Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in the age of CAR T cell therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the management of relapsed and refractory myeloma, with excellent outcomes and a tolerable safety profile. High dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is established as a mainstream of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) management in patients who are young and fit enough to tolerate such intensity. This standard was developed based on randomized trials comparing AHCT to chemotherapy in the era prior to novel agents. More recently, larger studies have primarily shown a progression free survival (PFS) benefit of upfront AHCT, rather than overall survival (OS) benefit. There is debate about the significance of this lack of OS, acknowledging the potential confounders of the chronic nature of the disease, study design and competing harms and benefits of exposure to AHCT. Indeed upfront AHCT may not be as uniquely beneficial as we once thought, and is not without risk. New quadruple-agent regimens are highly active and effective in achieving a deep response as quantified by measurable residual disease (MRD). The high dose chemotherapy administered with AHCT imposes a burden of short and long-term adverse effects, which may alter the disease course and patient's ability to tolerate future therapies. Some high-risk subgroups may have a more valuable benefit from AHCT, though still ultimately suffer poor outcomes. When compared to the outcomes of CAR T cell therapy, the question of whether AHCT can or indeed should be deferred has become an important topic in the field. Deferring AHCT may be a personalized decision in patients who achieve MRD negativity, which is now well established as a key prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Reserving or re-administering AHCT at relapse is feasible in many cases and holds the promise of resetting the T cell compartment and opening up options for immune reengagement. It is likely that personalized MRD-guided decision making will shape how we sequence in the future, though more studies are required to delineate when this is safe and appropriate.

Efficacy of Selinexor in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients with del17p and Other High-Risk Abnormalities (A Retrospective Single-Center Study).

Selinexor (Seli) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein, exportin-1 (XPO1). Seli exhibits its antitumor effect through the blockage of XPO1, which increases nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), including p53, thereby limiting the translation of oncogenes, triggering cell cycle arrest and the death of malignant cells. Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients with del17p are deficient in TP53 and have a particularly poor prognosis. Given its unique mechanism of action, we investigated whether Seli has increased efficacy in RRMM patients with del17p compared to other high-risk cytogenetics (OHRC). This is an IRB-approved observational study of RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics (del17p, t (4;14), t (14;16) or gain 1q) or standard-risk cytogenetics treated at the Levine Cancer Institute (LCI) with a Seli-based regimen between January 2019 and December 2022. Time-to-event endpoints (PFS, OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Log-rank tests compared time-to-event endpoints between cohorts [del17p vs. OHRC vs. standard risk]. We identified 40 RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including 16 patients with del17p and 24 patients with OHRC, as well as 20 with standard-risk cytogenetics. The median age was 62.5 vs. 69 vs. 65.5 years (del17p group vs. OHRC vs. standard risk). The median prior line of therapies was five (range: 3-16) with similar rates of prior autologous stem cell transplant in all arms (68.8% vs. 62.5% vs. 70.0%). The most frequently used regimens were Seli-Pomalidomide-dexamethasone(dex) or Seli-Carfilzomib-dex (Seli-Kd) in the del17p group and Seli-Kd in the OHRC and standard-risk groups. The median time to start the Seli-based regimen after initial MM diagnosis was 5.6 years for the del17p group, 4.1 years in OHRC, and 4.8 years in the standard-risk group. The median follow-up time after the start of the Seli-based regimen was 10.5 months (mos) in the del17p group, 8.4 mos in OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group. In the del17p group, 50% had an objective response, 41.7% in the OHRC, and 35% in the standard-risk group (p = 0.71). Depth of response was also similar across the arms (12.5% vs. 12.5% vs. 10.0% VGPR p = 0.99). The median OS was 10.9 mos in the del17p group, 10.3 mos in the OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group (p = 0.92). The median OS was 15.5 mos for patients who received Seli as a bridging therapy versus 9 mos for Seli use for other reasons rather than as a bridge. Overall, Seli-based regimens showed promising responses even in this heavily pretreated population. Our analysis suggests that Seli-based regimens lead to similar outcomes among RRMM patients with del17p, OHRC, and standard-risk cytogenetics. This contrasts with previously reported outcomes using combinations of novel therapies in this population, where the del17p patients often have a poorer prognosis. Interestingly, our data suggest that Seli is a particularly effective bridging modality for patients preparing for CAR-T cell therapies in our population. Further investigation into this population is warranted, including in earlier lines of therapy, in hopes of seeing a more durable response.

Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DPd) Compared to Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd) in Daratumumab-Naïve Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Daratumumab-based combinations with pomalidomide/dexamethasone (DPd), or bortezomib/dexamethasone (DVd), have shown activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. However, no direct comparisons of safety or efficacy of the two regimens have been published to date. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the safety and efficacy of DPd and DVd in daratumumab-naïve RRMM patients. We included 140 daratumumab-naïve patients who had received DPd or DVd for RRMM. Overall, the DPd group had a greater number of patients who had high-risk disease characteristics. Although response was deeper in the DPd group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between the two groups. The DPd group exhibited a higher incidence of hematologic toxicities, whereas the DVd group had a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy. The study results showed that while DPd may provide a deeper response, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS compared to DVd. For the high proportion of difficult-to-treat patients, duration of treatment may have contributed to these results, indicating that patient and disease characteristics should be considered when selecting salvage treatments.

Bone marrow Ki-67 index is of prognostic value in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Ki-67 is an index of proliferative activity and is an established predictive and prognostic marker in multiple malignancies. However, its prognostic relevance in multiple myeloma (MM) is unclear. We investigated the relationship between Ki-67 expression and survival outcomes in MM in the era of novel therapies. METHODS: We interrogated our database to identify patients with MM, newly diagnosed between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2020, with Ki-67 expression assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on bone marrow biopsies. Using an established threshold of 5% we defined Ki-67low (≤5%) and Ki-67high (>5%) subgroups for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 167 patients included: 53 (31.7%) had Ki-67high and 114 had Ki-67low. More patients with R-ISS 3 had Ki-67high (22.2% vs. 9.7%). The gain of 1q21 was overrepresented in the Ki-67high group (28% vs. 8%). Median PFS in the Ki-67low group was 3.1 years, and in the Ki-67high group 1.6 years (log-rank p < .001, HR: 1.9). Median OS was not reached in the Ki-67low vs. 4.8 years in the Ki-67high cohort (HR: 1.9; log-rank test: p = .018). In the multivariable modeling, after adjusting for other risk factors, HR for Ki-67high versus Ki-67low was 2.4 (p < .001) for PFS and 2.1 (p = .026) for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a high Ki-67 index (>5%) is an independent prognostic marker associated with worse OS and PFS in newly diagnosed MM. IHC staining for Ki-67 on bone marrow biopsies could be easily adopted as a prognostic biomarker for MM in economically constrained healthcare settings.

A Clinical and Correlative Study of Elotuzumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (Elo-KRd) for Lenalidomide Refractory Multiple Myeloma in First Relapse.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in first relapse remains a challenge. This phase II study combined elotuzumab (Elo) with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) for treatment of MM in first relapse with the aim of improving efficacy. METHODS: Enrolled patients received Elo-KRd induction for 4 cycles, and Elo-lenalidomide maintenance until progression. The primary endpoint was VGPR or better (≥VGPR) postinduction. Secondary endpoints were MRD by flow cytometry, OS, PFS, and safety. Correlatives included characterization of the impact of Elo-KRd on NK and T cell subsets via flow cytometry. Target accrual of 40 patients was not met due to COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Of 15 patients enrolled, 10 (67%) had high-risk features (del17p, t[4;14], t[14;16], 1q gain/amplification, plasma cell leukemia, extramedullary MM, or functional high risk), 12 (80%) were lenalidomide-refractory, and 5 (33.3%) bortezomib-refractory. Postinduction ≥VGPR was 7/15 (46.7%) and MRD-negative (10-5) rate 20%. Overall response during study was 80%, including ≥VGPR as best response of 53.3%. At median follow-up of 28.2 (range, 3.8 to 44.2) months, the median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 1.9, 18), and median OS not reached (95% CI 10.1, NA). No new safety concerns were reported. Elo-KRd treatment did not augment NK cell distribution or activity in blood or bone marrow. Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells significantly decreased postinduction, with concomitant acquisition of T central memory phenotype, particularly at a high rate in ≥VGPR group. CONCLUSION: A short course of Elo-KRd induction followed by Elo-lenalidomide maintenance demonstrated activity in predominantly lenalidomide-refractory and / or high-risk MM. The results with this well-tolerated combination are comparable to other contemporary approved triplet combinations.

Adverse Hematological and Non-Hematological Events in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma That Are Responsive to Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone.

Background: Daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd) is an effective option for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In this study, we sought to analyze the risk of hematological and non-hematological toxicities in patients who responded to DPd treatment. Methods: We analyzed 97 patients with RRMM who were treated with DPd between January 2015 and June 2022. The patients and disease characteristics, as well as safety and efficacy outcomes were summarized as descriptive analysis. Results: The overall response rate for the entire group was 74% (n = 72). The most common grade III/IV hematological toxicities in those who responded to treatment were neutropenia (79%), leukopenia (65%), lymphopenia (56%), anemia (18%), and thrombocytopenia (8%). The most common grade III/IV non-hematological toxicities were pneumonia (17%) and peripheral neuropathy (8%). The incidence of dose reduction/interruption was 76% (55/72), which was due to hematological toxicity in 73% of the cases. The most common reason for discontinuing treatment was disease progression in 61% (44 out of 72 patients). Conclusions: Our study revealed that patients who respond to DPd are at high risk of dose reduction or treatment interruption because of hematological toxicity, typically due to neutropenia and leukopenia leading to increased risk of hospitalization and pneumonia.

Retrospective Review of Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients With COVID-19 Infection (Two-Center Study).

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has profound effects on patients with multiple myeloma (MM) mainly due to underlying immune dysfunction and associated therapies leading to increased susceptibility to infections. The overall risk of morbidity and mortality (M&M) in MM patients due to COVID-19 infection is unclear with various studies suggesting case fatality rate of 22% to 29%. Additionally, most of these studies did not stratify patients by their molecular risk profile. METHODS: Here, we aim to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection with associated risk factors in MM patients and the effectiveness of newly implemented screening and treatment protocols on outcomes. After obtaining institutional review board approvals from each participating institution, we collected data from MM patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1, 2020, to October 30, 2020, at 2 myeloma centers (Levine Cancer Institute & University of Kansas medical center). RESULTS: We identified a total of 162 MM patients who had COVID-19 infection. The majority of patients were males (57%) with a median age of 64 years. Most patients had an associated comorbid condition. Their myeloma disease status and prior autologous stem cell transplant at the time of infection had no impact on hospitalization or mortality. In univariate analysis, chronic kidney disease, hepatic dysfunction, diabetes, and hypertension were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. In multivariate analysis regarding survival, increased age and lymphopenia were associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the use of infection mitigation measures in all MM patients, and adjustment of treatment pathways in MM patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

A phase II multi-arm study of magrolimab combinations in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks CD47, a 'do not eat me' signal overexpressed on tumor cells. CD47 is overexpressed in multiple myeloma (MM), which contributes to its pathogenesis. Preclinical studies have shown that CD47 blockade induces macrophage activation, resulting in elimination of myeloma cells, and that there is synergy between magrolimab and certain anticancer therapies. These findings suggest that magrolimab-based combinations may have a therapeutic benefit in MM. This phase II study investigates magrolimab in combination with commonly used myeloma therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory MM and includes a safety run-in phase followed by a dose-expansion phase. Primary end points include the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events (safety run-in) and the objective response rate (dose expansion).

Magrolimab is a therapy that blocks a 'do not eat me' signal overexpressed by certain cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Studies have shown that blocking this signal leads to destruction of myeloma cells and that this cancer-killing effect may be increased by combining magrolimab with certain additional anticancer therapies. These findings suggest that magrolimab-based combinations may have a therapeutic benefit in MM. This study is investigating magrolimab in combination with commonly used myeloma therapies in patients with MM who have persistent disease despite prior treatment. Goals of the trial include assessing safety and response to treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04892446 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is an established prognostic biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. Commonly used MRD testing techniques such as next generation sequencing or next generation flow cytometry can detect as little as one or two multiple myeloma plasma cells in 106 normal bone marrow cells. Early pull of bone marrow aspirates (BMA), necessary to achieve such level of sensitivity, can be difficult to secure in routine clinical practice due to the competing need for early pull samples for clinical response assessment, therefore introducing the risk of analytical interference during MRD testing. METHODS: To overcome this challenge, we standardized our workflow for collecting specimens by using a technical first pull after needle repositioning for MRD testing. To capture a comprehensive picture of MRD assay performance and specimen adequacy, we tested for MRD on 556 technical first pull bone marrow aspirates by next generation flow cytometry. Among the specimens, several key multiple myeloma treatment milestones were represented: end of induction therapy, two to three months post-autologous stem cell transplant, early and late stages of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: By using the technical first pull bone marrow aspirate, we achieved an analytical assay input of 10 million nucleated cells for 97.5% of specimens. Our analytical sensitivity reached 10-6; (i.e., 10 multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10 × 106 bone marrow cells). Twenty-four percent of specimens were significantly hemodiluted. Low assay input or hemodilution quantifiably lowered the assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Specimen adequacy is, therefore, an important metric to incorporate into MRD status reporting.

Mechanistic Studies and a Retrospective Cohort Study: The Interaction between PPAR Agonists and Immunomodulatory Agents in Multiple Myeloma.

Our previous study demonstrated that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists downregulated cereblon (CRBN) expression and reduced the anti-myeloma activity of lenalidomide in vitro and in vivo. We aimed to determine whether DNA methylation and protein degradation contribute to the effects of PPAR agonists. CRBN promoter methylation status was detected using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The CRBN protein degradation rate was measured using a cycloheximide chase assay. Metabolomic analysis was performed in multiple myeloma (MM) cells treated with PPAR agonists and/or lenalidomide. Our retrospective study determined the effect of co-administration of PPAR agonists with immunomodulatory drugs on the outcomes of patients with MM. CpG islands of the CRBN promoter region became highly methylated upon treatment with PPAR agonists, whereas treatment with PPAR antagonists resulted in unmethylation. The CRBN protein was rapidly degraded after treatment with PPAR agonists. Lenalidomide and fenofibrate showed opposite effects on acylcarnitines and amino acids. Co-administration of immunomodulatory drugs and PPAR agonists was associated with inferior treatment responses and poor survival. Our study provides the first evidence that PPAR agonists reduce CRBN expression through various mechanisms including inducing methylation of CRBN promoter CpG island, enhancing CRBN protein degradation, and affecting metabolomics of MM cells.

PPAR agonists attenuate lenalidomide's anti-myeloma activity in vitro and in vivo.

Many patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have comorbidities and are treated with PPAR agonists. Immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) are the cornerstones for MM therapy. Currently, little is known about how co-administration of PPAR agonists impacts lenalidomide treatment in patients with MM. Here, we determined the effects of PPAR agonists on anti-myeloma activities of lenalidomide in vitro and in a myeloma xenograft mouse model. Genetic overexpression and CRISPR/cas9 knockout experiments were performed to determine the role of CRBN in the PPAR-mediated pathway. A retrospective cohort study was performed to determine the correlation of PPAR expression with the outcomes of patients with MM. PPAR agonists down-regulated CRBN expression and reduced the anti-myeloma efficacy of lenalidomide in vitro and in vivo. Co-treatment with PPAR antagonists increased CRBN expression and improved sensitivity to lenalidomide. PPAR expression was higher in bone marrow cells of patients with newly diagnosed MM than in normal control bone marrow samples. High PPAR expression was correlated with poor clinical outcomes. Our study provides the first evidence that PPARs transcriptionally regulate CRBN and that drug-drug interactions between PPAR agonists and IMiDs may impact myeloma treatment outcomes.

BCMA-Targeted Biologic Therapies: The Next Standard of Care in Multiple Myeloma Therapy.

With recent advances in myeloma therapy, patients can achieve long-term remissions, but eventually relapses will occur. Triple-class refractory myeloma (disease that is refractory to an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) and penta-refractory myeloma (disease that is refractory to two proteasome inhibitors, two immunomodulatory agents, and an anti-CD38 antibody) are associated with a particularly poor prognosis, and novel treatments are desperately needed for these patients. Targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which is ubiquitously expressed on plasma cells, has emerged as a well-tolerated and highly efficacious strategy in patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma. Several mechanisms of targeting BCMA are currently under investigation, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, all with unique side effect profiles. Early phase clinical trials showed unprecedented response rates in highly refractory myeloma patients, leading to the recent approvals of some of these agents. Still, many questions remain with regard to this target, including how best to target it, how to treat patients who have progressed on a BCMA-targeting therapy, and whether response rates will deepen if these agents are used in earlier lines of therapy. In this review, we examine the rationale for targeting BCMA and summarize the data for several agents across multiple classes of BCMA-targeting therapeutics, paying special attention to the diverse mechanisms and unique challenges of each therapeutic class.

Transition from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Daratumumab Formulation in Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody widely used for treating patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab was developed with the purpose of minimizing the treatment burden (to patients and health care system) associated with intravenous daratumumab. Given its recent approval, there is a knowledge gap regarding the best practices that should be instituted for safe administration of subcutaneous daratumumab. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from August 2020 until November 2020 to identify patients either switched to or treated upfront (daratumumab naive) with any subcutaneous daratumumab-based treatment regimen. All patients received appropriate premedications per institutional standards of care. The study end points were to report real-world data regarding administration-related reaction rates (at or following discharge from infusion center), as well as compare their incidence rates to those noted in the COLUMBA study (historical cohort). RESULTS: The study included 58 patients, of whom 38% (n = 22) were daratumumab naive. The majority (84%, n = 49) received subcutaneous daratumumab in combination with various antimyeloma regimens. There were no cases of administration-related reactions at infusion center or after discharge irrespective of previous exposure to intravenous daratumumab. None of the patients included herein required rescue home medications or visited the emergency department within 24 to 48 hours after subcutaneous daratumumab administration. These translated into a significant difference in incidence of administration-related reactions compared with historical cohort (0% vs. 13%, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous daratumumab was extremely well tolerated and could be safely administered without need for monitoring or rescue home medications.

Thromboembolism Incidence and Risk Factors in Multiple Myeloma After First Exposure to Immunomodulatory Drug-Based Regimens.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated time to thromboembolism (TE) and risk factors in multiple myeloma (MM) patients after first exposure to immunomodulatory therapy, stratified by thromboprophylaxis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed adult MM patients who received immunomodulatory therapy with or without dexamethasone between February 2012 and October 2017. Thromboprophylaxis included aspirin, anticoagulants (low-molecular-weight heparin, direct oral anticoagulants, or warfarin), or none. Primary endpoint was time to on-treatment TE by thromboprophylaxis type. Time to TE using death as a competing risk censored at 12 months was used in univariate and multivariable analyses to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Of 485 evaluable patients, 57% were white and 36% African American; median age was 66. Most received lenalidomide (97.5%) and dexamethasone (90%). Half presented with ≥ 1 comorbidities. Sixty-nine had no documented receipt of prophylaxis, 357 aspirin, and 59 anticoagulation. More patients receiving anticoagulants had ≥ 1 comorbidities compared to aspirin or no-prophylaxis groups (P < .001). There was no difference in 12-month estimated cumulative incidence of TE (7.3%; 95% confidence interval, 5.2-9.9) between thromboprophylaxis groups (none 4.4%, aspirin 8.5%, anticoagulant 3.4%) (P = .24). In multivariable analyses, male sex (hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-5.17; P = .014) and presence of any comorbidity (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-4.73; P = .016) were associated with TE incidence; thromboprophylaxis type was not (P = .12). CONCLUSION: Male sex and presence of any comorbidity were associated with time to TE. There were no differences in TE incidence between thromboprophylaxis groups despite a higher proportion of those in the anticoagulant group having ≥ 1 comorbidities.

Daratumumab subcutaneous formulation for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous daratumumab has shown unprecedented anti-myeloma activity when used as a single agent or in combination with other myeloma therapies. Recently, a subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab was approved for use in both the United States and European Union based on data which showed shorter infusion times and decreased rate of infusion reactions while maintaining non-inferior efficacy. AREAS COVERED: We cover the physiology behind subcutaneous daratumumab and summarize the relevant clinical data with a particular focus on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and clinical efficacy. Articles used to generate this review were obtained by searching pubmed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with the search terms 'subcutaneous daratumumab' and 'daratumumab hyaluronidase'. EXPERT OPINION: Subcutaneous daratumumab is associated with lower risk of infusion reactions and decreased administration time while maintaining non-inferior efficacy. We support the use of subcutaneous daratumumab for all approved indications and for investigational use moving forward.

An evaluation of subcutaneous daratumumab for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: A subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab, a human immunoglobulin G1 kappa monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, recently achieved FDA approval for both newly diagnosed and relapsed refractory multiple myeloma amid promises to decrease infusion times and rates of infusion reactions in myeloma patients. AREAS COVERED: In this article the biology behind subcutaneous administration of oncologic antibody therapies is reviewed and the subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab is covered in depth. The most recent results from the PAVO, COLUMBA, and PLEIADES clinical trials evaluating subcutaneous daratumumab as a single agent, and in combination, in both newly diagnosed, and relapsed and refractory myeloma patients are summarized. The efficacy, safety, and PK data from these trials are reviewed, and the potential of the subcutaneous formulation to improve quality of life in myeloma patients and decrease healthcare resource use is discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Subcutaneous daratumumab is non-inferior to conventional intravenous daratumumab with lower risk of infusion-related reactions and decreased administration time. Based on these data, and the recent FDA and European Commission approvalsthe widespread use of the subcutaneous formulation for both conventional and investigational practice is supported.

The impact of bone marrow fibrosis and JAK2 expression on clinical outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with immunomodulatory agents and/or proteasome inhibitors.

We determined the impact of bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) on the clinical outcomes of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients in the current era of myeloma therapy. A total of 393 MM patients were included in the final analysis. The median followup was 83 months (range: 3.9 to 212 months). BMF was noted in 122 (48.2%) evaluable patients. Median progression free survival (PFS) in patients without BMF was 30.2 (95% CI: 24.7-38.0) months, and 21.1 (95% CI: 18.8-27.5) months in patients with BMF present (P = .024). Median overall survival (OS) was 61.2 (95% CI: 51.5-81.2) months in patients without BMF, and 45.1 (95% CI: 38.7-57.0) months in patients with BMF (P = .0048). A subset of 99 patients had their bone marrow biopsies stained for JAK1 and JAK2 by immunohistochemistry. Of these samples 67 (67.7%) patients had detectable JAK2 expression predominantly noted on bone marrow megakaryocytes. JAK2 expression correlated with myeloma disease stage (P = .0071). Our study represents the largest dataset to date examining the association of BMF with prognosis in the era of novel therapies and widespread use of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Our data suggest that MM patients with BMF (particularly those with extensive BMF) have a poorer prognosis even when treated with immunomodulatory agents and proteasome inhibitors.