Wear Experiences with Two Soft Contact Lenses for Astigmatism of Different Modalities.

Introduction: Patients expect to have excellent vision and comfort when wearing soft contact lenses. The purpose of this study was to compare the wear experiences of participants with astigmatism when wearing a daily disposable soft toric lens to an established, commonly used reusable toric lens. Methods: In this crossover study, habitual soft toric lens wearers were fit with a daily replacement soft toric lens (delefilcon A) and a reusable, 1-month replacement soft toric lens (comfilcon A) in a randomized order. After 30 days of wear, Visual analog scale (VAS) surveys were used to assess wear experience, including vision and comfort, for overall wear and end-of-day wear. Scores were compared statistically with mixed-effects linear models. Participants also responded to questions about convenience, ease of use, and satisfaction with both lenses and preference questions based upon comfort, vision, and overall performance. Results: Fifty-nine participants completed the multi-site crossover study. VAS scores [mean(std dev)] for overall quality of vision for the delefilcon A [80.4(16.4)] and comfilcon A [66.8(27.7)] lenses were statistically significant (P=0.002). The difference in the mean overall comfort scores for the delefilcon A lenses [71.6(26.3)] and comfilcon A lenses [63.2(28.9)] was 8.4, which exceeds the establish criteria for clinical significance, although not statistically significant (P=0.08). Overall satisfaction scores were 68.8(26.9) for the delefilcon A and 59.7(30.3) for the comfilcon A lenses (P=0.08). Both lenses provided mean binocular visual acuities better than 20/20 Snellen equivalent. Over half of the participants preferred the delefilcon A lenses based upon comfort, vision, and overall performance. Convenience, ease of use, and satisfaction all scored higher with delefilcon A lenses. Conclusion: The results of this study show that wear experience with delefilcon A lenses for astigmatism can meet or exceed that of comfilcon A toric lenses while also providing healthy, daily disposable lens wear.

Implementation of an Evidence-Based, Content-Validated, Standardized Support Surface Algorithm Tool in Home Health Care: A Quality Improvement Project.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to provide a standardized, repeatable, and easy-to-use process for selecting a support surface for prevention or treatment of pressure injuries (PIs). PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: The Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society Support Surface Algorithm was chosen to guide clinicians in selection of an appropriate support surface. These clinicians provide services to approximately 465,000 patients across the nation annually. APPROACH: This quality improvement project aimed to establish clinician knowledge and comfort levels when recommending a support surface and providing a standardized way to identify the appropriate support surface once a patient had been identified as at risk. The support surface algorithm was incorporated into our agency's electronic medical record (EMR); we chose this interactive algorithm to facilitate support surface selection among clinicians with no specialized expertise in PI treatment or prevention. OUTCOMES: Clinicians reported an increase in knowledge and comfort levels in the ability to select an appropriate support surface following implementation of the clinical decision support tool. Benchmarking data illustrated a decrease in the year over year aggregate (September 2018 to September 2021) trending for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services quality outcome measures surrounding potentially avoidable events related to PIs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Implementing the support surface algorithm assisted clinicians with support surface selection, elevated and standardized clinician practice, and reduced potentially avoidable events. As a result of this project, the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society Support Surface Algorithm Tool has been fully integrated into our EMR and is a standardized part of our clinical assessment.

Evaluation of Wear Experience with Soft Daily Disposable Lenses for Astigmatism over 16 Hours of Wear.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the wear experience of participants while wearing a toric daily disposable contact lens with water surface technology over long days of lens wear. Methods: Existing soft toric contact lens wearers were fit with the daily disposable study lenses. Participants assessed their initial comfort, vision, and satisfaction with the lenses by visual analog scale (VAS) survey. After a successful 1-week follow-up visit, participants were scheduled for 5 survey days, in which surveys were deployed to their smartphones for immediate assessments of comfort and quality of vision on a 1-10 scale at 10, 12, 14, and 16 hours of lens wear on 5 subsequent weeknights. The final study visit assessed visual acuity, and overall lens wear experience surveys were completed with VAS surveys. The overall median and interquartile (IQR) range of all surveys were calculated. Results: Thirty bilateral toric lens wearers completed the study. Median (IQR) initial impression VAS scores were 97(12) for quality of vision, 100(9) for comfort, and 96(10) for satisfaction. Median evening surveys resulted in comfort scores of 10(1) at 10 hours, 9(2) at 12 hours, 9(2) at 14 hours, and 8(2) at 16 hours of wear. Median evening surveys resulted in quality of vision scores of 10(1) at 10 hours, 10(2) at 12 hours, 9(2) at 14 hours, and 9(3) at 16 hours of wear. VAS scores for overall experience were 97(9) for comfort, 95(13) for vision, and 8(31) for dryness. End-of-day VAS scores were 93(21) for comfort, 90(15) for vision, and 21(38) for dryness. Mean (±standard deviation) OU LogMAR visual acuity with the study lenses was -0.19(0.06). Conclusion: Surveys of wear experience resulted in high scores for comfort and vision over the course of a long day of wear with the daily disposable study lenses in this population of patients with astigmatism.

Long Day Wear Experience with Water Surface Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the wear experience of silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses with water surface technology over a long day of lens wear. Methods: Thirty-five soft contact lens wearers were refit with the daily disposable study lenses and participants scored their initial impressions of comfort, vision and satisfaction using a visual analog scale (VAS). Participants used their smart phones to complete surveys of comfort and vision on a scale of 1-10 at 10, 12, 14, and 16 hours of lens wear on 5 weeknights. A participant score for each time point was calculated by averaging the evening responses. End of study VAS surveys of symptoms were also completed. Results: Median (Interquartile Range) VAS initial impression scores were 99.00 (12.00) for quality of vision, 98.00 (16.00) for comfort, and 100.00 (13.00) for satisfaction. The end of study surveys found end of day median VAS scores of 87.00 (19.00) for end of day quality of vision and 75.00 (24.50) for end of day comfort. The median score for overall quality of vision was 93.00 (14.00) and for overall comfort was 93.00 (16.50). The median score for end of day dryness was 37.00 (55.00) and overall dryness was 13.00 (34.00). Conclusion: The daily disposable lenses with water surface treatment used in this study maintained high median scores for comfort and quality of vision for up to 16 hours of wear.

A randomized clinical trial of burst vs. spaced physical therapy for Parkinsons disease.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal timing for physical therapy (PT) delivery in Parkinson's disease (PD) is unknown. Our objective was to determine whether spacing physical therapy visits over a longer period of time is beneficial for maintenance of physical function in PD. METHODS: A single center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of PD participants. Participants (n = 30) were randomized to either burst (two PT sessions weekly for 6 weeks) or spaced (one PT session every 2 weeks for 6 months) PT. 11 participants in each arm completed the study and were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test at baseline and 6 months. The burst group had an additional outcome measure timepoint at the completion of PT at 6 weeks. RESULTS: Neither group achieved a minimal clinically significant benefit in the TUG score (3.5s) at 6 months. The spaced PT TUG scores were maintained when comparing baseline (7.8 ± 1.5s) and 6 month timepoints (7.8 ± 2.6s, p = 0.594). The burst group TUG scores comparing baseline (9.8 ± 3.8s) to 6 weeks (9.1 ± 3.0s) also was maintained (p = 0.365). The burst group worsened, however, when measuring the period from 6 weeks to 6 months (12.1 ± 7.6s, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The spaced PT group had stability of the TUG mobility measure at 6 months, while the burst group had a significant worsening once PT was discontinued after 6 weeks. It is feasible to test these approaches in a future larger comparative effectiveness study.

Radiation Dose Audit Failures: Truth and Consequences.

The validation of a radiation sterilization dose involves an initial sterilization dose determination as well as maintenance of that sterilization dose. The procedures for maintenance of the sterilization dose typically include the periodic use of two types of tests: bioburden and dose audits. The details for the procedures are outlined in the ISO radiation sterilization standards. These documents also provide guidelines for recommended actions in response to the results of the two tests. The results for the dose audit are based on the number of positive tests of sterility (TOS) for products that have been irradiated at a verification or experimental dose. When the dose audit yields TOS positives, it is often thought that they indicate a sterilization failure and nonsterile product. The belief that any TOS positive is a failure is an incorrect assumption because of the statistical basis used for the determination of the sterilization dose. This article will outline the truth of what dose audit TOS positives mean in terms of the sterility assurance of product, as well as the consequences of TOS positives.

Efficacy of gait training with real-time biofeedback in correcting knee hyperextension patterns in young women.

STUDY DESIGN: Single cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of real-time biofeedback provided during treadmill gait training to correct knee hyperextension in asymptomatic females while walking. BACKGROUND: Knee hyperextension is associated with increased stress to the posterior capsule of the knee joint, anterior cruciate ligament, and the anterior compartment of the tibiofemoral joint. Previous methods aimed at correcting knee hyperextension have shown limited success. METHODS: Ten women, ages 18 to 39 years, with asymptomatic knee hyperextension during ambulation, were provided with 6 sessions of real-time feedback of kinematic data (Visual 3D) during treadmill training. Gait evaluations were performed pretraining, posttraining, and 1 month after the last training session. RESULTS: Participants showed improved control of knee hyperextension during overground walking at 1.3 m/s at posttraining and at 1 month posttraining. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that knee sagittal plane kinematics may be influenced by gait retraining using real-time biofeedback.