Association of blood donor's biological characteristics on outcomes of cardiac surgery patients receiving red blood cells transfusion.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the association of blood donor variables on the outcome of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who had cardiac surgery between January 2018 and December 2020. Blood donor characteristics such as age (≤ or >30 years), sex, and body mass index (BMI) (≤ or >25 kg/m2) were analyzed for association with patient outcomes (length of hospital stay (LOS), mortality, and readmission). Sex matching was done as fully match, fully mismatch, and partial mismatch. Cox regression and Linear regression models were used to study the association with mortality and readmission, and LOS. RESULTS: During the study period, 5788 patients had cardiac surgery; receiving a total of 20,348 red cell units. Of which, 522 (9%) died, 531 (9.2%) re-admitted and median LOS was 11 days (IQR 7-18). BMI >25 kg/m2 (ß, 2.96; p = 0.000), female to male transfusion (partial mismatch: ß, 4.42; p = 0.001; fully mismatch: ß, 9.0; p = 0.02) negatively affected LOS. BMI >25 kg/m2 (HR, 2.07; p = 0.00) and partial mismatch transfusion to male patients (HR, 1.60; p = 0.01) increased mortality. Fully mismatch transfusion to female patients (HR, 1.24; p = 0.01) and partial mismatch to male patients (HR, 1.86; p = 0.01) increased readmission. No association of donor age on patient outcome was observed. DISCUSSION: Blood donor sex, and BMI can influence mortality and LOS in cardiac surgery patients. The use of computer tools to match the patient's and donor's characteristics can assist to eliminate these types of adverse consequences.

Management of blood transfusion services in low-resource countries.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Enabling universal access to safe blood components should be a key component of every country's national healthcare strategy. This study aimed to assess the current status of infrastructure and resources of blood transfusion services (BTS) in low- and middle-income countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was designed to gather information on blood donations, components, redistribution, testing resources and quality management systems (QMSs). The survey was distributed to the International Society of Blood Transfusion members between October 2021 and November 2021. RESULTS: A total of 54 respondents from 20 countries responded to the survey. This included hospital-based BTS/blood centres (46%), national blood centres (11%)and national and regional blood services (11%). Voluntary non-remunerated, replacement and paid donors accounted for 94.2%, 84.6% and 21.1% of donations, respectively. Apheresis donation was available in 59.6% of institutions. National/regional criteria for redistribution of blood components were reported by 75.9% of respondents. Blood components incurred payment charges in 81.5% of respondents' institutions, and payments were borne by patients in 50% of them. Testing methods, such as manual (83%), semi-automated (68%) or fully automated (36.2%), were used either alone or in combination. QMSs were reported in 17 institutions, while accreditation and haemovigilance were reported in 12 and 8 countries, respectively. CONCLUSION: QMS was implemented in most of the countries despite the common use of paid donations and the lack of advanced testing. Efforts to overcome persistent challenges and wider implementation of patient blood management programmes are required.

National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017).

INTRODUCTION: The donor vigilance program is intended to collect and assess information on unexpected or undesirable effects or reactions resulting from blood donation. In this report, we discuss the analysis of the blood donor adverse reactions (DARs) reported in the National Blood Donor Vigilance Programme of India during the first 2 years of implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DAR reporting form prepared and approved by the National Executive Committee of the Haemovigilance Programme of India was used to capture the data by the blood centers and submitted to Donor-Vigil software prepared and hosted by the official website of the National Institute of Biologicals. Data reported for the years 2016 and 2017 were reviewed, analyzed, and validated by independent transfusion medicine experts. RESULTS: During this period, a total of 19,98,101 donations denominator data were reported, in which 1,622,600 (80.9%) were valid. A total of 6091 DARs were reported, out of which 3980 (65.35%) were found valid. Only validated numerator and denominator data were included in the analysis. Generalized DARs were the most common type of DARs reported (83.7%), followed by "others" type (7.7%), localized (7.6%), allergic (0.4%), and complications related to apheresis (0.4%). The overall DAR rate was 2.45/1000 blood donations, which was higher in apheresis donations (3.07/1000) as compared to whole blood donations (2.39/1000). The DARs rates were higher in females (3.5/1000) compared to male donors (2.3/1000) and in the first time (2.5/1000) compared to repeat donors (2.15/1000). CONCLUSION: In this report, we concluded that younger age, first time, and female donors are more prone to DARs as compared to older age, repeat, and male donors. During the analysis of the data, we found some limitations, which can be improved by upgrading the reporting form and conducting regular continuing medical education (CMEs) of participant blood centers.

Lessons learned in the collection of convalescent plasma during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The lack of definitive treatment or preventative options for COVID-19 led many clinicians early on to consider convalescent plasma (CCP) as potentially therapeutic. Regulators, blood centres and hospitals worldwide worked quickly to get CCP to the bedside. Although response was admirable, several areas have been identified to help improve future pandemic management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary, multinational subgroup from the ISBT Working Group on COVID-19 was tasked with drafting a manuscript that describes the lessons learned pertaining to procurement and administration of CCP, derived from a comprehensive questionnaire within the subgroup. RESULTS: While each country's responses and preparedness for the pandemic varied, there were shared challenges, spanning supply chain disruptions, staffing, impact of social distancing on the collection of regular blood and CCP products, and the availability of screening and confirmatory SARS-CoV-2 testing for donors and patients. The lack of a general framework to organize data gathering across clinical trials and the desire to provide a potentially life-saving therapeutic through compassionate use hampered the collection of much-needed safety and outcome data worldwide. Communication across all stakeholders was identified as being central to reducing confusion. CONCLUSION: The need for flexibility and adaptability remains paramount when dealing with a pandemic. As the world approaches the first anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic with rising rates worldwide and over 115 million cases and 2·55 million deaths, respectively, it is important to reflect on how to better prepare for future pandemics as we continue to combat the current one.

Understanding the role of therapeutic plasma exchange in COVID-19: preliminary guidance and practices.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19 is due to a pathological inflammatory response of raised cytokines. Removal of these cytokines by therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) prior to end-organ damage may improve clinical outcomes. This manuscript is intended to serve as a preliminary guidance document for application of TPE in patients with severe COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The available literature pertaining to the role of TPE for treatment of COVID-19 patients was reviewed to guide optimal management. It included indication, contraindication, optimal timing of initiation and termination of TPE, vascular access and anticoagulants, numbers and mode of procedures, outcome measures and adverse events. RESULTS: Out of a total of 78 articles, only 65 were directly related to the topic. From these 65, only 32 were acceptable as primary source, while 33 were used as supporting references. TPE in critically ill COVID-19 patients may be classified under ASFA category III grade 2B. The early initiation of TPE for 1-1·5 patient's plasma volume with fresh frozen plasma, or 4-5% albumin or COVID-19 convalescent plasma as replacement fluids before multiorgan failure, has better chances of recovery. The number of procedures can vary from three to nine depending on patient response. CONCLUSION: TPE in COVID-19 patients may help by removing toxic cytokines, viral particles and/or by correcting coagulopathy or restoring endothelial membrane. Severity score (SOFA & APACHE II) and cytokine levels (IL-6, C-reactive protein) can be used to execute TPE therapy and to monitor response in COVID-19 patients.

Consecutive reactive results in screening of transfusion transmitted infections: Family history of blood donors is also important.

BACKGROUND: Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test is used for screening of transfusion transmitted infections (TTI) in blood donors. Consecutive reactive results in ELISA is due to sample/reagent carryover or donor related. In this study we tried to find out the possibilities of family history/close contacts with patients of hepatitis among these consecutive reactive donors. AIM: To analyze the consecutive reactive results in ELISA tests for TTI testing on samples of healthy blood donors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2016 to July 2018 in a tertiary care hospital, North India. Consecutive reactive results by fourth generation ELISA for TTIs screening were evaluated for possible reasons. Confirmation tests were not done. Reactive donors were contacted telephonically for relevant history of close contact with infected personnel. RESULTS: Out of 53,740 donations 1,061 were reactive for TTIs during our study period. Prevalence of Hepatitis B (HBV), Human Immunodeficiency (HIV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) virus infection in blood donors were 1.27%, 0.20% and 0.50% respectively. Consecutive reactive results for HBV were 9.20% (63/685), for HCV 6.0% (16/266) and nil for HIV. There was no sample carryover in this. Out of 79 consecutive reactive donors 69 donated for same patients and 32 were related with infected patient which are statistically significant (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: This study recommends that in analysis of consecutive positive results in ELISA along with looking for procedure/sample error, there is also a need to take retrospective history of donors for close contact with infected patients.