An alternative mantle irradiation technique using 3D CT- based treatment planning for female patients with Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: For female patients, radiotherapy treatment for Hodgkin's disease invariably results in the irradiation of breast tissue that may lead to radiation induced secondary cancers. The risk for secondary breast cancer is correlated with dose. We have developed a technique in an attempt to increase breast sparing during mantle field irradiation for female patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To minimize the irradiated breast volume, a virtual simulation technique making use of a Styrofoam breast immobilization board has been developed whereby the patient lies prone with the breasts positioned in grooves within the board. The breast position is adjusted using Styrofoam wedges, and breast placement is verified using an AP CT-pilot view. A CT scan of the neck and thoracic regions is taken, and the lymph nodes, breast volume and critical structures are outlined. Virtual simulation of the mantle fields (typically AP/PA isocentric beams) is performed, and beam blocks are drawn on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) generated by the virtual simulation package. The shielding is designed to allow adequate margins around the lymph nodes while maximizing shielding of the lung and breast tissues. The para-aortic fields are also easily determined through virtual simulation, where multi-planar reconstructions (MPR) and 3D renderings of the patient's CT data are used to determine the field limits and beam gaps. In addition to allowing for the geometric optimization of the positioning of the breasts under the lung shields, the virtual simulation technique provides the necessary information for a 3D dosimetric analysis, including dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the irradiated breast volume. RESULTS: The 3D breast sparing technique was qualitatively and quantitatively compared to non-CT-based techniques and other 3D techniques currently available to assess the protection of the breasts. In a preliminary analysis, virtual simulation images (DRRs, 3D rendering and multi-planar reconstruction) demonstrated the advantage of using the breast sparing technique. A further analysis of DVHs showed a reduction of at least 50% in the volume of breast tissue irradiated when using the breast positioning board and virtual simulation as compared to the conventional simulation techniques where a breast immobilization board was not used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a breast immobilization board and of a virtual simulation technique is recommended for the planning and treatment of female patients with Hodgkin's disease. DVH analysis has shown that this leads to a decrease in the volume of breast irradiated. It is hoped that this approach will reduce the risk of secondary breast malignancies in female patients with Hodgkin's disease.

Dosimetry of hip irradiation for the prevention of heterotopic bone formation after arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The dosimetry of hip irradiation for the prevention of heterotopic bone formation following arthroplasty is complicated by the use of custom shielding in the treatment portal, and the fact that irradiation is usually required during a 48 hour period following surgery. Both the machine output and depth dose factors of the resulting fields are modified by the presence of the shielding blocks. A simplified dosimetric approach, based on correction factors for both the output and depth dose as a function of field geometry is presented for various megavoltage energy beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements of relative dose factors (RDF) and percentage depth dose (PDD) were carried out for different combinations of field size, block size and separation between adjacent blocks. Both RDF and PDD measurements were made in a water phantom. Ratios of RDF and PDD were obtained by dividing individual measurements or curves by the corresponding values for the open field (i.e., without blocks). The average values of these ratios constitute the correction factors to be applied for a given MU or treatment time calculation. RESULTS: Extensive RDF and PDD measurements reveal that for the field and block dimensions of interest the correction factors for RDF can be parameterized as a function of separation between two adjacent blocks and beam energy alone and the depth correction factors are additionally only a function of depth. The correction factors for depth dose are equally valid for fixed source-skin distance techniques (that use PDD) and fixed source-axis distance techniques (that use TMR). CONCLUSION: A simple model for the calculation of output in hip irradiation is presented for the situation where the use of computer-based algorithms may not be practical. The model accurately predicts the RDF of the treatment portal to within 2% and the PDD to within 2% for the range of field sizes, block sizes, block gaps and beam energies of interest ignoring other variables.

Limiting values of backscatter factors for low-energy x-ray beams.

Models for the calculation of upper and lower limiting values to the backscatter factor (BSF) are presented. The upper limit is obtained from Monte Carlo simulations of infinite parallel beams incident on semi-infinite phantoms with the dose contributions from all orders of photon scatter considered. The lower limits are calculated using an analytical photon transport model which considers only the primary dose and the scatter dose from photons that have undergone single scattering interactions in the phantom. The limiting values can be used to evaluate measured and modelled BSF values for x-ray beams with photons of < or = 150 keV. A parametrization of the limiting values in terms of photon energy and irradiation field size is presented so that results determined for monoenergetic beams can be extended to polyenergetic spectra. The utility of the limits is illustrated by comparisons made with BSFs from the literature.