented of patients with breast cancer who received multiagent chemotherapy regimens containing docetaxel that developed an atypical presentation of HFS on the dorsal aspect of the hands and feet. All patients received supportive care to manage the symptoms of their dermatologic toxicity. Dorsal HFS improved with supportive care or dose reduction and resolved following completion of the docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Based on the temporal relationship of the event and previous reports, we found that docetaxel was the probable offending agent.

Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in the Management of Ovarian Cancer: A Drug Class Review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, safety, efficacy, and role of poly adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the treatment and maintenance of relapsed, advanced ovarian cancer. SUMMARY: A total of 3 phase 2 trials and 2 phase 3 trials were reviewed that evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral niraparib, olaparib, and rucaparib in patients with ovarian cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated in the maintenance setting for niraparib and olaparib, resulting in a PFS of 21.0 months and 8.4 months, respectively. Olaparib and rucaparib were evaluated in the treatment setting, producing a PFS of 9.4 months and 12.8 months, respectively. PFS was higher in patients with BRCA mutation when compared to patients with BRCA wild-type in both the maintenance and treatment setting across all trials evaluated. Niraparib, olaparib, and rucaparib were found to be relatively well tolerated in clinical trials, with the most common adverse events being anemia, fatigue, and nausea. CONCLUSION: PARP inhibitors appear to be a safe and effective new option in the treatment and maintenance of relapsed, advanced BRCA1/2 mutant ovarian cancer. This drug class will likely have an expanding role in ovarian cancer as further trial results are published.

Rapid infusion rituximab for maintenance therapy: is it feasible?

Rituximab is an anti-CD-20 monoclonal antibody used in the management of lymphoproliferative disorders. The use of maintenance rituximab has improved progression free survival and overall survival in follicular lymphomas. Although rapid rituximab infusions have been studied extensively, there is little data on the use of rapid infusions during maintenance therapy for low grade lymphomas. The primary objective of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the incidence of Grade 3 and 4 toxicities with maintenance rapid infusion rituximab according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTC v. 4). Secondary objectives included evaluating all grade infusion related adverse events and correlation of adverse events with varying schedules of rituximab maintenance therapy. All patients who received rapid infusion rituximab as maintenance therapy for low grade lymphoma between December 2007 and November 2011 were included. Rapid rituximab infusions were administered over 90 minutes. Demographic, laboratory and clinical data were collected. A total of 109 patients received 647 rapid rituximab infusions. Three patients experienced an adverse reaction which resulted in one grade 1 infusion reaction and three grade 3 infusion reactions. No patients required hospitalization. All 3 patients received pharmacological and/or supportive care to relieve symptoms associated with the reaction.