Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sociol Health Illn ; 45(8): 1634-1651, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37237247

RESUMO

The organisation of neonatal units into geographically-based networks that offer different levels of care is intended to ensure babies receive the care they need via transfers between different units. In this article, we explore the significant organisational work required in practice to accomplish such transfers. Conducted within a wider study of optimal place of care for babies born between 27 and 31 weeks' gestation, we draw on ethnographic work exploring the accomplishment of transfers in this complex care context. We undertook fieldwork in six neonatal units across two networks in England, representing 280 hours of observation and formal interviews with 15 health-care professionals. Drawing on Strauss et al.'s concept of the social organisation of medicine and Allen's concept of 'organising work', we identify three distinct forms of such work central to the successful accomplishment of a neonatal transfer: (1) 'matchmaking', to identify a suitable transfer location; (2) 'transfer articulation', to successfully effect the planned transfer; and (3) 'parent engagement', to support parents through the transfer process. Our findings build on and extend Strauss et al. and Allen's work by both highlighting the different forms of 'organising work' undertaken in this clinical context and the distribution of such work across different professional groups.


Assuntos
Pais , Parto , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Idade Gestacional , Inglaterra
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(6): e059428, 2022 06 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35760541

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks of gestation in England are usually born and cared for in either a neonatal intensive care unit or a local neonatal unit-with such units forming part of Operational Delivery Networks. As part of a national project seeking to optimise service delivery for this group of babies (OPTI-PREM), we undertook qualitative research to better understand how decisions about place of birth and care are made and operationalised. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of ethnographic observation data in neonatal units and semi-structured interviews with neonatal staff. SETTING: Six neonatal units across two neonatal networks in England. Two were neonatal intensive care units and four were local neonatal units. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical staff (n=15) working in neonatal units, and people present in neonatal units during periods of observation. RESULTS: In the context of real-world neonatal practice, with multiple (and rapidly-evolving) uncertainties relating to mothers, babies and unit/network capacity, 'best place of care' protocols were only one element of much more complex decision-making processes. Staff often made judgements from a less-than-ideal starting point, and were forced to respond to evolving clinical and organisational factors. In particular, we report that managerial considerations relating to demand and capacity organised decision-making; demand and capacity management was time-consuming and generated various pressures on families, and tensions between staff. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers and policymakers should take account of the organisational context within which place of care decisions are made. The dominance of demand and capacity management considerations is likely to limit the impact of other improvement interventions, such as initiatives to integrate families into the neonatal care provision. Demand and capacity management is an important element of neonatal care that may be overlooked, but significantly organises how care is delivered.


Assuntos
Doenças do Prematuro , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Mães , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa
3.
Monash Bioeth Rev ; 40(2): 145-156, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35306627

RESUMO

While the literature on oncofertility decision-making was central to the bioethics debate on social egg freezing when the practice emerged in the late 2000s, there has been little discussion juxtaposing the two forms of egg freezing since. This article offers a new perspective on this debate by comparing empirical qualitative data of two previously conducted studies on medical and social egg freezing. We re-analysed the interview data of the two studies and did a thematic analysis combined with interdisciplinary collaborative auditing for empirical ethics projects. Despite their different contexts, major similarities in women's decision-making and reasoning were found. We developed two main common themes. Firstly, women felt a clear need to plan for future options. Secondly, they manipulated decision-times by postponing definitive decisions and making micro-decisions. The comparison highlights that the passage of time and the preservation of future choice seems to permeate all aspects of the patient experiences in both studies. As a result of considering real-world lived experiences, we suggest that there are many overlaps in women's reasoning about egg freezing regardless of why they are making a decision to freeze. These overlaps are morally relevant and thus need to be further integrated into the existing arguments that have been canvassed in the flourishing egg freezing and fertility preservation debates across the field, and in policy and practice globally.


Assuntos
Bioética , Preservação da Fertilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Criopreservação , Oócitos , Emoções
4.
Health (London) ; 25(4): 417-433, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31739676

RESUMO

Practical wisdom is a key concept in the field of virtue ethics, and it has played a significant role in the thinking of those who make use of virtue when theorising medical practice and ethics. In this article, we examine how storytelling and practical wisdom play integral roles in the medical ethics education of junior doctors. Using a qualitative approach, we conducted 46 interviews with a cohort of junior doctors to explore the role doctors feel phronesis has in their medical ethics practice and how they acquire practical wisdom through storytelling as an essential part of their medical ethics education. Through thematic analysis of the interviews, we discuss the key role storytelling about moral exemplars and role models plays in developing medical ethics education, and how telling stories about role models is considered to be one of the most useful ways to learn medical ethics. We finish by developing an argument for why practical wisdom should be an important part of medical ethics training, focusing on the important role that phronesis narratives should have in teaching medical ethics.


Assuntos
Médicos , Virtudes , Ética Médica , Humanos , Princípios Morais , Narração
5.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 30(6): 444-456, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32978322

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reducing avoidable harm in maternity services is a priority globally. As well as learning from mistakes, it is important to produce rigorous descriptions of 'what good looks like'. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterise features of safety in maternity units and to generate a plain language framework that could be used to guide learning and improvement. METHODS: We conducted a multisite ethnography involving 401 hours of non-participant observations 33 semistructured interviews with staff across six maternity units, and a stakeholder consultation involving 65 semistructured telephone interviews and one focus group. RESULTS: We identified seven features of safety in maternity units and summarised them into a framework, named For Us (For Unit Safety). The features include: (1) commitment to safety and improvement at all levels, with everyone involved; (2) technical competence, supported by formal training and informal learning; (3) teamwork, cooperation and positive working relationships; (4) constant reinforcing of safe, ethical and respectful behaviours; (5) multiple problem-sensing systems, used as basis of action; (6) systems and processes designed for safety, and regularly reviewed and optimised; (7) effective coordination and ability to mobilise quickly. These features appear to have a synergistic character, such that each feature is necessary but not sufficient on its own: the features operate in concert through multiple forms of feedback and amplification. CONCLUSIONS: This large qualitative study has enabled the generation of a new plain language framework-For Us-that identifies the behaviours and practices that appear to be features of safe care in hospital-based maternity units.


Assuntos
Antropologia Cultural , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa
6.
Soc Sci Med ; 266: 113362, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957025

RESUMO

Patient involvement, in the form of shared decision-making, is advocated within healthcare. This is informed by the principlist account of patient autonomy that prioritises informed understanding, and decision-making free from coercion. This arguably over-simplifies the role of the social, whilst overlooking the role of culture and context in medical decision-making. Clinicians encourage patients to demonstrably make decisions in the principlist 'style' that fit with their understandings of ethically 'correct' ways to support patient decision-making. However, this expected 'style' is often not achieved in practice. In this article, we use empirical data from a qualitative study exploring parental decision-making following diagnosis or suspicion of a severe congenital anomaly in pregnancy. Our study was based in four fetal medicine clinics in England, comprising semi-structured interviews with 38 parents whose pregnancy was affected by a severe congenital anomaly, 18 interviews with fetal medicine clinicians, and audio-recordings of 48 consultations. Examination of the dynamics at play within different approaches to decision-making highlights how the idealised concepts proposed in theory fail to capture real-life experiences of medical decision-making. The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on decisions is brought to the fore, highlighting the influence of power dynamics in implicitly and explicitly influencing patient decisions, and the need to better address this in policy and practice.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Pais , Inglaterra , Feminino , Humanos , Princípios Morais , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa
7.
J Bioeth Inq ; 17(4): 595-600, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32840825

RESUMO

Recent weeks have seen an increased focus on the ethical response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ethics guidance has proliferated across Britain, with ethicists and those with a keen interest in ethics in their professions working to produce advice and support for the National Health Service. The guiding principles of the pandemic have emerged, in one form or another, to favour fairness, especially with regard to allocating resources and prioritizing care. However, fairness is not equivalent to equity when it comes to healthcare, and the focus on fairness means that existing guidance inadvertently discriminates against people from ethnic minority backgrounds. Drawing on early criticisms of existing clinical guidance (for example, the frailty decision tool) and ethical guidance in Britain, this essay will discuss the importance of including sociology, specifically the relationship between ethnicity and health, in any ethical and clinical guidance for care during the pandemic in the United Kingdom. To do otherwise, I will argue, would be actively choosing to allow a proportion of the British population to die for no other reason than their ethnic background. Finally, I will end by arguing why sociology must be a key component in any guidance, outlining how sociology was incorporated into the cross-college guidance produced by the Royal College of Physicians.


Assuntos
COVID-19/etnologia , Ética Médica , Etnicidade , Racismo/etnologia , Racismo/ética , Medicina Estatal/ética , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
9.
BMJ Open ; 9(8): e029421, 2019 08 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31444186

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In England, for babies born at 23-26 weeks gestation, care in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) as opposed to a local neonatal unit (LNU) improves survival to discharge. This evidence is shaping neonatal health services. In contrast, there is no evidence to guide location of care for the next most vulnerable group (born at 27-31 weeks gestation) whose care is currently spread between 45 NICU and 84 LNU in England. This group represents 12% of preterm births in England and over onr-third of all neonatal unit care days. Compared with those born at 23-26 weeks gestation, they account for four times more admissions and twice as many National Health Service bed days/year. METHODS: In this mixed-methods study, our primary objective is to assess, for babies born at 27-31 weeks gestation and admitted to a neonatal unit in England, whether care in an NICU vs an LNU impacts on survival and key morbidities (up to age 1 year), at each gestational age in weeks. Routinely recorded data extracted from real-time, point-of-care patient management systems held in the National Neonatal Research Database, Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics, for January 2014 to December 2018, will be analysed. Secondary objectives are to assess (1) whether differences in care provided, rather than a focus on LNU/NICU designation, drives gestation-specific outcomes, (2) where care is most cost-effective and (3) what parents' and clinicians' perspectives are on place of care, and how these could guide clinical decision-making. Our findings will be used to develop recommendations, in collaboration with national bodies, to inform clinical practice, commissioning and policy-making. The project is supported by a parent advisory panel and a study steering committee. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval has been obtained (IRAS 212304). Dissemination will be through publication of findings and development of recommendations for care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02994849 and ISRCTN74230187.


Assuntos
Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/economia , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa , Inglaterra , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Análise de Sobrevida
10.
Monash Bioeth Rev ; 36(1-4): 68-85, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30617789

RESUMO

In this article I discuss the little examined relationship between time and patient autonomy. Using the findings from a study on the experience of premenopausal cancer patients making fertility preservation decisions during their treatment, I focus on how the patients in the study understood time, and how this understanding interacted with and influenced their decision-making. I then analyse in more depth the importance of time in patient decision-making, and the relationship of time to concepts of patient autonomy and decision-making in the field of bioethics more generally. Focusing on the relational conception of autonomy, I conclude that time is an integral part of patient autonomy which warrants further research, such that it can be better integrated into concepts of patient autonomy, and the policy and guidelines that they inform and influence.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões/ética , Preservação da Fertilidade/ética , Infertilidade Feminina/psicologia , Autonomia Pessoal , Relações Médico-Paciente/ética , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade/psicologia , Educação em Saúde/ética , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações
11.
Perspect Biol Med ; 59(3): 337-350, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28479576

RESUMO

In the field of medical virtue ethics, the concept of phronesis, or practical wisdom, plays a crucial role. In recent years a number of important theoretical questions have been identified in this regard: (1) is phronesis more akin to thinking or theorizing, or to feeling and intuiting? (2) can phronesis be communicated and explained, or is it individual and personal? and (3) is phronesis needed in all decision-making in medicine, or only in the making of decisions that are ethically fraught? In this paper we argue that, while these questions have received attention on the theoretical level, empirical investigation has the potential to shed light on these questions from the perspective of medical practice in the real world. Indeed, because virtue ethics insists that virtuous action can only be understood properly in the context of real decisions (and not in the abstract), there are good grounds for thinking that understanding phronesis must involve attention to real-world particulars. Empirical investigation, involving in-depth narrative interviewing and analysis, has the potential to shed light on these theoretical questions relating to phronesis.


Assuntos
Ética Médica , Medicina/normas , Medicina/tendências , Tomada de Decisões/ética , Humanos , Virtudes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...