Long-term risk of carotid stenosis and cerebrovascular disease after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recipients of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) are at significantly increased risk for carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD). We sought to determine (1) cumulative incidences of CAS and CVD among HNC survivors after RT and (2) whether CAS is associated with a RT dose response effect. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective cohort study examined patients with nonmetastatic HNC who completed (chemo)RT from January 2000 through October 2020 and subsequently received carotid imaging surveillance ≤2 years following RT completion and, in the absence of CAS, every 3 years thereafter. Exclusion criteria included history of known CAS/CVD. Asymptomatic CAS was defined as ≥50% reduction of luminal diameter, symptomatic CAS as stroke or transient ischemic attack, and composite CAS as asymptomatic or symptomatic CAS. RESULTS: Of 628 patients undergoing curative intent RT for HNC, median follow-up was 4.8 years (interquartile range, 2.6-8.3), with 97 patients followed ≥10 years. Median age was 61 years and 69% of patients received concurrent chemotherapy and 28% were treated postoperatively. Actuarial 10-year incidences of asymptomatic, symptomatic, and composite CAS were 29.6% (95% CI, 23.9-35.5), 10.1% (95% CI, 7.0-13.9), and 27.2% (95% CI, 22.5-32.1), respectively. Multivariable Cox models significant association between asymptomatic CAS and absolute carotid artery volume receiving ≥10 Gy (per mL: hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: HNC survivors are at high risk for post-RT CAS. A dose response effect was observed for asymptomatic CAS at doses as low as 10 Gy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Recipients of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer are at significantly increased risk for carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular disease. However, carotid artery screening is not routinely performed among head and neck survivors following radiation therapy. In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, patients with head and neck cancer were initially screened for carotid artery stenosis ≤2 years following radiation therapy completion, then every 3 years thereafter. The 10-year actuarial incidence of carotid artery stenosis was >25% and stroke/transient ischemic attack >10%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated significant associations between asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and artery volumes receiving ≥10 Gy.

A Novel Preclinical Murine Model to Monitor Inflammatory Breast Cancer Tumor Growth and Lymphovascular Invasion.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an understudied and lethal breast cancer, is often misdiagnosed due to its unique presentation of diffuse tumor cell clusters in the skin and dermal lymphatics. Here, we describe a window chamber technique in combination with a novel transgenic mouse model that has red fluorescent lymphatics (ProxTom RFP Nu/Nu) to simulate IBC clinicopathological hallmarks. Various breast cancer cells stably transfected to express green or red fluorescent reporters were transplanted into mice bearing dorsal skinfold window chambers. Intravital fluorescence microscopy and the in vivo imaging system (IVIS) were used to serially quantify local tumor growth, motility, length density of lymph and blood vessels, and degree of tumor cell lymphatic invasion over 0-140 h. This short-term, longitudinal imaging time frame in studying transient or dynamic events of diffuse and collectively migrating tumor cells in the local environment and quantitative analysis of the tumor area, motility, and vessel characteristics can be expanded to investigate other cancer cell types exhibiting lymphovascular invasion, a key step in metastatic dissemination. It was found that these models were able to effectively track tumor cluster migration and dissemination, which is a hallmark of IBC clinically, and was recapitulated in these mouse models.

Healthcare provider evaluation of machine learning-directed care: reactions to deployment on a randomised controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) face barriers related to implementation and trust. There have been few prospective opportunities to evaluate these concerns. System for High Intensity EvaLuation During Radiotherapy (NCT03775265) was a randomised controlled study demonstrating that ML accurately directed clinical evaluations to reduce acute care during cancer radiotherapy. We characterised subsequent perceptions and barriers to implementation. METHODS: An anonymous 7-question Likert-type scale survey with optional free text was administered to multidisciplinary staff focused on workflow, agreement with ML and patient experience. RESULTS: 59/71 (83%) responded. 81% disagreed/strongly disagreed their workflow was disrupted. 67% agreed/strongly agreed patients undergoing intervention were high risk. 75% agreed/strongly agreed they would implement the ML approach routinely if the study was positive. Free-text feedback focused on patient education and ML predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Randomised data and firsthand experience support positive reception of clinical ML. Providers highlighted future priorities, including patient counselling and workflow optimisation.

Optimizing Management of the Central Nervous System in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes and patterns of failure, specifically in regards to the central nervous system (CNS), in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning regimens. Methods and Materials: All adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with ALL undergoing allogeneic HSCT using TBI-based conditioning regimens treated from 1995 to 2020 at Duke University Medical Center were evaluated. Various patient, disease, and treatment-related factors were collected, including CNS prophylaxis and treatment interventions. Clinical outcomes, including freedom from CNS relapse, were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for patients with and without CNS disease at presentation. Results: One hundred and fifteen patients with ALL were included the analysis (myeloablative, 110; nonmyeloablative, 5). Of the 110 patients undergoing a myeloablative regimen, most (n = 100) did not have CNS disease before transplant. For this subgroup, peritransplant intrathecal chemotherapy was administered in 76% (median of 4 cycles) and 10 received a radiation boost to the CNS (cranial irradiation, 5; craniospinal, 5). Only 4 failed in the CNS after transplant, none of whom received a CNS boost, with freedom from CNS relapse at 5 years of 95% (95% confidence interval (CI), 84-98%). Freedom from CNS relapse was not improved with a radiation therapy boost to the CNS (100% vs 94%, P = .59). Overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality at 5 years were 50%, 42%, and 36%, respectively. Among the 10 patients with CNS disease before transplant, 10 of 10 received intrathecal chemotherapy and 7 received a radiation boost to the CNS (cranial irradiation, 1; craniospinal, 6) and none subsequently failed in the CNS. A nonmyeloablative HSCT was pursued for 5 patients because of advanced age or comorbidities. None of these patients had prior CNS disease or received a CNS or testicular boost, and none failed in the CNS after transplant. Conclusions: A CNS boost may not be necessary in patients with high-risk ALL without CNS disease undergoing a myeloablative HSCT using a TBI-based regimen. Favorable outcomes were observed with a low-dose craniospinal boost in patients with CNS disease.

Divergent Interpretations of Imaging After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Conflicting information from health care providers contributes to anxiety among cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate discordant interpretations of follow-up imaging studies after lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) between radiologists and radiation oncologists. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with SBRT for stage I non-small cell lung cancer from 2007 to 2018 at Duke University Medical Center were included. Radiology interpretations of follow-up computed tomography (CT) chest or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans and the corresponding radiation oncology interpretations in follow-up notes from the medical record were assessed. Based on language used, interpretations were scored as concerning for progression (Progression), neutral differential listed (Neutral Differential), or favor stability/postradiation changes (Stable). Neutral Differential required that malignancy was specifically listed as a possibility in the differential. Encounters were categorized as discordant when either radiology or radiation oncology interpreted the surveillance imaging as Progression when the other interpreted the imaging study as Stable or Neutral Differential. The incidence of discordant interpretations was the primary endpoint of the study. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2018, 139 patients were treated with SBRT and had available follow-up CT or PET-CT imaging for the analysis. Median follow-up was 61 months and the median number of follow-up encounters per patient was 3. Of 534 encounters evaluated, 25 (4.7%) had overtly discordant interpretations of imaging studies. This most commonly arose when radiology felt the imaging study showed Progression but radiation oncology favored Stable or Neutral Differential (24/25, 96%). No patient or treatment variables were found to be significantly associated with discordant interpretations on univariate analysis including type of scan (CT 22/489, 4.5%; PET-CT 3/45, 7%; P = .46). CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance imaging after lung SBRT is often interpreted differently by radiologists and radiation oncologists, but overt discordance was relatively low at our institution. Providers should be aware of differences in interpretation patterns that may contribute to increased patient distress.

Clarifying the Relative Impacts of Vascular and Nerve Injury That Culminate in Erectile Dysfunction in a Pilot Study Using a Rat Model of Prostate Irradiation and a Thrombopoietin Mimetic.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) offers an important and curative approach to treating prostate cancer, but it is associated with a high incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED). It is not clear whether the etiology of radiation-induced ED (RI-ED) is driven by RT-mediated injury to the vasculature, the nerves, or both. This pilot study sought to distinguish the effects of vascular and nerve injury in RI-ED by applying a vascular radioprotectant in a rat model of prostate RT. METHODS: A single dose of the thrombopoietin mimetic (TPOm; RWJ-800088), previously shown to mitigate radiation-induced vascular injury, was administered 10 minutes after single-fraction conformal prostate RT. Nine weeks after RT, rats were assessed for erectile and arterial function. Nerve markers were quantified with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Immunofluorescent microscopy further characterized vascular effects of RT and TPOm. RESULTS: Sham animals and animals that received RT and TPOm showed significant arterial vasodilation in response to systemic hydralazine (24.1% ± 7.3% increase; P = .03 in paired t test). However, animals that received RT and vehicle were unable to mount a vasodilatory response (-7.4% ± 9.9% increase; P = .44 in paired t test). TPOm prevented RT-induced change in the penile artery cross-sectional area (P = .036), but it did not ameliorate cavernous nerve injury as evaluated by gene expression of neuronal injury markers. Despite significant structural and functional vascular protective effects and some trends for differences in nerve injury/recovery markers, TPOm did not prevent RI-ED at 9 weeks, as assessed by intracavernous pressure monitoring after cavernous nerve stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that vascular protection alone is not sufficient to prevent RI-ED and that cavernous nerve injury plays a key role in RI-ED. Further research is required to delineate the multifactorial nature of RI-ED and to determine if TPOm with modified dosing regimens can mitigate against nerve injury either through direct or vascular protective effects.

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Murine Model of Chronic Radiation-Induced Proctitis.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used to treat most pelvic malignancies. While treatment is often effective, curative radiation doses to the rectum can result in chronic radiation-induced proctitis, which is characterized by diarrhea, tenesmus, and/or rectal bleeding, recently termed pelvic radiation disease. An animal model of chronic radiation-induced proctitis would be useful to test both preventative and therapeutic strategies to limit this morbidity but has been elusive because of the high rodent mortality associated with acute bowel RT injury. The objective of this research was to develop a novel mouse model of chronic radiation-induced proctitis using advanced technology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using an X-RAD 225-Cx (Precision X-Ray) small animal irradiator, multiple plan configurations were evaluated for planning treatment volume and organ-at-risk avoidance to deliver a 15 Gy 3D conformal treatment plan. The final plan was verified by high resolution 3D dosimetry (PRESAGE/optical-CT), and delivered using a single arc. Mice were monitored for mortality for 250 days, followed by histopathological correlates including mucicarmine, Masson's trichrome, and fecal pellet length. RESULTS: Six beam arrangements were considered: single and parallel-opposed fields with whole-pelvis coverage, and collimated fields in parallel-opposed, 3-field, 4-field, and arc geometries. A collimated arc plan offered superior planning treatment volume coverage and organ-at-risk avoidance compared to whole-pelvis irradiation. Treatment verification with PRESAGE 3D dosimetry (Heuris Inc) showed >99% of voxels passing gamma analysis with 2%/2 mm criteria. Our treatment resulted in no acute mortality and 40% mortality at 250 days. Histopathological analysis showed increased mucous production and fibrosis of the irradiated colon, but no change in fecal pellet length. CONCLUSIONS: Our model was able to target successfully lower colon and rectum with lower mortality than other published models. This permitted measurement of late effects that recapitulate some features of rectal damage in humans.

Application of a Novel Murine Ear Vein Model to Evaluate the Effects of a Vascular Radioprotectant on Radiation-Induced Vascular Permeability and Leukocyte Adhesion.

Vascular injury after radiation exposure contributes to multiple types of tissue injury through a cascade of events. Some of the earliest consequences of radiation damage include increased vascular permeability and promotion of inflammation, which is partially manifested by increased leukocyte-endothelial (L/E) interactions. We describe herein a novel intravital imaging method to evaluate L/E interactions, as a function of shear stress, and vascular permeability at multiple time points after local irradiation to the ear. This model permitted analysis of quiescent vasculature that was not perturbed by any surgical manipulation prior to imaging. To evaluate the effects of radiation on vascular integrity, fluorescent dextran was injected intravenously and its extravasation in the extravascular space surrounding the ear vasculature was measured at days 3 and 7 after 6 Gy irradiation. The vascular permeability rate increased approximately twofold at both days 3 and 7 postirradiation ( P < 0.05). Leukocyte rolling, which is indicative of L/E interactions, was significantly increased in mice at 24 h postirradiation compared to that of nonirradiated mice. To assess our model, as a means for assessing vascular radioprotectants, we treated additional cohorts of mice with a thrombopoietin mimetic, TPOm (RWJ-800088). In addition to stimulating platelet formation, thrombopoietin can protect vasculature after several forms of injury. Thus, we hypothesized that TPOm would reduce vascular permeability and L/E adhesion after localized irradiation to the ear vasculature of mice. If TPOm reduced these consequences of radiation, it would validate the utility of our intravital imaging method. TPOm reduced radiation-induced vascular leakage to control levels at day 7. Furthermore, L/E cell interactions were also reduced in irradiated mice treated with TPOm, compared with mice receiving irradiation alone, particularly at high shear stress ( P = 0.03, Kruskal-Wallis). We conclude that the ear model is useful for monitoring quiescent normal tissue vascular injury after radiation exposure. Furthermore, the application of TPOm, for preventing early inflammatory response created by damage to vascular endothelium, suggests that this drug may prove useful in reducing toxicities from radiotherapy, which damage microvasculature that critically important to tissue function.