Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-1005736

RESUMO

@#Introduction: Proximal tibial plateau fractures are one of the major problems in orthopaedic surgery and are associated with high complication rates. Intra-articular proximal tibia plateau fractures represent approximately 1% of fractures in adults. Various modalities of proximal tibial plateau fracture management have been considered, ranging from simple external fixators in impending compartment syndrome to periarticular proximal tibia plates and inter-locking nails with poller screws. Purpose of this study is to determine clinical outcomes of proximal tibial plateau fractures treated with plate. Materials and methods: We did this study of proximal tibial plateau fracture according to Schatzker’s classification treated with proximal tibial periarticular plates in 53 patients prospectively admitted at the author’s institute from June 2018 to May 2020 with follow-up period of 6 months. Results: In our study, the average knee score was 89.30 (ranging from 79 to 93) and functional knee score was 97.92 (ranging from 75 to 100). Fifty-one (51) patients (96.23%) showed excellent results and 2 patients (3.77%) showed good results according to Knee Society Score, which suggest that internal fixation of proximal tibia plateau fracture with plating provides better results. Out of 53 patients, 9 patients had post-operative complications. Average radiological union was seen at 14 weeks. Conclusion: Locking compression plate in proximal tibia plateau fractures act as a good biological fixation provide stable fixation, articular reduction and limb alignment even in difficult fracture situations. Fixation of proximal tibia plateau fractures with plate gives excellent to good knee society score, with satisfactory functional and radiological outcome.

2.
Cir. pediátr ; 33(3): 137-142, jul. 2020. tab, graf, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-193556

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: La fístula palatina es la complicación más frecuente tras una palatoplastia. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron: describir las técnicas de reparación más frecuentemente empleadas, estudiar los resultados y la tasa de recidiva, analizar posibles variables predictivas de recidiva y valorar la posible superioridad de una determinada técnica según el tamaño y la localización de la fístula. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes operados de fístulas palatinas desde 2008 hasta 2018 en 7 centros. Todos operaban al menos 20 casos nuevos de fisuras labiopalatinas al año (rango 20-80) con una incidencia de fístulas de 14% (rango: 1,5-20%). El seguimiento mínimo fue de 1 año. Se recogieron 8 variables para el análisis estadístico. RESULTADOS: Se operaron 234 pacientes con fístulas. La mayoría ocurrieron en fisuras labiopalatinas bilaterales completas (tipo IV de Veau). La localización más frecuente fue el paladar duro (tipos IV y V de Pittsburgh) (63,2%) y la mayoría fueron grandes (42,1%) y medianas (39,5%). La técnica de reparación más frecuente fue la repalatoplastia (34,2%). La tasa de recidiva fue del 22%. El análisis multivariante mostró más recidivas en fístulas tipo III reparadas con repalatoplastia en mayores de 3 años. CONCLUSIÓN: Se observó una tendencia a utilizar más reparación con colgajo en fístulas grandes del paladar duro, repalatoplastia en fístulas medianas de paladar duro y de la unión y colgajos locales o repalatoplastia en fístulas pequeñas en cualquier localización, pero no se pudo demostrar estadísticamente la superioridad de una técnica reparadora concreta en diferentes situaciones clínicas


INTRODUCTION: Palate fistula is the most frequent complication following palatoplasty. The objectives of this study were: to describe the most widely used repair techniques; to study results and recurrence rate; to analyze potentially predictive recurrence variables; and to assess whether a specific technique is superior according to fistula size and location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients undergoing palate fistula repair in 7 healthcare facilities from 2008 to 2018. All facilities had at least 20 new cases of cleft lift and palate annually (range: 20-80), with a fistula incidence of 14% (range: 1.5-20%). Minimum follow-up was 1 year. 8 variables were collected for statistical analysis purposes. RESULTS: 234 fistula patients underwent surgery. Most fistulas occurred in complete bilateral cleft lift and palate (Veau type IV). The most frequent location was the hard palate (Pittsburgh types IV and V (63.2%)), and fistulas were mostly large (42.1%) and medium (39.5%). The most frequent repair technique was re-palatoplasty (34.2%). Recurrence rate was 22%. The multivariate analysis demonstrated more recurrences in re-palatoplasty repaired type III fistulas in patients over 3 years old. CONCLUSION: A tendency towards using flap repair in large hard palate fistulas, repalatoplasty in medium hard palate and soft and hard palate junction fistulas, and local flaps or re-palatoplasty in small fistulas at any location was observed. However, it could not be statistically demonstrated whether a specific repair technique was superior in different clinical situations


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Fístula Bucal/cirurgia , Fístula Bucal/complicações , Palato Mole/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , 28599 , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...