Dentinal Microcracks after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Root: An In Vitro Evaluation of ProTaper Gold and Kedo-S Rotary File Systems.

Context: There is a possibility of dentinal crack formation in primary teeth after root canal preparation using rotary files. Aims: To evaluate and compare the effect of ProTaper-Gold and Kedo-S rotary files on crack formation after root canal preparation in primary molars. Settings and design: A total of 120 freshly extracted mandibular primary molars (6-9 years) were randomly divided into three groups of 40 each: ProTaper-Gold, Kedo-S, and Hand H-files, respectively. Materials and methods: The roots were covered with a snuggly fitting surgical glove and stabilized in the teeth slot of a silicone mold of mandibular mixed dentition. Dental casts were obtained in a mixture of plaster of paris and sawdust. A screw system was incorporated in the cast for stabilization of the cast into the phantom head. All the root canals were instrumented in a standard operating position till 1 mm short of the radiographic apex. All roots were then stained and sectioned perpendicular to the long axis at the furcation level and 2 mm below the furcation to obtain one section per tooth. Sections were examined under a stereomicroscope at 25× magnification for any crack formations and recorded. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p = 0.05). Results: The total number of cracks in terms of percentage following the use of ProTaper Gold, Kedo-S, and H-files were 35, 10, and 0%, respectively, on the upper surface and 15, 5, and 0% on the lower surface. Within the group, there was a statistically significant difference in ProTaper-Gold (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The use of ProTaper-Gold resulted in a greater number of dentinal cracks compared to Kedo-S and H-files. How to cite this article: Patil MB, Mandroli PS, Jalannavar P, et al. Dentinal Microcracks after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Root: An In Vitro Evaluation of ProTaper Gold and Kedo-S Rotary File Systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(5):692-697.

Point-of-care testing in India: missed opportunities to realize the true potential of point-of-care testing programs.

BACKGROUND: The core objective of any point-of-care (POC) testing program is to ensure that testing will result in an actionable management decision (e.g. referral, confirmatory test, treatment), within the same clinical encounter (e.g. POC continuum). This can but does not have to involve rapid tests. Most studies on POC testing focus on one specific test and disease in a particular healthcare setting. This paper describes the actors, technologies and practices involved in diagnosing major diseases in five Indian settings - the home, community, clinics, peripheral laboratories and hospitals. The aim was to understand how tests are used and fit into the health system and with what implications for the POC continuum. METHODS: The paper reports on a qualitative study including 78 semi-structured interviews and 13 focus group discussions with doctors, nurses, patients, lab technicians, program officers and informal providers, conducted between January and June 2013 in rural and urban Karnataka, South India. Actors, diseases, tests and diagnostic processes were mapped for each of the five settings and analyzed with regard to whether and how POC continuums are being ensured. RESULTS: Successful POC testing hardly occurs in any of the five settings. In hospitals and public clinics, most of the rapid tests are used in laboratories where either the single patient encounter advantage is not realized or the rapidity is compromised. Lab-based testing in a context of manpower and equipment shortages leads to delays. In smaller peripheral laboratories and private clinics with shorter turn-around-times, rapid tests are unavailable or too costly. Here providers find alternative measures to ensure the POC continuum. In the home setting, patients who can afford a test are not/do not feel empowered to use those devices. CONCLUSION: These results show that there is much diagnostic delay that deters the POC continuum. Existing rapid tests are currently not translated into treatment decisions rapidly or are not available where they could ensure shorter turn-around times, thus undermining their full potential. To ensure the success of POC testing programs, test developers, decision-makers and funders need to account for such ground realities and overcome barriers to POC testing programs.

Barriers to Point-of-Care Testing in India: Results from Qualitative Research across Different Settings, Users and Major Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Successful point-of-care testing, namely ensuring the completion of the test and treat cycle in the same encounter, has immense potential to reduce diagnostic and treatment delays, and impact patient outcomes. However, having rapid tests is not enough, as many barriers may prevent their successful implementation in point-of-care testing programs. Qualitative research on diagnostic practices may help identify such barriers across different points of care in health systems. METHODS: In this exploratory qualitative study, we conducted 78 semi-structured interviews and 13 focus group discussions in an urban and rural area of Karnataka, India, with healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, specialists, traditional healers, and informal providers), patients, community health workers, test manufacturers, laboratory technicians, program managers and policy-makers. Participants were purposively sampled to represent settings of hospitals, peripheral labs, clinics, communities and homes, in both the public and private sectors. RESULTS: In the Indian context, the onus is on the patient to ensure successful point-of-care testing across homes, clinics, labs and hospitals, amidst uncoordinated providers with divergent and often competing practices, in settings lacking material, money and human resources. We identified three overarching themes affecting point-of-care testing: the main theme is 'relationships' among providers and between providers and patients, influenced by the cross-cutting theme of 'infrastructure'. Challenges with both result in 'modified practices' often favouring empirical (symptomatic) treatment over treatment guided by testing. CONCLUSIONS: Even if tests can be conducted on the spot and infrastructure challenges have been resolved, relationships among providers and between patients and providers are crucial for successful point-of-care testing. Furthermore, these barriers do not act in isolation, but are interlinked and need to be examined as such. Also, a test alone has only limited power to overcome those difficulties. Test developers, policy-makers, healthcare providers and funders need to use these insights in overcoming barriers to point-of-care testing programs.